Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

2014-04-09 Thread Jan Grulich
Hi, On Wednesday 09 of April 2014 07:20 Kevin Ottens wrote: Hello, On Tuesday 08 April 2014 19:51:05 Lamarque Souza wrote: I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to do to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. The

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

2014-04-09 Thread Chusslove Illich
On March 28, 2014, 4:43 p.m., David Faure wrote: Looks wrong, QLocale looks at .ts/.qm files while we mostly use .po/.gmo files - different translation system. Also doubly wrong because uiLanguages() returns the user preferences (e.g. for me en, fr), which has nothing to do with

Re: Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 04 April 2014 16:06:32 Aleix Pol wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: Hi, similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from kde- runtime into the globalaccel framework would significantly raise the tier and

Re: Review Request 117016: Allow overriding DrKonqi lookup directories by PATH

2014-04-09 Thread Dan Vrátil
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117016/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 10:47 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

2014-04-09 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your Frameworks book, now is the time to step forward. Here are some things to think about: Most of this book is already written somewhere. When the words have already been written down, all we need do is gather and arrange them.

Re: Kioslave repos

2014-04-09 Thread Àlex Fiestas
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 17:37:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: Good move. Pushed me toward looking a bit closer to this page, as obviously we didn't look close enough before (sorry about that), I might have a concern still: solid-deviceautomounter getting its own repository. It looks again like a

Re: Review Request 117440: Make sure that common licenses are accessed throught help:/ protocol

2014-04-09 Thread Burkhard Lück
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117440/#review55266 --- Ship it! Works for me, thanks - Burkhard Lück On April 8,

Re: Kioslave repos

2014-04-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Àlex Fiestas wrote: I'm against having anything in plasma-* without maintainer and even less if it is something that is known to have bugs (many) in KDE4. So we wither split it and hope somebody will give love to it or remove it. Not talking about that repo in

Re: Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

2014-04-09 Thread Aleix Pol
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: On Friday 04 April 2014 16:06:32 Aleix Pol wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: Hi, similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from kde-

Re: Kioslave repos

2014-04-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 11:57:37 Marco Martin wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Àlex Fiestas wrote: I'm against having anything in plasma-* without maintainer and even less if it is something that is known to have bugs (many) in KDE4. So we wither split it and hope somebody will

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Merry
On 08/04/14 23:51, Lamarque Souza wrote: Hi, I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to do to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. The other doubt I still have is where _kde_add_platform_definitions is defined. By what I

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

2014-04-09 Thread Kevin Funk
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your Frameworks book, now is the time to step forward. Here are some things to think about: Most of this book is already written somewhere. When the words have

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

2014-04-09 Thread Aleix Pol
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Funk kf...@kde.org wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your Frameworks book, now is the time to step forward. Here are some things to think about:

kcoreaddons: is src/mimetypes/kde.xml still in use?

2014-04-09 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Hi, I am trying to figure out which code is responsible for loading xml_mimetypes.po. This file is produced by scripty when running on kcoreaddons, but I can't find any code actually loading the catalog. Is my git grep fu too weak? Aurélien ___

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

2014-04-09 Thread Kevin Funk
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 15:42:47 Aleix Pol wrote: On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Funk kf...@kde.org wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your Frameworks book, now is the time to step

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

2014-04-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117132/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 4 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

2014-04-09 Thread Mario Fux
Am Mittwoch, 09. April 2014, 15.05:06 schrieb Kevin Funk: Morning Valorie, Kevin and Co Thanks for bringing this topic up again. On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your Frameworks book, now is the

Re: kcoreaddons: is src/mimetypes/kde.xml still in use?

2014-04-09 Thread Burkhard Lück
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2014, 06:59:08 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau: Hi, I am trying to figure out which code is responsible for loading xml_mimetypes.po. This file is produced by scripty when running on kcoreaddons, but I can't find any code actually loading the catalog. Is my git grep fu too

Auto-restarting of DBus Services

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Hi all, kglobalacceld has the following piece of code: // Restart on a crash KCrash::setFlags(KCrash::AutoRestart); Now I'm wondering whether this is needed at all. After all it's a DBus service and should get auto-restarted (or at least started when next accessed), shouldn't it? Cheers

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

2014-04-09 Thread Aleix Pol
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote: I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it on RB, but the gist is: kde4support - kdelibs4support KDE4SUPPORT -

kdeinit5 binary and man page in different repos

2014-04-09 Thread Michael Palimaka
Hi, I noticed that kdeinit5 is in kinit, and its man page appears to be in kservice. I guess the man page should be moved, but I'm not sure of the best procedure with regards to preserving history etc. Best regards, Michael ___ Kde-frameworks-devel

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Merry
On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote: What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support? Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up require. Alex ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list

Re: kdeinit5 binary and man page in different repos

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Merry
On 09/04/14 19:08, Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, I noticed that kdeinit5 is in kinit, and its man page appears to be in kservice. I guess the man page should be moved, but I'm not sure of the best procedure with regards to preserving history etc. Huh, so it is. *Adds it to his TODO list*

Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

2014-04-09 Thread Hrvoje Senjan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aleix Pol Gonzalez. Repository:

Re: kdeinit5 binary and man page in different repos

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Merry
On 09/04/14 19:34, Alex Merry wrote: On 09/04/14 19:08, Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, I noticed that kdeinit5 is in kinit, and its man page appears to be in kservice. I guess the man page should be moved, but I'm not sure of the best procedure with regards to preserving history etc. Huh, so

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 19:33:20 Alex Merry wrote: On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote: What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support? Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up require. wouldn't it be possible to

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Merry
On 09/04/14 20:07, Martin Graesslin wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2014 19:33:20 Alex Merry wrote: On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote: What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support? Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

