sometimes, we get this exception. we're using jboss 3.2.0
i'd be happy to provide additional details if needed. if this is a known
bug in 3.2.0, is there a workaround (we can't upgrade now)
thanx,
ittay
2004-07-13 14:29:27,805 WARN [org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl]
(HttpProcessor[80][2]:) XAExce
Hello All,
When running our J2EE application, the following exception gets generated.
Could you please help me understand the problem.
Some information:
- The Stateless Session Bean uses both XA and Non-XA datasources
- Non-XA datasource is declared using no-tx-datasource
- Database is Oracle 8.1
hi,
a short question about transactions.
Is's good idea to set transactions for all get*() methods to Never i.e.:
/**
* Gets the permission_id attribute of the Acl_EntryBean object
*
* @return The permission_id value
*
* @ejb.persistence
* column-name="per
hi,
I am using jboss 3.2.1 with jetty.
When I am trying to create a CMP Entity Bean, the transaction is timing out.
My method call is somewhat like this -
public void createA(HashMap aHash){
Set keySet=aHash.keySet();
Iterator ite=keySet.iterator();
while(ite.hasNext()){
Integer id=(Integer)ite.ne
Hello Ittay,
you have to understand how finders work.
First, finders always executed against the datastore.
Second, by default, when finder is executed, synchronization occurs.
It means cached in the tx entities are flashed to the datastore before
the finder is executed. For example, you have a fi
Hello,
I have a bean A (CMP+CMT) with a finder that returns all beans whose foo
property is not null. name it findAllFooNotNull().
I want to write a method that works in two stages:
1. it selects some beans and nullifies their foo property
2. it uses findAllFooNotNull() and works with the collect
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:15, Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
> how can I increase a transaction timeout for a session bean and entity
> bean?
From a previous answer to this question:
> From: "Barlow, Dustin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> In 3.2.1, in /server//deploy/transaction-service.xml
>> you will find th
hi,
how can I increase a transaction timeout for a session bean and entity bean?
regards,
Rafal
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Downl
Hi Guys,
I'm developing a middleware using Jboss3.2.1 and Quartz scheduler.
Things work fine under normal load. But under heavy load, dead lock happens and when I
try to shutdown after deadlock occounrance, it does not shutdown properly. I have to
kill the process explicitly. I see the following
Yes it is using the ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties config-property:
TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
See the jboss-3.0.7/docs/examples/jca/oracle-xa-service.xml for example.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Michael Sta
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user]
Transaction Isolation levels
in jboss 3.2 you can only configure data
connection isolation levels.
In your blah-ds.xml data connection pool
config file add:
TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
| TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED | etc
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user]
Transaction Isolation levels
in jboss 3.2 you can only configure data
connection isolation levels.
In your blah-ds.xml data connection pool
config file add:
TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
| TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED | etc
Behalf Of Michael
StanleySent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:56 AMTo: 'JBoss
Users (E-mail)'Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction Isolation
levels
Where can I configure default
transaction isolation levels?
-
Mike
Where can I configure default transaction isolation levels?
- Mike
16:39:29,887 WARN [TransactionImpl] Transaction TransactionImpl:XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=entwicklung2//9, BranchQual=] timed out. status=STATUS_ACTIVE
i get the above warning and in the Jboss and the client is hanging ..can any one help me with this . i already made all the getter
hi,
we found our misstake too. thanks for fast response.
Best Regards,
Rafal
At 11:45 30.05.2003 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi,
A normal exception doesn't automatically
rollback the transaction.
Only Errors, RuntimeExceptions and RemoteExceptions are handled by the
server.
You request a rollback
Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rafal Kedziorski
> Sent: 30 May 2003 10:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user] transa
Hi,
we have some problem with TransactionRollBack in our application.
