[jquery-dev] Re: drag/drop for live events, and is jQuery still accepting minor patches?

2010-01-15 Thread Justin Meyer
y.event.add( this, data.live, liveHandler, data ); } On Jan 13, 11:40 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > I'm trying to implement drag-drop for live events: > > $(".handle").live("dropped", func1); > $(".drop").live("dropon", func2); > &

[jquery-dev] drag/drop for live events, and is jQuery still accepting minor patches?

2010-01-13 Thread Justin Meyer
I'm trying to implement drag-drop for live events: $(".handle").live("dropped", func1); $(".drop").live("dropon", func2); I'm unable to get it working without needing to change jQuery, but not significantly. Are these types of patches still going to be accepted? The problem is that an efficient

[jquery-dev] make cleanData available

2010-01-13 Thread Justin Meyer
jQuery.UI and a few other plugins require a 'teardown' callback by hacking removeData, remove, html, empty, etc. In 1.4, it would be very easy to hack in teardown if cleanData was exposed. So something like: var cd = jQuery.cleanData jQuery.cleanData = function(elems){

[jquery-dev] jQuery Foundation timelines?

2010-01-05 Thread Justin Meyer
It was mentioned at jQCon that jQuery was going to be under a foundation (like Dojo). I've got a client (a Microsoft Shop), that is anxiously waiting for this. Any word on when this is going to happen? I'd also like to move JavaScriptMVC's code into the jQuery foundation. Will this be possible?

[jquery-dev] Teardown on plugins

2009-12-14 Thread Justin Meyer
Is there a 'teardown' for plugins that can get triggered automatically (similar to that for events)? It's extremely common, and a source of bugs when I see: $.fn.mySuperPlugin = function(){ ...code ... $(document).click(function(e) { ...code... }); ...code... } Yes, they should be doing adding/r

[jquery-dev] Re: Ant build

2009-11-26 Thread Justin Meyer
Ah, git is by default CRLFing files. To turn it off: git config core.autocrlf false On Nov 25, 2:33 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > It works now that I have updated to the latest jQuery. > > On Nov 25, 1:13 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > > > > > it might be the qunit file that

[jquery-dev] Re: Ant build

2009-11-26 Thread Justin Meyer
src/sizzle' make: *** [init] Error 1 - Notice the test/jquery.js. This is on a fresh install. Am I stupid, or the only person using windows doing this? On Nov 25, 2:33 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > It works now that I have updated to the l

[jquery-dev] Re: Ant build

2009-11-25 Thread Justin Meyer
It works now that I have updated to the latest jQuery. On Nov 25, 1:13 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > it might be the qunit file that is blocking it. > > On Nov 25, 12:56 pm,JustinMeyer wrote: > > > > > Only sizzle runs for some reason.  Likely b/c I am using windows. > &

[jquery-dev] Re: Ant build

2009-11-25 Thread Justin Meyer
it might be the qunit file that is blocking it. On Nov 25, 12:56 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > Only sizzle runs for some reason.  Likely b/c I am using windows. > Does this work for someone else using msysgit?  Here's

[jquery-dev] Re: Ant build

2009-11-25 Thread Justin Meyer
Should qunit be listed in .git/config? http://pitupepito.homelinux.org/?p=24 says that submodules should be listed there. On Nov 25, 12:56 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > Only sizzle runs for some reason.  Likely b/c I am using windows. > Does this work for someone else using msysgit?  Here

[jquery-dev] Re: Ant build

2009-11-25 Thread Justin Meyer
Only sizzle runs for some reason. Likely b/c I am using windows. Does this work for someone else using msysgit? Here's the output: -- $ make Grabbing external dependencies... Submodule 'src/sizzle' (git://github.com/jeresig/sizzl

[jquery-dev] Ant build

2009-11-09 Thread Justin Meyer
Does building with Ant work from github anymore? I'm guessing no b/c it needs to get QUnit/Sizzle. Would it be nice if you could pull in dependencies in JS like ruby's gem install, and all your building would already be done via JavaScript. Hm ... JMVC has this feature :). -- You received

[jquery-dev] Re: Fix-less events

2009-11-09 Thread Justin Meyer
for custom events. I > mean, there's not much point in not-fixing the event object for some > events - might as well do it for no events then. > > ...unless there's something else that you were considering? > > --John > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Just

[jquery-dev] Fix-less events

2009-11-05 Thread Justin Meyer
The fix function is rather expensive for things like mousemove and mouseover. Can we make it possible that events won't be fixed for certain events? If you like this idea, I'll submit a patch. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" gro

[jquery-dev] Re: Will the live() method be improved in 1.4?

