-showAboutApplication(); break;
^
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/KF5XmlGui.dir/kmainwindow.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/KF5XmlGui.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
Thomas Lübking wrote:
gah... blast. you can't trust anybody
-showAboutApplication(); break;
^
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/KF5XmlGui.dir/kmainwindow.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/KF5XmlGui.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
Thomas Lübking wrote:
gah... blast. you can't trust anybody
size to the QWidget size
also see https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/
Diffs (updated)
-
src/kmainwindow.cpp e273a76
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120078/diff/
Testing
---
Hrvoje, see bug - not tested myself.
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
/kmainwindow.cpp e273a76
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120078/diff/
Testing
---
Hrvoje, see bug - not tested myself.
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
.
- Thomas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120078/#review65899
---
On Sept. 6, 2014, 9:09 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote
size to the QWidget size
also see https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/
Diffs (updated)
-
src/kmainwindow.cpp e273a76
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120078/diff/
Testing
---
Hrvoje, see bug - not tested myself.
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
/119594/#review63770
---
On Aug. 4, 2014, 11:57 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594
On Aug. 29, 2014, 9:30 vorm., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
Thanks for your work on this feature - I think that many users would really
appreciate this.
I think that Emmanuel's idea to add write support to the kioslave might be
worth considering. However, implementing the drop on an
/119594/#review63770
---
On Aug. 4, 2014, 11:57 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594
On Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 07:24:33 CEST, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
btw, is there a way to run qdbus correctly from SSH? If I run it
inside X11 konsole, I get all the stuff, if I run it from SSH, even
with xhost and DISPLAY set, I don't get anything about kde:
Sorry, no idea how to do that.
On Sonntag, 17. August 2014 18:38:29 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Konqueror and rekonq use the same engine. So what one renders, so does the
other.
The may ship with different defaults for khtml or webkit as backend.
(Actually rekonq might even be linked to a newer version of QtWebkit in his
On Dienstag, 12. August 2014 14:41:31 CEST, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Reason, if I'm building kdelibs from git, my autopilot way
would be cloning
(which gives you the master branch, dunno what'd happen if
there's no remote
master in the origin), see master, and assume that I now have latest
On Dienstag, 12. August 2014 21:20:41 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Is
git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/KDE/4.14
an option?
Maybe, what does it do?
Create a symbolic ref master that like the symbolic ref HEAD would (then)
point KDE/4.14
Locally this just works fine -
On Aug. 11, 2014, 12:17 vorm., Christoph Feck wrote:
dolphin/src/statusbar/dolphinstatusbar.cpp, line 120
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119701/diff/1/?file=303675#file303675line120
Where does the text for the spaceInfo come from? If it is possible to
compute the widest string
On Aug. 8, 2014, 3:35 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Would it be sufficient to set the cursor on target instead of an
application wide override?
setOverrideCursor has this nasty stack behavior which could be
troublesome in a library and I could eg. think of screensavers
(or using an override on top ...)
- Thomas Lübking
On Aug. 8, 2014, 12:37 nachm., Wolfgang Bauer wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119663
On Aug. 6, 2014, 5:04 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
src/netwm.cpp, line 4779
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119267/diff/3/?file=296945#file296945line4779
- qstrdup?
(also new code issue)
Ivan Čukić wrote:
nstrdup is used all over the file, qstrdup not. Would
don't mind that at all (and it's used in the file
anyway) there are objections against it and Martin might disapprove adding more.
Like that much better, thanks =)
Two of tehm comments are more to trigger a comment from Martin, but the issue
one is I believe a copy 'n paste bug.
- Thomas Lübking
/kdeplatformfiledialoghelper.h 406a4f1
src/platformtheme/kdeplatformfiledialoghelper.cpp 520b6f5
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
___
Kde-frameworks-devel
On Aug. 3, 2014, 11:13 nachm., Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
No change here, ie. it doesn't restore the file dialog geometry.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
what is your precise testcase?
a bit remote because of your other patches: did you check that the
correct platformtheme lib is used? (ran
, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/#review63765
---
On Aug. 4, 2014, 11:57 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
/119593/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/#review63726
---
On Aug. 3, 2014, 7:16 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594
/kdeplatformfiledialoghelper.h 406a4f1
src/platformtheme/kdeplatformfiledialoghelper.cpp 520b6f5
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119594/#review63765
---
On Aug. 4, 2014, 11:57 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
/119593/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
Tinkl,
and Martin Klapetek.
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
summarized
Diffs
-
src/gui/kwindowconfig.cpp c3cefb7
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119593/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
,
Thomas Lübking
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
Tinkl,
and Martin Klapetek.
