Re: [j-nsp] BGP route announcements and Blackholes

Don't really follow this either. Aggregate routes should use a discard NH - I always tend not to use the aggregate route type and simply use static routes with discard NH and attach the BGP communities I need directly to them, but I don't see how this is an issue in your case. Are you saying when

Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

Help me out a bit... I've used a lot of proxy-arp and bridging (never at the same time...!) in the past on bridged consumer services... simple stuff. To evaluate a proxy-arp config, I'd want the IPs of a sample host and your offnet host, and routing and ARP tables in addition to the interface

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

VRRP[3]. MX150 is based on vMX plus x86 & BRCDM, so this PR should also be relevant for MX150. The actual problem was already solved with PR1351981, unfortunately only for IPv4 VRRP MAC addresses. .peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list ju

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 Maximum Packet Rates

Hi Leon, both MX204 und MX10003/LC2103 use eagle forwarding ASIC, LC2103 Linecard has 3xASIC, MX204 has 1xASIC, WAN Output Rate for eagle pfe is for 100G Interface ~110 MPPS. Assumption is, that you got the traffic on the MX10003 over more than one PFE/ASIC incoming. BR, .peter On 20.05.21

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN with IRB and static routing

route. BR, .peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN with IRB and static routing

, try to deactivate CNH for family evpn ingress, export Host routes via routing policy, install the static route with the option "resolve" and "longest-match". Thx, .peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [j-nsp] error: the ethernet-link-fault-management subsystem is not running on a EX2300

Hi, Am 01.03.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Valentini, Lucio: Any clue? EX2300 and EX3400 are not supporting LFM, CFM at FRS. .peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

Thanks for all the feedback! >-Original Message- >From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] >Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:17 AM >To: Peter Sikora ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104 > > >The MX104 is slo

[j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

Hi, currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we want to update them soon. If possible I want to install a newer release than 13.3. Does somebody of you have experiences with 15.1 or 14.2 and that device types? Thanks for your help! Best regards, Peter Peter Sikora

[j-nsp] (no subject)

Swssr -- Sent from Mobile ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MPC2E vs MPC2E NG

~130GBit/s for MPC2E-NG 80GBit/s) lookup chip: XL based (FIB with 64 Bit Junos 10M) flexible QoS 32K Queues (non Q) -Q 512K Queues New Filter Architecture (Offloading to filter block) better performance at smaller packet site Regards, .peter

Re: [j-nsp] Junos load balancing question

Hi James, > On 23 Sep 2015, at 15:29, james list wrote: > > hello Peter, > thank you. > > On that url I do not see how control packets are threated, do you say are > threated as per the other passing through traffic and hashed in the same way ? I don’t think there will

Re: [j-nsp] upgrading a ex4550 VC to 15R1.8 using non-stop-upgrade

L. So you could upgrade form 12.3 to 14.1 (I’m not sure if ISSU is supported in this path as well). [1] http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos15.1/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/15.1/topic-83365.html#rn-junos-ex-migration-u

Re: [j-nsp] EX4300 and full-duplex-only

> On 23 Sep 2015, at 15:30, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Really? So you can't use EX4300 at 10 Mbps (I don't know of any > devices that support 10/Full)? If this is true, it is a > purchase-stopper for us. > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:58:36PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: >> Does anyone know the ba

Re: [j-nsp] Junos load balancing question

e two interface (example the one with lower id), or > round robin, or hashed ? > > Any url reference is appreciated ? I think you’re looking for something like this for EX series: http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB22943 I don’t known how

Re: [j-nsp] eBGP Failover

Possible options : 1) link bundling technologies And run single ebgp session over the bundle 2) two ebgp sessions with shorter keep Alive 3) two ebgp sessions with bfd Sent from a mobile . On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > Hi all > I have a case where my router is connected

Re: [j-nsp] Aggregate policer config

have you considered writing an event script for this ? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Crocker wrote: > > Hello, > > A customer with two connections to my mx240. I want to police their total > bandwidth to 800mbps. Right now I have a 800mbps policer but that gives them > 800mbps on

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 redundant RE and virtual-chassis

;s, one on each unit. -- Kind regards, Peter Tavenier > Op 21 mrt. 2015 om 17:07 heeft Nitzan Tzelniker > het volgende geschreven: > > AFAIK The second RE is spawn only during the upgrade and shutdown after the > upgrade > > Nitzan > > > On Sat, M

