Sorry again if I was offensive. Trying to be ironical in a foreing
language frequently leads to this, I should've known better. I'm glad
we sorted it out, except for the soccer thing ;)
About having no idea on the scope of your project, that's what I was
trying to ask you. It's easier to help or
It's too bad we didn't kick your ass in soccer the past couple weeks
ago. Now I wish we really had!
Brazil is overrated in soccer.
On Jul 9, 4:40 pm, expresso wrote:
> This is exactly the kind of shit I'm talking about and I am cocky?
> unreal.
>
> On Jul 9, 4:37 pm, expresso wrote:
>
> > Has
This is exactly the kind of shit I'm talking about and I am cocky?
unreal.
On Jul 9, 4:37 pm, expresso wrote:
> Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea
> on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like
> that and honestly coming here to tell me
Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea
on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like
that and honestly coming here to tell me you're serious. But to state
something like that and to butt in like this is unbelievable. Do you
do this to people
It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a
fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of
better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that!
On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso wrote:
> >>>Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more
Ricardo, I have a feeling some put you up to this to piss me off
again :) Nice work.
On Jul 9, 4:06 pm, expresso wrote:
> >>>Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to
>
> do this for you :]
>
> can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to
> me.
Ricardo, I have a feeling some put you up to this to piss me off
again :) Nice work.
On Jul 9, 4:06 pm, expresso wrote:
> >>>Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to
>
> do this for you :]
>
> can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to
> me.
>>>Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to
do this for you :]
can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to
me.
On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo wrote:
> "expresso" (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help,
> why not post an overvi
"expresso" (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help,
why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several
pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure
you're trying to code. Like "I need a carousel that expands when
blablabla and loads blablabla fr
I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll
try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up
till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am
definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford
to just step back and say
It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish
is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it,
maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code
with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood.
and code that someone wrot
As requested I'm done. I hope that Charlie re-evaluates his
assumptions (that people have not tried things out, that what they are
doing overall is simple, yada yada) before he posts things.
As for the future yea, I'll try to consolidate. I try to give as much
information as possible as to what
expresso,
Please stop going on and on and on (ad infinitum). (I am trying to be
polite)
Thank you.
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 12:33 -0700, expresso wrote:
> Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may
> find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know
> about
"expresso"
To: "jQuery (English)"
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Access by item in the array
and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin
put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know?
if that's "blowing
Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may
find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know
about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are doing
is "simple"
On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso wrote:
> >>>making it difficult to understand what y
While I certainly have gotten all pissed off in this thread now...I
think both sides need to re-evaluate.
On your side, you need to both stop with your little hints of "you're
an idiot" in your responses. Key words like these from developers who
think they are above others is what I'm talking ab
Charlie and this is what pisses me off about you, statements like
this:
"You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a
simple carousel"
so you're saying basically "you're an idiot, this shit is simple".
wtf man, and you find me cocky? I hate developers like you who think
that
>>>and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin
put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know?
if that's "blowing up" then you need to relax when you read replies.
That in no way was "blowing up".
On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso wrote:
> >>>Morning, then tell my why the cod
>>>Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight
from the JCarousel plug-in
Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said
that disabled is not part of a Read the post.
YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way
trying to be
Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts.
Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people
have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you
create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open
source, still. When you email the creator nicel
"hahah, I double posted. OH boy, bend me over and slap me. "
I don't think you get the point of the double post thing... you said
in another post that "i hit refresh"... in other words, your feeling
is the mailing list is "operators are standing by to take your call"
in that you should sit there
hahah, I double posted. OH boy, bend me over and slap me.
On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso wrote:
> >>>making it difficult to understand what you are asking
>
> tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the
> situation and things tried.
>
> On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso wrote:
>
>
you sir are a complete ingrate!
You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple
carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last
posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that
everyone is getting really tired of all the fran
>>>making it difficult to understand what you are asking
tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the
situation and things tried.
On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso wrote:
> You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter
> out if you stay in the same topic
>>>making it difficult to understand what you are asking
tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the
situation and things tried.
On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso wrote:
> You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter
> out if you stay in the same topic
>>>making it difficult to understand what you are asking
tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the
situation and things tried.
On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso wrote:
> You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter
> out if you stay in the same topic
You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter
out if you stay in the same topic.
I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start
veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a different
approach (in this case in that previous thread I started
how the hell am I being rude?
And second, I am giving information to help you help me. Again I try
all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on every
step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you either
get called out for not giving enough information or giving to
"so it's only respectful on my part to
start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same
thread. Not cool. "
You've got it backwards it makes more sense and keeps the clutter
out if you stay in the same topic.
As Liam points out you already asked the index quest
Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to my original
posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my part to
start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same
thread. Not cool.
On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter wrote:
> how about reading all the repli
thanks will try that out.
On Jul 9, 9:15 am, Michael Lawson wrote:
> If i'm reading your code right, you may want to try eq(i) instead of index
> (i). index is used to return the index of the match element, its not used
> to retrieve that element.
>
> cheers
>
> Michael Lawson
> Development Lea
how about reading all the replies to your other thread about this?
$("#mycarousel > li:eq(10)").css("margin-right", "5px");
expresso wrote:
Is it possible to target certain in an unordered list by index
with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to
get the syntax right
thanks will try that out.
On Jul 9, 9:15 am, Michael Lawson wrote:
> If i'm reading your code right, you may want to try eq(i) instead of index
> (i). index is used to return the index of the match element, its not used
> to retrieve that element.
>
> cheers
>
> Michael Lawson
> Development Lea
If i'm reading your code right, you may want to try eq(i) instead of index
(i). index is used to return the index of the match element, its not used
to retrieve that element.
cheers
Michael Lawson
Development Lead, Global Solutions, ibm.com
Phone: 1-276-206-8393
E-mail: mjlaw...@us.ibm.com
'
34 matches
Mail list logo