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
summarized
Diffs
-
src/gui/kwindowconfig.cpp c3cefb7
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119593/diff/
Testing
---
See
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119512/
Thanks,
Thomas Lübking
,
Thomas Lübking
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
/119267/#comment44293
Any chance we can make this a function return in netwm.h to be used by the
lib, kactivities and kwin and plasma and whoever else?
NETWM::allActivityUUID() or so?
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 31, 2014, 10:09 vorm., Ivan Čukić wrote
On Juli 31, 2014, 12:03 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
src/kwindowinfo_x11.cpp, line 305
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119267/diff/2/?file=292848#file292848line305
Any chance we can make this a function return in netwm.h to be used by
the lib, kactivities and kwin and plasma
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:17 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
drkonqi/gdbhighlighter.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119498/diff/1/?file=293510#file293510line74
an abort is not a crash ;-)
If you hit this assert, the looked up (lineNr - 1) is somehow out
be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
The trick with winId() unfortunately doesn't work, the dialog gets
restored to the default size, not the saved one... :/ Any other ideas?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not gonna
On Juli 30, 2014, 8:54 vorm., Vishesh Handa wrote:
src/tagwidget.cpp, line 180
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119543/diff/1/?file=294417#file294417line180
Any reason you've combined the too functions? I don't remember why, but
there was a point when it split up.
wrote:
You're right, QPointer it has to be.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I don't wanna be a spoil spot, but if you delete a qobject while one of
its (heaped) children is in a nested eventloop (ie. you're most likely
deleting it from that eventloop), you'll usually hit a segfault just
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:17 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
drkonqi/gdbhighlighter.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119498/diff/1/?file=293510#file293510line74
an abort is not a crash ;-)
If you hit this assert, the looked up (lineNr - 1) is somehow out
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:17 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
drkonqi/gdbhighlighter.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119498/diff/1/?file=293510#file293510line74
an abort is not a crash ;-)
If you hit this assert, the looked up (lineNr - 1) is somehow out
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:17 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
drkonqi/main.cpp, line 111
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119498/diff/1/?file=293511#file293511line111
This can go unconditionally.
Show really only shows the window.
Becoming active and then raise
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:17 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
drkonqi/gdbhighlighter.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119498/diff/1/?file=293510#file293510line74
an abort is not a crash ;-)
If you hit this assert, the looked up (lineNr - 1) is somehow out
On Juli 28, 2014, 10:17 vorm., Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
If the only issue is the open ::exec() TODO, you might trick it by
calling ::winId(), then restore the size and ultimately ::exec()
Otherwise you could open an own nested eventloop instead of relying on the
dialogs exec, but that'd
nested eventloop instead of relying on the
dialogs exec, but that'd be less elegant.
In either case I don't see why bringing your own config re/storage.
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 28, 2014, 9:35 vorm., Lukáš Tinkl wrote
On Juli 28, 2014, 10:17 vorm., Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
If the only issue is the open ::exec() TODO, you might trick it by
calling ::winId(), then restore the size and ultimately ::exec()
Otherwise you could open an own nested eventloop instead of relying on the
dialogs exec, but that'd
.
if the test is pointless altogether (i do not know. no idea. no record on
drkonqui) just remove it with the comment in the commit message, but ifdeffing
a void statement makes us look silly ;-)
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 27, 2014, 9:16 vorm., Ian Wadham wrote
anyway)
kinit/kinit.cpp
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119497/#comment44049
this and line 1504 look like debug leftovers? or are they needed for extra
logging?
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 27, 2014, 9:15 vorm., Ian Wadham wrote
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:32 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
kinit/kinit.cpp, line 118
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119497/diff/1/?file=293442#file293442line118
this looks fishy, because this should be related to the Window System,
not the OS (ie. if you're running X11 on Darwin
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:32 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
kinit/kinit.cpp, line 118
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119497/diff/1/?file=293442#file293442line118
this looks fishy, because this should be related to the Window System,
not the OS (ie. if you're running X11 on Darwin
On Juli 27, 2014, 11:32 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
kinit/kinit.cpp, line 118
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119497/diff/1/?file=293442#file293442line118
this looks fishy, because this should be related to the Window System,
not the OS (ie. if you're running X11 on Darwin
On Juli 20, 2014, 9:21 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
lib/konq/konq_operations.cpp, line 479
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119372/diff/2/?file=291313#file291313line479
is there any guarantee that all urls in lst are in the same directory?
Arjun Ak wrote:
what?
you're
On Juli 21, 2014, 5:16 vorm., Ian Wadham wrote:
So where are we leaving this? Any conclusions? Any solutions or further
patches?
