ven't looked in a bit, but at one point Kea's built-in logging was
pretty minimal, with "ISP level" logging done as a paid add-on module.
They've got to pay the bills, but I dislike that model.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
speed 1g in the
interface.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
, but if there is a way, it might be configured under "set chassis
> pic ...", perhaps something like this:
>
> sst chassis pic fpc-slot 0 pic-slot 1 port 0 speed 10g
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 09:23:10AM -0600, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote:
> > I have
set ether-options speed, but it'll only go to 1g
on the ge-foo interface; I can set xe-foo ether-options speed 10g but it
is ignored (since the EX doesn't think it has an xe-foo interface).
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already
> running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and the v4
> VRRP switched over, but both routers think they are master for the v6
> side. Looking at "sh
-address".
>
> -Jonas
>
> Am 2022-01-25 20:51, schrieb Chris Adams via juniper-nsp:
> >I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already
> >running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and
> >the v4
> >VRRP switched over,
you have a loopback filter applied that could drop the packets?
>
> kind regards
> Rolf
>
> On 25/01/2022 20:51, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote:
> >I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already
> >running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from
}
}
}
}
protocols {
router-advertisement {
interface ae1.101 {
virtual-router-only;
}
}
vrrp {
version-3;
}
}
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://pu
S). I haven't
had any trouble with any of them on 18.1 and 18.4 JUNOS. No magic sauce
in use as far as I know.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
a problem with Juniper's.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
s over the years, but each time it
tended to be a "big deal" upgrade (versions you couldn't skip, no
downgrades without a full reload, changed behvaior, etc.).
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
).
It's my understand that the Linux kernel tends to have broader support
for new hardware than the FreeBSD kernel, but I haven't really looked in
a long time (I run Linux, not FreeBSD, so I could be wrong).
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junip
ing autoneg
or fec or the like).
Have you tried alternate optics or such?
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
e my deck of Juniper playing cards somewhere.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
s, so you could monitor
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.67. If dhcp-relay is running, that
variable should return 0.0.0.0; if not, the variable won't exist.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.ne
was that no DAC cables are supported on any MX routers.
That seems a little odd to me... I thought DAC cables are a part of the
various specs, so saying they're not supported is saying those aren't
actually Ethernet ports to me.
--
Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Mark Tinka said:
> We've had to go all the way to Junos 19 for 1Gbps optics on the MX204.
I'm using 1G optics on MX204 with 18.1. Not sure why you need to go to
19...
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> We have some route policy applied based on communities set directly on
> static routes. That works fine for us (with a 2-byte ASN), but doesn't
> appear to accept 4-byte ASN long communities. I just get an error about
> an invalid communit
this?
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
tion, so I can't just use the included lugs.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
that my UID existed and is a super-user.
:facepalm:
In other words, commit scripts (at least in python) must be owned by
root if you want them to work after an upgrade, because no other user
exists until after the script runs. This seems like a shortcoming...
--
Chris Adams
n
and picks what to look up before it gets to looking at what table you've
asked for (so adding "table inet6.0" doesn't work).
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
I can "show route " and JUNOS will do a DNS lookup and show
the route for the resolved IP. Is there any way to control that for
hosts with multiple IPs, especially IPv6?
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether
Once upon a time, Simon Lockhart said:
> On Thu May 23, 2019 at 03:15:11PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > I've seen 10G SFP+ modules inserted in 1G SFP ports, and work just fine at
> > > 1G, but I suspect it depends on using an SFP+ that's multirate.
> >
> >
Once upon a time, Simon Lockhart said:
> On Thu May 23, 2019 at 03:07:00PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Ah, okay. This may be a dumber question then: do SFP+ optics typically
> > support a 1G mode as well? I've never actually tried that (just plugged
> > a 1G SFP into th
Once upon a time, Simon Lockhart said:
> On Thu May 23, 2019 at 02:41:34PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > While looking at the Juniper port configurator for MX204 and MX10003, I
> > noticed a 4x1G selection for the QSFP+/QSFP28 ports. I haven't seen a
> > 4x1G QSFP; is tha
part either).