We have TransferFacade session bean which will be called from a servlet:
try {
Long ownUserID = getUserId();
Long mandantID = getMandantId();
projectMD = transferFacadeHome.create().importArchive(ownUserID,
mandantID
: Saturday, March 29, 2003 2:53 AM
SMS> Subject: [JBoss-user] transaction restarts + log4j
>>
>> And now a problem regarding log4j: I have configured the log4j for
>> my application but I see that the log4j.xml still uses
>> category/priority tags which as I see fro
* Manoj Sasidharan
> Are you running on WLS 7.x??? We found some differences b/w WLS 6.x and WLS
> 7.x in the transaction feature.
We use Weblogic 7.0.
--
Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norges-bank.no
---
This SF.net email is s
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 2:53 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] transaction restarts + log4j
>
> And now a problem regarding log4j: I have configured the log4j for
> my application but I see that the log4j.xml still uses
> category/priority tags which as
Hi!
I am developing a small jsp/servlet combo using UserTransaction. My
JBoss is 3.0.6. However loading the jsp from the browser messes the
transaction module...:
HTTP ERROR: 500 Find failed: org.jboss.util.NestedSQLException: Could not enlist in
transaction on entering
meta-aware o
Are you running on WLS 7.x??? We found some differences b/w WLS 6.x and WLS
7.x in the transaction feature.
MS
-Original Message-
From: Jon Haugsand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction differences in
From: Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction differences in weblogic and jboss
Date: 27 Mar 2003 14:23:55 +0100
I think I have discovered a difference between jboss and weblogic
concerning transactions
I think I have discovered a difference between jboss and weblogic
concerning transactions and this is (currently) a bit troublesome for
us. Given the following metacode:
Start transaction
a = findBeanInstance(p);
a.getValue();
Start transaction
a.setValue(newValue);
End transac
Hi.
I'm using a many to one relationship between BeanA and BeanB. I've defined a
"beanB" in the element for BeanA in the
. This works without any problems. I can access BeanB with code
like:
BeanB beanB = beanA.getBeanB();
Everything is fine.
But when we have many parallel requests accessing
Runtime exceptions cause transactions to role back. Checked exceptions do not.
Lawrence
Justin Casp wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm hoping somebody out there can give me a hint on how to set up transaction
> attributes for session beans that behave in the following manner.
>
> ImportantBean has a method, 'd
Hello,
I'm hoping somebody out there can give me a hint on how to set up transaction
attributes for session beans that behave in the following manner.
ImportantBean has a method, 'doImportantWork' which throws MajorException
UnimportantBean has a method 'doUnimportantWork' which throws TrivialExc
as far as i know i don't think it is mentioned in the spec which one to
be default.
/L
tisdagen den 11 februari 2003 kl 16.20 skrev Jon Haugsand:
* Lennart Petersson
I think it is TX_REQUIRED by default.
Thanks to you and Alex. (Amazing how fast one gets answers.) Is this
JBoss-spesifics a
* Lennart Petersson
> I think it is TX_REQUIRED by default.
Thanks to you and Alex. (Amazing how fast one gets answers.) Is this
JBoss-spesifics a part of Sun's ejb spec?
--
Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norges-bank.no
---
T
I think it is TX_REQUIRED by default.
/L
tisdagen den 11 februari 2003 kl 14.32 skrev Jon Haugsand:
In ejb-jar.xml one can (and should) define the applications
transaction policy. This is typically done in two levels, per bean
and per finder methods, is it?
Anyway, what happens if you _don't_
Required.
alex
Tuesday, February 11, 2003, 3:32:33 PM, you wrote:
JH> In ejb-jar.xml one can (and should) define the applications
JH> transaction policy. This is typically done in two levels, per bean
JH> and per finder methods, is it?
JH> Anyway, what happens if you _don't_ give any specifics?
In ejb-jar.xml one can (and should) define the applications
transaction policy. This is typically done in two levels, per bean
and per finder methods, is it?
Anyway, what happens if you _don't_ give any specifics? I.e. what is
the default behaviour? Is it "supported"?
--
Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL
Does any body know why I periodically see this in my logs?
