Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/21/04

--- This is an automatically generated reply --- The NVSI internet connection is currently experiencing technical difficulties. You email has been received by the mail server, but may not be delivered to its intended recipient for a few days. If you need to contact an NVSI staff member urgentl

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/21/04

--- This is an automatically generated reply --- The NVSI internet connection is currently experiencing technical difficulties. You email has been received by the mail server, but may not be delivered to its intended recipient for a few days. If you need to contact an NVSI staff member urgentl

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/20/04

Please read for precompiler - 'preprocessor'; sorry for the error. - Original Message ----- From: "Info LabVIEW Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Info LabVIEW Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:01 PM Subject: Inf

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/18/04

#define is really a precompiler directive in C/C++. It is probably more efficient if we wrote a macro which could be read directly by the compiler ; and there are moves to try to eliminate the precompiler altogether. So I wouldn't laugh at alternatives but rather pursue them as to how it could impr

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/16/04

At 8:04 -0400 6/16/04, Hysell Shannon wrote: >If anyone saves their previous posts- can someone forward me the various posts >regarding the RTOS using a PC?? I deleted them and now I have a thought! You can search for any previous posting at Brian Renken's EXCELLENT search engine.

RE: SPAM - RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/16/04

You could try searching the Info-LabVIEW archives at http://www.searchview.net/ This site automatically archives the messages so they can searched. It has everything back to 1991. Ed Edwin O. Dickens - Certified LabVIEW Developer DISTek

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/16/04

If anyone saves their previous posts- can someone forward me the various posts regarding the RTOS using a PC?? I deleted them and now I have a thought! Thanks so much, Shannon Hysell Siemens VDO

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 06/03/04

Good Morning All,    Hopefully this email will get through and not end up garbled as the digest version of my last post from this "Braindead AOL" mailer did. Unfortunately the only two email systems I have available on the road are AOL and Yahoo, and I _won't_ use the Outlook Express virus magnet

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 05/26/04

>>How do I yield from a C program back to the labview program? It may allow the other threads to run automatically but it blocks the UI thread I think and that is >>really a significant block Scott, A small clarification to your point above: If the LV DLL node is configured as "reentrant" (r

RE: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest

ering www.ammonsengineering.com (810) 687-4288 Phone (810) 687-6202 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brophy Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest LabVIEW SCXI 1100 anomaly

RE: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest

Perhaps the low pass filtering on the cards is not the same. You may be seeing the effects of some "high frequency" noise causing aliasing which is perceived as a variation in temperature. Check the input voltages using an oscilloscope. Measure the voltage on each leg of the differential inputs

RE: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest

os Flores ArchonWest Technologies telephone: 888.824.2320 mobile: 323.620.1548 http://www.archonwest.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brophy Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest

Question to Info-LabVIEW Digest

LabVIEW SCXI 1100 anomaly Dear all, I have run into a truly bizarre anomaly when reading from an SCXI 1100 card with labview 6.1. I have been using labview for over 4 years and have never seen anything like this. I wonder if anyone can help me. I have an application with many temperature reading

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 05/14/04

I ran into this as well once at a previous employer (a large telecom equip mfgr), I made this suggestion to the managers: order a server! Servers will usually not be subject to the desktop software licensing requirements, (MS-Office, disk partitioning, case access (installing cards), latest OS, et

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 04/21/04

Hello, I receive my info-labview mailings as a daily digest. Rather than being text message as before, those coming from the new address contain a text listing of subjects, then a bunch of attachments. The first day, there was an attachment for each entry in the list of messages. Today, I

Re: The Future of Igor and Info-LabVIEW Lists

On Friday, March 19, 2004, at 04:32 PM, Coradeschi, Tom [AMSRD-AAR-AIS-E] wrote: As I slowly fade from the scene, I'd also like to thank all of you for making this a really great experience. Way back when I was a heavy Igor and LabVIEW user, the lists made a tremendous impact on my ability to do

RE: The Future of Igor and Info-LabVIEW Lists

rch 19, 2004 10:32 PM > To: igor; info-labview > Subject: The Future of Igor and Info-LabVIEW Lists > > Good afternoon, all. As you know, there have been a number of problems > which > have impacted the availability of the Igor and Info-LabVIEW mailing lists > recently

Info-LabVIEW New Host & Administrator (was: Let's have election!It is fun:))

Howdy Ya'll, Political Puns Prologue: It has been said that the best form of government is a benign democratic dictatorship, where things generally free-run as long as everyone behaves, and the dictator exercises their absolute authority very infrequently and always to the benefit of those being g

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 04/05/04

so. Bruce -- Bruce Ammons Ammons Engineering www.ammonsengineering.com (810) 687-4288 Phone (810) 687-6202 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lewis Drake Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: In

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 04/05/04

I am using the new IMAQ 7.0 image control that imbeds an image on the front panel of a LV VI. However, I can't seem to find a way to make it autosize to the image. Has anyone been able to do this? Lewis Drake Process Automation Corporation Belle Mead, NJ 908 359-1011 www.processauto.com

Re: Alternative info-LabVIEW list (NOT!)