Re: [j-nsp] L2Circuit with BGP/LDP

you can try enabling labeled-unicast address family for family inet under bgp and advertise the loopbacks over that session. so the transport label will be signalled using BGP , then you can do a targeted LDP session between the loobacks of both PEs and then configure L2ciruit to exchange the VC la

[j-nsp] SRX5800 changing flow distribution

, Peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Export Inactive BGP routes with the best route is a BGP Route.

have you looked at add-path option ? http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/example/bpg-add-path.html On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Peter Ehiwe wrote: > Let them peer with the transit provider directly , (ebgp multihop maybe ) > or give them a leased circuit

Re: [j-nsp] Export Inactive BGP routes with the best route is a BGP Route.

of you know any work around for this situation? It´s pretty common on > IOS. > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-

Re: [j-nsp] config msti vlan range?

Just use the command with 'vlan 1-10' http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.1/topics/reference/configuration-statement/vlan-edit-protocols-mstp.html Kind regards, Peter > Op 22 jul. 2014 om 05:22 heeft Victor Sudakov het > volgende geschreven: > > Colleague

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

Sorry, fat Fingers. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

at PR603468, Title MX80: System crashed after using system snapshot multiple times resulting in DA0 corruption and stuck during boot. Release Note: Under certain circumstances,MX80 may crash when using the command "request system snapshot". Resolved In 10.4R

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

and stuck during boot. Resolved In:10.4R14 11.4R7 11.4R8 12.1R6 12.2R4 12.3R1 12.3R2 13.2R1 Regards, .peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

and stuck during boot. Release Note: Under certain circumstances,MX80 may crash when using the command "request system snapshot". Resolved In 10.4R14 11.4R7 11.4R8 12.1R6 12.2R4 12.3R1 12.3R2 13.2R1 Hth, .peter signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

Re: [j-nsp] RIB -> FIB filtering.

Hi, I think no one made an argument for not doing it that way.. I will deploy the RIB->FIB filtering tomorrow morning during our maintenance window, i hope everything goes well. Thank you all for your input. Kind regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juni

Re: [j-nsp] RIB -> FIB filtering.

twork performs every role. ,Peter From: Morgan McLean Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 4:32 PM To: Peter Krupl Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RIB -> FIB filtering. Can you establish a separate bgp neighbor and use a different routing instan

[j-nsp] RIB -> FIB filtering.

e approach ? Your opinion is appreciated. Alternative approaches ? Kind regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] AppSecure AppTrack

ect internals are in a state of flux as I rework ideas and as such I wouldn't curse anyone with it. If you're really keen on nfsen for now jflow would give you the basic IP info, failing that Splunk/greylog might do in the short term? P. -- Peter Wood Network Security Specialis

Re: [j-nsp] Spanning Tree Inconsistent State

ing daemon), that's where spanning tree processing happens, but that is definitely impacting. Best regards, Peter Tavenier > Op 3 okt. 2013 om 01:50 heeft Crist Clark het volgende > geschreven: > > I am a little confused about the spanning tree state on an EX4200 VC, > runnin

Re: [j-nsp] BOOTP helper on MX vrf

sen / Kind regards Peter Krüpl Network Specialist Tel: +45 88805242 Siminn Danmark A/S -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sebastian Wiesinger Sent: 13. juni 2013 13:03 To: Juniper NSP Subject: [j-nsp] BOOTP helper on MX vrf Hello,

Re: [j-nsp] SRX 3600 dropped packets - how to debug?

lines of "You want me to enable full flow debugging on three SPC's collectively pushing 8Gbps!?!"). Also you using anything like AppTrack and AppFW/AppQos/AppDos? I've unfortunately had a fair amount of experience with datapath debugs, so feel free to give me a shout off li

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX4550

Hi Suginto, We're running EX4550-32F with 1G and 10G SFP's. no problem to use this switch in mixed mode. Best regards, Peter Op 13 mei 2013, om 05:19 heeft Suginto Hung het volgende geschreven: > Hi everyone, > > I have experience on EX4200, For EX4200, we can only u

