On Wednesday 07 February 2018 12:27:20 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 09:43:27 CET Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 February 2018 21:06:05 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > > Pali, bugzilla email works for many developers and this is the first time
> &g
me to hack my
MDA+MUA to start repairing "hard-to-process" kde bugzilla emails.
I got answer that I should ignore emails RFCs (e.g. RFC5322), but sorry
all my email software is written according RFC2822 or RFC5322. Therefore
I cannot easily ignore them.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Friday 02 February 2018 13:00:12 Shawn Sörbom wrote:
> On Friday, February 2, 2018 12:41:41 PM PST Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 02 February 2018 12:25:18 Shawn Sörbom wrote:
> > > find_qjson.diff: Xmpp was missing a required dependency in its build
> > > script -
On Friday 02 February 2018 21:41:41 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > disable-libjingle: Unfortunately fixing the xmpp issue also enabled
> > libjingle,
> > which caused the compiler to error out, so I set the default to disabled.
>
> I'm going to look at this problem. libjingle sh
hich caused the compiler to error out, so I set the default to disabled.
I'm going to look at this problem. libjingle should build fine.
> XMPP Now builds! Vive open chat protocols!
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 19 January 2018 21:56:10 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 January 2018 20:50:35 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have now completed the merge from Pal
content of this JSON file, but there is no
KDE4 trunk version in repository anymore. master branch now points to
trunk KF5 version and there is no 17.12 (stable) version.
> (for i18n) and kde-build-metadata (for the CI and kdesrc-build users)
It is https://phabricator.kde.org/source/kde-build-metadata/ right? What
should I check there?
> as soon as possible.
>
> Regards,
> Ben
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 16 January 2018 23:05:42 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 16 de gener de 2018, a les 0:45:27 CET, Pali Rohár va escriure:
> > On Tuesday 16 January 2018 00:32:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El dimarts, 16 de gener de 2018, a les 0:09:50 CET, Pali Ro
derstand how such
renaming would help.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 16 January 2018 09:05:41 Alexander Semke wrote:
>
> On 16.01.2018 00:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Because it does not work.
> >
> > remote: Push declined - excessive notifications would be sent
> > remote: Please file a KDE Sysadmin bug to continue
> &
On Tuesday 16 January 2018 00:32:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 16 de gener de 2018, a les 0:09:50 CET, Pali Rohár va escriure:
> > On Tuesday 16 January 2018 00:06:29 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > So is the problem:
> > > a) that you could not pus
On Tuesday 16 January 2018 00:06:29 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> So is the problem:
> a) that you could not push that master-kf5 to master
Problem is really a).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
ers (like Launchpad, Github or old Gitorious)
I never hit any problem on them (yet).
I'm not subscribed to kde-core-devel, so please CC me on reply.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
igure this out an tell me where I am going
> wrong and how can I fix this??
>
> Your Sincerely,
> Ayush Mahajan
But currently Kopete is switching from KDE4 to KF5. New KF5 code is in
kf5 branch of kopete git repository and I would suggest to switch into
that branch (until kf5 code lands in master git branch).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
raries. But I do not know if
it is possible to build Kopete on Windows. Kopete is Linux client and
all developers use Linux.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Thursday 09 November 2017 11:38:19 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Pali Rohár ha scritto:
> > On Monday 07 August 2017 10:43:17 Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> On Monday 07 August 2017 10:26:46 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> >>> Il 07 agosto 2017 09:34:37 CEST, "Pali Rohár"
On Monday 07 August 2017 10:43:17 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 07 August 2017 10:26:46 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Il 07 agosto 2017 09:34:37 CEST, "Pali Rohár" <pali.ro...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > >
> > >Anyway, I rebased kf5 br
.Harish Navnit wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124349/
> -------
>
> (Updated okt. 4,
generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124305/
> ---
>
> (Updated okt. 4, 2017, 11:22 popoludní)
>
>
> Review request for Kopete, Laurent Montel and Pali Rohár.
