Hi Michael
I tried also the AffineTransformPlugIn (the one computing
an affine
transform from 1 to 3 vectors), but it is hard to make it
work without a
complete documentation as the menu-item stay grayed until
you have
one-active-task-one-selected-layer-and-at-least-one-at-most-three
Hi again,
Sorry for the previous mail, I finally found
AffineTransformationPlugIn
in editing menu (I should have read peppe's doc !).
I think its place is in the warping menu with the other
interactive
warping tool. I'll change it if everybody agrees.
that must be an old proposal about
Hi all,
I request a couple of modification about this tool which seems quite useful:
1) Output window: actualy mean and mode are groupped all together in the same
column output. It seems that this plugin calculate the mean only of integer
atribute tytpe an mode of the text ones. Is it possible
Hi Stefan,
What is the progress with the new (dynamic?) toolbar...
Well actually not much. I wasted a lot of time on dreams and schemes that
didn't work out. I think what is needed is a simpler method of doing the
same thing without so much overhead. I was thinking that a simple floating
There is a bit of confusion about these tools. Unless I'm mistaken, warping
is not the same as affine transform unless the number of vectors is between
1 and 3. That is why the Affine Transform under warping does not enable
unless those conditions are met. Warping uses triangulation.
The New
Hei Jukka,
thanks!
While I was going to update the wiki page now I found this nice image:
http://openjump.org/wiki/show/Shortcut+Keys+1-pager
suprise surpise...
time to link it more prominently
stefan
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
btw: Did we write down somewhere what keys can be used to do panning
ah.. I just wondered if Warping is really a rubbersheeting or if there
is some more stuff in the rubbersheeting.
stefan
Larry Becker wrote:
There is a bit of confusion about these tools. Unless I'm mistaken,
warping is not the same as affine transform unless the number of vectors
is
Ok.. but thank you for working on it.
On your idea: I can not really imagine what you are talking about, i.e.
how it would look like...
stefan
Larry Becker wrote:
Hi Stefan,
What is the progress with the new (dynamic?) toolbar...
Well actually not much. I wasted a lot of time on
mhm.. doable for sure, but would this also shorten access-time to a
function like Merge Two Polygons?
I understand it right now the way, that you right-click on that pannel
and a popup menu opens?
How about text-only-buttons stacked? like these new fancy menus in .Net
applications - but
I understand it right now the way, that you right-click on that pannel
and a popup menu opens?
No, a mode-less Geometry function dialog is almost exactly what I'm
proposing with the function being chosen from the drop-down pick list.
How about text-only-buttons stacked?
That would work too. It
BTW, SkyJUMP has a repeat last command function that we could hijack for
this toolbox. So any menu command that you execute could automatically be
added and selected.
Larry
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.comwrote:
I understand it right now the way, that you
Larry Becker a écrit :
There is a bit of confusion about these tools. Unless I'm mistaken,
warping is not the same as affine transform unless the number of
vectors is between 1 and 3. That is why the Affine Transform under
warping does not enable unless those conditions are met. Warping
I was going to commit this for Peppe, but I can't for the life of me
find where we are keeping the I18N properties files in the SVN. Can
someone remind me?
The Sunburned Surveyor
2009/2/26 Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it:
Hi,
this is an upgrade of the Italian language file. Included
Hi,
I think the big advantage of Larry's proposition is that it would
probably be simpler to implement.
From a user point of view, I think a toolbox would be more efficient
for some actions (faster, and easier to understand thanks to icons).
Larry, can you explain what are the dreams and plans
I think you're on the right track here, Larry. I thought of something
like this for providing access to JTS functions, and have actually
implemented something similar in the JTS TestBuilder. The
GeometryFunction dialog probably would have warped into something like
this with a bit more
core/src/lanuage/
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
I was going to commit this for Peppe, but I can't for the life of me
find where we are keeping the I18N properties files in the SVN. Can
someone remind me?
The Sunburned Surveyor
2009/2/26 Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it:
Hi,
this is
mhm.. I think I need to look into what the different things exactly do,
before I can give a comment.
stefan
Michaël Michaud wrote:
Larry Becker a écrit :
There is a bit of confusion about these tools. Unless I'm mistaken,
warping is not the same as affine transform unless the number of
Thanks buddy. Peppe's properties file is commited.
Thanks Peppe for maintaining the Italian language files for OJ.
SS
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Stefan Steiniger sst...@geo.uzh.ch wrote:
core/src/lanuage/
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
I was going to commit this for Peppe, but I can't for
Hei all,
I thought it would be good if we can more easily track the use of
OpenJUMP in Research. Therefore I added a wiki page on citing OJ:
http://www.openjump.org/wiki/show/Citing+OpenJUMP
I propose to cite the use of OpenJUMP in publications as follows:
OpenJUMP Development Core Team
I only wonder if we should mention The JUMP Pilot Project somewhere.
That is technically the name of our SourceForge project, and OpenJUMP
is really the name of the program we produce.
So I would tweak it this way:
OpenJUMP Development Core Team/The JUMP Pilot Project (2008): OpenJUMP
GIS - The
yep.. that is another option I was thinking about, i.e.
The JUMP Pilot Project (2008): OpenJUMP GIS - The free and open source
Java-based desktop GIS. Available from www.openjump.org. (Accessed
January 2009)
however, I would not take both as authors.
any other comments?
stefan
Sunburned
21 matches
Mail list logo
