Aaron,
Not sure if you caught it, but I screwed up some quotes in my code
snippet (stupid iphone). It should be:
$('ul.foo li ul').addClass("bar");
On Mar 1, 9:25 am, Aaron Johnson wrote:
> Greg, Nathan, Thanks very much for your help!
>
> On 1 March 2010 14:58, Nathan Klatt wrote:
>
> > On M
This will add the class for you. Put it in the document ready function
if you want it on page load or in whatever function you want to call
it from.
$('ul.foo li 'ul").addClass("bar");
On Mar 1, 5:06 am, Aaron Johnson wrote:
> Hello...
>
> I have an unordered list containing nested lists...
>
>
I don't know what to make of that Coldfusion code (makes me long for
Perl) but what I would do is display the msg div then use $.ajax() to
send a request to the server. Use the 'success' callback function to
then hide the msg div when your server-side code is done.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:17 PM
that into a div on another page it stops working.
That's where I am stuck
-Original Message-
From: Liam Potter [mailto:radioactiv...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-04-09 2:01 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie Question
Do you have an online example so I can
});
}
Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com wrote:
3 Errors
syntax error
[Break on this error] });\n
(line 167)
syntax error
[Break on this error] });\n
(line 6)
_ajaxInit is not defined
[Break on this error] _ajaxInit();\n
That's what I see now but still nothing good happ
-04-09 1:34 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie Question
Have you updated the original script to my one?
function _ajaxInit() {
$("a.group").fancybox(
{
'overlayShow': true
});
});
wind
rors
syntax error
[Break on this error] });\n
(line 167)
syntax error
[Break on this error] });\n
(line 6)
_ajaxInit is not defined
[Break on this error] _ajaxInit();\n
That's what I see now but still nothing good happening.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Liam Potter [mailto:radioa
otter [mailto:radioactiv...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-04-09 1:19 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie Question
yeah, use the modified script and add _ajaxInit(); to the callback;
$('a.profile_data').click(function(){
var url = $(this).attr('href&#x
7;, function(){
$('#loadHere').load(url, function(){
$('#loadHere').fadeIn('fast');
});
});
return false;
});
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Liam Potter [mailto:radioactiv...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-04-09 12:5
.@gmail.com]
Sent: August-04-09 12:50 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie Question
function _ajaxInit() {
$("a.group").fancybox(
{
'overlayShow': true
});
});
window.onload = function () {
$('.slide
function _ajaxInit() {
$("a.group").fancybox(
{
'overlayShow': true
});
});
window.onload = function () {
$('.sliderGallery').each(function(){
var id_parts = $(this).attr('id').split('_');
var id = id_parts[id_parts.length - 1];
var container = $('#sli
On Jul 28, 5:53 am, James wrote:
> This:
> (function() { do some stuff } )();
>
> is known as a closure.
You have a warped view of a closure. It is an example of the module
pattern, which can create closures, but doesn't necessarily do so.
URL: http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/closures.
No problem, Michael. Thanks for the clarification regarding an
anonymous function and a closure, and the detailed explanation for
closures. I'll give some related resources a good read on closures. :)
On Jul 27, 1:46 pm, "Michael Geary" wrote:
> That's a great explanation, James. I hope you won'
That's a great explanation, James. I hope you won't mind if I nitpick a
point of terminology.
The code you were talking about is not a closure:
(function() { /* do some stuff */ })();
As you described, the advantage of this code is that any variables you
define inside the function won't pol
This:
(function() { do some stuff } )();
is known as a closure. It just runs once and it does not leave around
any global variables (that is, if you also don't set any inside this
function also).
Compared to this:
function doSomething() { // do some stuff };
The doSomething variable will exist
Well, it's a common pattern that is used when creating a jQuery
plugin.
A common problem doing that is the use of a '$' sign, because other
frameworks use it too as well. I didn't try to use some frameworks
simultaneously yet, so I didn't encountered that problem by myself.
One of the way is to us
Yes, your action script can be anything.