>
>
> Repo
ebased kf5 and kf5 branch and
> looking at each cases. I will update issues on phabricator.
Ok.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
There was some problem with this clone repository, kde sysadmin fixed it
https://cgit.kde.org/clones/kopete/pali/kopete.git/log/?h=master-kf5
On Wednesday 09 August 2017 22:57:04 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Try direct clone:
>
> git clone g...@git.kde.org:clones/kopete/pali/k
me
> > of writing this email it was not synced to all kde git mirrors...
> >
> > --
> > Pali Rohár
> > pali.ro...@gmail.com
> >
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Monday 07 August 2017 09:34:37 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 07 August 2017 07:52:39 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am fixing the raised issues in old review requests so how do I submit the
> > changes for review. Should I create a new review request ad
On Monday 07 August 2017 10:26:46 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Il 07 agosto 2017 09:34:37 CEST, "Pali Rohár" <pali.ro...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> >
> >Anyway, I rebased kf5 branch on top of master with (semi-manual)
> >conflicts resolution and found out
hich was done from master to kf5 were incorrectly.
I will push that new branch (kf5 rebased on top of master) to kopete git
repository under name master-kf5, so we would be able to compare and fix
possible problems...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
if this is the same
> commit we are talking about.
> Link :
> https://cgit.kde.org/kopete.git/commit/?h=kf5=cb97ce4e61baa44d9f40
> 1b8853982355ef6e684f
Previous behaviour is to stay kopete running in systray even last
windows is closed. And above commit change behavior from
setQu
On Saturday 05 August 2017 14:58:20 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Now I'm looking at Kopete kf5 git branch and thinking if now it is
> time to switch master branch to kf5 code.
>
> IIRC KDE Applications 17.08 is the last version which can be based on
> KDE4 code base.
>
:
protocols/jabber/libiris/README_BEFORE_COMMITTING
$ git diff origin/master..origin/kf5 -- protocols/jabber/libiris/
Due to synchronization with upstream, we either need to drop these
changes or send them to upstream.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description
On Wednesday 28 June 2017 09:34:50 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> On 28-Jun-2017 03:30, "Pali Rohár" <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 27 June 2017 20:30:21 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> > On 27 June 2017 at 23:53, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> w
On Tuesday 27 June 2017 20:30:21 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> On 27 June 2017 at 23:53, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 June 2017 20:49:47 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> > > Three functions that not working because of port
> > > - one
sed or comment them
> > out? Should I add them to timeline(if yes then for later or now)?
> >
> > I am working on the test cases at present and have gotten quite a
> > hang of the internal connections inside kopete and how classes are
> > handled.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vijay Krishnavanshi
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Resources is removed.
> and other is of flexibility in command line interface(because of
> KCmdLineArgs).
What do you mean by this?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
KF5 Kopete. New
storage (SQLite) should be enough. One storage would mean less (really less!)
technical code around. What would be neeed is to convert old XML based history
to new storage.
- Pali Rohár
On jún 24, 2017, 3:41 popoludní, Paulo Lieuthier wrote
tps://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130164/#comment68800>
merge problem?
plugins/history/backends/xml/xmlhistorybackend.h (line 33)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130164/#comment68801>
Wrong design. You do not need new instance of backend for every contact.
- Pali Rohár
On jún 24
> On jún 25, 2017, 7:39 popoludní, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > plugins/history/backends/sqlite/sqlitedatabase.h, line 23
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130166/diff/1/?file=496730#file496730line23>
> >
> > Really singleton? This would break unloading p
nal clone on kde git) and put code there.
Initial comments are on reviewboard.
(PS: I looked at KDE phabricator, but seems it does not work for kopete
git repository correctly...)
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
/r/130166/#comment68798>
It was needed for serialization via Qt4XML.
- Pali Rohár
On jún 25, 2017, 6:38 popoludní, Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://g
kends/sqlite/sqlitehistorybackend.cpp (line 78)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130166/#comment68793>
Why it is needed before storing message into SQLite database?
