Dear All,
First of all thank you for all message on and off list. I think I got this
working now. I have simplified the topology (but it works on the initial
topology as well)
R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5
rsvp full mesh on R1, R2 and R3
ldp full mesh on R3, R4 and R5
we want to establish a bgp signa
On 2012-07-24 10:34, Tobias Heister wrote:
Am 24.07.2012 07:21, schrieb Antti Ristimäki:
On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote:
The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but it
does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface routes
to i
Am 24.07.2012 07:21, schrieb Antti Ristimäki:
> On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote:
>> The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but
>> it does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface
>> routes to inet6.3 does not work (at
>> least on
On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote:
The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but it does not
help much. First of all the method explained to get interface routes to inet6.3 does not
work (at least on 10.4R9 but I figured out the correct way myself) and then
Am 23.07.2012 16:28, schrieb Per Granath:
>> Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath:
>>> Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8
>> and R10?
>>
>> This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not
>> allowed (or for a better term wanted) in
> Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath:
> > Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8
> and R10?
>
> This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not
> allowed (or for a better term wanted) in this scenario to extend ldp beyond
> 4, 8 and
Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath:
> Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 and
> R10?
This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not
allowed (or for a better term wanted) in this scenario to extend ldp beyond 4,
8 and 5 (not e
Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 and R10?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Dear All,
I am trying to wrap my head around this for some days now and it seems I am
stuck. Sorry for the lengthy post, bit I tried to give as much information as
possible.
I have 6 routers setup like this, currently all are logical-systems on a
MX80-48T running 10.4R9 in our lab.
/--- 9 --
9 matches
Mail list logo