On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:39:46AM +1100, Robert Norris wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:21:29PM +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
m?n 2003-12-01 klockan 19.05 skrev Peter Saint-Andre:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Magnus Henoch wrote:
XMPP IM states in section 11.3 that a
mån 2003-12-01 klockan 19.05 skrev Peter Saint-Andre:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Magnus Henoch wrote:
XMPP IM states in section 11.3 that a resource with a negative
priority will not receive message or presence stanzas. What will
happen to those stanzas instead?
For
NOT be sent, but that was
apparently a mis-copy/paste that will get fixed in the last draft.
--
Joe Hildebrand
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Hallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 AM
To: Jabber Devel List
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Negative priority
mån
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:46:10PM -0700, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
Setting your priority to -1 affects ONLY the step in the server where it's
picking what resource to send a message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (no
resource). -1 resources are not eligible for this default routing.
Messages
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:21:29PM +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
m?n 2003-12-01 klockan 19.05 skrev Peter Saint-Andre:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Magnus Henoch wrote:
XMPP IM states in section 11.3 that a resource with a negative
priority will not receive message or
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Magnus Henoch wrote:
XMPP IM states in section 11.3 that a resource with a negative
priority will not receive message or presence stanzas. What will
happen to those stanzas instead?
For example, if a client sets negative priority when the user is