[j-nsp] MPC(MX80) + DPCE-R firewall filter cpacity

rface speciffic filters ? I assume that the limit must be in the Trio or Ichip on each DPC or MPC, right ? How can I check resource usage ? Kind regards, Peter Krüpl Network Specialist Tel: +45 88805242 Siminn Danmark A/S ___ juniper-nsp mailing l

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 generates power supply and fan alarms when environment is good

, jnxContentsL3Index 0, jnxContentsDescr Power Supply: Power Supply 4 @ 0/4/*, jnxOperatingState/Temp 1) Kind regards, Peter Tavenier Op 24 mrt. 2013, om 12:48 heeft Peter Tavenier het volgende geschreven: > I got the two PR numbers (PR842933, PR858565) for this issues which will be > fi

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 generates power supply and fan alarms when environment is good

I got the two PR numbers (PR842933, PR858565) for this issues which will be fixed in 12.3R2. Which other problems do 12.3 have with the chassisd process? Kind regards, Peter Tavenier Op 22 mrt. 2013, om 22:09 heeft Giuliano het volgende geschreven: > Never mind about 12.3 > &g

[j-nsp] EX4200 generates power supply and fan alarms when environment is good

OK Spinning at normal speed FPC 0 Fan 3OK Spinning at normal speed {master:0} petert@mnz-bascule03-sw01> show chassis alarms No alarms currently active Is this a bug of did I configure something incorrect? With kind regards, Peter Ta

Re: [j-nsp] ability to turn USB port on/off for MX routing engine?

MX 960 (both on 11.4) shows that binary is missing. If the command were to exist something like this should work: /usr/sbin/usbconfig -u 0 -a 2 power_off P. -- Peter Wood Network Security Specialist Information Systems Services Lancaster University __

Re: [j-nsp] L2 Circuits accross domains

Dear All, Thanks, works fine now just any issue of over working and not looking at the finer details. Best Regards, Peter Nyamukusa Technical Manager | SimbaNET (T) Cell: +255685110455 Email: pet...@simbanet.co.tz Sent from my iPad On 21 Nov 2012, at 12:32, Fernando Garcia Fernandez wrote

Re: [j-nsp] Fw: L2 Circuits accross domains

Thanks Alex, I had already redistibuted all my loopback into my IGP and all were reachable   | Kind Regards, | | Peter Nyamukusa| | MCSE-2000/2003, CCNP, CCIP

[j-nsp] Fw: L2 Circuits accross domains

- Forwarded Message - From: Peter Nyamukusa To: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:33 AM Subject: L2 Circuits accross domains Hi Folks, I have an exsisting L3 / L2 MPLS network with Cisco ASR on the Core as PE router and Junper routers as PE

[j-nsp] L2 Circuits accross domains

protocols l2circuit] peter@xxx-PE1# show } neighbor 41.x.x.1 {     interface ge-0/0/2.2001 {     virtual-circuit-id 2001;     description "XYZ L2";     no-control-word;     ignore-mtu-mismatch; [edit interfaces ge-0/0/2] peter@xxx-PE1# show description "Customers L2

[j-nsp] How-to flash RE BIOS (U-Boot+loader) on bricked SRX650 SRE6

After a hang and power cycle during a "request system firmware upgrade re bios" I have a SRE6 RE with no leds and no u-boot prompt. Is this an RMA or does someone know the incantation required to re-flash the bios ? BTW, it's not a h/w issue, the RE worked before, it's a classic bricked bios

[j-nsp] IPFix export behavoiur on MX80

-server 10.20.126.2 version-ipfix template ipv4 set instance sample-1 family inet output inline-jflow source-address 10.20.126.200 Kind Regards, Peter Krupl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] OSPF + ipsec asymmetric routing on SRX ?

