Re: [j-nsp] Unequal-Cost Load Balancing for OSPF

No. And it's not Juniper, It is OSPF which does not support unequal cost load balancing. EIGRP supports this behavior by variance factor. If EIGRP is open atandard (not Cisco proprietry) then Juniper will also support the same feature for EIGRP. However you can use some tricks to justify your sc

Re: [j-nsp] Can't assign requested address ??

Got it. Thanks! On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Bjorn Tore Paulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wrong routing-instance? > > /BT > > > -Opprinnelig melding- > > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Farhan Jaffer >

[j-nsp] Can't assign requested address ??

Hi, I am connecting my laptop with M7i Fa ptp ip address. Ping from Laptop to M7i ptp address is fine, but reverse gives the amazing result *ping 30.40.50.2 source 30.40.50.1 ping: bind: Can't assign requested address* Even i connect this interface to switch, observing the same behavior. What is

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Is there any way to adjust MTU on tunnel OR we have to do on source interface only? I don't find any option in juniper on tunnel interfaces. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes exactly Masood. But if LDP won't work i am not able to

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

wrote: > Yea you can have established LSP without LDP. Guess how :) > > What if you are running both LDP and RSVP... ;) > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Junaid > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008

[j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Hi, I am testing connectivity over GRE tunnel, IBGP session is established, LSP is also established, however LDP session is not going to establish. Any idea? FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/lis

Re: [j-nsp] Frame Relay Show commands

xample see the interface and DLCI with some "show interface" > But you will not have some "show frame-relay pvc" commands like on other > vendor's router > > Regards > Alain > > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [

[j-nsp] VPLS in J series router?

Hi, I need to enable encapsulation vlan-vpls in J6350, but it is not supported on that platform. Is there any alternative method / trick? -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] PtP link over FR

Thanks for all. It was one mistake from my side. I used management interface ip address for routes on Juniper :) It's working fine now. Thanks again. -FJ On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > There is an interesting situation

[j-nsp] PtP link over FR

Hi, There is an interesting situation, let me discuss the scenario first, Cisco Router A (same n/w) Juniper Router -(FR point-to-point pvc) --- Cisco Router B. PVC is Active & point to point connectivity is OK. But the ping response from cisco router A to B via FR is unreachable

Re: [j-nsp] Application of L2 VPN in Real World Scenario

Hi Abhi, We are providing connectivity over MPLS cloud for customers on Ethernet via L2 VPN, by separate VLAN IDs. Other type of L2 VPNs are also there & deployed in many n/ws. -FJ On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Abhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everybody > > I have been the the JNCIS boo

[j-nsp] Frame Relay Show commands

I am using M7i with JUNOS 8.1R2.4, frame-relay basic show commands are not working on this, is there any way? Thanks in advance. -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Reliable Static Routing

D configured on both sides (like Amos said), that's to say that you need on > both sides Juniper routers or Juniper on the first side and other vendor > equipment BFD capable. > > Regards > Alain > > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

Re: [j-nsp] Reliable Static Routing

gt; can't say ping a remote address. > > Phil > > On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:35 AM, Farhan Jaffer wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there any way of reliable static routing in Juniper Routers? >> Similar as Object Tracking in Cisco. >> >> Many Thanks in advanc

[j-nsp] Reliable Static Routing

Hi, Is there any way of reliable static routing in Juniper Routers? Similar as Object Tracking in Cisco. Many Thanks in advance. -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Backup route config?

0.2 { ### > preference 10; > } > } > } > > Erdem > > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am adding backup route in Juniper router, as if in case one link is > &

[j-nsp] Backup route config?