Ted
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Greg Evans wrote:
>
> That looks great, and I think it is just what I need. I want to clarify
> however, this shows to comment.php, but something like comment.pl should
> work equally as well correct?
>
>
>
> On Jul 1
That looks great, and I think it is just what I need. I want to
clarify however, this shows to comment.php, but something like
comment.pl should work equally as well correct?
On Jul 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, brian wrote:
Do you want the form to submit via AJAX? Have a look at the form
pl
Do you want the form to submit via AJAX? Have a look at the form plugin.
http://malsup.com/jquery/form/
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:47 PM, raisputin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have just discovered jQuery and it looks cool. I used the jQuery UI
> builder at ui.jquery.com to build the UI and it looks a
$(selector1, selector2).click(function(){})
http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors/multiple#selector1selector2selectorN
e.g. $('td, th').click(function(){alert("clicked table cell");});
Colin
On Jul 2, 6:09 am, Alexandru Adrian Dinulescu
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am trying to do something like this
> $(el
Hello.
Damn i'm so silly, i looked over the website and i totally didnt see that.
Thanks a lot for pointing it
Best Regards
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Charlie wrote:
> http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors
>
> look at the last item in "Basics" , "Selector1,Selector2" and click on
> it to
http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors
look at the last item in "Basics" , "Selector1,Selector2" and click
on it to see the example
getting familiar with the jquery website categories of "selectors,
traversing, manipulation etc " is probably the #1 best tool for
learning jquery.
Alexandru A
Greatly appreciated.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:james.gp@gmail.com]
Sent: June-03-09 3:55 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie question on selectors
$("a[class^=edit_]").click(...);
This is saying: all with class that begins with '
you can try something like this
$("a[class^=edit]").click(function(){
var url_id = $(this).attr('href');
do stuff..
});
On Jun 3, 11:20 am, "Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com"
wrote:
> I have a page with 6 links that each have a unique class ;
> edit_profile
> edit_preferences
> edit_journal
Sounds good!
Will keep that in mind, but its working perfect.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:james.gp@gmail.com]
Sent: June-03-09 4:51 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie question on selectors
Sorry, I forgot to mention that this would not
ls.com"
wrote:
> Perfect...
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Greatly appreciated.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James [mailto:james.gp@gmail.com]
> Sent: June-03-09 3:55 PM
> To: jQuery (English)
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie question
Perfect...
Thanks for your help.
Greatly appreciated.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:james.gp@gmail.com]
Sent: June-03-09 3:55 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Newbie question on selectors
$("a[class^=edit_]").click(...);
This is saying:
$("a[class^=edit_]").click(...);
This is saying: all with class that begins with 'edit_'.
http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors
On Jun 3, 8:20 am, "Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com"
wrote:
> I have a page with 6 links that each have a unique class ;
> edit_profile
> edit_preferences
> edit_journal
>
Excellent! Glad to see you figured that one out. Rest assured that
*every* web developer has pulled out hair related to that particular
issue. Fortunately, in many editors today, you can run a tool called
'jslint' that does a simple syntax check for you. In my editor
(TextMate), I actually hav
Just to finish this one off, I discovered my problem in IE6 was
nothing to do with the jquery search operation we were discussing.
As I was working on the code I had added an object initialisation
above the line in question that had an extra comma at the end, as in-
var frames= {
On May 25, 3:44 am, Jason Persampieri wrote:
> Certainly... you're really not all that far off at all... let me just
> point out a couple of things.
Very nice presentation!
It is likely that many novice users of jQuery will be able to benefit
from it. Please do respond to the originator's ques
In fact I tried an alert() to see what the code was doing, and it now
looks as if it's not running at all. Don't you just love IE6?