Hello, I have 4 SRX 240, two on each side, i can't use cluster. I have to run ospf over ipsec between sites. There will be a problem if asymmetric routing will occur ? I made some lab and test via icmp. I noticed when was asymmetric route some packets was blocked until i made ping originat

[j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006

plane - and few others things on bgp edge which model will be better ? thanks for some advice regards Peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] ERX, and placing DHCP subscribers into VRF with Radius

Hi List, I have been searching for a solution on how to use radius to place dhcp subscribers into a vrf on an ERX. I have found small threads here and there, but none with a complete solution. Is anyone on the list actually doing this ? Kind Regards, Peter Krupl

[j-nsp] Join my network on LinkedIn

LinkedIn Peter Chon ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: -- I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. Aceptar invitación de Peter Chon http://www.linkedin.com/e/u96119-guigx

[j-nsp] Join my network on LinkedIn

LinkedIn Peter Chon ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: -- I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. Aceptar invitación de Peter Chon http://www.linkedin.com/e/u96119-guigxc

[j-nsp] Force IP traffic not to use the LSP path when enabling ISIS Traffic Engineering with Shortcuts

traffic will continue to used inet.0 as we enable the ISIS traffic engineering feature. We observed a disruption in our IP traffic when we enabled the traffic engineering feature possibly due to the fact in the change of the forwarding path to the LSP. Regards, Peter

Re: [j-nsp] Issue with pseudo-wire attempting to establish across non LSP path

, metric2 1 Indirect 72.22.160.240:10002:1:1/96 *[BGP/170] 2d 06:26:01, localpref 100, from 72.22.160.241 AS path: I > to 72.22.160.12 via ge-0/0/9.0 **notice pw trying to establish across IGP \ non LSP path.** Reg

[j-nsp] Issue with pseudo-wire attempting to establish across non LSP path

restrict pseudo-wires from trying to establish connections across a path without an established LSP path across the connection? Regards, Peter Kalogerakos ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

[j-nsp] jnxBgpM2PeerRoutingInstance, which vrf it is pointing to.

Hi, On an MX running 10.4 the snmp agent supports the OID: jnxBgpM2PeerRoutingInstance. After days of research it still can't figure out how to figure out which VRF each bgp peering belongs to. Can anyone shed some light on this ? Kind regards, Peter

Re: [j-nsp] Arp entries not showing on IRB interfaces.

Hi, I just figured it out The arp entry is created for the LSI interface or the local ports participating in a bridging or vpls instance. And not the BVI interface. Quite counter intuitive in my opinion. Kind regards, Peter Krupl > -Original Message- > From: Hentati,

[j-nsp] Arp entries not showing on IRB interfaces.

set routing-instances e101 routing-interface irb.101 Is this something that has been previously observed by anyone ? Everything seems to be working just fine. Kind regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [j-nsp] BGP multihop problem - ERX310

. Explicitly setting the source of your ping would help. Kind regards, Peter Krupl > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart > Sent: 03. May, 2011 01:19 > To: 'juniper-nsp Lis

Re: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

matched in a "chained" Policy. Please disregard my previous post, my finger slipped while moving the mouse over the send button. Kind Regards, Peter Krüpl > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net] > Sendt: 30. april 2011

Re: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

> -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net] > Sendt: 30. april 2011 17:48 > Til: Peter Krupl; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Emne: RE: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome > > > -Original Message- &g

[j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

hould be like [ policy2 policy3 ]. Anyone got a better solution ? Or even a practical example, that is easy to maintain ? Kind Regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] msdpc example configs...

. Im only sampling IPv4 from a single vrf. Kind regards, Peter Krupl Siminn Danmark A/S > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of OBrien, Will > Sent: 26. April, 2011 20:34 > To: J NSP

Re: [j-nsp] Tower top switch/router recommendation..

more difficult to solve.. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com -Original Message- From: OBrien, Will [mailto:obri...@missouri.edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 3:26 PM To: Peter Kranz Cc: Pavel Lunin; juniper-nsp@puck.net

Re: [j-nsp] Tower top switch/router recommendation..

Hi Pavel, Each customer is on a separate non-overlapping subnet, but NOT on a different VLAN generally.. So filtering at the subnet level is easy.. does this change your response at all? Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-161

Re: [j-nsp] Tower top switch/router recommendation..

, only allowed to specify burst in terms of burst-size.. I need a way to ensure a customer gets their CIR at all times, and if adequate extra BW available, they can burst to a higher (but limited to a specified MIR) bandwidth.. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207

Re: [j-nsp] Tower top switch/router recommendation..

CIR, burstable to 15 Mbps as long as resources are available.. If both customers attempt 15 Mbps at the same time, the switch should give each 10 Mbps.. Easy to do in HTB using RATE= and CEIL= statements, but I can't figure out how to do it in JunOS.. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 51

Re: [j-nsp] Tower top switch/router recommendation..

