Re: ojb related exception leads to blank page on jetspeed2 install

.apache.org/portals/Jetspeed2/OkayItBuildsWhyTheHeckWontItRun > > removed all pluto references, and removed all the jar files from > the > > shared/lib directory. > > > > On searching the maillist archives, I see there are folks getting > the > > 'Failed

Re: ojb related exception leads to blank page on jetspeed2 install

ves, I see there are folks getting the 'Failed to initialize prefs api' error message, but no one seems to be getting the 'org.apache.jetspeed.prefs.om.impl.NodeImpl not found in OJB Repository' error message. I looked in my jre/lib/ext directory, and I don't have OJB in t

ojb related exception leads to blank page on jetspeed2 install

uto references, and removed all the jar files from the shared/lib directory. On searching the maillist archives, I see there are folks getting the 'Failed to initialize prefs api' error message, but no one seems to be getting the 'org.apache.jetspeed.prefs.om.impl.NodeImpl not fo

Re: ojb 0.7.343, where is it used?

On Aug 3, 2004, at 4:02 AM, Stijn de Witt wrote: Hi, Looking at the dependencies for Jetspeed-1.6-dev in project.xml, I found a reference to OJB: ojb 0.7.343 true Does anyone here know where that is used? And if it is possible to take it out? I am saying this because I am

Re: ojb 0.7.343, where is it used?

TMK, no where. An OJB implementation of Jetspeed 1 never got of off the ground. Stijn de Witt wrote: Hi, Looking at the dependencies for Jetspeed-1.6-dev in project.xml, I found a reference to OJB: ojb 0.7.343 true Does anyone here know where that is used? And if it is possible

ojb 0.7.343, where is it used?

Hi, Looking at the dependencies for Jetspeed-1.6-dev in project.xml, I found a reference to OJB: ojb 0.7.343 true Does anyone here know where that is used? And if it is possible to take it out? I am saying this because I am using db-ojb 1.0.0 myself and I am wary of

RE: Registry: SQL based OJB implementation

Is there a proposal somewhere documenting this? -Original Message- From: Scott T. Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:27 AM To: Jetspeed Users List Subject: Re: Registry: SQL based OJB implementation I don't think that was ever completed. I wrote a g

Re: Registry: SQL based OJB implementation

I don't think that was ever completed. I wrote a ground implementation using OJB at my previous job, unfortunately I do not have access to the source code. giluka wrote: There's no documentation about managing registry (.xreg files) with a SQL based OJB implementation. Can anyo

Registry: SQL based OJB implementation

There's no documentation about managing registry (.xreg files) with a SQL based OJB implementation. Can anyone help me ?? Thanks --- Gianluca

RE: database registry service, OJB?

Hi Joe, FYI, OJB will be the default persistence model for Jetspeed 2. However, the entire implementation is abstracted by a thin plugin model that allows users to easily add plugin(s) of their own using what ever tool or approach they wanted like: JAXB, Hibernate, Torque, Castor, raw SQL

RE: database registry service, OJB?

Thanks Mark. -Original Message- From: Mark Orciuch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 7/3/2003 12:03 PM To: Jetspeed Users List Cc: Subject: RE: database registry service, OJB? > > After h

RE: database registry service, OJB?

> > After hunting around the mail list and source release of 1.4b4, > I'm still not quite sure where things are at with a database > implementation of the registry. I see that there has been some > work done to enable OJB as a persistence layer, but it doesn't >

database registry service, OJB?

Hi all, After hunting around the mail list and source release of 1.4b4, I'm still not quite sure where things are at with a database implementation of the registry. I see that there has been some work done to enable OJB as a persistence layer, but it doesn't look like it's fi

RE: AW: OJB

> turbine will have support for torque AND ojb in future versions. > i'm planning to seperate the generation part from torque and extend it > to support both systems. > i'll also try to generate torque-style om/peer classes using ojb to make > it easy to switch from to

RE: OJB

> -Original Message- > From: Jürgen Hoffmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:16 AM > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' > Subject: AW: OJB > > > Hi David, > > >> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence

Re: AW: OJB

Jürgen Hoffmann wrote: Hi David, Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed? I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't finish though, ran out of time. How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continu

AW: OJB

Hi David, >> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed? > I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't finish though, ran out of time. How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist development or start

RE: OJB

> -Original Message- > From: Jürgen Hoffmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OJB > > > Hi Community, > > Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed? I star

OJB

Hi Community, Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed? Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown Turbine App. Is it possible to integrate this Application with Jetspeed? Is