---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114479/#review46109
---
Much better, but... :)
kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdialog.h
Hey guys
I would like to move Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC soon. It would be
nice if someone could review the code. Both the projects are in kdereview.
Baloo is a metadata and search framework which is a successor to the Nepomuk
project. It primarily provides -
* An API for searching
*
On Tuesday 24 December 2013 11:28:11 Vishesh Handa wrote:
Hey guys
I would like to move Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC soon. It
would be nice if someone could review the code. Both the projects
are in kdereview.
Baloo is a metadata and search framework which is a successor to
the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114455/#review46131
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114623/#review46132
---
Ship it!
what a silly function, but looks okay to me.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114479/
---
(Updated Dec. 24, 2013, 2:26 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and David
On Dec. 24, 2013, 8:14 a.m., David Faure wrote:
kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdialog.cc, line 350
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114479/diff/3/?file=227047#file227047line350
this method could now call the other one with an empty selectGroup, to
remove the code duplication, right?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114479/#review46134
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Dec. 24, 2013, 2:26
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114479/
---
(Updated Dec. 24, 2013, 2:50 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114479/#review46135
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114436/#review46137
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114436/
---
(Updated Dec. 24, 2013, 3:01 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 52 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: alexmerry, apol and myself.
Announcement:
* I lined up that one to see who would show up, merry christmas!
* alexmerry has been working on getting jenkins
On Tuesday 24 Dec 2013 13:06:55 Christoph Feck wrote:
How does Baloo cooperate with Nepomuk? Note that we have ABI
guarantees, so if the metadata is not shared between running instances
of two services, but applications would have to be ported to the new
ABI, then you cannot introduce Baloo in
On Dienstag, 24. Dezember 2013 19:29:11 CEST, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Tuesday 24 Dec 2013 13:06:55 Christoph Feck wrote:
How does Baloo cooperate with Nepomuk? Note that we have ABI
guarantees, so if the metadata is not shared between running instances
of two services, but applications would
On 24 Dec 2013 18:57, Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dienstag, 24. Dezember 2013 19:29:11 CEST, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Tuesday 24 Dec 2013 13:06:55 Christoph Feck wrote:
How does Baloo cooperate with Nepomuk? Note that we have ABI
guarantees, so if the metadata is not
On Tuesday 24 December 2013 21:25:37 Ivan Čukić wrote:
As I understand it there are no plans to remove the nepomuk-core or
nepomuk-widget libraries. If you switch to Baloo, anything compiled
against
nepomuk will still run but will act as if nepomuk is disabled. This is
something clients
On Tuesday 24 December 2013 19:57:17 Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Dienstag, 24. Dezember 2013 19:29:11 CEST, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Tuesday 24 Dec 2013 13:06:55 Christoph Feck wrote:
How does Baloo cooperate with Nepomuk? Note that we have ABI
guarantees, so if the metadata is not shared
On Dienstag, 24. Dezember 2013 22:03:28 CEST, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Tuesday 24 December 2013 21:25:37 Ivan Čukić wrote:
I would like baloo to be available in 4.x, with no API
stability guarantees, ...
As I see it, the nepomuk maintainer says it works better than
Nepomuk for all
cases
On Tuesday, 24. December 2013. 22.03.28 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
As I see it, the nepomuk maintainer says it works better than Nepomuk for
all cases covered by SC. I don't see any reason not to move forward then.
The truthfulness of Vishesh's claim does not enter into it. If we believe it
(and I
20 matches
Mail list logo