It seems like on the EX platform, I would need each customer in a separate VLAN for this to work (All customers on one port are on the same VLAN, and only split by subnets).. Also don't see how one goes about setting up a MIR.. CIR seems straight forward.. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk

[j-nsp] Tower top switch/router recommendation..

problems.. Possible with Juniper? Is so, what device, and what QOS rules? Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@p

Re: [j-nsp] Enquiry on EX series MPLS & SNMP

version 10.3R1.9 on an EX4200. But if you want to use it as static LSP box, why not graph the (sub)interfaces instead ? Kind regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] BGP path selection criteria per vrf ?

rf ? Kind Regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Cisco 7206 replacement

luding L3-ADV license, Queuing, Inline Jflow, Junos WW. (4x10G fixed ports and 1x front empty MIC slot restricted) Kind Regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Ex4200 interface-switch

Ok. But the connection is not forwarding any traffic. So is this a bug in 10.2R1.8 & 10.3R1.9 (the ones I have tested ) ? Or worse... is this unsupported ? Kind Regards, Peter Krupl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net h

Re: [j-nsp] Filtering of routes from VRF to other PE's

1234>89.233.11.65I * 10.0.0.2/32D 0 >lo0.666 Kind Regards, Peter Krupl > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Krupl > Sent: 24. November, 2010

[j-nsp] Filtering of routes from VRF to other PE's

ve searched other threads in this forum, and found the "vpn-apply-export" option. Which should be disabled as im neither peering eBGP or running RR on the PE in question. . And I do not need to both apply the vrf-export, and then the bgp-export policies at the same time. Any hits or s

Re: [j-nsp] 1000BASE-T SFP sets interface status "up" once inserted into EX4200-24F

n/a 23GIGE 1000Tn/a Methode Elec. SP7041-M1-JN n/a Kind Regards, Peter Krupl Siminn Danmark A/S > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Martin T &

Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

Hi, Yes we are running CCC's on the EX4200's. ,Peter > -Original Message- > From: Michael Damkot > Sent: 23. September, 2010 13:56 > To: Peter Krupl > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching.

Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

Hi Micael, I sent a simplified version of my config. The reason we are using "vlan-tagging", is that we are doing a lot of CCC's on the boxes. So ethernet switching is not an option for us. Kind Regards, Peter > -Original Message- > From: Michael Damkot > Sent

[j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

? Kind Regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MS-DPC and netflow.

mpls-template; } template mpls-ipv4 { mpls-ipv4-template; } } } . } ---CONFIG--- Kind Regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- Fr

[j-nsp] MS-DPC and netflow.

port 9990; version9 { template { ip-template; } } } interface sp-1/0/0 { source-address 1.1.1.1; } } } } Kind regards, P

Re: [j-nsp] GRE & Bridging, is it possible with a Juniper box ?

ow im looking into L2TP as an alternative. But the One-Access 1221 & 1424 are supporting ethernet over GRE. Kind Regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Derick Winkworth Sent: Friday, June

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 to IPv4 NAT on the MS-DPC

-DPC, as a virtual firewall device is not a feasible solution. Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netværksspecialist Teknik Kundeservice +45 7026 2300 Fax +45 7026 2301 Siminn Danmark A/S Stationsparken 25 . 2600 Glostrup . Danmark . siminn.dk -Original Message- From: Chris Grundemann [mailt

Re: [j-nsp] GRE & Bridging, is it possible with a Juniper box ?

Hi, That would not be an option form me. As I have several CPE devices (One-Access 1221 & 1424), supporting bridged GRE deployed. But I think there is some hope, I could try to find a cheap tunnels services module for our ERX310's. Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netværksspeciali

[j-nsp] GRE & Bridging, is it possible with a Juniper box ?