2009-11-05 Thread Justin Meyer
How about $("#something").delegate(".thing","click", func). It almost makes too much sense :). On Nov 5, 6:31 pm, Robert Katić wrote: > I wonder why there would be an $.live with document as the only > interesting context. > > Something like > >   $(document).zombi(selector, type, ...) > > would

[jquery-dev] Re: Dependency Management and jQuery building

2009-10-09 Thread Justin Meyer
Should getScript have a little dependency management? Should people to know if they are loading events, that they have to load data? On Oct 9, 5:54 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > I've started working on this.  If I remember correctly from the > conference, core will include just the

[jquery-dev] Re: Dependency Management and jQuery building

2009-10-09 Thread Justin Meyer
I've started working on this. If I remember correctly from the conference, core will include just the core.js and getScript. Is this correct? The only other potentially likely candidate in my opinion would be the ready event. Thoughts? On Sep 18, 10:49 am, Justin Meyer wrote: > jQ

[jquery-dev] Dependency Management and jQuery building

2009-09-18 Thread Justin Meyer
jQuery core team, I was very excited to hear about a possible jQuery mobile. Keeping file size small is always a concern, and it will be useful for non- mobile projects as well. Further, I don't like having to build every time I make a change in trunk, but then see a giant single file when debu

[jquery-dev] Re: Event Delegation

2009-09-14 Thread Justin Meyer
w ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP") : new XMLHttpRequest(); Any other ideas? On Sep 14, 10:39 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > On Kangax's method: > Perfect, thanks!  I'm surprised that works. > > On 100s of delegates: > Well 100s is a

[jquery-dev] Re: Event Delegation

2009-09-14 Thread Justin Meyer
On Kangax's method: Perfect, thanks! I'm surprised that works. On 100s of delegates: Well 100s is an exaggeration, but I would guess about 200. There are about 40 different components, each responding to about 5 events. The components listen regardless if the component is in the page. Someone c

[jquery-dev] Re: Event Delegation

2009-09-14 Thread Justin Meyer
live.remove is going to have to get passed the stored guids instead of just counting the remaining 'submits'. On Sep 14, 5:41 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > Another issue is that every live event is stored in $.data > ('events').live in a flat hash.  That means you have

[jquery-dev] Re: Event Delegation

2009-09-14 Thread Justin Meyer
It seems like I need to be able to store multiple guids in guid. Would it be better to have it handle if guid is an array, or just add a guids property? On Sep 14, 5:41 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > Another issue is that every live event is stored in $.data > ('events').live in a

[jquery-dev] Re: Event Delegation

2009-09-14 Thread Justin Meyer
you guys are busy, but I'd like to know that my work might have a chance at being used or is going in the right direction. Thanks, Justin On Sep 14, 1:15 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > The following avoids browser sniffing for IE's submit. > It simply creates a div inside a form, the

[jquery-dev] Re: Event Delegation

2009-09-14 Thread Justin Meyer
veChild( div ); div = null; form = null; alert(jQuery.support.submitBubbles) }); On Sep 14, 12:16 am, Justin Meyer wrote: > WARNING: Skip to the end to avoid an in depth discussion of the > problems, and the only questions I need guidance. > --

[jquery-dev] Event Delegation

2009-09-13 Thread Justin Meyer
WARNING: Skip to the end to avoid an in depth discussion of the problems, and the only questions I need guidance. I'm going to replace JMVC's delegation lib: http://code.google.com/p/javascriptmvc/source/browse/branches/2_0/j