[org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule] Transaction XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=localhost.localdomain//23606, BranchQual=] timed out.
status=STATUS_ACTIVE
I monitor POP3 mail box each 5 seconds, to do so I perform:
...
session = (Se
David,
I've put together a simple test program which shows the behavior I
described in the initial posting for this thread. I've attached the
source code, Junit test. and ANT script as a jar file.
When you run the test with 'no' transaction the test succeed. If you run
with transaction require
On 2003.01.06 05:53:21 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:32:05PM -0500, David Jencks wrote:
> > inside the jboss vm, if you start a user transaction or container
> managed
> > transaction, any connection obtained in the same thread is enrolled in
> the
> > transaction.
>
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:32:05PM -0500, David Jencks wrote:
> inside the jboss vm, if you start a user transaction or container managed
> transaction, any connection obtained in the same thread is enrolled in the
> transaction.
I suppose it become more complicated in my case. I have one method i
inside the jboss vm, if you start a user transaction or container managed
transaction, any connection obtained in the same thread is enrolled in the
transaction. This assumes the connection is of a type that supports jta
transactions: for jdbc, this means you didn't set up a
NoTxConnectionManager.
I do not have any SQL statement, i.e. bean transactions and/or
persistency are all managed by the Container (CMP). Therefor I would
expect that upon the updateShippedQuantities remote method call
returning, the transaction would had been committed and persisted.
But since you mentionned it, the
You are not using pure SQL somewhere in this part? Cause if you do, this code run in
another transaction than the CMP-code and thus don't see the changes of the CMP before
that transaction is commited.
For me this resulted in the junit test failing, and I had to commit the
usertransaction inside
Kris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 12:39 PM
To: JBoss User List Group
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction not saving entity bean changes
Hi, any help with this one would be appreciated.
** Environment:
- Plain out-of-the-box jboss-3.0.4_tomcat-4.1.12
- Window NT
Hi, any help with this one would be appreciated.
** Environment:
- Plain out-of-the-box jboss-3.0.4_tomcat-4.1.12
- Window NT, 4.0, patch-level 5
** Scenario:
- A stateless session bean method, i.e. updateShippedQuantities,
loops on an entity bean method call, i.e. updateShippedQuantity,
inal Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 1:35 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] TRANSACTION ISOLATION and ORACLE
>
>
>
>Hi Saroi,
>
>not exactly
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:cc: (bcc: Marek
Sedliak/BYS/SOFTIP)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [JBoss-user]
TRANSACTIO
Hi Marek,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:13 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] TRANSACTION ISOLATION and ORACLE
>
>
>
>Thank
Sent by:cc: (bcc: Marek
Sedliak/BYS/SOFTIP)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user]
TRANSACTION ISOLATION and ORACLE
Replies inline
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 7:49 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] TRANSACTION ISOLATION and ORACLE
>
>
>
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user]
TRANSACTION ISOLATION and ORACLE
vid Jencks
cc: (bcc: Marek
Sedliak/BYS/SOFTIP)
Sent by:Subject: Re: [JBoss-user]
TRANSACTION ISOLATION and ORACLE
[EMAIL
Hi
all,
i'm using JBOSS
3.0.2 + Tomcat. I want to display to one jsp, a large number of
database rows (represented by entity bean) . When calling findAll() and start
iterating through records JBOSS console after a while
reports:
13:28:00,763 WARN [TxCapsule] Transaction XidImpl
[FormatId
by default jboss doesn't set the tx isolation level. You can only set it
in the datasource configuration, not per bean/method.
You can use names or numbers
for *-service.xml
READ_COMMITTED
for ds.xml
READ_COMMITTED
david jencks
On 2002.12.20 07:16:51 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hi
jboss.jca:service=RARDeployme
nt,name=JBoss LocalTransaction JDBC Wrapper
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 5:47 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi All.