Hi, I have looked through the Juniper doc's for GRE with bridging. But it doesn't seem to exist at all. Is is possible ? Can I do it on a MX/MS-DPC or another Juniper box ? Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netværksspecialist Teknik Direkte +45 3525 4752 Mobil  Kundeservice +45 7026 23

[j-nsp] IPv6 to IPv4 NAT on the MS-DPC

1/128 set services nat rule vrf3_to_vrf1 term 1 then translated translation-type source static set services nat rule vrf3_to_vrf1 term 1 then translated translation-type destination static Kind Reagards, Peter Krupl Netværksspecialist Teknik Direkte +45 3525 4752 Mobil  Kundeservice +

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 questions

so far. I think the restriction is that the EX only can manipulate the MPLS top label. We skipped the virtual chassis stuff for now, but we might consider to use it in the future. This device is a cisco killer, when it comes to access aggregation. I love it. Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netvæ

[j-nsp] MS-DPC, Nat between IPv6 and IPv4.

ource is within different VRF's 1. Same source, means all CE devices have the same configuration for management. 2. To make sure that there is no addressing conflict within the customer vrf's I want to use public IP's, allocating different IP's to each VRf would be a waste of IP

Re: [j-nsp] bgp policy

Hi Raheel, Can you show how you are applying the policies and also give us a "show route x.x.150/23" so we can if the route is being properly accepted and is a candidate for advertisement? I assume this is an export policy toward your transit provider(s)? I'm not sure if you know, but there is a

Re: [j-nsp] Shaping on regular PIC

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Ramesh Karki wrote: > Dear Truman > > Thanks for clearity. We are using policers with limited brust size. I was > just wondering whether shaping can be done using DiffServ or not. I have > tried using classifer or scheduling but didn't get succcess. Hi Ramesh, I

Re: [j-nsp] Announcing aggregate route via BGP to peers

Hi John, I'm not exactly sure what the issue is, but if you just want to leak a single aggregate route, just use a static route. I very rarely use the "aggregate" route facility unless I really want dynamic aggregates. Most times, a static one (pointed to discard) works well. Pete On Tue, Mar

Re: [j-nsp] network engineering

[...] > I guess you could do filter based forwarding to rectify > this behavior, but it seem a little like putting out a > match with a firehose. It's tough to design a simple yet consistent filter-based solution; on the other hand, VRs/VRFs are self-consistent in this respect.

Re: [j-nsp] network engineering

onses out the zone (thinking about it, I haven't checked to see if it keeps flow state per-interface when the zone contains multiple interfaces) on which the request arrived. When it's necessary, it makes for a simpler config. I

Re: [j-nsp] RAM for J2300

Theoretically the chipset will support >1GB, but I haven't tried more in the J2300. While the forwarding process sucks up a tremendous amount or RAM, I doubt >1GB (to achieve >512MB free when idle/unconfigured) would buy you much. [...] Peter E. Fry ___

Re: [j-nsp] Router selection, Juniper intro

to fit a J series until you look closely at QoS on that chassis, if QoS is a concern. Naturally, if you could justify the budget you could do a lot worse than an M series. I have to disagree with Ben about the NPE-300, though -- for the price of one of those you

Re: [j-nsp] multiple bgp routing tables

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Ying Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious, if use "filter-based forwarding" with multiple bgp routing > tables from multiple ISPs, in case ISP-1 peer is down, will the other ISPs > become backup links for these prefixes used to destine to ISP-1? JUNOS all

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Hold time expiry

27;d just drop the IP MTU on the Cisco to 1500B. I imagine it worked with Cisco CPE because the Cisco would advertise a 1460B MSS on serial links, and I'll bet the Juniper advertises... more. After all these years I finally have a link on which I can investigate this -- I may just get off

Re: [j-nsp] M-320 Alerts

JTAC said it's either hardware (mostly PIC) or Cable issue. I replaced fiber, XENPACK and PIC but the alerts came back. Thanks, Peter On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Vineet Venugopal < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi Peter > > Can you clean teh fiber connected on this p

[j-nsp] M-320 Alerts

, Peter -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People will forget what you said, People will forget what you did, But people will never forget how you made them feel. ___ junipe

Re: [j-nsp] Getting started with Juniper

ain you can actually register your product. But the fees look pretty reasonable (the unhappy USD helps, I imagine). Me, I find that Cisco and Juniper both have advantages and disadvantages. CE QoS/queueing is my latest peeve -- neither can match a decent CBQ or HFSC setup. Peter E. Fry ___

Re: [j-nsp] ATM VC Reserved

elieve some may be publicly available). As to why Juniper would threaten to do more than drop a warning about it, it could be an attempt at behavior modification. I doubt they have a SAR that doesn't allow reserved assignments; they may wish to avoid potential collisions. Peter E. Fry __

  1   2   >