Hi, I am adding backup route in Juniper router, as if in case one link is down, traffic shifted to backup link. When i add preference with second (backup) route, it applies on both. Like: + next-hop [ 10.0.0.2 172.16.0.2 ]; + preference 10; The purpose is same as we are doing in Cisco with inc

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF neighbor Down :: without reason

again for all feedback. Regards Farhan Jaffer On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Stefan Fouant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you 'set flag event detail' on the traceoptions within 'protocols ospf'? > You should be able to get a little more detailed information as t

[j-nsp] OSPF neighbor Down :: without reason

Hi, I am running OSPF in my n/w. Yesterday one neighbor got down & up after few seconds, i couldn't get any idea from logs. One side: rpd[3120]: RPD_OSPF_NBRDOWN: OSPF neighbor a.b.c.d state changed from Full to Down due to InActiveTimer (event reason: neighbor was inactive and declared dead) Ot

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP Ifindex persist

ng the snmp > > ifindex information remains the same between reboots > > and upgrades. I have seen rare situations where they > > have changed (e.g. upgrading between certain versions) > > but those situations are the exception and not the > > norm. > > > > Ja

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP Ifindex persist

I don't think so. When my M40e rebooted, all if indexes changed. -FJ On Jan 8, 2008 10:38 PM, Stacy W. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The equivalent functionality is enabled by default in JUNOS, and I'm > unaware of any way to turn it off. > > --Stacy > > O

[j-nsp] SNMP Ifindex persist

Is there any equivalent command of IOS '*snmp-server ifindex persist*' in JUNOS? OR any other alternate way to perform the same function? Thanks & Regards -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listin

[j-nsp] VLAN range support on MPLS based L2VPN?

Hi, I have configured MPLS based L2VPN b/w M7i & J6350, but i wondered when i noticed that only 512 VLAN ids are there to play with (using encapsulation vlan-ccc). I go through Juniper documentation & came to know about extended-vlan-ccc encapsulation option. Now three questions are there: 1) En

[j-nsp] Broadcast traffic on Juniper router?

Hi, Is there any way to send broadcast traffic from Juniper router to Juniper router? Like we can do on Cisco router interfaces by bridging & ip helper address commands. Thanks. Regards -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance b/w two or more LSPs

LOAD-BALANCE { > term t1 { > then { > load-balance per-packet; > } > } > } > } > routing-options { > forwarding-table { > export LOAD-BALANCE; > } > } > > -A >

[j-nsp] Load Balance b/w two or more LSPs

Hi, I am doing in house testing of MPLS based L2 VPN, but stuck at this position. While i doing load balancing b/w two LSPs, it's not working. Let me explain the scenaio: Two Routers (M7i & J6350) back to back connected with 2 E1s. I establish one LSP with one E1 & the other with another. Uneven

[j-nsp] Unequal Path Loadbalance in OSPF?

How to configure unequal load balacing in OSPF to the same destination via different paths ? In Cisco, we have 'variance' factor for this purpose, is there anything equivalent in Junos ? Regards -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.n

[j-nsp] Unequal Path Loadbalance in OSPF?

How to configure unequal load balacing in OSPF to the same destination via different paths ? In Cisco, we have 'variance' factor for this purpose, is there anything equivalent in Junos ? Regards -FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.ne

Re: [j-nsp] Netflow feature for Juniper ?

i have to know any alternatives or much detial about it. Thanks Farhan Jaffer On 12/19/06, Ariff Premji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What type of accounting feature do you want to run ? > There are some nice features that allow you to count pkts to/from AS > numbers, commu

Re: [j-nsp] Netflow feature for Juniper ?

Many thanks to all your reply . It's running now, under the same config i have posted. I made a bit mistake in the netflow tool. Now for the next ques, any comments?? I want to run accounting feature on the same M7i. Regards Farhan Jaffer On 12/16/06, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [j-nsp] Netflow feature for Juniper ?

Thanks Aaron. I believe this config is enough for filter 'all'. firewall { filter all { term all { then { sample; accept; } } } } What do u say? Regards Farhan Jaffer On 12/16/06, Aaron Dewell <[EM

[j-nsp] Netflow feature for Juniper ?

rate 100; } } output { cflowd 10.0.0.100 { port 9800; version 5; } } } } Any comments ?? Thanks in advance. -- Regards, Farhan Jaffer ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.