I have already searched the forum but haven't found any answer. Please, I
would appreciate any suggestions. I have the following problem :
I've got two session beans. The first one has a method with Required
transaction attribute and the second one has a method with RequiresNew
transact
Jon Haugsand wrote:
When running a quite big transaction which takes around 5 minutes or
more, the following exception emerges. Rerunning the transaction, it
fails on different places.
Are there any timout settings we have forgotten?
[Snipped]
The default transaction-timeout is 300 sec, def
When running a quite big transaction which takes around 5 minutes or
more, the following exception emerges. Rerunning the transaction, it
fails on different places.
Are there any timout settings we have forgotten?
cocte1@banklab7:~/nb/nb2/src/build> ant statusfil
Buildfile: build.xml
statusfi
I suspect you are using a version that only warns you the first time it
notices.
I'd advise you to use the same datasource for all ejbs unless you are
really accessing different databases or one datasource is used only for
"read-only". Otherwise you can possibly have work in one datasource
commit
DS> Was this checked before or after my massive check in
DS> yesterday? I know you wrote the 29th, but I want to
DS> be sure as I messed with most of the interceptors.
10/29/2002 around 2pm EST.
Michael
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
DJ> This is pretty strange. You should be getting this
DJ> consistently (if you are really using 2 resource managers
DJ> in one transaction, one of them being only local tx
DJ> capable) or never (if there is only one, for instance your
DJ> only datasource).
I didn't think to mention my datasourc
I've been wrong before, but this should have nothing to do with the
interceptors. It should depend only on the tm and the XAResource
isSameRM() implementation.
david jencks
On 2002.10.31 17:46:51 -0500 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Was this checked before or after my massive check in yesterday? I kno
This is pretty strange. You should be getting this consistently (if you
are really using 2 resource managers in one transaction, one of them being
only local tx capable) or never (if there is only one, for instance your
only datasource).
If you can pin down anything else about how to make this ha
Was this checked before or after my massive check in yesterday? I know
you wrote the 29th, but I want to be sure as I messed with most of the
interceptors.
-dain
David Jencks wrote:
This is pretty strange. You should be getting this consistently (if you
are really using 2 resource managers in
JDK 1.4.1
JBoss HEAD 10/29/2002
I have a session bean (A) in one EJB JAR that calls another session bean (B)
in another EJB JAR which calls another session bean (C) in another EJB JAR.
I get these warning when A calls B, then when B calls C (2 warnings). It
happens intermittently but when it occu
Mokas Vassilis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi.
I have succesfully connect to my Oracle DB through the appropriate
oracle-service.xml
file in /deploy folder.
Is there any way to configure the Transaction Isolation Level of my JDBC
driver to be TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE ?
I think you should be
Hi.
I have succesfully connect to my Oracle DB through the appropriate
oracle-service.xml
file in /deploy folder.
Is there any way to configure the Transaction Isolation Level of my JDBC
driver to be TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE ?
Vassilis
---
creation exception, both either throwing
EJBException or setRollbackOnly() is working
BTW, any idea for question 1 (i.e. connection keeps increasing).
Camus
> - Original Message -
> From: "Camus Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent
on
Miranda
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Transaction and connection problems in JBoss
3.0.3
About item 2, it could be that the exception raised by the method does not
set the transaction to rollback. In EJB 2.0 spec (Chapter 18), a transa
>
>2. I cannot write any workable transaction sample. The scenario is that:
>I have a (stateless) session bean which looks up two CMP beans, each of the
>CMP beans insert a record (into two different tables). However, I notice
>that whatever the result of the 2nd insert (e.g. Oracle raises errors
rollback.
Robson.
- Original Message -
From: "Camus Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:32 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction and connection problems in JBoss 3.0.3
> Hi,
>
> I have a couple of problems whe
Hi,
I have a couple of problems when running JBoss 3.0.3 (actually starting from
JBoss 3.0.0) for a long time. Please give some hints, directions:
System Information:
OS: Solaris 2.7
JBoss: 3.0.3
Tomcat: 4.1.12
Database: Oracle8i
JDK: 1.3 / 1.4
>>> JBoss and Tomcat are started successfully and t
Figuring this out would require knowing in detail how Castor does locking.
