Re: [j-nsp] AE Bundle Load Balancing | EX series

. Regards, Ramesh On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Bill Blackford bblackf...@nwresd.k12.or.us wrote: How would I determine the load balancing method in use for aggregated Ethernet bundles, what the choices are and how to change? Thanks, -b -- Bill Blackford Senior Network Engineer

Re: [j-nsp] Why family Ethernet Switching under unit 0

I correct myself, there can be many units on a physical interface with inet defined. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ramesh rameshb...@gmail.com wrote: This is by design. Since having more than one unit's would not make sense on family ethernet switching, one special unit had to be defined

Re: [j-nsp] Why family Ethernet Switching under unit 0

This is by design. Since having more than one unit's would not make sense on family ethernet switching, one special unit had to be defined. So I guess they went with 0. On family inet, there can be many more than one units. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Muhammad Rehan

Re: [j-nsp] STP in EX4200 Virtual Chassis

juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- B. Ramesh 408-409-4358 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Sampling filter with ifIndex

Is there anyone who have came across this type of issue? Thank You, Ramesh ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

Hi Nilesh, yes, I can still see the DA rejects slightly increasing on interface connected to Cisco VXR. show interfaces fe-0/1/0 extensive | match DA Input DA rejects 812 this output is of after 3 hours after cleared. Thanks, Ramesh On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:11 AM

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

Hi all, The issue is resolved now after restarting RPD. Thank you all for helping me to resolve the issue, really very appreciated. thank you, Ramesh On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 09:59, Serge Vautour sergevaut...@yahoo.ca

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

interval is 0 milliseconds ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. Have a query that is, why even the static route didn't worked on the box? Thank you, Ramesh On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:56 PM

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

Nilesh, Give me few minute I will get back to you. ramesh On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Nilesh Khambal nkham...@juniper.netwrote: Ramesh, Do you see cisco neighbor in show ipv6 neighbors? Thanks, Nilesh On 4/4/10 11:32 PM, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Antonio

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

Hi Nilesh, Herewith, I have attached the output file. please go through the file. thank you, Ramesh On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Nilesh Khambal nkham...@juniper.netwrote: Ramesh, Do you see cisco neighbor in show ipv6 neighbors? Thanks, Nilesh On 4/4/10 11:32 PM, Ramesh Karki

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

: can you show us your ospf and ospf3 configuration? Also, have you specified router-id under routing-options? Thanks, Nilesh -Original Message- From: Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com Subj: Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing Date: Sat Apr 3, 2010 10:52 pm Size: 1K To: mti

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

BDR 0.0.0.10 x.x.192.4x.x.192.1 1 but the same interface configured for ospf3 outcome is unexpected. show ospf3 interface fe-0/1/0.0 OSPF instance is not running Thank you, Ramesh On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote: On Friday 02

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

ping works over the interface? Thanks, Serge - Original Message From: Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com To: Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wed, March 31, 2010 4:54:29 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing Hi, Similar ospf config between

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

Hi Muhammad Aamir, I have configured the router-id in routing-option. show configuration routing-options | match router-id router-id x.x.192.1 thank you, On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Muhammad Aamir aamirw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ramesh, Can you check if you have configured the 32 bit

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

. whatever routing protocol (static/ospf) of ipv6 routing is completely paralyzed in m10i,its sucking me. Thank you, On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net wrote: On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki wrote: Similar ospf config between cisco to cisco is okay there is not any

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

it is on the same interface. eg. interface fe-0/1/0 has been configured for both v4 and v6. thank you, On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net wrote: On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki wrote: Is your ospf config similar for both IPv4 and IPv6? Do we need

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

doc on the web too.. Chris, This is my productions box, so I can restart the rpd process only on our regular maintains day. thank you, Ramesh On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 09:59, Serge Vautour sergevaut...@yahoo.ca wrote

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

: Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com To: Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.com Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Serge Vautour se...@nbnet.nb.ca Sent: Thu, April 1, 2010 2:07:02 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing Hi Serge, Are you able to ping your Cisco router's FF80 address? Yes I can ping

