On Wednesday 25 September 2002 07:59, Rohan Almeida wrote:
Hi List,
I've truly sorry if this question has been tried
on this LIST, but i'm quite desperate now!
I'm currently using a linux box doing proxy-arp,
with same IP on both interfaces.
kernel 2.4.18 with htb and iproute2 patch
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:28:28AM +0200, Soulfly wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 5 priomap 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1
1 1 1 2 2 2 2
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0
Soulfly [EMAIL PROTECTED] thus wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 5 priomap 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1
1 1 1 2 2 2 2
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 30:
I'm happy to help! I just want to make sure you've know the basics so you
don't fall into pitholes. Examples is one of the best sources of
information.
Oh I didn't look up the number for your protocol, so exchange the 'XX' with
this.
- Original Message -
From: Emmanuel Lacour [EMAIL
Soulfly [EMAIL PROTECTED] thus wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 5 priomap 2 3 2 2 3 3 3
3 1
1 1 1 2 2 2 2
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 07:59, Rohan Almeida wrote:
Hi List,
I've truly sorry if this question has been tried
on this LIST, but i'm quite desperate now!
I'm currently using a linux box doing proxy-arp,
with same IP on both interfaces.
kernel 2.4.18 with htb and
mandrake2.4.19mdk - sorry that i'm not able to be more helpfull :)
And just sending make test reports
==
TCNG host syntax: bare name with host prefix: PASSED
TCNG host syntax: bare name with host prefix (obsolete): PASSED
TCNG host
correct me if im wrong, but couldn't u achieve the same goal only with htb?
i mean by creating a leave-level with classes rate=1bps, ceil=maxbw, prio 0-6
and attaching sfq/pfifo as leave-qdiscs to these classes?
s.th. like:
tc qdisc root handle 1:0 htb
tc class parent 1:0 handle 1:1 rate
Hep
Trying to get pfifo to work. Setup :
|--|---eth1 (192.168.10.0/24)
eth0---| GW |---eth2 (192.168.11.0/24)
|--|---eth3 (192.168.12.0/24)
read all documentation :
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.interactive-prio.html
here is my TOS mangling rulse in iptables :
I woluld like to know if there is a way to know the route to a destination
without asking it via console (ip route get) but from within c code.
One possible way is to make system(ip route gat xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx), redirect
to a file and then read the file.
Is there a simpler and more efficient way?
hi,
just like Steve said in the previous mail, prioband is ok but it doesn't
make sure that your bandwith is consumed by one service (even if it's in a
lower class than interactive stuff) because it doesn't reserve bandwidth
for its priomaps.
to achieve what u want i suggest using htb (see
Hi all,
I'm running RH7.3 plus errata.
I've read through the HowTo and I had something like this configuration
working on RH7.1, but it looks like the interface to IP and ROUTE has
changed considerably since then.
I'm trying to set up a simple router configuration to route between
David Lamparter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know where this ping effect comes from,
east:
# ip tunnel add netb mode gre remote a.b.c.e local f.g.h.i ttl 255
# ip link set netb up
# ip addr add 192.168.0.254/32 peer 192.168.1.0/24 dev netb
west:
# ip tunnel add neta mode gre
Steve M Bibayoff schrieb:
Tried both of these, am still seeing this weird ping affect. If no
traffic travels over the tunnel for a while (5 minutes) I can't get
from .0/24 neta(east) to .1/24 netb(west) till after I send some traffic
from west to east first. Once I do that, everything else
David Lamparter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have NAT / mangling / etc. running somewhere? The connection
tracking timeout is 500 s afaik, maybe GRE is NATed on one of your
gateways?
A possible explanation would be that east does SNAT on GRE packets
or
west does DNAT on GRE ... so
hi,
So I have the following:
ROUTER 10.0.0.254
|
10.0.0.3(eth0)
MY_DEBIAN_RTR
209.52.x.126(eth1)
|
LAN (the 209.52.x.64/26 subnet)
I need to route the 209.52.x.64 subnet through MY_DEBIAN_RTR
and on to the telephone company router. I'd probably like
209.52.x to have it's own table (if that
16 matches
Mail list logo