2014-04-09 Thread Lamarque Souza
Hi, Sure I think they are, I am asking all those questions about dependencies and implications of adding the libraries to KF5 because of that too. I just want to make sure the other developers still think the same. I did not make that decision alone back in 2011 in Madrid. I think they are

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

2014-04-09 Thread Lamarque Souza
Ok, so let's go make a better NMQt/MMQt :-) Lamarque V. Souza KDE's Network Management maintainer http://planetkde.org/pt-br On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 09 of April 2014 07:20 Kevin Ottens wrote: Hello, On Tuesday 08 April

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

2014-04-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/#review55313 --- CMakeLists.txt

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

2014-04-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/#review55314 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On April 9, 2014,

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

2014-04-09 Thread Hrvoje Senjan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 10:53 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117440: Make sure that common licenses are accessed throught help:/ protocol

2014-04-09 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117440/#review55316 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Re: Review Request 117454: Implement KUser::faceIconPath for Windows XP

2014-04-09 Thread Alexander Richardson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117454/#review55319 --- Ship it! Looks good, but hopefully we can drop XP support

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

2014-04-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 18:33:38 Alex Merry wrote: I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it on RB, but the gist is: kde4support - kdelibs4support KDE4SUPPORT - KDELIBS4SUPPORT

Re: Review Request 117400: kdm: read DesktopNames from session file and export XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP from it Add DesktopNames key to kdm sessions files.

2014-04-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117400/#review55254 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oswald Buddenhagen On April 6, 2014,

Kronometer now in KDE Review

2014-04-09 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
Hi all, with this email I'm going to ask a review for Kronometer, in order to be accepted in KDE. Kronometer is a stopwatch application for KDE. It's meant to be simple but also customizable. Kronometer has been moved to kdereview from its previous location, playground/utils. I'm not sure whether

Re: Review Request 112294: Implement multi-seat support in KDM

2014-04-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On March 28, 2014, 10:59 a.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: kdm/backend/dm.c, line 1397 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112294/diff/2/?file=186612#file186612line1397 that seems questionable to me. why are you re-defining the display to be permanent? when the seat goes away, kdm

Re: Is kpovmodeler still valid or should it be removed

2014-04-09 Thread Burkhard Lück
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2014, 08:54:11 schrieb Burkhard Lück: Am Montag, 10. März 2014, 22:54:50 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: El Dilluns, 10 de març de 2014, a les 12:36:59, Burkhard Lück va escriure: Am Samstag, 8. März 2014, 22:11:11 schrieb Freek de Kruijf: One of our translators

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55262 --- I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
On April 9, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never see emails as KMail only shows the first 8 results or so. The user can scroll but by default they will never see the Emails. Do you think it would make sense interleaving

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
On April 9, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never see emails as KMail only shows the first 8 results or so. The user can scroll but by default they will never see the Emails. Do you think it would make sense interleaving

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 1:42 p.m.) Review request for Baloo and Vishesh

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55289 --- Ship it! - Vishesh Handa On April 9, 2014, 1:42 p.m., Eike

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55288 --- Ship it! - Vishesh Handa On April 9, 2014, 1:42 p.m., Eike

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 1:55 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
Hi Vishesh, On 08 Apr 2014, at 10:36 , Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote: will it be possible to run KDE without baloo enabled? Yes. You can go to System Settings - Desktop Search - Exclude Folders, and add your $HOME directory over there. Otherwise you can also edit the baloofilerc file

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Frank Reininghaus
Hi, 2014-04-09 21:29 GMT+02:00: Hi Vishesh, On 08 Apr 2014, at 10:36 , Vishesh Handa wrote: will it be possible to run KDE without baloo enabled? Yes. You can go to System Settings - Desktop Search - Exclude Folders, and add your $HOME directory over there. Otherwise you can also edit the

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 9 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:11:49, mk-li...@email.de va escriure: Hi Albert, On 09 Apr 2014, at 22:01 , Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: How is this a development question? Remember this is kde-devel, not a support forum. it is not? No, it is not, if we had to do

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 10 d'abril de 2014, a les 00:12:55, mk-li...@email.de va escriure: Hi again, On 09 Apr 2014, at 23:53 , Frank Reininghaus frank7...@googlemail.com wrote: I think that there are many KDE apps which do not require Baloo at all. I could imagine that too. I'm not sure if there

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
On 10 Apr 2014, at 00:18 , Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: Again not Baloo guy here, but as far as I know you can't disable Baloo, what Vishesh told you is how to disable it's file indexer (baloofile), but if you use KMail it(akonadi_baloo_indexer) will still index your emails into

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2014 schrieb : So, I wonder what baloo would be doing on OSX to get its hands into the user’s emails… I hope Vishesh can clarify this! Sure one doesn’t want to see any collisions between OSX’ Spotlight indexer on one side and baloo on the other. i assume,

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:18:56 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote: but if you use KMail it(akonadi_baloo_indexer) will still index your emails into the Baloo database, and may be other baloo_stuff (not aware of others existing) running. Contacts and calendar as well. If the akonadi_baloo resource

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Apr 9, 2014, at 3:47 PM, mk-li...@email.de wrote: On 10 Apr 2014, at 00:40 , Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote: i assume, ideally the api would just abstract spotlight on osx? would require someone developing an osx backend. Yes, Thomas, that would be ideal. Since I am not

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Ian Wadham
On 10/04/2014, at 8:40 AM, Thomas Lübking wrote: Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2014 schrieb : So, I wonder what baloo would be doing on OSX to get its hands into the user’s emails… I hope Vishesh can clarify this! Sure one doesn’t want to see any collisions between OSX’ Spotlight