Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-22 Thread Michael Pyne
On Fri, April 22, 2016 01:04:42 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 21 d’abril de 2016, a les 15:04:57 CEST, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > >>> Also, another -1 from me is because I don't think we should use GitHub > > >>> more than a mer

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dijous, 21 d’abril de 2016, a les 15:04:57 CEST, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >>> Also, another -1 from me is because I don't think we should use GitHub > >>> more than a mere mirror. > >> > >> It would still remain a mere mirror imho, i.e

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dijous, 21 d’abril de 2016, a les 18:35:14 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Teo Mrnjavac wrote: > > On giovedì 21 aprile 2016 13:05:31 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Elvis Angelaccio > >> > >> wrote: > >> > 2016-04-20 23:09 GM

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> >>> Also, another -1 from me is because I don't think we should use GitHub >>> more than a mere mirror. >> >> >> It would still remain a mere mirror imho, i.e. strictly read-only. Btw do we >> have some written rule about our github presence

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > > 2016-04-21 9:48 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : >> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Elvis Angelaccio >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2016-04-21 3:07 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Elvis Angelaccio >> >> w

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-21 9:48 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Elvis Angelaccio > wrote: > > > > > > 2016-04-21 3:07 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Elvis Angelaccio > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > 2016-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid :

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-21 9:32 GMT+02:00 Harald Sitter : > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Elvis Angelaccio > wrote: > > Hi, > > as many of you already know, KDE has a github mirror in place at [1]. > > I've been playing with travis-ci [2] and I was surprised by how easy to > use > > and how well integrated wi

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > > 2016-04-21 3:07 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : >> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Elvis Angelaccio >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2016-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : >> >> >> >> El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:00:26 CEST

Telegram usage by KDE people (was Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?)

2016-04-21 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:31:23 +0200 Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > To be fair, similar concerns should then be raised lalso against our > usage of Telegram (which seems to me less open than Travis, btw). FWIW, I think it's a really, really bad idea to use Telegram for the same reason. Clos

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-21 3:07 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Elvis Angelaccio > wrote: > > > > > > 2016-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > >> > >> El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:00:26 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio > va > >> escriure: > >> > 2016-04-20 22:09 GMT+02:00

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Harald Sitter
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > Hi, > as many of you already know, KDE has a github mirror in place at [1]. > I've been playing with travis-ci [2] and I was surprised by how easy to use > and how well integrated with github is. > > I think it would be nice to have travis

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-21 8:30 GMT+02:00 Frederik Schwarzer : > Am 21.04.2016 07:56 schrieb Teo Mrnjavac: > > Hi, > > Can we call things as they are please? The name is "Travis CI", not >> "githubCI". Travis CI is open source, a separate product and service that >> happens to talk to GitHub. >> > > I think Alber

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-21 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-21 3:05 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley : > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Elvis Angelaccio > wrote: > > > > > > 2016-04-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Beltrame : > >> > >> Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 > >> Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > >> > >> > I think it would be nice to have travis

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Teo Mrnjavac wrote: > On giovedì 21 aprile 2016 13:05:31 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Elvis Angelaccio >> >> wrote: >> > 2016-04-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Beltrame : >> >> Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 >> >> >> >> Elvis A

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Am 21.04.2016 07:56 schrieb Teo Mrnjavac: Hi, Can we call things as they are please? The name is "Travis CI", not "githubCI". Travis CI is open source, a separate product and service that happens to talk to GitHub. I think Albert's concern is (and I agree) that the meaning of a potential T

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Teo Mrnjavac
On giovedì 21 aprile 2016 13:05:31 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Elvis Angelaccio > > wrote: > > 2016-04-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Beltrame : > >> Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 > >> > >> Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > >> > I think it would be nice to hav

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Teo Mrnjavac
On giovedì 21 aprile 2016 00:07:23 CEST Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > 2016-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:00:26 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va > > > > escriure: > > > 2016-04-20 22:09 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > > > > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > > 2016-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : >> >> El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:00:26 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va >> escriure: >> > 2016-04-20 22:09 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : >> > > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > > 2016-04-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Beltrame : >> >> Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 >> Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: >> >> > I think it would be nice to have travis builds for the (mirrored) >> > repositories that provides a .t

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:00:26 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va > escriure: > > 2016-04-20 22:09 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > > > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 18:42:31 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio > va > > > > > > escriure: > > > >

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Beltrame : > Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 > Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > > > I think it would be nice to have travis builds for the (mirrored) > > repositories that provides a .travis.yml configuration file. The > > -1. Aside the arguments moved by A

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:00:26 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va escriure: > 2016-04-20 22:09 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 18:42:31 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va > > > > escriure: > > > Hi, > > > as many of you already know, KDE has a github mirror

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > I think it would be nice to have travis builds for the (mirrored) > repositories that provides a .travis.yml configuration file. The -1. Aside the arguments moved by Albert, I add that the solution is finding ways to help w

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
2016-04-20 22:09 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid : > El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 18:42:31 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va > escriure: > > Hi, > > as many of you already know, KDE has a github mirror in place at [1]. > > I've been playing with travis-ci [2] and I was surprised by how easy to > use

Re: Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimecres, 20 d’abril de 2016, a les 18:42:31 CEST, Elvis Angelaccio va escriure: > Hi, > as many of you already know, KDE has a github mirror in place at [1]. > I've been playing with travis-ci [2] and I was surprised by how easy to use > and how well integrated with github is. > > I think it

Could we enable Travis-CI on our github mirrors?

2016-04-20 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
Hi, as many of you already know, KDE has a github mirror in place at [1]. I've been playing with travis-ci [2] and I was surprised by how easy to use and how well integrated with github is. I think it would be nice to have travis builds for the (mirrored) repositories that provides a .travis.yml c