Should we report the inconsistent handling of Native file dialogs as a bug
on bugs.kde.org (without a patch this time)?
If so, against what product
((*it).path());
...
}
This allows you to re-use the QFileInfo object w/o useless overhead and
also removes a branch level.
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 21, 2014, 2:12 nachm., Arjun Ak wrote:
---
This is an automatically
is at least a behavioral change and assumingly wrong)
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 20, 2014, 8 vorm., Arjun Ak wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119372
/r/119372/#comment43474
this looks while it applies to directories AND FILES.
While moving a -w directory isn't possible, moving a -w file is, so this
case needs to be catched?
- Thomas Lübking
On Juli 19, 2014, 4:44 nachm., Arjun Ak wrote
On Juli 19, 2014, 7:39 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
lib/konq/konq_operations.cpp, line 474
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119372/diff/1/?file=291253#file291253line474
this looks while it applies to directories AND FILES.
While moving a -w directory isn't possible
On Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014 20:54:57 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
e.g., 2014.07
My problem with that is that it's too long to write
+1
looks worse (we're
looking for something relative nice looking and catchy here,
not for something
totally obvious)
0xe.c =)
Cheers,
Thomas
Visit
at reviewing this patch, now that
I have tested it on Apple OS X with a few different file-open and save
situations.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
You'd need to request addition of the group to groups (just a formality
to add the entry, ask sysadmin æt kde döt org), otherwise you've to add rene
On Juli 12, 2014, 2:11 nachm., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
kio/kfile/kfiledialog.cpp, line 316
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119243/diff/1/?file=289740#file289740line316
I don't know why you did that, but it doesn't look good.
Marko Käning wrote:
Actually, when submitting
On Juli 5, 2014, 11:36 vorm., Arjun Ak wrote:
dolphin/src/dolphinrecenttabsmenu.cpp, line 102
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118994/diff/5/?file=287351#file287351line102
Is it safe to 'delete' a QObject? shouldnt we be using deleteLater()
There's no general rule.
Deleting a
On June 30, 2014, 9:01 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
src/kwindowinfo_x11.cpp, line 301
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119008/diff/2/?file=285388#file285388line301
are you sure it's Latin1? Normally string properties are utf8.
Ivan Čukić wrote:
Well, since those are UUIDs,
one *could* wait
for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop symbol:
removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible) and be
introduced even with KWin 5.0.3 or whatever the final name scheme will be ;-)
- Thomas Lübking
On June 26, 2014, 7:22 a.m
position.
from their patch: the gobject device-id (so i assume we're supposed to
link gdk, yes?)
- Thomas Lübking
On June 25, 2014, 6:17 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
would not set floating
dock override to bring its own titlebar)?
While kwin (iirc by default) hides them for inactive windows, that's rather a
feature.
- By their nature, they should not be in the taskbar. But should they not
appear in pagers?
- Thomas Lübking
On June 23, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Martin
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 14:22:46 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
installed,
kde-runtime-dbg
kde-workspace-dbg
kdelibs5-dbg
Unfortunately, still no debug info
You mean no Dr. Konqui?
- run plasma-* in gdb
gdb --args plasma-desktop 21 | tee plasma-desktop.dbg
(gdb) run
Program
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 14:46:45 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:35:31 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
Unfortunately, still no debug info
You mean no Dr. Konqui?
Nope, I mean gdb reports not debug info.
gdb plasmoidviewer
--nofork (not sure whether plasmoidviewer does
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 22:55:47 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 03:00:26 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 14:46:45 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: ...
I tried plasmoidviewer and plasma-desktop with --nofork, but no
debug info for either.
You get
/118816/#comment42172
shouldn't the call to removeViewWidget() just be omitted from
viewDestroyed(QObject* object) - I assume removing the widget from the stack is
still required on dragging a tab out of the window?
- Thomas Lübking
On June 18, 2014, 7:24 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote
section.
You've certainly my vote, since the present code is clearly wrong and this
patch implies no behavioral change, but please wait whether somebody has to
raise a veto (next few workdays) before pushing (though i doubt so)
- Thomas Lübking
On June 15, 2014, 8:18 a.m., Fabian Kosmale wrote
)
- Thomas Lübking
On June 14, 2014, 10:09 p.m., Fabian Kosmale wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118750
On Sonntag, 1. Juni 2014 09:16:46 CEST, Leslie Zhai wrote:
so there is NO Apper assoicate WID for AuthDialog constructor.