You may be more likely to get someone willing to figure this out on the
Castor lists.
thanks
david jencks
On 2002.09.12 02:11:57 -0400 Arijit Ghosh wrote:
> I am getting the following Transaction RollBack Exception. Pl
I am getting the following Transaction RollBack Exception. Please help.
2002-09-12 11:24:02,030 ERROR [org.jboss.jdo.castor.CastorJDOImpl]
Exception
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Transaction
org.exolab.castor.jdo.engine.TransactionContextImpl@26b16f does not hold
the read lock: com.softex.ites
I'm using JBoss 2.4.8 with Tyrex as the TM. In the Tyrex domain.xml file, I
set the timeout to 360 seconds (6 minutes). In code, I set the transaction
timeout to 600 seconds (10 minutes). After 120 seconds (2 minutes), the
default timeout for Tyrex (http://tyrex.exolab.org/configuration.html),
Well, if you are trying to propagate transactions between jboss instances
you should be using tyrex. The jboss tx manager won't do that, although I
am working on it via the jca 1.5 transaction import contracts. (tx import
is working, but I haven't thought about how to export an xid with the
invo
Nevermind I forgot about Tyrex
Knew I was doing something stupid.
-=Brian
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 00:00, Brian Towles wrote:
> Howdy all
>
> I have been trying to implement some cross server EJB calling between
> two Jboss instances (3.0.1) and hit some MarshalExceptions caused by
> Not
Howdy all
I have been trying to implement some cross server EJB calling between
two Jboss instances (3.0.1) and hit some MarshalExceptions caused by
Not Serializable TransactionImpl, TxCapsule and
TimeoutFactory$TimeoutImpl so far.
I thought at first it was just missing a Serializable interf
Hi,
I am using Struts Framework --> Jboss 3.0 (Stateless Session Bean) -->
Castor JDO.
I am getting the following error whenever I am recompiling my code and
deploying to the server. Error persists even after restarting the server
once or twice. After multiple restarts, the error goes away.
Any
There were some duplicate classloader problems that caused errors like
this. I think they are fixed in released 3.0.1 and all cvs branches.
david jencks
On 2002.08.13 07:35:13 -0400 Arijit Ghosh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Jboss 3.0 with JDO. The problem arises when i try to
> update an
Hi,
I'm using Jboss 3.0 with JDO. The problem arises when i try to
update an object already in the database. Consider an object CLIENT. The
sequence of
steps involved are
1) Displaying the list of clients. (Transaction -1)
2) Loading the details of the selected client. (Transaction -2)
3
There's a bug somewhere here, perhaps you could file a report.
You will stress the jca machinery less if you get the connection after the
tx has started and close the connection before the tx commits.
I think someone did get MQSeries to work, look in the messaging forum.
david jencks
On 2002.0
Replying to myself:
I've got this working now.
> Having committed a UserTransaction, if I then begin a new
> UserTransaction in the same thread, using the same JMS objects
> (QueueSession, etc.), MQSeries complains
It seems that a new QueueSession must be created for each transaction.
Starting
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:24 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction problem
Hi,
The scenario is like this.
1. Jsp will call session bean(Manager) to insert number of records.
2. The session bean(Manager) starts the transaction. And calls the Entity
bean/s in loop.
3. The Sessi
Thanks for your speedy reply, Dain.
I set the transaction attributes of my Session Bean methods to RequiresNew.
These methods in turn call the entity finder & abstract accessors. I'm
assuming this is what you meant by wrapping my code in a single transaction.
I've followed the examples in th
You need to wrap your code up in a single transaction. You can use the
UserTransaction code given at the end of the chapter, or you can put
your code in a Session Bean.