It's something that might be of use to me, as I'm considering a MX10003
for an application, but I'd need a small number of 1G ports as well (and
would rather not add a switch if I don't have to).
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
t;
> They don't seem to exist on either MX10003 or MX204...
What about the other newer REs that run the RE in a VM? I wonder if
that's the change.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Once upon a time, Simon Lockhart said:
> On Thu Dec 13, 2018 at 10:41:49AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Oh yeah, that of course makes sense... I didn't think of checking that.
> > On an MX204, the "power-on" option has no additional completions, so
> > probably j
Once upon a time, Thomas Bellman said:
> On 2018-12-13 16:10, Chris Adams wrote:
> > While configuring a new MX204, I noticed this:
> >
> > admin@newrouter> request vmhost power-o?
> > Possible completions:
> > power-offPowe
While configuring a new MX204, I noticed this:
admin@newrouter> request vmhost power-o?
Possible completions:
power-offPower off the software on RE
power-on Power on the system
Umm, why is there a CLI command to turn the router ON?
--
Chris Ad
I've got an old MX80 running the JTAC recommended release 15.1R7, but
that has a USB bug (PR 108) that is causing crashes. The PR says it
is fixed in 16.1R4 and 17.1R1, but I was wondering what releases other
people might be running and recommend on the MX80 these days.
--
Chris Adams
leave it running on the previously-stand-by RE?
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
raded JUNOS from 17.4 to 18.1, I think it only took about 3 minutes
from "request system reboot" until I could SSH back in to the RE
management ethernet.
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.n
was fubar. Is
there anything like that on a Juniper?
--
Chris Adams
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
the 100G ports to 40G, you get an
error "Not enough MACs left on asic EA-0".
I wish there was better documentation on exactly what is going on with
that.
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.net
Once upon a time, Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net> said:
> FiberStore tri-rate, chipped as Juniper. I'm getting a non-tri-rate SFP
> from somebody else to test and see if that's the issue.
For the archives: yes, it appears that's the issue - a third-party
EX-SFP-1GE-T links up and pa
essentially like
port-x/x/x, just without slashes... enp0s31f6 is ethernet on PCI bus 0
slot 31 function 6, so like ge-0/31/6.
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
r SFP you're using?
FiberStore tri-rate, chipped as Juniper. I'm getting a non-tri-rate SFP
from somebody else to test and see if that's the issue.
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.net
(both ends see transmits but 0 receives).
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
don't know what.
This is all Juniper (MX routers and EX switches). I'm not that
knowledgeable about multicast, so I don't know what to look at. Thanks
for any pointers/help.
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junip
fault you only get a /64 from Comcast).
I see (on OpenWRT, not JUNOS) a /128 assigned to the WAN interface and a
DHCPv6 PD /60, which OpenWRT then carves up for the local networks.
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list jun
86 to x86_64 is a big improvement.
Also, you'd only see double the RAM usage if every single thing stored
was a pointer (and no actual data was stored somehow). Since that's
obviously not the case, RAM usage would be nowhere near double.
--
Chris Ad
assuming int and pointer are the same size); that kind of bug
usually gets sorted out pretty rapidly (and would probably be changed in
the common source, not just a 64-bit fork).
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list jun
ram.
The break would be lower than that. I can't remember whether 32 bit
FreeBSD uses a 2G/2G or 3G/1G user/kernel memory split, but you
definitely can't have 4G in a single user process (PAE only extends
physical addressing, not virtual addressing used for processes).
--
Chris Adams &l
cal ports built-in. The lower models have some ports disabled by
licenses; only buy what you need today, and you can "upgrade" with a
license purchase later to enable more ports.
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
juniper-nsp mailing l
” going on. I’m
> able to connect to the console using a Cisco 2511 terminal server, as well as
> just a regular serial connection to a PC. It’s just the connection to this
> MRV console server that isn’t working. This is what I get:
Try a different port on your console server?
