sorry for the delay, I've just applied your comments
On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 7:05:07 PM UTC+3, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> The response came in a separate thread. Added the plugin's maintainer to
> Cc.
> I'd bet that KK will allow it.
>
> I've also added some comments to your pull request
Hi,
is there anybody who observed the same issue?
Thanks
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 12:51:49 PM UTC+5:30, jenkin...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> disk usage gets triggered multiple times for maven builds.
> There are multiple Module Builds inside the maven builds.
> In that case disk calcul
On 20/10/15 22:21, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>> Yeah, I've had the same problem with trying to justify one-day
>> inter-continental conference trips, so being longer would help — though
>> note that this proposal would likely only be a two-day conference for
>> the majority of potent
Hi everyone,
I added a list of the proposals in the (non-website) 2.0 discussion so far to
the wiki page to provide an easier entry point into the discussion, and flesh
out the specific ideas in more detail:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins+2.0 (scroll down a bit)
The discus
+1 for streaming. i'll make the suggestion to the organizing team.
rdgs,
alyssa
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luca Milanesio
wrote:
>
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 23:12, Alyssa wrote:
>
> when JUC EU was planned - the goal has always been to find a central
> location where folks from diff parts of
@ James. majority of the JUC West attendees were from California: San
Francisco, San Jose , Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Mt View, and Palo Alto. For
JUC EU - London had the most attendees. Cambridge, Berlin, Dublin came in
second but each of these cities had single digit attendees.
On Tuesday, Octo
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 23:12, Alyssa wrote:
>
> when JUC EU was planned - the goal has always been to find a central location
> where folks from diff parts of EU can conveniently attend. But it didn't turn
> out that way - mainly local people attended. And of course one big event in
> EU is ver
when JUC EU was planned - the goal has always been to find a central
location where folks from diff parts of EU can conveniently attend. But it
didn't turn out that way - mainly local people attended. And of course one
big event in EU is very costly. The CB-Jenkins Summits will provide the
oppt
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Stefan Wolf wrote:
>> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-29922
>>
>> Part of this would include adding a common annotation which in the
>> future Job DSL (and YAML Project, etc.) could interpret as well.
>
> I see. This is how we get from the simple Name
+1
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:40 PM Jesse Glick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
> > …this is relatively easily achievable by moving the transformed code
> into a
> > separate method so that bytecode index remain the same.
>
> I am not going to sleep more soundl
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
> …this is relatively easily achievable by moving the transformed code into a
> separate method so that bytecode index remain the same.
I am not going to sleep more soundly tonight. :-)
I think the broader issue is that use of runtime byt
Am Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 17:59:59 UTC+2 schrieb Jesse Glick:
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Wolf > wrote:
> > the main advantage of the workflow approach is that you
> > can instantiate plugins and these do not depend on the workflow plugin
> > itself. The main disadvantage is
FYI, there is also a feed for plugins which appear on the CloudBees
update center (which is normally a superset of the regular Jenkins UC,
though it is generated by a different system):
https://twitter.com/jepluginrelease
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
2015-10-20 7:45 GMT-07:00 Christopher Orr :
> Yeah, I've had the same problem with trying to justify one-day
> inter-continental conference trips, so being longer would help — though
> note that this proposal would likely only be a two-day conference for
> the majority of potential non-US particip
Yes, the downside of not having JUC in Europe has been considered.
One of the problems we had in the past few years with JUC in Europe has
been that we have never managed to create a truly pan-Europe event. When we
do JUC in Paris, only French people came. Did one in Berlin and only
Germans came.
/me suspects somebody doesn't want to give up their golden hammer ;-)
On 20 October 2015 at 19:38, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>
>
> 2015-10-20 2:53 GMT-07:00 James Nord :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 12:58:30 AM UTC+2, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-10-19 12:19 GMT-
2015-10-20 2:53 GMT-07:00 James Nord :
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 12:58:30 AM UTC+2, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-10-19 12:19 GMT-07:00 Jesse Glick :
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>>> wrote:
>>> > Queue.Item.id has known fixed set of subtypes, s
>
> 1. Receive the job parameters from the Eclipse user (if I understand
>> correctly, this is already supported by Jenkins under the "File parameter"
>> utility).
>> 2. Run the build.