2. KWindowSystem::forceActiveWindow sometimes worked BUT ...
Sometimes it FAILED to force active window to act like modal
one
The window is not modal, since it's not
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2014 05:09:58 CEST, Leslie Zhai wrote:
Hi KDE developers,
My colleage reported a bug to me, it is about PolicyKit1-KDE AuthDialog
UI behavior issue, the AuthDialog could not show as TOP_LEVEL
That's called _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE - toplevel usually refers to a window
with the
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112258/#comment40757
ctrl+a will generate two key events, the second is not empty (though not
printable string either)
- (!(keyEvent-modifiers()
(Qt::ControlModifier|Qt::AltModifier|Qt::MetaModifier) ...
- Thomas Lübking
On Nov. 6, 2013, 7:07 p.m
On Sonntag, 25. Mai 2014 20:07:31 CEST, vedant agarwala wrote:
I am unable to reproduce on my Kubuntu 14.04. For me there is no command
`kdesu`. I use `kdesudo`.
kdesu != kdesudo - completely different application.
@Magnus
either you try to run kdesu as root (or any other user that is not the
on this?
- Thomas Lübking
On May 22, 2014, 6:53 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118252
the taskbar (iirc)
imo should only make sense in the showing desktop case (which is more or less
detectable by the kwin core/effects) - and the animating effects completely
ignored it anyway.
- Thomas Lübking
On May 20, 2014, 11:55 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote
as well.
- Thomas Lübking
On May 19, 2014, 7:52 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118197
On May 19, 2014, 12:05 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
We are seeing quite a few bug reports about a severe regression between KDE
SC 4.13.0 and KDE SC 4.13.1:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334776
According to the reporter of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334988
but certainly should whenever the
entry changes for whatever reason (config value re-read, defaults applied,
whatever)
- Thomas Lübking
On May 2, 2014, 7:59 p.m., Andrea Iacovitti wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
();
owner-claim(m_replace, true);
+Xcb::sync();
Sufficient? (though it warns about a QPA crash later)
b) Qt bug (should flush once per eventcycle) or feature (keeps dirty flag and
only flushes on internal need)? - can such flag be set explicitly?
- Thomas Lübking
On May 16, 2014, 1 p.m., Martin
On May 16, 2014, 1:38 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
a) main.cpp, void Application::start()
-Xcb::sync();
owner-claim(m_replace, true);
+Xcb::sync();
Sufficient? (though it warns about a QPA crash later)
b) Qt bug (should flush once per eventcycle) or feature (keeps
-remove -root _NET_SUPPORTED; sleep 1; klipper
--waitforwm sleep 30; kwin
Assuming it would be relevant, you got a shipIt! from at least here - sorry for
not reviewing before.
- Thomas Lübking
On May 12, 2014, 10:25 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote
On Freitag, 9. Mai 2014 14:42:50 CEST, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
does clicking on the shadow drawn by the window
also prevents you from say focusing the window
below (when no windeco is in place)?
Afaics the entire shadow area is used for window resizing (you get the gtk+
cursor for that)
It
On Freitag, 9. Mai 2014 13:44:18 CEST, John Layt wrote:
Thanks for that link, it explains things very nicely. Between their
lack of resources and the GnomeOS philosophy it will be interesting
to see how they respond to our approaches: in the article they clearly
state only a mass rebellion
On Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 12:08:19 CEST, Aleix Pol wrote:
Personally, I don't think we want to even try to convince them against.
They're introducing interaction within the decoration space so they are
committed to the idea.
That's actually not the point.
The correct way would have been to say
On Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 13:13:33 CEST, Alexander Mezin wrote:
Hi
Is there any way to invoke kcminit function again when some hardware
is plugged in? I can implement this in KDED module or make udev rule,
but isn't there any built-in solution (key in kcm's desktop file,
etc)?
What's the
On May 6, 2014, 1:30 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
AFAICT it is BIC but no SIC, no brainer.
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
it's a SIC change as one could have used the variant specifying just
NET::Properties and screen. This would now have to be changed to use
NET::Properties2 before screen
argument.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
It's SIC.
NETRootInfo(connection, properties, 1); would now cause an error, but
since it's been buggy anyway (enums are indeed not polymorphic, but for
int,... though gcc could have known better) that should hardly matter.
@Marco
got
argument.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
It's SIC.
NETRootInfo(connection, properties, 1); would now cause an error, but
since it's been buggy anyway (enums are indeed not polymorphic, but for
int,... though gcc could have known better) that should hardly matter.
@Marco
got
argument.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
It's SIC.
NETRootInfo(connection, properties, 1); would now cause an error, but
since it's been buggy anyway (enums are indeed not polymorphic, but for
int,... though gcc could have known better) that should hardly matter.
@Marco
got
501 - 600 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