- Pali Rohár
On jún 25, 2017, 6:38 popoludní, Pau
not have to copy email content to wiki).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 22 June 2017 03:59:11 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> On 21-06-2017 11:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 08:38:01 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> >> On 20-06-2017 05:20, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 20 June 2017 01:24:10 Paulo Lieuthier w
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 08:38:01 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> On 20-06-2017 05:20, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 01:24:10 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> >> The new iteration:
> >>
> >> Conversations:
> >> * id
> >> * subconversat
* state
This looks like a synthetic split. Via "Conversations" there are stored
two relations (id + subconversation_id), so it in final it N:M relation
via two tables?
> On 12-06-2017 07:33, Pali Rohár wrote:> On Sunday 11 June 2017 20:22:24
> Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> On Sunday 11 Jun
a0368621a48656
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124701/ -
ea461c02b22681ca50bca40e83c9da6ea517b582
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124305/ -
Montel, can you look at them and check if what/how needs to be fixed?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
.org/r/124701/#comment68749>
FIXME
libkopete/ui/kopetelistviewitem.cpp (line 1153)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124701/#comment68751>
FIXME
libkopete/ui/metacontactselectorwidget.cpp (line 208)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124701/#comment68752>
FIXM
> On sep. 3, 2015, 8:38 dopoludnia, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > libkopete/ui/accountselector.cpp, line 100
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124345/diff/6/?file=400086#file400086line100>
> >
> > Are you sure that setHeaderLabel() is equivalent to addCo
On Sunday 11 June 2017 20:22:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 11 June 2017 19:25:52 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> > > Plus there is missing something like "session" information. E.g. in
> > > jabber you can communicate with one person in more one-to-one
> > >
ssages, so what is needed to store
is content of Kopete::Message class.
> Any obvious unsoundness in this schema? I'm sure it will have to
> improve before the project is complete, but I think this is a good
> starting point.
>
> This next week I'll be working on the storage façade, and probably
> send a few more patches regarding Qt5 and KF5 migration!
>
> Paulo
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
error, can it be
committed/merged into kf5 branch?
- Pali Rohár
On jún 10, 2017, 4:47 popoludní, Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
e/commit/a901f0455f228a467dd9e5f8dd990535b9da5873
> [3] https://sqlite.org/fts5.html#external_content_tables
> [4] https://sqlite.org/fts5.html#_summary_of_technical_differences_
> [5] https://sqlite.org/fts5.html#tokenizers
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
.
> * Search for a database solution, both schema-friendly and text
> search-friendly (SQLite, Firebird, Xapian)?.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 31 May 2017 11:20:41 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> On 29-05-2017 04:41, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 May 2017 23:04:57 Paulo Lieuthier wrote:
> >> Hey, Pali. I thought history2 was the best option today.
> >
> > history2 does not support rich text
in API/ABI.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
lugin function as exportable and make it public
for application is a really bad idea.
What should work is to statically compile plugin into your testing
binary. E.g. compile all source code files (plugin files + testing
application) in one step into one executable binary.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
rt. SQLite has some
plugins for it, but probably different indexes would be better (or
not?).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
the new one.
PS: In future please send timeline or other documents to mailing list
(plain text is enough), not some external link which does not have to
work without internet connection.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ect, even before
> Qt5/KF5, would it be welcome?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Thursday 11 May 2017 10:37:40 laurent Montel wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 mai 2017, 10:36:10 CEST laurent Montel a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 11 mai 2017, 10:15:05 CEST Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > > Ok, finish timetime and send it to mailing list. I hope that Montel
> > > would
uth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for the oportunity. I'm finishing my timeline and will send to the
> > ML soon.
> >
> > Congratulations, Vijay! Let's do it!
> >
> > Paulo
> >
> > On 05/05/17 17:25, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
On Friday 05 May 2017 22:16:48 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> Do we have to give updates on kde-devel also or just updates on
> kopete-devel are fine?
kopete-devel is enough. It is public list with public email archive at:
https://marc.info/?l=kopete-devel
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gma
!) are
absolutely needed.
