Hi,
Thank you for your kind Response.
The issue is on Sampling traffic filter by interface “ifIndex” on JunOS 9.2
running on M10i. I have flow collector called “RansNet MNA” running on my
VM, it has many options to filter the traffic and get output, but I am
having problem on ifIndex filter with
, Nilesh Khambal wrote:
> Ramesh,
>
> Just curious. Do you still see the earlier mentioned DA rejects, policed
> discards after restarting RPD?
>
> Thanks,
> Nilesh
>
>
> On 4/7/10 4:34 AM, "Ramesh Karki" wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The
Hi all,
The issue is resolved now after restarting RPD. Thank you all for helping me
to resolve the issue, really very appreciated.
thank you,
Ramesh
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 09:59, Serge Vautour wrote:
> > This is very odd. The "OSPF in
Hi Nilesh,
Herewith, I have attached the output file. please go through the file.
thank you,
Ramesh
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Nilesh Khambal wrote:
> Ramesh,
>
> Do you see cisco neighbor in "show ipv6 neighbors"?
>
> Thanks,
> Nilesh
>
> On 4/4/
Nilesh,
Give me few minute I will get back to you.
ramesh
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Nilesh Khambal wrote:
> Ramesh,
>
> Do you see cisco neighbor in "show ipv6 neighbors"?
>
> Thanks,
> Nilesh
>
> On 4/4/10 11:32 PM, "Ramesh Karki" wrote:
&
56 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki wrote:
>
> As I have already mentioned, the same interface fe-0/1/0 has been
>> configured
>> to run both ospf and ospf3 and there is no any issue on ospf v4 from the
>> beginning.
>>
>> sho
sh Khambal" wrote:
>
> > can you show us your ospf and ospf3 configuration? Also, have you
> specified
> > router-id under routing-options?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nilesh
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: &quo
Hi Mark,
As I have already mentioned, the same interface fe-0/1/0 has been configured
to run both ospf and ospf3 and there is no any issue on ospf v4 from the
beginning.
> show ospf interface fe-0/1/0.0
Interface State AreaDR ID BDR ID
Nbrs
fe-0/1/0.0 B
22 PM, Serge Vautour wrote:
> I agree with Chris. Everything looks configured right. Since you can ping,
> the only problem seems to be with OSPFv3. Anything in the logs? I'd restart
> RPD as well... Do you have a lab box you can try it on?
>
> Serge
>
>
>
> - Origi
Hi Serge,
Are you able to ping your Cisco router's FF80 address?
Yes I can ping both the link local address and the manually assigned
address.
What do you see if you run "monitor interface traffic fe-0/1/0" while you
run your pings?
The captured output seems okay (I have tried with tcpdump from
it is on the same interface. eg. interface fe-0/1/0 has been configured for
both v4 and v6.
thank you,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki wrote:
>
> Is your ospf config similar for both IPv4 and IPv6?
>> Do we ne
.
whatever routing protocol (static/ospf) of ipv6 routing is completely
paralyzed in m10i,its sucking me.
Thank you,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki wrote:
>
> Similar ospf config between cisco to cisco is okay there is not
router ID explicitly on
> Juniper.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ramesh Karki wrote:
>
>> Hi Serge,
>>
>> The M10i is running on ipv4 (bgp, ospf, including static)from beginning
>> with
>> neighbor Cisco routers, now the require
t;
> I'm assuming IPv4 ping works over the interface?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Serge
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Ramesh Karki
> To: Antonio Querubin
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wed, March 31, 2010 4:54:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ipv6
/0/0.0 {
metric 10;
am I missing anything ??
My curiosity : when I execute the command > run show ospf3 interface
ge-0/0/0.0 it says -
“OSPF instance is not running” ??
Thank you,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ramesh Karki wrote:
*[Direct/0] 1d 04:55:09
> via lo0.0
I have also tried to run ospf3 but no luck, the command > show ospf3
interface ge-0/0/0.0 says
“OSPF instance is not running”
Thank you,
Ramesh
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Ramesh Karki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes
*[Direct/0] 1d 04:55:09
> via lo0.0
I have tried run ospf3 but no luck, the command > show ospf3 interface
ge-0/0/0.0 says
“OSPF instance is not running”
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 04:06:55 pm Ramesh Karki
hello,
I am still waiting the response ..is there anyone have faced the same
problem ??
Thank you,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ramesh Karki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is my config :
>
> sh conf int ge-0/0/0
> description " ";
> unit 0 {
> family in
is lo0 ip.
The command > show route table inet6.0 only shows the direct and connected
route.
thank you,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 03:20:28 pm Ramesh Karki wrote:
>
> > Static route from Cisco to M10i Lo0 ip is okay. but
>
Hello all,
Can someone help me why my ipv6 routes is not activating on intet6.0 table
?
Scenario :
C720x -L2-SwM10i
Static route from Cisco to M10i Lo0 ip is okay. but static route from M10i
to 720x Lo0 is not showing on routing table and it is not working. There is
no problem betwee
hello,
I have configured sampling traffic input on all the interfaces, and
configured forwarding-option with max-packet per second 7000, rate 100 and
run-length 0, means 1 packet out of 100. I am using RE based sampling. On
the server side we are using flow-tool FlowScan as a data collector. In my
Hi all,
I am using STM-1 OC3 interface on my M10i and its connected to Cisco other
side. The interface is up but not stable. The log messages shows frequent up
down cause also the bgp session got flaps.
Feb 7 12:37:12 mib2d[4785]: SNMP_TRAP_LINK_DOWN: ifIndex 131,
ifAdminStatus up(1), ifOperSta
ards,
> Truman
>
>
> On 17/12/2009, at 7:28 PM, Ramesh Karki wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks for your response. There is no option like GTS (Cisco feature) for
> > traffic shaping on juniper regular PIC. Current i have 4FE regular PIC,
> need
> &g
upto 128K.
Thank You
Regards,
Ramesh
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Ramesh Karki wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I m trying to shape traffic on Regular 4FE-PIC with JunOS 9.2. I think
> shaping on regular PIC can only be done using DiffServe queue.
>
> if someone have already
Hi experts,
I m trying to shape traffic on Regular 4FE-PIC with JunOS 9.2. I think
shaping on regular PIC can only be done using DiffServe queue.
if someone have already done or configured, configuration will be really
appreciated.
Thank you,
Ramesh
Samit Dai,
Here is the complete Configuration for JunOS FBF :
JunOS#(edit prompt)
JunOS#set routing-instances pbr-test instance-type forwarding
JunOS#set routing-instances pbr-test routing-options static route
0.0.0.0/0next-hop 192.168.2.1
JunOS#commit
JunOS#set routing-options interface-routes r
Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ramesh Karki
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:06 PM
> To: Chris Adams; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP strange problem on M10i
>
> H
only it takes on effect.
Currently we peering with Tier One1 ISP with two location (Multi-homing to
the single AS), and got a full BGP table from both side.
Thank you Ramesh.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ramesh Karki said:
> > First, we had to h
. Last
time when we had deactivated BGP, it wasn't updated-( BGP remained active).
Only after rebooting the RE, the router operates as configured.
If anyone has faced similar issue, I would appreciated any sort of help in
this regard.
Thank you,
Ramesh
29 matches
Mail list logo
