Derek Wrote,
"Im thinking I want to a trigear on my kr Im not really in love with the
taildragger. Let me know if you think that would be a ok idea"
I think it's a terrible idea! Not only will you ruin the looks of the
airplane (Look what a nosegear did to the Pacer! Turned a graceful
design
Some older RV'ers eventually go to 3 in the green build option. My brother
is considering a tri-gear after years & many TD's (62yrs old)
Many factor's.Alan Toule serial RV Builder once said in SA mag about
doing same said he had too much cash $$$ in his TD to have it wrecked by a
simple mis
So, so agreed
If you want, get some duel conventional time in a variety of
conventional gear birds :-)
-dave
laser...@juno.com wrote:
> Derek Wrote,
>
> "Im thinking I want to a trigear on my kr Im not really in love with the
> taildragger. Let me know if you think that would be a ok idea
Looks, Speed, money, and adding something else that can break your plane.
The KR has to be the easiest conventional gear airplane that there is to fly
It is so easy that even I can do it.
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
See you at the 2008 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon
"your tone is absolutely arrogant"
Oh calm down. Taking offense at a tongue in cheek proclamation doesn't
say much for your security level.
Mike
Click here to become a professional counselor in less time than you think.
http://thirdp
And why are you Luddites with the tender egos still re-posting
everything. Weren't Mark's instructions clear enough?
I swear, ten year olds do better.
Mike
Buying a home? Click here for free information on find the home of your drea
Actually Mark mentioned or a small 'snip' of previous email.Which is
exactly what the last two emails were? & Funny besides :-)
CL-Tim
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 22:48
Subject: KR> Flying Milkstools
And why are you Luddite
BOY AM I GLAD THAT THIS IS JUST AN OPINION. Because it surly not a fact,
N357CJ had a true airspeed of 183,6 mph @ 450 MSL the other night at 6
gph- I have never taken offence to the nose vs. tail wheel before but
your tone is absolutely arrogant
Joe Horton
Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA.
joe.kr2s.bui
I have to agree with Joe, it is an opinion. I think the taildragger looks a
little "old timey", and is so low to the ground that it looks small...not
confidence inspiring to those who are afraid of flying (not that I care).
The tri-gear looks like a more substantial airplane because it's up off
Oh, and to have been more thorough in looking at both sides, the taildragger
is always trying to run off the runway (in a minor way) as opposed to being
naturally more directionally stable on the ground, but that's never bothered
me (yet). Another angle is that if the nose gear breaks you will
I probably hand out as much ribbing about airplane training wheels and such as
anyone, and 8 of the 9 planes I have owned so far have been tail draggers;
However I have to agree with Joe here. If a guy want's a nose gear on his
plane cause that's what he's comfortable with, then by all means, h
I haven't seen any mention of it, so I'll mention it: For those of us
who live near alot of water, retracts are best for a water landing, or
perhaps landing on frozen cornfields (john S. did that), probably for a
muddy field too.
jg
N611GB
Puyallup WA
I have never taken offence to the nose vs. tail wheel before but
your tone is absolutely arrogant
I do take offence to your comments.
MY view is opposite to yours but I would never say what you did to anyone on
this list
Phil Matheson
SAAA Ch. 20 http://www.saaa20.org/
VH-
3 weeks.
--- On Tue, 11/4/08, John Gotschall wrote:
From: John Gotschall
Subject: Re: KR> Flying milkstools and idiots
To: "KRnet"
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 7:48 PM
I haven't seen any mention of it, so I'll mention it: For those o
14 matches
Mail list logo