On May 25, 4:49 pm, colin_e wrote:
> I hate to say this but i'm using IE6 for compatibility testing because
> that (like it or not) is still our organisation's stan
I hate to say this but i'm using IE6 for compatibility testing because
that (like it or not) is still our organisation's standard
browser... :-}
On May 25, 2:03 pm, Jason Persampieri wrote:
> re: this vs $(this) -
> this = DOMNode
> $(this) = [DOMNode] (ie, an array containing the single element
re: this vs $(this) -
this = DOMNode
$(this) = [DOMNode] (ie, an array containing the single element,
DOMNode) that also happens to have lots of nifty methods like
'children', 'find' and 'animate'.
The jQuery version should work in pretty much all browsers though...
the compatibility layer is bui
That is very, very helpful, thanks!
I knew I hadn't found the correct way to say "constrain the search to
children of 'this', now I know.
To be honest I think i'm still unclear on the real difference between
the vanilla Javascript 'this' and the jquery '$(this)'. For example I
think that I could
Certainly... you're really not all that far off at all... let me just
point out a couple of things.
1) It's ":first-child", not ":first".
2) inside the loop, the variable - this - is a reference to the DOM
node. Hence, to get the jQuery object for that node, use $(this)
(note the lack of quote
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for reply!
I tried to use anchor, but it doesn't work:
$('#info').hide();
$('a#show_hide_info').click(function(){
$('#info').toggle();
});
Show/hide info
some
When I click #show_hide_info, this doesn't move me to my anchor.
So what I am doin
sounds like you could jsut use an inline anchor, with the JS being
executed in the onclick event
On May 21, 8:11 am, Lacrima wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I think very simple question, but I am very new to jquery...
> For example, I have the next code:
>
> $('#info').hide();
> $('a#show_hi
Hey there,
You could try the following:
$(document).ready(function() {
$("ul li").each(function() {
var thisName = $('.name', this).text(); // get the content inside
'.name' class of this element
$(this).append(''+
thisName +"'s additional Info" );
});
});
With your approach of $('.nam
Try using toggle instead:
${"a.welcomenav").toggle(function(){
$("#welcome").show();
return false;
},function(){
$("#welcome").hide();
return false;
});
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of K
Thanks for clarifying, Jonathan!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:34 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: newbie question
Also, you should only ever have to call
have to write out jQuery.noConflict() or
> > $.noConflict(), right?
>
> > Rick
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
>
> > Behalf Of Jonathan
> > Sent: Tuesday, Apr
t;
> Behalf Of Jonathan
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:08 PM
> To: jQuery (English)
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: newbie question
>
> $ is simply an alias to jQuery().
>
> jQuery.noConflict() removes the $ alias so other frameworks don't
> throw a fit.
>
> $bfa = jQu
googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:08 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: newbie question
$ is simply an alias to jQuery().
jQuery.noConflict() removes the $ alias so other frameworks don't
throw a fit.
$bfa = jQuery.noConflict() simply assig
x27;t have
> to do so much typing. $bfa or jq is just quicker. It's just a convenience
> thing...perhaps someone else has more to offer in terms of explanation.
>
> hth,
>
> Rick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@goog
--
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Ronz
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:21 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: newbie question
Hi, Rick.
Here's a quote to my hosting news group that 'splains' what has
happened since yesterday. Maybe y
Hi, Rick.
Here's a quote to my hosting news group that 'splains' what has
happened since yesterday. Maybe you could comment on the latter
portion if you have time. TIA.Ron
It turns out that what I downloaded from jQuery ended up with a bunch
of line feeds in it...my bad I'm sure.
I en
Hi, Ron...
Assuming that you have your jQuery source file "jquery-1.3.2.min.js"
in the same directory as the page it's running on,
do you have this in the head section of your document?
If you do, then also post your jQuery code and your HTML so it's
easier to see where the problem may be in y
ok, got it.
thanx weidc,
On Mar 24, 9:44 pm, weidc wrote:
> $(".clickme").attr("id");
>
> On 24 Mrz., 14:03, Jesse wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I am not good at js. I want to get the id from "A" tag.
> > E.g. link
>
> > I need the value "1234" from the code above, but dont know how to do
> > it.