--
Chris
are looking for a KVM-based virtualization setup
that has more of the functionality of VMWare (not just CLI-based local
VMs), check out oVirt http://www.ovirt.org/.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
unclean-shutdown corruption). You
might have some garbled log files on the drive, as data wasn't all
flushed, but there aren't other files typically being actively written,
so everything else should be fine.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper
systems
don't operate like that (well, there are things like SMM, but that's
different).
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
-collections/qos-configuration/index.html?book-swconfig-qos-configuration.html
That's for ERX/JUNOS-E, not MX/JUNOS.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
to have their own rate.
I haven't done that before; what's the best way to do that?
This is on an MX960.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
and blame was better. :)
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
a firewall filter with a counter, you could get
stats from the firewall MIB.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
if the MX5-MX80 routers face the same eventual issue. It would
be good for Juniper to issue an official statement about this; hardware
with planned obsolescence built in is not good.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
this neighbor? It takes a while for the
routing engine to send updates to remove/replace 200k+ prefixes to the
forwarding engine.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
in between
two arbitrary ethernet devices and see for sure what is on the wire.
If the packets go through for a short time after a reboot, I'd suspect
the switch is resetting something after a link state change and then
forgetting about it after a timer runs out.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
obliged to manually authorize internal private IP
traffic used by the CLI and that doesn't even leave the RE
Another fine design...
Seems like a good case for a commit script to auto-build the filter
rule from configured NTP servers and configured loopback addresses.
--
Chris Adams c
should be the
default, with an option to disable that or allow more remote devices to
monitor your NTP.
AFAIK the only current way to fix is it firewall filter on lo0 that
limits inbound UDP port 123 to be from your NTP servers (and monitoring
system, if you monitor NTP).
--
Chris Adams c
that, and it certainly shouldn't have been sent
to manufacturing to put on shipping hardware.
--
Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
method that includes source/dest MAC, IP, and (IIRC) port (I can't
find that page again now either; my Google-fu is slipping).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
, and I'd like to get them on something newer.
We have an M10i that is not doing a lot, and I think I have seen mention
of using that platform as an LNS.
Any comments? Is this something that would work, or is it a case of
here be dragons?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network
Juniper is distributing that contains GPL-licensed
software (and what is that software)?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
, other than to apply filters to every interface?
Or am I just missing something obvious?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
, if it makes any difference.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
(so the server doesn't see them). It looks like
native-vlan-id only sets the VLAN for inbound untagged packets. How do
I get VLAN 9/misc packets sent untagged on this port?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody
unblocked
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
on Modify Your Alert Preferences.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
fast routing lookups?
SRAM is just normal RAM (address based lookups). It differs from DRAM
in that it does not need to be periodically refreshed and can operate
with lower access times.
With faster RAM, regular data structures (e.g. trie) are fast enough for
routing lookups.
--
Chris Adams cmad
While trying to solve a problem, I was wondering: is it possible to have
two trunks connected to a switch (say an EX2200), and change a VLAN ID
between them?
For example, if trunk A has VLAN 10, but I want trunk B to carry the
same traffic but in VLAN 50, is that possible?
--
Chris Adams cmad
for a trunk of 10 and 50.
Thanks, that sounds like what I'm looking for. I found this page:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=KB16755cat=JUNOS_EXactp=LIST
that mentions the EX3200 and EX4200; does anybody know if this works on
the EX2200 as well?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
behavior beyond the log message itself.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Once upon a time, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net said:
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 03:20:34 AM Chris Adams
wrote:
I've got an M10i running JUNOS 9.3R4.4 that is logging
the same error about that prefix, but it does not cause
the BGP session to flap. I'm not seeing any unusual
exist in
all x86 Juniper hardware.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Once upon a time, Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com said:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Well, that isn't entirely true. Intel added the Physical Address
Extension to the Pentium Pro many years ago (and virtually everything
claiming to be i686
the case with PPP+RADIUS, but lots of examples show Framed-MTU anyway).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
(excluding the original
packet-only 2300, 4300, and 6300).