>>
> These steps can be done using Jenkins APIs or CLI. No need in the plugin
>
So if I understood you corre
Hello Dan,
I replied you few days ago:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/build-pipeline-plugin/pull/79#issuecomment-146625699
Regards,
2015-10-20 17:12 GMT+02:00 Dan Alvizu :
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to have commit access to the build-pipeline-plugin
> (https://github.com/jenkinsci/build-pipeline-plugin
Hello,
I'd like to have commit access to the build-pipeline-plugin
(https://github.com/jenkinsci/build-pipeline-plugin). I believe the
original authors (centrum systems) no longer maintain it, and only recena
is involved. I e-mailed him directly and he 302'd me here. I'd like to help
out with
Yeah, I've had the same problem with trying to justify one-day
inter-continental conference trips, so being longer would help — though
note that this proposal would likely only be a two-day conference for
the majority of potential non-US participants (i.e. they're not likely
to care about Day 0).
Since Stephen mostly addresses me, I need to explain my position. We had a
discussion with him in https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1815 and
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1804
I'm not against multi-commit changes when these commits are really
reasonable on the atomic level (
On 20 October 2015 at 15:14, Christopher Orr wrote:
> On 20/10/15 13:26, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> On 20 October 2015 at 12:06, James Nord wrote:
I have some concerns about mandating a tidy-up (I note that Jesse is
against rewriting the history of a PR branch as that means that GitHub
Huh, true. One post per plugin seems to come from https://dlvr.it/ and
another (very unreliably) is posted by http://twitterfeed.com/
On 20/10/15 15:09, domi wrote:
> and by the way: it also tweet every release twice…
> /Domi
>
>> On 20 Oct 2015, at 15:07, Christopher Orr wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
On 20.10.2015, at 16:19, Christopher Orr wrote:
> Funnily enough, the release-history.json contains a `firstRelease` (and
> `latestRelease`) flag, which seems to be generated correctly.
release-history.json is a byproduct of the update site generation and doesn't
care about group identifier.
On 20/10/15 15:15, Daniel Beck wrote:
>
> On 20.10.2015, at 15:07, Christopher Orr wrote:
>
>> t would be nice
>> to confirm this, but I don't know where the source code is, or where the
>> bot runs.
>>
>> This is just out of curiosity, so it's not really important — but I find
>> it quite a use
On 20/10/15 13:26, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 20 October 2015 at 12:06, James Nord wrote:
>>> I have some concerns about mandating a tidy-up (I note that Jesse is
>>> against rewriting the history of a PR branch as that means that GitHub
>>> hides the code review comments)
>>
>>
>> Can you expla
Excellent, thanks! :)
On 17/10/15 17:30, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've released the new version and added changelogs to the plugin's Wiki
> page.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg
>
> пятница, 16 октября 2015 г., 1:54:27 UTC+3 пользователь slide написал:
>
> I have been meaning to do a relea
Hi again,
Issue created : https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-31064
Best Regards,
Pierre.
Le mardi 20 octobre 2015 14:08:14 UTC+2, Daniel Beck a écrit :
>
> Please file an issue against the 'packaging' component.
>
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/How+to+report+an+issue
>
Hello Christopher,
I've released this plugin this morning.
It seems the owner did that change:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/log-parser-plugin/commit/398c0efd775de2ae1d4a55f4cc9ca5f0792a7aa2
Regards,
2015-10-20 15:07 GMT+02:00 Christopher Orr :
> Hi all,
>
> I just saw this, which claims Log Pa
On 20.10.2015, at 15:07, Christopher Orr wrote:
> t would be nice
> to confirm this, but I don't know where the source code is, or where the
> bot runs.
>
> This is just out of curiosity, so it's not really important — but I find
> it quite a useful resource, so it would be nice to know where i
On 20.10.2015, at 15:07, Christopher Orr wrote:
> t would be nice
> to confirm this, but I don't know where the source code is, or where the
> bot runs.