>
$(".clickme").attr("id");
On 24 Mrz., 14:03, Jesse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not good at js. I want to get the id from "A" tag.
> E.g. link
>
> I need the value "1234" from the code above, but dont know how to do
> it.
>
> Please help.
>
> Thanks.
What did you download? There is the main jquery library (plain,
minified, etc.) and there's all the UI stuff. If you want to use the
UI widget/effect libraries you'll have to get them separately.
However, you can get them as prepackaged bundles based on the things
you want:
http://ui.jquery.com/d
See
http://docs.jquery.com/CSS
Specifically
http://docs.jquery.com/CSS/offset
http://docs.jquery.com/CSS/position
http://docs.jquery.com/CSS/scrollTop
http://docs.jquery.com/CSS/scrollLeft
- Richard
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, saiful.ha...@gmail.com <
saiful.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi
Hi, Mike.
Thanks for the hint. Will try it tonite at home :-)
Jean
On Oct 16, 2:28 am, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Second, I´ve found a solution using the DOM while it works is far from
> > being jQuery pure code:
>
> > //Iterate among all retrieved items.
> > $('
> Second, I´ve found a solution using the DOM while it works is far from
> being jQuery pure code:
>
> //Iterate among all retrieved items.
> $('item', xml).each(function(i){
> //Retrieve the Node of the item.
> Item = $('item',xml).get(i);
>
Hi again.
First of all, sorry for the double posting; just a mistake.
Second, I´ve found a solution using the DOM while it works is far from
being jQuery pure code:
//Iterate among all retrieved items.
$('item', xml).each(function(i){
//Retrieve the Node of the i
Is the gif visible when you try to get it's height?
If not try this:
var height = $('#wait_also').css("visibility", "visible").height();
$('#wait_also').css("visibility", "hidden");
On 12 Sep., 12:23, Kevin Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, this is very simple I think but I can't fathom
Wow, that sure is nice and concise.
Thanks Richard
On Aug 29, 12:45 am, "Richard D. Worth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could do something like this:
>
> $("#mySpan").find(":input").removeAttr("checked").val("").hide()
>
> - Richard
>
> Richard D. Worthhttp://rdworth.org/
>
> On Thu, Aug 28
You could do something like this:
$("#mySpan").find(":input").removeAttr("checked").val("").hide()
- Richard
Richard D. Worth
http://rdworth.org/
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Peter Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there. I recently discovered jQuery and it appears to be an
> excel
I think you can do this a little differently to achieve the effect
you're looking for. One thing you should be aware of is that IDs and
classes must start with a letter. We won't have to access those
numbers in the script anyway.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('div.add_image_content').h
Hi everyone,
I found one way to do this, and it is only a few lines. This is my
first use of JQuery so can anyone comment on whether there is a better
way?
$(document).ready(function() {
$("input:radio").click(function() {
thisClass = $(this).attr("class");
On 29 déc, 18:27, X490812 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> parent.document.getElementById("buttonsForm:filterByActor").style.display="none"
> //jQuery("#buttonsForm:filterByActor",
> parent.document).css({"display":"none"});
>
> });
>
> //-->
>
> The issue is that the jquery script that is com
To get "this" to chain with the .click() method, you need to wrap it
in $() so it looks like: $(this)
Better still, don't bother with the .each().
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'button'].button1").click(function(){MyFunc(this);});
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.lear
Just a quick point. You shouldn't really have 'delete' as a hyperlink.
Any actions which affect your database should be a POST from a form
submission.
The reason for this is simple. If your site is public and google or
someone crawls your site it will hit all the delete hyperlinks
(ignoring the j
$('a.taskDelete').click(function(){
return confirm('Please confirm deletion...');
});
On Dec 2, 4:41 am, lattedaddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I'm pretty new to both JS and JQuery. Thanks for the help in advance.
>
> I have a link in my code as follows (it talks to an app to do a
That worked. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Newbie-Question%3A-Callback-for-Load-Only-Works-the-First-Time-Load-is-Called--tf4720377s27240.html#a13501834
Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Try...
