Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-30 Thread Tobias Heister
Dear All, First of all thank you for all message on and off list. I think I got this working now. I have simplified the topology (but it works on the initial topology as well) R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 rsvp full mesh on R1, R2 and R3 ldp full mesh on R3, R4 and R5 we want to establish a bgp signa

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-25 Thread Antti Ristimäki
On 2012-07-24 10:34, Tobias Heister wrote: Am 24.07.2012 07:21, schrieb Antti Ristimäki: On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote: The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but it does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface routes to i

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-24 Thread Tobias Heister
Am 24.07.2012 07:21, schrieb Antti Ristimäki: > On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote: >> The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but >> it does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface >> routes to inet6.3 does not work (at >> least on

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-23 Thread Antti Ristimäki
On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote: The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but it does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface routes to inet6.3 does not work (at least on 10.4R9 but I figured out the correct way myself) and then

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-23 Thread Tobias Heister
Am 23.07.2012 16:28, schrieb Per Granath: >> Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath: >>> Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 >> and R10? >> >> This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not >> allowed (or for a better term wanted) in

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-23 Thread Per Granath
> Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath: > > Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 > and R10? > > This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not > allowed (or for a better term wanted) in this scenario to extend ldp beyond > 4, 8 and

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-23 Thread Tobias Heister
Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath: > Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 and > R10? This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not allowed (or for a better term wanted) in this scenario to extend ldp beyond 4, 8 and 5 (not e

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-23 Thread Per Granath
Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 and R10? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] 6PE and BGP signaled lsps

2012-07-23 Thread Tobias Heister
Dear All, I am trying to wrap my head around this for some days now and it seems I am stuck. Sorry for the lengthy post, bit I tried to give as much information as possible. I have 6 routers setup like this, currently all are logical-systems on a MX80-48T running 10.4R9 in our lab. /--- 9 --