RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! Well, its like what Mike said. IntelliJ does literally *everything* I need done, and does it very nicely. I don't

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
Well, its like what Mike said. IntelliJ does literally *everything* I need done, and does it very nicely. I don't need all the plugins, as its out of the box functionality covers it all. I do use jEdit also, from time to time, and adding many of its plugins make it a very nice "IDE". As for

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
July 18, 2002 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! Could you (and other Eclipsers) elaborate on what components really rock, that is what features specifically? The things I like about NetBeans are: * cvs integration works wel

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Guy McArthur
Could you (and other Eclipsers) elaborate on what components really rock, that is what features specifically? The things I like about NetBeans are: * cvs integration works well * database browser is handy * xml and xsl editing support is very good - thankfully there is an option to di

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Mike Oliver
he codes. >:-) > >-Original Message- >From: Art Gramlich >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Sent: 7/18/02 11:28 AM >Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! > >Actually around here the opinions are about 50/50 on which is better. >IntelliJ seems to d

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Mike Oliver
nd of >the year, there will be no contest. > >-Original Message- >From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:29 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! > >Hmmm...I find it hard to b

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Jon Thomas
yeah Art can even read his slashdot while he codes. :-) -Original Message- From: Art Gramlich To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: 7/18/02 11:28 AM Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! Actually around here the opinions are about 50/50 on which is better. Inte

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
year, there will be no contest. -Original Message- From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! Hmmm...I find it hard to be convinced by arguments like this: it

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Thomas Hicks
Hmmm...I find it hard to be convinced by arguments like this: it's not as extensible and it costs money...but it rocks! -tom At 11:13 AM 7/18/2002 -0700, Erik wrote: >Nope. >But it rocks! > >Mike Oliver wrote: >>Is IntelliJ as modular and extensible as Eclipse? >>O

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
o >>>> make sure that you >>>> follow any instructions as some plug-ins aren't >>>> immediately visible. >>>> >>>> Hope this helps. >>>> >>>> Art >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Mike Oliver
y and >>>others don't. Just open the zip and take a look. Also >>>make sure that you >>>follow any instructions as some plug-ins aren't >>>immediately visible. >>> >>>Hope this helps. >>> >>>Art >>> >&g

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
ately visible. >> >>Hope this helps. >> >>Art >> >>-Original Message- >>From: J t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:28 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity >

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Lesiecki Nicholas
ns aren't > immediately visible. > > Hope this helps. > > Art > > -Original Message- > From: J t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity > Conti

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
visible. Hope this helps. Art -Original Message- From: J t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! On 7/17/02 6:34 PM, "Lesiecki Nicholas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-17 Thread J t
On 7/17/02 6:34 PM, "Lesiecki Nicholas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If its an archive and the root directory is plugins then extract it to /eclipse and it will probably work. This has been my experience. Peace out. Jt. > Hello, sorry to bother the group with newbie questions, but > the Eclipse

Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-17 Thread Vincent Greene
Just unpack at the root of your eclipse install (c:\eclipse) using folders and it will install itself into the proper plugin folders. You might need to restart the IDE before it takes effect. It is a pretty well hidden project. Basically, it will add an XML Editor that is linked by default to a

[jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-17 Thread Lesiecki Nicholas
Hello, sorry to bother the group with newbie questions, but the Eclipse "help" seems to primarily be designed for Eclipse developers. Ok, so I'm trying to install the solareclipse plugin, and I've tried tossing it in the root of the eclipse install and also the plugins folder, no success. So I tr