Bugs item #2055584, was opened at 2008-08-16 23:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jiajun
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2055584&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
Hi All,
This is our Weekly KVM Testing Report against lastest kvm.git
ce094fc0d25cb364bce6f854dffc6849876ab89 and kvm-userspace.git
55ff0bb298456450a81448200fea8f50246893b4.
No new issue found this week and one issue fixed. All failed cases can
pass by manual.
One Issue Fixed:
==
* On Friday 22 Aug 2008 23:48:42 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
> > index d9ef7d3..2956e35 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
> > @@ -495,4 +495,6 @@ struct kvm_assigned_irq {
> > __u32 flags;
>
* On Friday 22 Aug 2008 23:51:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > The following two patches contain VT-d support for device assignment
> > for KVM guests.
> >
> > The first patch contains the changes that are required to the generic
> > VT-d code.
> >
> > The second patch contains the chang
Amit Shah wrote:
* On Friday 22 Aug 2008 23:48:42 Avi Kivity wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
index d9ef7d3..2956e35 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
@@ -495,4 +495,6 @@ struct kvm_assigned_irq {
__u32 flags
Amit Shah wrote:
* On Friday 22 Aug 2008 23:51:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
The following two patches contain VT-d support for device assignment
for KVM guests.
The first patch contains the changes that are required to the generic
VT-d code.
The second patch contains the chan
* On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 14:58:50 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > Also, is KVM_CAP_foo needed for this? This is the only #define that'll be
> > used and we can simply do something like
> >
> > #ifdef KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_USE_VTD
> > flags |= KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_USE_VTD
> > #endif
> >
> > ?
>
> That
Fix indentation style in libkvm.c to match the rest of the file
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
libkvm/libkvm.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.c b/libkvm/libkvm.c
index 5edfad7..ad7f5a5 100644
--- a/libkvm/libkvm.c
+++ b/li
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:33:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> So long as there is no potential for performance or security impact,
> having pvdma turned on automatically is better. We could still have
> dma=noparavirt to disable it.
pvdma has advantages and disadvantages. It has a significant
pe
* On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 15:03:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > * On Friday 22 Aug 2008 23:51:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> Amit Shah wrote:
> >>> The following two patches contain VT-d support for device assignment
> >>> for KVM guests.
> >>>
> >>> The first patch contains the changes that
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:50:25PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:33:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > So long as there is no potential for performance or security impact,
> > having pvdma turned on automatically is better. We could still have
> > dma=noparavirt to d
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:10:52AM +0300, Amit Shah wrote:
> The second patch contains the changes to KVM.
>
> I've updated the 2nd patch to use VT-d only when requested by a
> parameter on the command line, making it easier to support iommu
> with pvdma and multiple iommu types.
>
> The command
* On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 15:27:47 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:10:52AM +0300, Amit Shah wrote:
> > The second patch contains the changes to KVM.
> >
> > I've updated the 2nd patch to use VT-d only when requested by a
> > parameter on the command line, making it easier to sup
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 03:55:25PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> The authorship info and the commit log stays the same; just contains
> my signoff.
Actually, unless you add an explicit 'From:' header, the email From
header is used by git as the author of the patch.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Workshop on I/O V
* On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 16:10:54 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 03:55:25PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > The authorship info and the commit log stays the same; just contains
> > my signoff.
>
> Actually, unless you add an explicit 'From:' header, the email From
> header is used by
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:41:02PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> * On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 16:10:54 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 03:55:25PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > The authorship info and the commit log stays the same; just contains
> > > my signoff.
> >
> > Actually, unless
* On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 17:41:32 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:41:02PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > * On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 16:10:54 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 03:55:25PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > The authorship info and the commit log stays
On Friday, August 22, 2008 12:10 am Amit Shah wrote:
> From: Kay, Allen M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch extends the VT-d driver to support KVM
>
> [Ben: fixed memory pinning]
>
> Signed-off-by: Kay, Allen M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: B
After movong from KVM-72 to KVM-73 I do get the Notice
"vmport: unknown command 13"
The Message appears on starting emulation. In an Netboot environment it
does appear before booting from Network is asked.
What might go wrong here?
Elmar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
Elmar Haneke wrote:
> After movong from KVM-72 to KVM-73 I do get the Notice
>
> "vmport: unknown command 13"
>
> The Message appears on starting emulation. In an Netboot environment it
> does appear before booting from Network is asked.
>
> What might go wrong here?
It's actually harmless; it'
Hey.
When running a guest in the following setup, I observ a "massive"
performance decrease after a couple of gigabytes of transfrerred data.
other guests keep running fine (no regressions) and nothing unusual is
observed on the host.
fedora 8 host, kvm-72 (user and module)
fedora 9 guest, all
Having given up getting normal ESX booting from within KVM, I thought i'd
give ESXi a go.
PXE booting the hypervisor image outside of KVM I have working fine.
When trying within KVM i had a few issues:
The 'vmport' breaks ESXi, so for now I commented out vmport_init();
Then it complains about t
Yuksel Gunal wrote:
Hi,
I have been playing with KVM and was wondering about the following
question: is there a resource configuration setting that would enforce
a fraction of CPU to be guaranteed for a KVM guest? What I have on
mind is something similar to the "reservation" setting on VMwar
23 matches
Mail list logo
