mhm.. doable for sure, but would this also shorten access-time to a function like "Merge Two Polygons"?
I understand it right now the way, that you right-click on that pannel and a popup menu opens? How about text-only-buttons stacked? like these new fancy menus in .Net applications - but without the opening of submenus: see on the left http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Outlook_07.png Larry Becker wrote: > I was thinking of something like the attached OJ Geometry Function > dialog only mode-less (floating window). The pop-up menu would contain > functions defined by users. This way there is no need for making a > unique icon and you never run out of room on a tool pallet. Clicking > the (TBD ) button would be the same as clicking a tool icon. An example > of a custom tool might be: "Add a tree" which would input a point and > prompt for an attribute like species. > > Larry > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Stefan Steiniger <sst...@geo.uzh.ch > <mailto:sst...@geo.uzh.ch>> wrote: > > Ok.. but thank you for working on it. > > On your idea: I can not really imagine what you are talking about, i.e. > how it would look like... > > stefan > > Larry Becker wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > > > >What is the progress with the new (dynamic?) toolbar... > > > > Well actually not much. I wasted a lot of time on dreams and schemes > > that didn't work out. I think what is needed is a simpler method of > > doing the same thing without so much overhead. I was thinking that a > > simple floating window with a pop-up menu of custom tools and a > button > > to activate it might do the trick. Opinions? > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Stefan Steiniger > <sst...@geo.uzh.ch <mailto:sst...@geo.uzh.ch> > > <mailto:sst...@geo.uzh.ch <mailto:sst...@geo.uzh.ch>>> wrote: > > > > Hei Larry, > > > > on a bit different thing as you outline your current > develoment goal... > > What is the progress with the new (dynamic?) toolbar - so > could we > > include that in the next OJ 1.3? > > Or do you think it is a bit obsolete, since a Jython script > may do the > > same? (I haven't tried it yet to make a script that generates > a "merge > > two polygons" button) > > > > @Peppe (sorry for highjacking this topic): > > I have only checked the beginning of the OJ functions manual > (first 10 > > pages). It will take a few more days (weeks) till it is done > as I have > > put preference for integrating the final OJ 1.3 functionality > (Things to > > be done are i18n of the Pirol image stuff - and checking what > goes wrong > > with the referencing, and finally Michaels Attribute plugin) > > > > stefan > > > > Larry Becker schrieb: > > > >That build comes with Oracle support that is missing > from FWTools > > > binaries. > > > > > > Yes, but you do have to have an Oracle client installed, > and it it is > > > missing a few of the other formats. > > > > > > In any case, I suppose this is a detail that can be left > to the > > user to > > > resolve at install time. I hope to write my driver to > support all > > > available ogr2ogr features (although you might have to > manually type > > > some parameters). I do plan to package it up as a > separate plugin > > > bundled with binaries for Windows. It should look a > little like > > ogr2gui > > > when finished. I'm going to attempt to avoid any JUMP > specific > > > dependencies so that it could run stand-alone if desired. > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Rahkonen Jukka > > > <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>> > > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> > > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > You may have a look also at the gdal binaries coming > with ms4w > > > package http://maptools.org/ms4w/index.phtml. That build > > comes with > > > Oracle support that is missing from FWTools binaries. > > > > > > Here is the list of supported formats in FWTools 2.2.8: > > > C:\ohjelmat\FWTools2.2.8>ogr2ogr --formats > > > Supported Formats: > > > -> "ESRI Shapefile" (read/write) > > > -> "MapInfo File" (read/write) > > > -> "UK .NTF" (readonly) > > > -> "SDTS" (readonly) > > > -> "TIGER" (read/write) > > > -> "S57" (read/write) > > > -> "DGN" (read/write) > > > -> "VRT" (readonly) > > > -> "REC" (readonly) > > > -> "Memory" (read/write) > > > -> "BNA" (read/write) > > > -> "CSV" (read/write) > > > -> "NAS" (readonly) > > > -> "GML" (read/write) > > > -> "GPX" (read/write) > > > -> "KML" (read/write) > > > -> "GeoJSON" (read/write) > > > -> "Interlis 1" (read/write) > > > -> "Interlis 2" (read/write) > > > -> "GMT" (read/write) > > > -> "SQLite" (read/write) > > > -> "ODBC" (read/write) > > > -> "PGeo" (readonly) > > > -> "OGDI" (readonly) > > > -> "PostgreSQL" (read/write) > > > -> "MySQL" (read/write) > > > -> "XPlane" (readonly) > > > -> "AVCBin" (readonly) > > > -> "AVCE00" (readonly) > > > -> "Geoconcept" (read/write) > > > > > > -Jukka- > > > > > > > > > Larry Becker wrote: > > > > > > >Hi Jukka, > > > > > > >>Conversion to gml and reading that instead of > shapefiles > > would be > > > better > > > choise sometimes... > > > > > > >I agree, but it doesn't sound like GML is compatible > > between the two > > > programs: http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_gml.html > > > > > > >BTW, here is a link to all of the supported formats. > I'm > > not sure > > > how many > > > of the optional ones are compiled into FWTools, which > is the only > > > practical > > > way of getting binaries. > http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_formats.html > > > > > > >Larry > > > > > > >On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Rahkonen Jukka > > > ><jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> > > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>> > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> > > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi > <mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>>>>wrote: > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> I may be difficult to decide which of the many ogr2ogr > > options > > > will be > > > >> supported by user interface. Perhaps there could > be an empty > > > slot called > > > >> "og2oogr parameters" which just passes on > everything just as > > > user has > > > >> written. > > > >> Some formats that ogr2ogr supports may have mixed > > geometries, 3D > > > data or > > > >> several layers and making use of them simple may > also be > > a bit > > > tricky. > > > >> Conversion to gml and reading that instead of > shapefiles > > would > > > be better > > > >> choise sometimes, but OJ needs those templates. > And writing > > > OpenJUMP driver > > > >> directly into ogr2ogr would need C++ programmer, I > fear. > > > Anyway, your plan > > > >> will be a good start and it will also offer one > way to write > > > data to Oracle > > > >> and PostGIS. > > > >> > > > >> -Jukka- > > > >> > > > >> > > > > -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- > > > > Lähettäjä: Larry Becker > [mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com> <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com>>>] > > > > Lähetetty: pe 20.2.2009 22:13 > > > > Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use > > > > Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] Increased GDAL Java activity > > > > > > > > >Perhaps this could be done by simply making OS > external > > > > >process calls, rather than in-process bindings to the > > library? > > > > > > > > That is actually the path I'm investigating now. > The import > > > utility would > > > > just script ogr2ogr to put the results as > shapefiles in a temp > > > folder. > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Martin Davis > > > <mbda...@refractions.net > <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net> <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net > <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net>> > > <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net > <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net> <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net > <mailto:mbda...@refractions.net>>> > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yep, I'd agree. And for something so core to the > > application, > > > I think > > > > > it's really important to preserve the 100% Java > aspect, with > > > all the > > > > > benefits of platform-independence that it brings. > > > > > > > > > > Plus all that JNI hacking - brrrrrr! > > > > > > > > > > Format transformation is less core to the > architecture, > > so it > > > doesn't > > > > > seem unreasonable to look to GDAL to provide formats > > which are > > > > > required. Perhaps this could be done by simply > making > > OS external > > > > > process calls, rather than in-process bindings to the > > library? > > > > > > > > > > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > > > > > > Larry, > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know much about GDAL, but I'm thinking > it will > > be a > > > lot easier > > > > > > to add deegree or GeoTidy/GeoTools CRS support > to OJ. > > > > > > > > > > > > SS > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Larry Becker > > > <becker.la...@gmail.com > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com> <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com>> > > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com> <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com > <mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com>>>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> This post is continuing the debate/discussion > about > > adding OJ > > > > projection > > > > > >> support, and other interesting things that > GDAL provides. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I've noticed that Even Rouault has been giving the > > GDAL Java > > > bindings > > > > > quite > > > > > >> a workout lately. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/trunk/gdal/swig/java/apps/ > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Does this development indicate that it may no > longer > > be quite so > > > > > difficult > > > > > >> to add GDAL support to JUMP? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> regards, > > > > > >> Larry > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > > Francisco, CA > > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > > Enterprise > > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > > participation > > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > > code: SFAD > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > > _______________________________________________ > > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > > > -- > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