$("#HelpInfo").load("http://localhost:/index.php/your_plan/
ShowHelpInfo",
{contents: htmlStr}, function(){ ScrollToDiv("HelpInfo"); } );
});
On Oct 30, 7:53 pm, Vik_R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got some code that uses load to add some help info to a page when the
> user cl
Thanks very much, guys!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Newbie-Question%3A-Specifying-the-links-that-are-in-a-particular-Div--tf4713851s27240.html#a13480579
Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi there,
a couple of things. First, you can create your selectors the same way
you do with css rules (but you can actually use all the selectors
from css 1-3 with jQuery). So, inside the $(), just put in "#menu a".
Then, when you're dealing with links, you'll need to stop the default
beh
I think you want $("#menu a").click(function() {
etc.
});
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Vik_R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 12:04 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Newbie Question: Specifying the links that are in a
particular Div?
I'd like to attach an onc
How about creating the form once and moving it to where ever it's
needed. This assumes you can only have one form displayed at a time.
Failing that. Make one form and clone it each time it's needed.
Adrian
On Oct 25, 9:15 pm, "Merlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am trying
Im not understanding. If you have that CSS, it's applied to the
id="Explanation". What do you want to add?
Glen
On 10/2/07, Johny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I have style defined like this
>
> div#Explanation{position:absolute; top:720px; width:10px; right:
> 0px;margin:40px 0 0 0;}
t; > On Sep 21, 10:01 am, "Richard D. Worth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > The change event doesn't fire until the input is blurred (focus moves
> > > > away
> > > > > from the dropdown via tab-key or mouse click elsewhere). If you want
If you want to
> > > > handle the "changes" to the selected option while they're being changed,
> > > try
> > > > keydown, keyup, or keypress.
>
> > > > - Richard
>
> > > > On 9/21/07, Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On 9/21/07, hobbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This does not seem to work for me. Could it be the version of jquery
> we are using? We are using an older version, version 1.0.3. Do you
> know if this is supported in that version?
In my code I changed jquery-latest.js to jquery-1.0.3.js an
This does not seem to work for me. Could it be the version of jquery
we are using? We are using an older version, version 1.0.3. Do you
know if this is supported in that version? I tried replacing the "//
do some stuff here" line with simply "alert("hello!");", but this
alert is not executed w
to the selected option while they're being changed,
> > try
> > > keydown, keyup, or keypress.
>
> > > - Richard
>
> > > On 9/21/07, Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I've tried this, but it does not catch change
> keydown, keyup, or keypress.
> >
> > - Richard
> >
> > On 9/21/07, Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I've tried this, but it does not catch change events trigged by the
> > >
eing changed, try
> keydown, keyup, or keypress.
>
> - Richard
>
> On 9/21/07, Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I've tried this, but it does not catch change events trigged by the
> > keyboard. Why?
>
> > Brook
>
y Matthews
> Sent: September 20, 2007 1:21 PM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: NEWBIE QUESTION: Catch Select event
>
>
> I believe you'd want the change handler.
>
> $("select").change(function() {
> //do some stuff here...
> )};
I've tried this, but it does not catch change events trigged by the
keyboard. Why?
Brook
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Matthews
Sent: September 20, 2007 1:21 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: N
I believe you'd want the change handler.
$("select").change(function() {
//do some stuff here...
)};
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of hobbit
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:22 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] NEW
$("#mySelect option")
$("#mySelect option:selected")
$("#mySelect option:selected").attr("id);
$(#mySelect")[0] //the actual dom node.
All untested, but should be ok.
Firebug in Firefox has all kinds of neat tools for this.
In the script tab, put a watch for $("#mySelect") and you can inspect t
if php's version great than 5.2.0, you may use json_encode function.
2007/9/15, Wizzud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Example (very simple!):
> /*
> * AjaxHandler.php
> */
> $myName = $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'];
> echo "Hello World, from $myName";
> ?>
>
--
http://www.goumin.com/
QQ: 443089607
QQ mail: [EM
I really think you should read through the examples given under the ajax()
documentation, and the tutorials available on Ajax (and possibly some of the
others too) - look for Tutorials on the jQuery website Documentation page.