> > -- > > Subject: RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list (NOT!) > From: "Scott Hannahs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:27:45 -0500 > > At 2:04 PM -0500 3/22/04, Bookwalter,

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list (NOT!)

At 2:04 PM -0500 3/22/04, Bookwalter, Dan wrote: > >I would like to see Info-LabVIEW on a news (NNTP) server. > >I sure hope this doesn't happen... I have tried and tried to get our IT guys >to open up NNTP for me. They simply won't do it... I am sure there are many >

Re: The Future of Igor and Info-LabVIEW Lists

Thank you very much, Tom. It has been a wonderful run. -k

Re: Alternative Info-LabVIEW home.

Just want to update everyone who may be curious as to what is the status of Info-LabVIEW. Tom Coradeschi posted the following to the list: Good afternoon, all. As you know, there have been a number of problems which have impacted the availability of the Igor and Info-LabVIEW mailing lists

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

ributors Who knows maybe even some contibutors from Info LabVIEW - although I would doubt many. Tom set up Info LabVIEW with great foresight. We all belong to it because it performs the task we require. We all (including NI) owe Tom a great deal of thanks. Countless problems as well as many

Info-LabVIEW

Salut. This list as contibuted greatly to my understanding of LV and the dataflow concepts. So... One big :o) to Tom and also to all the subsribers :o). I would like the list to stay as is. This doesn't mean that it cannot be extended, just that i would like to keep what i have now the way it

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

Listers For what it's worth, given that I'm not currently a heavy LabVIEW user or list "presence", I echo Rolf's position. Info-LabVIEW has always been a convenient, spam-free on-topic email folder on my desktop. Whenever I want I can go browse through the recent posti

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

er mailing lists. I don't want to login to a news server every day to follow all the communication and to wade through a long lists of unrelated posts. Just the way a mailing list works accommodates my needs. Info-LabVIEW has never really been spammed in the past thanks to its outstanding

Re: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

On 03/22/04 14:04:17, "Bookwalter, Dan" wrote: > I would like to see Info-LabVIEW on a news (NNTP) > server. I sure hope this doesn't happen... I have tried and tried to get our IT guys to open up NNTP for me. They simply won't do it... I am sure there are many othe

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

ivial task. Threaded topics are easily broken. They get mail bombed, spammed, etc. I would like to see Info-LabVIEW on a news (NNTP) server. The beauty of comp.lang.labview is that I can read and post from a news reader and search its archives with Google. No need for a web interface. I

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

t a matter of time since Tom's personal >server that hosts info-LabVIEW goes "tits up". In the long-term we just >want one list of course. Since Tom has asked for help in transferring >the list, I am just stepping up to the plate and making the first move. > >If there

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

OK, my turn... I believe that Michael Aivaliotis would be an excellent info-labview list administrator. He has repeatedly demonstrated that he is technically capable of this task through his management of the LAVA mailing lists, discussion forums, and the NI Week Blog. I have found him to be

RE: The Future of Igor and Info-LabVIEW Lists

usual. Take care Tom and again, Thank You. Michael Aivaliotis http://forums.lavausergroup.org > Good afternoon, all. As you know, there have been a number of > problems which have impacted the availability of the Igor and > Info-LabVIEW mailing lists recently. I've asked the reade

Re: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

Jean Pierre et all,   > I don't mean a public USENET newsgroup but maybe a private news server accessible > only to the list subscribers.   I like that idea.   PJM    Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.

Re: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

> >I would like to see Info-LabVIEW on a news (NNTP) server. > > I sure hope this doesn't happen... I have tried and tried to get our IT guys > to open up NNTP for me. They simply won't do it... I am sure there are many > others in the same situation > Sc

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

>I would like to see Info-LabVIEW on a news (NNTP) server. I sure hope this doesn't happen... I have tried and tried to get our IT guys to open up NNTP for me. They simply won't do it... I am sure there are many others in the same situation Dan Bookwalter N8DCJ Hi-Stat a Stone

RE: The Future of Igor and Info-LabVIEW Lists

CLAP CLAP CLAP... Standing Ovation. Thanks Tom for everything. Rick M. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Coradeschi, Tom [AMSRD-AAR-AIS-E] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:32 PM To: igor; info-labview Subject: The Future of Igor and Info

