Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up

2007-10-16 Thread usacox
Thank you for your reply. I configured same setting both interfaces with auto-negotiation. I am looking with no-autonegotiation configuration without its fellow after this problem. On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Sabri Berisha wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:25:27PM +0900, usacox wrote:

Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up

2007-10-16 Thread Sabri Berisha
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:51:22PM +0900, usacox wrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. I configured same setting both interfaces with auto-negotiation. I am looking with no-autonegotiation configuration without its fellow after this problem. Some devices implicitly disable

Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up

2007-10-16 Thread Brandon Bennett
When using 10 or 100. There is no such thing at 1000-half (at least defined in the standard). ~Brandon On 10/1/07, Sabri Berisha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:51:22PM +0900, usacox wrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. I configured same setting both interfaces

Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up

2007-10-16 Thread Sabri Berisha
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:18:30AM -0600, Brandon Bennett wrote: Hi, When using 10 or 100. There is no such thing at 1000-half (at least defined in the standard). That's, correct. However, the following config is valid: ge-0/0/3 { speed 100m; link-mode full-duplex;

Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up

2007-10-16 Thread usacox
Dear all, Many thanks for your replys. I am waiting under this condition with no-autonego setting a littile more. My center's default setting is auto-nego. I will suggest no-auto-negotiation for default setting. Many thanks On Oct 17, 2007, at 12:27 AM, Sabri Berisha wrote: On Tue, Oct

[j-nsp] Juniper ERX SRP Memory Question

2007-10-16 Thread Dr Rocco DiSanto
Hi all, I've been reviewing the release notes to determine if the ERX's SRPs require SODIMMs in pairs. Example: Can the SRP work with 1 512 Module installed or would it require 2 256 Meg modules to function. Any definitive information or reference to this information would be much appreciated.

Re: [j-nsp] J-series: number of policers ?

2007-10-16 Thread Anton Smith
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:24:30 +0400 From: Alexandre Snarskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [j-nsp] J-series: number of policers ? To: Juniper-NSP Mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi! J-Series

Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up

2007-10-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Paul Civati [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Personally, I have for the most part (various equipment) found that auto-neg works fine although I know that a lot of people will say to nail both ends to 100/full. There are only a couple of things that I don't leave at autoneg: - Cisco