The ajax() examples show you what needs to go in your calling program
Your php program simply 'echo's its data. That data can be HTML, XML, JSON,
etc, but whatever it is the $.ajax call needs to be aware of the type of
data expected to be returned (dataType), and it can then inspect the
returned data in its success handler and, if necessary, act on it.
Example (ve
so, I can have a testing area and I can simply include and edit
the js files to tweak code as opposed to getting it from the database and
upating the database each time.
Brook
-Original Message-----
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: Sep
On Sep 12, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Glen Lipka wrote:
Shouldn't it be child() and children() if we have parent() and
parents()?
I feel like we are mangling plural/singular rules.
I don't think so. As Richard pointed out, you can have more than one
direct child (one level down) but you can only e
Shouldn't it be child() and children() if we have parent() and parents()?
I feel like we are mangling plural/singular rules.
Glen
On 9/12/07, Richard D. Worth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/12/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am confused. Why aren't the grandchildren be
On 9/12/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am confused. Why aren't the grandchildren being included in the call
> for children()?
> Using $("#content *") gets all the grandkids. I thought parents() gets
> all the grandparents. Is children different?
$("#content").children() is equ
parent is to children
as
parents is to find("*")
That's the rough equivalence in jQuery.
--John
On 9/12/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been playing around with this.
> http://www.commadot.com/jquery/selectorChildren.php
>
> It's interesting to me how text and html act diffe
I have been playing around with this.
http://www.commadot.com/jquery/selectorChildren.php
It's interesting to me how text and html act differently in terms of
encoding and what actually shows up.
It's also interesting to see how text nodes and a div are treated.
I am confused. Why aren't the gra
On Sep 12, 10:52 pm, "Richard D. Worth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as John pointed out, html() returns innerHTML, not outer, so id="panelPreview"...> should only be expected if $('#content').html() were
> called.
Doh, of course.
/me smacks forehead.
On 9/12/07, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 12, 9:20 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > .html() only gets the innerHTML for the first matched element.
>
> i think that's what the OP is saying: the element's HTML he's getting
> back is *not* that of the first child
On Sep 12, 9:20 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .html() only gets the innerHTML for the first matched element.
i think that's what the OP is saying: the element's HTML he's getting
back is *not* that of the first child element:
> >
> >
> >
.html() only gets the innerHTML for the first matched element. What
are you trying to do with the children?
--John
On 9/12/07, Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to simply grab the children of a div. The markup is:
>
>
>
>
I am not sure, but maybe you could try to make those urls relative,
maybe that will do.
let's say your page is located at 'http://localhost:/.html',
then call the scripts like this:
also, I don't know if that's how it is in your page, but don't leave
whitespaces in the src.
On 11 sep
Can you possibly post this online? Would make it easier to debug.
Glen
On 9/10/07, Vik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm a Javascript newbie, but I do have some Javascript working, and I
> have the jQuery demo working.
>
> Here's the code I have on one of my html pages to load javascript:
>
>
I believe you can use $("p").toggle("slow"); and it will achieve the result
you are after, no need for 2 seperate functions.
On 6/15/07, Giovanni Battista Lenoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I'm a newbie in jquery please be patient :-)
I'm playin with jquery mixing some tutorials.
I'm tryi
Thanks for help Richard
What bugs me is that keydown should be fired once. I wonder if it
works for you guys that way.
I am using the flag. The flag will be assigned x times during the
keydown, which "works" however...
var SHIFTKEY_FLAG=false;
$(document).keydown( function(e){ if(e.shiftKey){ S
On 6/8/07, kotouc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
my problem is that this code returns:
keydown
keypress
keydown
keypress
keydown
keypress
keydown
keypress
keyup
jQuery 1.1.2 and FF1.5
Further running:
$('textarea').keydown(function(e){console.log(e);});
When I press and hold the key down it
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
