Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Miguel
>>Buttons don't need to parse XML ... no need for gnujaxp.jar >> > > > Just to qualify the above. If a button as shown above includes any script > such as > "load RRSS_fm-5-ts2.xml; wireframe .1; etc" > > then indeed even the button needs to include > archive="JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar". > It

Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 17 February 2005 14:34, Miguel wrote: > > Just to restate it: CML *does* work on MSFT JVM, but does require > > gnujaxp.jar > > (or actually gnujaxp-saxonly which is only 70kB, not 230kB!) > > We worked on this in early Dec 2004. I was unable to get it running with > gnujaxp-saxonly. >

Re: [Jmol-users] vs

2005-02-17 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 17 February 2005 00:08, Miguel wrote: > > Enshrined deep inside jmol.ps > > Jmol.js ? Jmol, JMol; Jmol.jar, Jmol.js, Jmol.ps ... it's all so confusing :) > > is the tag, including the immortal > > attribute Sorry of the DEFANGED stuff... it's a university policy thing :( > > " >

Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Miguel
> Just to restate it: CML *does* work on MSFT JVM, but does require > gnujaxp.jar > (or actually gnujaxp-saxonly which is only 70kB, not 230kB!) Egon, We worked on this in early Dec 2004. I was unable to get it running with gnujaxp-saxonly. Had I been able to get it running with gnujaxp-saxonly

Re: [Jmol-users] gnujaxp.jar issues

2005-02-17 Thread Miguel
>>That is because he is running Java 1.3 ... a product which is >>approximately 4 years old. >> >>And a version on the Mac which is *not* supported by Jmol. > > > As always, things are not simple. I suspect what has happened is that this > OS X user (at level 10.3.7) actually has BOTH Java 1.3 and

Re: [Jmol-users] gnujaxp.jar issues

2005-02-17 Thread Miguel
>>Exiting all instances of the browser and restarting should be sufficient. > > I have a clear counter example. Mozilla on Win XP does NOT clear > the Java cache upon restarting the browser. I recommend that you file it as a bug report at mozilla.org Restarting should be sufficient. If not, the

Re: [Jmol-users] gnujaxp.jar issues

2005-02-17 Thread Philip Bays
I had this problem some time ago. I solved it by clearing the java cache. I believe that option is listed in the java control panel. Phil Bays On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Rzepa, Henry wrote: Yes, because that is what you are supposed to do. but each browser seems to have a different way of

Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Rzepa, Henry
>> > archive="JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar" width="12" >> code="JmolAppletControl" mayscript="true"> >> >> >> >Don't know why this would have failed. > >But ... this is a JmolAppletControl for putting up a butto

Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Rzepa, Henry
I'm 100% with Miguel when he says that if you can get your clients to upgrade >to Sun 1.4 or 1.5, please do so! That's the best solution! > > Well, Apple have quite confused this aspect. They offer both 1.3 AND 1.4 (but not yet 1.5, which will come with Tiger). For reasons totally beyond

Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:59 am, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2005 12:02 am, Miguel wrote: > > Henry wrote: > > My position is: > > - I don't support CML on the Microsoft 1.1 JVM and NS 4.7* > > I can offer some support for this. BTW, forgot to mention this. I'm 100%

Re: [Jmol-users] archive='JmolApplet.jar,gnujaxp.jar'

2005-02-17 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 17 February 2005 12:02 am, Miguel wrote: > Henry wrote: > My position is: > - I don't support CML on the Microsoft 1.1 JVM and NS 4.7* I can offer some support for this. What we'll do is setup a Wiki page where people can register as CML/1.1JVM user, and which will give some informa