On Oct 10, 12:17 am, hj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 12:56 am, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 3:42 pm, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Yep, absolutely. If you have any ideas on how we could test a
> > browsers
> > > support for a selec
On Oct 9, 12:56 am, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 8, 3:42 pm, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yep, absolutely. If you have any ideas on how we could test a
> browsers
> > support for a selector without maintaining a hard coded list then I
> > would love
Ok, I'm pleased to say I have updated the plugin and we are now at 0.3
This brings a whole bunch of tweaks but mainly it (hopefully) fixes
the IE issues that people where having.
Ta,
Andy.
On 9 Oct, 08:56, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 8, 3:42 pm, Andy Kent <[EM
On Oct 8, 3:42 pm, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, absolutely. If you have any ideas on how we could test a browsers
> support for a selector without maintaining a hard coded list then I
> would love to hear them.
$(document).ready(function () {
$('body').append(
' \
\
div#
Sam Collett wrote:
> I noticed that you have added String.prototype.trim. jQuery actually
> has this already, e.g. jQuery.trim(" foo ");
>
Urg! No messing with core JS objects please - don't turn jQuery in to
another Prototype :(
@ All developers: Please, please, please namespace stuff prop
WOW!
> I noticed that you have added String.prototype.trim. jQuery actually
> has this already, e.g. jQuery.trim(" foo ");
Wow, I totally missed this, thanks, I'll get it changed over.
> An easy was to get better CSS support in browsers that are not up to
> it. Maybe in a future version, browsers th
On Oct 7, 4:39 am, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://andykent.bingodisk.com/bingo/public/jss/
I *exactly* wanted to do the same plugin. I also used similar idea in
some of the projects already (crude code without plugin). My ideas
were:
1. Common crossbrowser CSS in a file, say cr
I noticed that you have added String.prototype.trim. jQuery actually
has this already, e.g. jQuery.trim(" foo ");
An easy was to get better CSS support in browsers that are not up to
it. Maybe in a future version, browsers that are capable will just be
ignored?
Also, maybe best to wrap it in a
Impressive work! Would this by chance make position:fixed for IE6 just
work? That alone would be a god-send for me right now.
> It would be good to see this detect and use Brandon Aaron's Live
> Query(http://brandonaaron.net/docs/livequery/) for new elements
> added after $.jss.apply() is called.
Yep, this is on the plan, but it actually involves a slightly
different approach.
Rather than using .css() to apply the style
Yay! child selectors in ie!
thank you :-)
It would be good to see this detect and use Brandon Aaron's Live
Query( http://brandonaaron.net/docs/livequery/ ) for new elements
added after $.jss.apply() is called.
Josh
On Oct 6, 6:39 pm, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> This is a plug-in that was thrown together in a few
Great plugin great protentioal.
jQuery has great CSS selector support, including CSS3 which alot of browsers
don't. Also jQuery has great browser support. Join those togeather you get
great cross browser CSS3 support via jQuery.
I'm guessing it might even be possible to use specific jQuery select
Thanks Nate,
IE was working fine but I made some changes in 0.2 so something must
have broke it. I'll take a look into it this afternoon.
Sorry, my bad.
On 7 Oct, 09:40, Nate Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> This is actually really cool.
>
> However, the script doesn't seem to
Hi Andy,
This is actually really cool.
However, the script doesn't seem to work in IE 6 or 7. Im running Windows
XP, and the test page looks completely different in both IE6 and 7 than it
does in Firefox.
I noticed on your page that the plugins supports both IE's, but I'm
wondering if perhaps
To answer those questions about how I intededed it could be used.
The beauty of it is that if you stick to CSS3 selectors then your CSS
will still be a valid CSS file, this means that browsers should still
read it and apply all the selectors that it understands and then the
JS can fill in the gap
Very cool
How would you recommend using it ? Ie. would you have a jss.css
containing specific CSS included after the normal CSS ?
Or is your intention to ignore users without javascript ?
Jonah
On Oct 7, 3:16 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A question.
> Probably I do not
A question.
Probably I do not get itbut how you could use it in real world?
I mean what you think this should be helpfull.
Looks quite interesting but I do not get it completely.
Andrea
On 6 oct, 18:51, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks interesting.
> Would it fix this pr
This looks interesting.
Would it fix this problem here?
http://www.commadot.com/jquery/cssAND.php
Glen
On 10/6/07, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> This is a plug-in that was thrown together in a few spare hours after
> chatting with some people at FOWA last week, I hadn't
20 matches
Mail list logo