>
> This is just out of curiosity, so it's not really important — but I find
> it quite a useful resource, so it would be nice to know where i
and by the way: it also tweet every release twice…
/Domi
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 15:07, Christopher Orr wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just saw this, which claims Log Parser 2.0 is a new plugin:
> https://twitter.com/jenkins_release/status/656450179571150849
>
> I know it's not a new plugin, and the ar
Hi all,
I just saw this, which claims Log Parser 2.0 is a new plugin:
https://twitter.com/jenkins_release/status/656450179571150849
I know it's not a new plugin, and the artifactId hasn't changed, and the
Update Centre JSON looks good (i.e. we haven't accidentally released a
duplicate of the exis
Wearing my family hat. Can we please have this at a time when I do not have
to worry about school runs or I will never get approval to go ;-)
"oh a three day party in CA near San Francisco? And you expect me to take
AL to handle the school run?"
flashbacks of Florida!
On Tuesday 20 October 2015,
Hi everyone,
we established this program in April, and I took over the AI to write the wiki
page from KK.
Here it is:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Rewards+for+reporting+security+issues
As always, please provide feedback, especially on the specific rules I came up
with. See sect
Please file an issue against the 'packaging' component.
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/How+to+report+an+issue
On 20.10.2015, at 13:11, Pierre Fourès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve just installed a new instance of Jenkins and got it silently not
> starting (however error messages was in t
Well... I'm wearing my OSS contributor hat now.
I think that Kohsuke has mis-stated the proposal a bit. "No JUC in Europe"
means that there is "No JUC *sponsored by CloudBees *in Europe". That's
all. CloudBees organizes the events in order to push it's business, so it's
eligible to optimize it'
I had a somewhat different problem, that it was hard to motivate the travel
expense across the pond for a mere one day conference.
A three day conference would be easier to motivate in my experience;
previously working for a larger corporation with large investment in
Jenkins at least.
The first Je
On 20 October 2015 at 12:06, James Nord wrote:
>> I have some concerns about mandating a tidy-up (I note that Jesse is
>> against rewriting the history of a PR branch as that means that GitHub
>> hides the code review comments)
>
>
> Can you explain this. If I pushed a rebased commit the comments
Hello James,
(reply in line)
2015-10-20 12:03 GMT+02:00 James Nord :
> Taking off my cloudbees hat and putting on my old hat being based in Europe.
>
> Getting approval to attend conferences abroad (outside Europe) for me was
> not always easy - as it involves large travel and time lost due to th
Hi,
I’ve just installed a new instance of Jenkins and got it silently not
starting (however error messages was in the jenkins logs).
The container was set up with JDK6 (thus making Jenkins unable to start due
to its new requirements). But as you can see, the command line didn’t
report any pro
>
> I have some concerns about mandating a tidy-up (I note that Jesse is
> against rewriting the history of a PR branch as that means that GitHub
> hides the code review comments)
>
Can you explain this. If I pushed a rebased commit the comments are still
there with "commented on an outdated
We seem to have some strong opinions on how pull requests should be
merged for core.
On the one hand, there is the view (which I share) that we should not
rewrite the work of contributors.
On the other hand, there is the view that we should squash all pull
requests before merging.
Now when I loo
Taking off my cloudbees hat and putting on my old hat being based in Europe.
Getting approval to attend conferences abroad (outside Europe) for me was
not always easy - as it involves large travel and time lost due to this.
As such it was easier to go to a european conference. I also feel tha
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 12:58:30 AM UTC+2, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>
>
>
> 2015-10-19 12:19 GMT-07:00 Jesse Glick
> >:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi > > wrote:
>> > Queue.Item.id has known fixed set of subtypes, so we can restrict the
>> rewrite to a much smal
On 20.10.2015, at 07:39, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
> What do we do with plugins belonging to Kohsuke? I doubt he has any time to
> maintain them.
The "developer" field isn't really all that reliable, so how you'd identify
them? Once you're looking at recent commits, it makes relatively little
dif
On 20.10.2015, at 05:14, Slide wrote:
> How is https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/SCP+plugin different from
> the Publish Over SCP Plugin? Maybe as part of this exercise, we should look
> at deprecating some of the plugins?
Makes sense. Locks and Latches is another such candidate on
Hi,
disk usage gets triggered multiple times for maven builds.
There are multiple Module Builds inside the maven builds.
In that case disk calculation gets triggered multiple times.
Started calculate disk usage of build
Finished Calculation of disk usage of build in 0 seconds
Started calculate di
49 matches
Mail list logo