Missing status update would lead to failure of your GSoC project!
If you have any question, just ask.
(CC montel: please subscribe to kopete-devel ML if you are not already)
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
would not be on
GSoC as it is more or less finished by Laurent Montel and must be
finished before end of GSoC, ideally for Applications 17.08 release.
If you are still interested in Kopete, please choose other project for
Kopete on GSoC.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
protocol anymore... IIRC
they were removed in commit 42bdc1dcfcd442e44775020d3354522e10f77c98. So what
is reason for this very huge patch?
- Pali Rohár
On mar. 24, 2017, 5:42 popoludní, Vijay Krishnavanshi wrote
plication (ideally for everyday usage) so would be able to
find something which would like to change...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
/linphonemediaengine.cc (line 172)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129325/#comment68456>
It was told that passing NULL crash application.
- Pali Rohár
On nov. 3, 2016, 7:01 popoludní, Fabian Vogt wrote:
>
> ---
> This is a
> Not sure what this serves, maybe Pali can explain.
>
> Pali Rohár wrote:
> IIRC qt-mt is old qt3 multithread library
>
> R.Harish Navnit wrote:
> Shall remove it.
>
> Vijay Krishnavanshi wrote:
> Hi, I see these issues coresponding to th
Jobs or Bugs to try fixing to get familiar
> > with Kopete ?
> > Can i try the earlier Kopete KDE3 version and get the code to see how IRC
> > worked?
> >
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
to find particular commits in kf5 branch from
which reviewboard pull requests are created.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 07 November 2016 10:06:50 4ernov wrote:
> 2016-11-07 11:55 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi! Thank you for current information about state. I see that in
> > kopete git repository are more kf5 branches and it would be greate
> > to h
On Tuesday 14 February 2017 10:19:17 Luca Beltrame wrote:
> Il giorno Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:21:12 +0100
> Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > 1) Upstream libiris does not support building dynamic shared library
>
> Then they should be pestered until
ffects only Kopete)
Problem 3) is fixed now, all Kopete patches were upstreamed.
Psi is the main "user" of libiris and it has embedded libiris library
too (via git submodule). So I do not know if 1) and 2) can be easily
fixed -- which needs to be done in upstream.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
16.12.3 (Kopete 1.11.3).
More information at:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376348
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5593
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q1/373
https://github.com/psi-im/iris/pull/47/commits/02e976d4426a1319a7af7d26d7aba9d8c6077570
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro
list or upload to KDE reviewboard into Kopete group:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kopete/?show-closed=0
> Any guidance would largely help! Thank you so much for your valuable
> time. I am looking forward to your reply.
>
> Regards,
> Pratik Dhanave
>
> [0] - https:/
> On jan. 22, 2017, 11:17 popoludní, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > No comment after Pali's "Fix it" more than 2 years ago, should we discard
> > this review request?
>
> Ovidiu Nitan wrote:
> YMSG protocol is dead anyway, so I guess it can be discarded.
I think such option can be useful
On Saturday 19 November 2016 12:49:00 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello!
>
> New feature in Kopete 1.11 (part of KDE Applications 16.12) is
> support for X-OAUTH2 SASL authentication in jabber protocol. It is
> alternative to clear-text password based authentication.
>
> Currently i
> On nov. 20, 2016, 1:26 popoludní, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hi! Instead disabling this plugin, please rather help with debugging, like
> > providing exact steps how to reproduce your vulnerability (asked in bug
> > #362535 ).
Bugs should be fix
with debugging, like
providing exact steps how to reproduce your vulnerability (asked in bug #362535
).
- Pali Rohár
On nov. 20, 2016, 12:37 popoludní, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
be useful for google accounts with disabled (or not
available) clear-text password authentication. Or for people who do not
want to send clear-text password in TLS tunnel to google servers (as
google does not support SCRAM)...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description
> On nov. 3, 2016, 8:32 popoludní, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Can you point to documentation or description of that changed function API?
> > Or e.g. to sources?