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

As far as we can tell, it's just a matter of time since Tom's personal server that hosts info-LabVIEW goes "tits up". In the long-term we just want one list of course. Since Tom has asked for help in transferring the list, I am just stepping up to the plate and making the firs

Re: Info-LabVIEW New Host & Administrator

I hesitate to suggest this as it may sound like NI propaganda, but there is a facility specifically for archiving VIs and hosting discussions. http://zone.ni.com If the mailing list needs a place to put VIs and such, the developer exchange has a place to host those VIs: http://www.ni.com/devzo

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 02/20/04

Two points. To George; fine for low throughput, but don't expect to update XY graphs by reference. To J Adam Crain; This sounds suspiciously like you want VIs buried deeply in the heirarchy to respond to events on the front panel without any direct linkage. Interesting tricks like this make it an

Info-LabVIEW - Continued Existence

I'd like to agree with Jim K. that Michael has my trust in supporting the continued existence of info-LabVIEW. I've been subscribed to info-LabVIEW since ~1990 (so long I don't remember!) I would like to see the list continue. Cudos to Tom C. he should be rewarded for his ef

Info-LabVIEW - Continued Existence

I'd like to agree with Jim K. that Michael has my trust in supporting the continued existence of info-LabVIEW. I've been subscribed to info-LabVIEW since ~1990 (so long I don't remember!) I would like to see the list continue. Cudos to Tom C. he should be rewarded for his ef

Re: Info-LabVIEW New Host & Administrator

HOSTING: I favor hosting the list with an institution, not an individual. The hosting of the list should be officially sanctioned and supported by the institution, with clear guidelines as to succession should the Administrator pass on or resign. I agree with this completely. Along with the other

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

view newsgroup. Then again there are participants in the forums.lavausergroup.org. The point is that each has a "character" and a unique set of people that surround it. We should try and avoid changing the makeup of info-labview if at all possible and keep the "character" cons

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

If the list is being moved and reworked, then why not consider changing the format of it to something that allows for better tracking of discussion topics? There are several software packages available that support discussion groups like this and allow for HTML. Lewis Drake Process Automation Cor

RE: Alternative info-LabVIEW list

Scott, Thanks a whole bunch for the offer. It is amazing for how long Tom Coradeshi ran info-labview pretty much flawlessly for years. I remember when I joined, way back in 1992 which is 12 years ago. Yeah, and these Macs do run fine for a long time. To me it seems a logic move from Igor to Igor

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 02/20/04

George, I use this technique frequently for large control systems where multiple threads update their corresponding front panel data. I have even toyed with the idea of allowing the threads to detect their own events (instead of the launching thread detecting and messaging) with the dynamic eve

Alternative info-LabVIEW list

Well, I decided to put up an alternative Info-LabVIEW mailing list. Since it is a fact that many people refuse to use web based forums, I think a mailing list is still essential. Right now, the original list is up and down. Here is the link to the new subscription page. http://lavausergroup.org

Links to Info-LabVIEW status information

LabVIEWers, At Brian Renken's suggestion, I have made the Info-LabVIEW status information on my site easier to access by increasing the size of the text and moving it to its own page, http://www.sullutions.com/LabVIEW/Info-LabVIEW.html. There is a link to this location from the ol

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 02/05/04

> } >As I understand it a version of LabVIEW can always(?) open a VI written > } >with an earlier LV version but the converse is not true. > > Converse... inverse... reverse... nope, it's been too long since my > discrete math courses. Can't remember how to form logical converse. > > But this is

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 02/05/04

> That's because LabVIEW need a VI's wiring diagram to recompile it up > to a higher version, and building a VI into an executible removes > it's diagram by default. The runtime engine doesn't have a compiler, so even if the diagrams were present, there's no way to recompile. > >As I understa

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 02/05/04

> Subject: RE: [W] VI Server vs. System Exec. > From: "Junginger, Johann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:15:34 -0500 > > >As I understand it a version of LabVIEW can always(?) open a VI written > >with an earlier LV version but the converse is not true. > > That is only true for

RE: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 02/04/04

You will get the best possible results using the regression fit routines if you adjust your input data arrays so that they contain numbers that are "small". These routines suffer from numeric errors internally when processing large numbers, like timestamps. I do this to the data before passing it

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 01/26/04

I> Sorry Greg, but your last message was the funniest one in the digest. > In cultural awareness practice, when someone named Hamid says they > don't eat pork, you're not supposed to guess that they're a vegan. Yeah, yeah, I know. I was just trying to show the breadth of food in Austin. I'd hav

Re: Info-LabVIEW Digest - 01/26/04

re not supposed to guess that they're a vegan. --David P.S. I always explain that my wife is a vegran. That's a vegetarian who's one weak spot is mashed potatoes and gravy. P.P.S. I joined the info-labview crowd at Country Line in