Note that there are a few things in the filesystem that are not part of
the config that you probably want to copy over (such as SSH host keys
and possibly the interface ifIndex table).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network
Once upon a time, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net said:
I'm currently using interface, policer, and filter config like this to
rate-limit ethernet interfaces to paid bandwidth on an M10i:
I got responses from several people along the same lines, but I figured
I'd summarize my solution
different hardware
probably comes close to paying for the difference in manufacturing
costs (and then a fair number of customers will upgrade by buying a
license key over time to make up the difference).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I
(not just
some models).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Once upon a time, Serge Vautour sergevaut...@yahoo.ca said:
I'm not seeing sub-interface descriptions show up in ifAlias. Has anyone seen
this before?
No, I haven't had that problem. You didn't say what platform, JUNOS
version, etc. though.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems
.
If I ping the switch from the Linux server, the ARP request goes out
with the IP in the same subnet, the switch responds, the Linux server
gets an ARP cache entry, and communication works both ways for all IPs
until the ARP cache entry expires on the Linux side.
--
Chris Adams cmad
of the ethernet, but it still sent the ARP
request with the DNS IP as the source.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp
got all the info; I ran tcpdump on the Linux server and
monitor traffic interface me0 (which is really tcpdump) on the EX.
Both sides see the same packets; the EX just doesn't respond to the ARP
requests.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet
IP address. If your IP is in the destination field
of a request, you swap destination and source MAC and IP (putting your
MAC in the new source) and send the reply.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself
.
There's nothing in there that says to filter based on the source
protocol address (which is still just my guess as to what JUNOS is
doing).
I guess I'll try JTAC tomorrow.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody
fixed-address {
94.228.69.144;
}
boot-file pxelinux.0;
boot-server 94.228.69.77;
On an old J-series (running packet JUNOS), I have next-server, not
boot-server. I would expect that to be the same for SRX.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator
Once upon a time, Martin T m4rtn...@gmail.com said:
Ok :) Any hints? Even if I press DEL rapidly, it still continues with
normal boot process..
Make sure your serial program is sending the correct code when you hit
DEL. I believe the RE is looking for ^?, not (for example) ^[[3~.
--
Chris
equivalent) to write the install media to the CF.
You don't need to partition, mkfs, etc. The install media is a disk
image with all that done already.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's
the
timeout.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
)
But no LNS, or was that supported by way of the other platforms with LNS
support?
I think the only JUNOS LNS support is on the M120, M10i, and M7i
(haven't used it but have looked at it a couple of times).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet
Once upon a time, martin m4rti...@gmail.com said:
ok, but what do you mean by fix the software? You don't poll
interfaces by ifindex number?
My configuration references everything by interface name (e.g.
so-0/2/1) and the software translates that as needed.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
to Cricket 10+ years
ago; I configure Cricket to graph so-0/2/1, not 17. Who knows what
17 is; so-0/2/1 is pretty obvious.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
, and then if there's a problem with the
upgrade, have somebody hold the button on the front the right amount of
time to roll to the rescue config.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
and will be end of life before too long (when JUNOS 9.3 is EOL).
The smallest actual router is back to being the M7i.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
that version (or when there's a
serious problem and they don't fix it), what then?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
___
juniper-nsp mailing
it is. I don't think I've seen a problem
related to it though (although I do still think it is weird).
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble
is that I
can set what cards I actually use, and only those parts of the image are
loaded into flash. At the rate JUNOS seems to be growing, it seems like
I'm going to have to go through another round of CF card upgrades before
long.
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network
to do any kind of reset; on JUNOS, policy changes are
applied on commit (although it can take a few seconds to work through a
full BGP table).
You didn't mention what version of JUNOS you are running (always an
important thing to include when discussing possible bugs).
--
Chris Adams cmad
Once upon a time, keegan.hol...@sungard.com keegan.hol...@sungard.com said:
Maybe it's an effort at some sort of VAR relationship? I'm sure we'd all
buy more routers if they came with a large fry and some sort of toy.
Free toy inside! Free toy inside!
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