The tx attributes are set in the ejb-jar.xml file. If you don't declare
tx attributes, the default is Required. Tx attri
Hi List,
In reading the latest JBossCMP docs, I found a note in the Transactions
section of the Optimized Loading chapter that mentions the exact problem I'm
having.
quote (footnote 21)
"It's actually worse than this. JBossCMP executes each of these queries three
times; once for each cmp-field
Hi,
The scenario is like this.
1. Jsp will call session bean(Manager) to insert number of
records.
2. The session bean(Manager) starts the transaction. And calls
the Entity bean/s in loop.
3. The Session bean(Manager)commits the
transaction.
I have packaged session bean and all entity b
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] transaction rollback
getSessionContext().setRollbackOnly();
-Original Message-
From: Ionel Gardais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] transaction rollback
Hi,
I
Hi,
I didn't notice this before I read the JBoss3.0QuickStart guide but I've
specified a "Required" trans attribute to my beans.
For example, my transaction atomicity is to update the database and to
send a JMS message to the client to notify the update.
If any of these operations fail, I'd like
: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] transaction timed out
If you insert that many beans in one tx, it might timeout. You could use
more tx or increase the tx timeout.
david jencks
On 2002.06.26 10:25:29 -0400 Eric Kaplan wrote:
> I got the foll
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] transaction timed out
If you insert that many beans in one tx, it might timeout. You could use
more tx or increase the
I think they are all RequiresNew, but I'll check, thanks
eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] transaction timed out
If you insert
If you insert that many beans in one tx, it might timeout. You could use
more tx or increase the tx timeout.
david jencks
On 2002.06.26 10:25:29 -0400 Eric Kaplan wrote:
> I got the following:
>
> [WARN] [TxCapsule] Transaction XidImpl [FormatId=257,
> GlobalId=ARMANTAC2//1,
> BranchQual=] ti
It may be because of Deadlock...if ur using Jboss2.4.4
Regards,
Rajeshwar Rao.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:55 PM
> To: Jboss-User
> Subject: [JBoss-user] transaction timed out
I got the following:
[WARN] [TxCapsule] Transaction XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=ARMANTAC2//1,
BranchQual=] timed out. status=STATUS_ACTIVE
This was in the midst of creating about 11000 beans, I got this one error.
Can anyone tell me what I should investigate?
Thanks
Eric Kaplan
Armanta, In
JBossCMP will only work with a transaction. Are you trying to run cmp
code without a transaction?
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC
Julien Viet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a NullPointerException in JDBCStoreManager
> bec
Hi,
I have a NullPointerException in
JDBCStoreManager
because of a null transaction returned by the
transaction manager
line 213 of JDBCStoreManager : int status =
tx.getStatus();
here tx object is null
I am using jboss Branch_3_0.
any ideas ?
But what is the default transaction type (required, supports etc) on a method that has
nothing specified? Is this J2EE or jboss-spesific?
Marius K
boostcom.no
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:24:54PM -0400, David Jencks wrote:
> The default isolation level is whatever Oracle sets as the default
> iso
The default isolation level is whatever Oracle sets as the default
isolation level. I don't know what it is.
You need to make the ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties more like this:
TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
jdbc:oracle:thin:@youroraclehost:1521:yours
Thanks a lot, David.
I'm still not sure what to do: Do I write in my "mydb-service.xml" a line like this?
TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
Is there a DTD for oracle-service.xml? How do I know what tags to write?
Secondly, what is the default isolation level, i.e., if you don't specify any isolation le
I have 2 stateless session beans called ClassInfoBean and TreeInfoBean
and several cmp entity bean.
Both ClassInfoBean and TreeInfoBean calle NodeClassBean.
Specifically NodeClassBean calls the findByPrimaryKey method and the
getNodeClass method to get the beans value object.
ClassInfoBean calls t
Hi
I am running JBOSS on windows 2000 with MS SQL
Server as Database, when i tried to insert 1 records through CMP
Bean(sample Example) it's inserting, but when i tried to search are delete the
records by calling the methods written in Bean. It;s giving the folllowing Error
when
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
