Am Montag, den 28.01.2008, 10:31 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on Hamradio station logging program in Lazarus
> (http://cqrlog.sourceforge.net/). I started a few months (maybe a year)
> ago in Lazarus 0.9.23 CVS (I don't remember date, I'm on another
> computer). Why this
Am 25.01.2008 um 02:37 schrieb mramirez:
Hi. I was wondering if C++ classes binary "*.obj" files could be
accessed from a Free Pascal application.
As far as I know this is not possible (yet). The main problem is that
the C++ ABI is very complicated and also changes with each GCC version.
Am 24.01.2008 um 10:31 schrieb Damien Gerard:
On Jan 24, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Albert Zeyer wrote:
Hi,
Just packed it together. Here it is (but only for IntelMac):
http://www.az2000.de/downloads/Robot1.7.Mac.zip
You have just to click on the robot-Application (robot.app) inside.
In a OS X
Hi,
Just packed it together. Here it is (but only for IntelMac):
http://www.az2000.de/downloads/Robot1.7.Mac.zip
You have just to click on the robot-Application (robot.app) inside.
Regards,
Albert
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
Hey,
Just wanted to report that everything works really fine under MacOSX!
I am really impressed. I haven't found any big bug which prevents me
from working with the native Carbon interface.
Some screenshots:
http://www.az2000.de/pics/robot2mac_1.png?get
http://www.az2000.de/pics/robot2mac_
Am 24.01.2008 um 00:06 schrieb Albert Zeyer:
Am 23.01.2008 um 23:48 schrieb Hess, Philip J:
Hi Albert,
The Lazarus installer creates the lazarus.app bundle and puts the
structure inside it that OS X wants. For apps you develop yourself
you
can use the create_app_mac.sh script to create
d the 2.2.1 FPC just
create
more problems than it solves?
Thanks.
-Phil
-Original Message-----
From: Albert Zeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:35 PM
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] make, MacOSX
Am 23.01.2008 um 23:26 schrieb Tom Gregorov
Am 23.01.2008 um 23:36 schrieb Vincent Snijders:
Albert Zeyer schreef:
Am 23.01.2008 um 23:02 schrieb Hess, Philip J:
http://michael-ep3.physik.uni-halle.de/Lazarus/
Try a snapshot from here.
Thanks.
Someone should update the files on SF.
Release are put on sourceforge, nightlybuilds
Am 23.01.2008 um 23:26 schrieb Tom Gregorovic:
On Jan 23, 2008 9:26 PM, Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Is there any documentation about the parameters I can pass to the
Makefile?
I am mainly trying to compile Lazarus directly on my system without
using Lazarus f
rt Lazarus and I get very much exactly the same
behaviour as last time. The only difference is that I can move the
window now, though I cannot focus it and neither click on "Ignore".
Regards,
Albert
-Original Message-
From: Albert Zeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Am 23.01.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Damien Gerard:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Hess, Philip J wrote:
http://michael-ep3.physik.uni-halle.de/Lazarus/
Try a snapshot from here.
I believe an Intel Mac's can run the PowerPC version via its
"Rosetta"
technology.
Yes but you should not. For co
;darwin-x86" (is this the correct name?)?
Thanks,
Albert
-----Original Message-
From: Albert Zeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:26 PM
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: [lazarus] make, MacOSX
Hi,
Is there any documentation about the parameters I can p
-Button on this window
but I cannot click on it. I even cannot focus the window neither move
it or do anything with it. The only thing I can do is pressing Ctrl+C
in the console to break it.
Any ideas? Any hints?
Regards,
Albert Zeyer
Thanks for the hint.
Sadly I need the same realy for C++ as most of the code is C++ based (a
lot of classes).
Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2008, 14:20 + schrieb Luis Quental:
> On Jan 22, 2008 11:29 AM, Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there
Hi,
If have just googled a bit about Generics in FPC and the Lazarus Wiki
says that they are implemented since FPC 2.3.1.
How is the current state? Are they used? Are all the common containers
(like list, vector, map, etc.) available as generic classes?
In the FPC reference, it seems that
Hi,
Is there any automatic C++ to Object Pascal converter?
I am thinking of porting a C++ game to Object Pascal and want to have
some code as a basic to work with. It's enough if just the syntax got
translated and some easy designed objects.
Greetings,
Albert
_
Am 15.01.2008 um 20:26 schrieb Vincent Snijders:
For creating a successful and strong development tool (which is
the goal of the whole project AFAIK) you need not only
contributors but users as well...
Why needs Lazarus users that contribute nothing?
They are testers and they infect othe
Am 15.01.2008 um 18:35 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 06:28:12PM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote:
I've no idea what you mean by that remark.