>
> Fabian Vogt wrote:
> Unfortunately the official online source is broken (as is the online git
> bro
On Friday 11 November 2016 18:03:49 R.Harish Navnit wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2016-11-10 20:01 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>:
> >> On Monday 07 November 2016 10:35:23 4ernov wrote:
> >>>
ersonal cloned
repositories too...
> >> Pali said, the code is still in git and available in case of
> >> someone would wish to port also some not ported protocol.
> >
> > Perfect.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Harish
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
kf5 branches and it would be greate to have one
for kf5 development (to prevent duplication, etc)...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
;Request URL" is
>retrived "Access Token" which is then used for real authentication. You can
>use "Access Token" for autentication too (instead previous four settings), but
>Google generates "Access Token" with one hour validity.
Thanks,
Pali Rohár
of that changed function API? Or
e.g. to sources?
- Pali Rohár
On nov. 3, 2016, 7:01 popoludní, Fabian Vogt wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
Hello,
what is current state of effort on porting Kopete to KF5?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ent ID", "Client Secret Key", "Refresh Token" and as "Request URL"
use: "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token;
>From "Client ID", "Client Secret Key", "Refresh Token" via "Request URL" is
>retrived "Access Token" which is then used for real authentication. You can
>use "Access Token" for autentication too (instead previous four settings), but
>Google generates "Access Token" with one hour validity.
Thanks,
Pali Rohár
51b9e445dd3d8beaee936dc6ef7290e27593dc5b
protocols/jabber/xoauth2provider.h PRE-CREATION
protocols/jabber/xoauth2provider.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129239/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Pali Rohár
ported to Qt5
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
sqlite or other performance key-value database with search support; need
to investigate what is available in year 2016), but it is not easy and
I'm proposing this project for GSoC for more years...
From last year I have in my mind idea how it should looks like and how
it could be implemented
for everyday chatting for about 2-3 months already (I mean,
> KF5-partially ported version).
If you have code parts which are compatible with both qt4 and qt5 I can
merge it into kopete master branch (after review). Basically master
branch needs to be compiled with qt4
Re: GSoC - Kopete IRC protocol project".
So please let us know and clarify your state. In two weeks is mid-term
evaluation of students, checking if students worked on projects and done
what they should. Keep in mind that we did not see anything from you and
kde developers cannot ev
> On máj 31, 2016, 9:47 dopoludnia, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Pali Rohár wrote:
> Just add proper BUG: and REVIEW: keywords into commit message
>
> Johannes Huber wrote:
> I doubt that Peter has write access. I can do it for him. Which branch is
> On May 31, 2016, 9:47 a.m., Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Pali Rohár wrote:
> Just add proper BUG: and REVIEW: keywords into commit message
>
> Johannes Huber wrote:
> I doubt that Peter has write access. I can do it for him. Which branch is
>
> On May 31, 2016, 9:47 a.m., Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Ship It!
Just add proper BUG: and REVIEW: keywords into commit message
- Pali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org
> On May 31, 2016, 7:26 a.m., Luca Beltrame wrote:
> > +1 To me. You may want to add Pali Rohar as reviewer as he's been doing
> > most of the work in Kopete nowadays.
Group "Kopete" is enough :-)
- Pali
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128006/#review96073
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Pali Rohár
On May 31, 2016, 3:30
Harsh, can you wrote some report?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
/new_irc gives the files to understand IRC
> Protocols to
> implement the plugin.
I would suggest you to use master git branch. Delete existing irc
protocol (in protocols/irc directory) and copy+rename protocols/testbed
instead. Testbed is example how protocol should be written and which
functions/cla
count. I
think you already asked for it...
So your first step would be to clone kopete git repository and build it.
If you are not familiar with git, let me know and I will help you.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This i
.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
er xmpp library better fit for Kopete, feel
free to do experiments and show test results. Some comparison of
features of both libraries can be useful too...
Replacing libiris for another library would take lot of time which I do
not have. And because libiris is working I did not have any
1 - 100 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