[j-nsp] ipv6 routing

Hello all, Can someone help me why my ipv6 routes is not activating on intet6.0 table ? Scenario : C720x -L2-SwM10i Static route from Cisco to M10i Lo0 ip is okay. but static route from M10i to 720x Lo0 is not showing on routing table and it is not working. There is no problem

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

. The command show route table inet6.0 only shows the direct and connected route. thank you, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote: On Wednesday 31 March 2010 03:20:28 pm Ramesh Karki wrote: Static route from Cisco to M10i Lo0 ip is okay. but static route

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

hello, I am still waiting the response ..is there anyone have faced the same problem ?? Thank you, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, here is my config : sh conf int ge-0/0/0 description ; unit 0 { family inet { address

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

via lo0.0 I have tried run ospf3 but no luck, the command show ospf3 interface ge-0/0/0.0 says “OSPF instance is not running” On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote: On Wednesday 31 March 2010 04:06:55 pm Ramesh Karki wrote: Hi

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

via lo0.0 I have also tried to run ospf3 but no luck, the command show ospf3 interface ge-0/0/0.0 says “OSPF instance is not running” Thank you, Ramesh On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, yes, I can ping my neighbor or next-hop

Re: [j-nsp] ipv6 routing

/0/0.0 { metric 10; am I missing anything ?? My curiosity : when I execute the command run show ospf3 interface ge-0/0/0.0 it says - “OSPF instance is not running” ?? Thank you, On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net wrote: On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki

Re: [j-nsp] Sampling Traffic Problem--- Urgent

hello, I have configured sampling traffic input on all the interfaces, and configured forwarding-option with max-packet per second 7000, rate 100 and run-length 0, means 1 packet out of 100. I am using RE based sampling. On the server side we are using flow-tool FlowScan as a data collector. In

Re: [j-nsp] Shaping on regular PIC

Dear Truman Thanks for clearity. We are using policers with limited brust size. I was just wondering whether shaping can be done using DiffServ or not. I have tried using classifer or scheduling but didn't get succcess. Thank You Regards, Ramesh On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Truman Boyes

Re: [j-nsp] Shaping on regular PIC

upto 128K. Thank You Regards, Ramesh On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, I m trying to shape traffic on Regular 4FE-PIC with JunOS 9.2. I think shaping on regular PIC can only be done using DiffServe queue. if someone have already done

[j-nsp] Shaping on regular PIC

Hi experts, I m trying to shape traffic on Regular 4FE-PIC with JunOS 9.2. I think shaping on regular PIC can only be done using DiffServe queue. if someone have already done or configured, configuration will be really appreciated. Thank you, Ramesh

Re: [j-nsp] BGP strange problem on M10i

help will be appreciated. Thank you Ramesh On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Nalkhande Tarique Abbas ntari...@juniper.net wrote: If you have NSR configured, then have a look at PR/396291 Thanks Regards, Tarique A. Nalkhande -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun

Re: [j-nsp] PBR config help

192.168.10.0/24 JunOS#set firewall family inet filter via-WAN2 term 1 then then routing-instance pbr-test JunOS#set firewall family inet filter via-WAN2 term 2 then accept JunOS#commit JunOS#interfaces ge-0/0/2 unit 0 family inet filter input via-WAN2 JunOS#commit Thank you, Ramesh On Sat, Nov 14

[j-nsp] BGP strange problem on M10i

. Last time when we had deactivated BGP, it wasn't updated-( BGP remained active). Only after rebooting the RE, the router operates as configured. If anyone has faced similar issue, I would appreciated any sort of help in this regard. Thank you, Ramesh Karki

Re: [j-nsp] BGP strange problem on M10i

then only it takes on effect. Currently we peering with Tier One1 ISP with two location (Multi-homing to the single AS), and got a full BGP table from both side. Thank you Ramesh. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Once upon a time, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com