[jquery-dev] JavaScriptMVC 2.0

2009-09-06 Thread Justin Meyer
re is a demand for these problems to be solved. Not everyone is building Gmail. Most are using a few scripts to add a lightbox here and an animation effect there. However, it's possible to for jQuery to have a smooth gradient from adding simple hover effects to full blown, 100k lines-of-

[jquery-dev] window['eval']() in rhino

2009-05-19 Thread Justin Meyer
I assume there must be a good reason, but why is window['eval'] used as opposed to window.eval in httpData? This has some issues in rhino for reasons discussed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev-tech-js-engine-rh...@lists.mozilla.org/msg00664.html I know jQuery's tests run in rhino, but perh

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-04-28 Thread Justin Meyer
g > while taking bits from ruby on rails, zend as well as my personal php > mvc framework. > > Sorry. Harsh opinion, but I wouldn't be me without it. If your > interested on working on some projects (as well as other people), I'd > love to hear back from you. > &g

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-04-27 Thread Justin Meyer
sing time that comes from > dispatching and routing, has the potential for a bit of overhead, > especially in a large application. > > UI, being as dynamic as it is, calls for many different situations > where you might respond to an event by posting a form via ajax, and > when t

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-26 Thread Justin Meyer
work > > is solid they should all become official jQuery projects/conventions. > > > Now I'm not discounting any additional code or patterns but we need to > > start with what we have and make sure that we're working with the best > > possible resources. If we

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-24 Thread Justin Meyer
have and make sure that we're working with the best > possible resources. If we define the above conventions and code we may > find that there is less of a need for a new project than we originally > thought - and we get the benefit of having excellently defined and > documented resou

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-24 Thread Justin Meyer
JS is Object Oriented. So are we really just talking about classical inheritance (and even more specific, _super) ? I see how widget.js creates a plugin. But how does one expand on the plugin? I'm more than happy with widget.js if you can easily expand on the widget. For example, quickly add

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-24 Thread Justin Meyer
> - package and minimize multiple files (YUI Compressor) - Could be solved much better as it is not integrated into the 'framework'. You have to 'double' include everything (once in your page, another in your build script). You have to set your html to switch from loading separate files to load

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-24 Thread Justin Meyer
understandability. Why do you think this would contribute to jQuery bloat anymore than jQuery.UI does? On Feb 24, 12:40 pm, Justin Meyer wrote: > John, > Thanks for your reply! You are absolutely right that we need to > discuss which problems are difficult to solve. > > Is it safe

[jquery-dev] Re: A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-24 Thread Justin Meyer
John, Thanks for your reply! You are absolutely right that we need to discuss which problems are difficult to solve. Is it safe to say that you agree that jQuery says very little about how to : - package and minimize multiple flies - document - test - dependency management - log errors / debug

[jquery-dev] A Modest Proposal: jQuery Enterprise

2009-02-23 Thread Justin Meyer
jQuery community, Amazing work. I can't believe how fast jQuery has developed into the best bottom-up JS library. 1.4 looks great. But as jQuery expands to include things like lazy loading, it might be time for a sister project that provides important, but less commonly needed functionality i

[jquery-dev] Re: Event delegation

2009-01-25 Thread Justin Meyer
So, I've started the process of converting to jQuery. But, I think there is a snag. I noticed that you can't cancel events. Is this on the horizon? In JMVC, I collect all the elements that respond to the event through delegation and order them. I dispatch each callback, but if the event's "ki

[jquery-dev] Re: Event delegation

2008-12-24 Thread Justin Meyer
Change in IE: I listen for click instead of change. I check if it is on a SELECT element. If it is, I check to see if its value has changed after each click. I don't think using capture instead of bubbling will help. Change in webkit Listen for change, but I think it is called even if someon

[jquery-dev] Event delegation

2008-12-22 Thread Justin Meyer
jQuery developers, I've heard that event delegation is being added to many of the big JS libraries, including jQuery. It has been a major component of JavaScriptMVC. For JavaScriptMVC's next version, I'm considering using jQuery by default and replacing any redundant functionality with jQuer