Linux became popular because it was/is easy to install. (OK, not
gained by
the Linux kernel developers itself but by the comm
Am 15.01.2008 um 18:13 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 05:44:15PM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote:
Andrew Brunner schreef:
Vincent: > IOW: I expect Lazarus users to be knowledgeable,
Lazarus is
not for
fools.
I offer you all this. The #1 reason why Microsoft Windows (3
Am 15.01.2008 um 17:11 schrieb Vincent Snijders:
Andrew Brunner schreef:
Vincent: > IOW: I expect Lazarus users to be knowledgeable,
Lazarus is not for
fools.
I offer you all this. The #1 reason why Microsoft Windows (3 and
up) took
off and became so popular was Visual Basic for idiots a
Am 15.01.2008 um 17:02 schrieb Andrew Brunner:
Vincent:
IOW: I expect Lazarus users to be knowledgeable, Lazarus is not for
fools.
I offer you all this. The #1 reason why Microsoft Windows (3 and
up) took
off and became so popular was Visual Basic for idiots and Turbo
Pascal /
Delphi
Hey, just looked and it and it's realy nice!
Just wanted to thank you...
Greetings,
Albert
Am Dienstag, den 20.11.2007, 08:53 +0100 schrieb Tiziano De Togni:
> SteveG wrote:
> > Would anybody know if there is a listing (or some way of building one)
> > of all functions available for Lazarus and
Am Montag, den 12.11.2007, 18:35 +0100 schrieb Marc Weustink:
> Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> > http://www.stevetrefethen.com/blog/IWishTheDelphiCommandLineCompilerWereFree.aspx
> >
>
> Where have I heard such accusations before
>
Also my first thought.
--
Albert
___
Please read also this:
http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/92735
It's not only that MS-OOXML is useless. There is the usual MS strategy
behind. Their goal is to became MS-OOXML as an standard and after to
make all its users dependend on MS (because some important parts are not
open).
Read perhaps al
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 22:34 +0700 schrieb Paul Ishenin:
> Albert Zeyer пишет:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 15:35 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> >
> >
> >> Just a guess: Maybe it is an endless loop between gtk and LCL about too
> >&
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 15:35 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> Just a guess: Maybe it is an endless loop between gtk and LCL about too
> small widget sizes. I added minimum constraints of 1x1. Can you update
> lazarus svn and check if this fixes the problem?
I have updated the svn (to rev
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 15:19 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:51:59 +0200
> Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I stepped through the code and I figured out that I get the message
> > exactly at this point:
> &
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 13:59 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:23:59 +0200
> Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On the console, I get all the time: (also when I do nothing)
> > [DBGTGT]
> > NOTE: TGtkWidgetSet.In
Hi,
I got a freeze when I resize my window to a size where one of the panels
of the form becames completly hidden (it is moved to the left while
making the window smaller; this is because of the Anchors: left, right,
bottom).
I am using GTK2 and Lazarus rev 12674.
On the console, I get all the t
I like the X11-version of OO way more better then the native one. The
native one works slower, a bit unstable, has less features but on the
other side more problems. (But I must admit, I tested it one year ago or
so.)
And it's also no problem to have X on your Mac OS X, it's installed by
default a
Am Dienstag, den 22.05.2007, 10:09 +0200 schrieb A.J. Venter:
> So it's a case of which is your needs - for general console apps
> though - you should use ncrt because it's terminal independent and a
> LOT faster (ansi escapes take a long time to execute and make your
> whole program feel slow)
>
Use either {$MODE DELPHI} or ...OnClick := @BtnMenuClick.
Am Montag, den 21.05.2007, 11:39 -0700 schrieb Carlos Avogaro:
> I have this in Delphi, and the event onClick, work perfect
>
> for xx do
> btnMenu[xx].Height := 25;
> btnMenu[xx].Left:= 15;
> btnMenu[xx]
lication.
>
> I know that OpenGL is available within Lazarus because the demo
> directory includes some code. So it's probably only a matter of time.
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
> Albert Zeyer wrote:
>
> > This (AIGLX) is to prefer over XGL, because it doesn&#
This (AIGLX) is to prefer over XGL, because it doesn't add a complete
X11-layer and it allows the usage of hardware accelerated OpenGL through
it:
http://wiki.beryl-project.org/wiki/Install_Beryl_on_Ubuntu_Edgy_with_AIGLX
But all this isn't related to the software you run within. You only
change t
Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 18:22 -0400 schrieb Hess, Philip J:
> A Mac feels much more "alive" than other computers. For example, when logging
> in if you mistype your password the login dialog briefly wiggles from side to
> side as if shaking its head no at you. You get the point instantly. On
I don't know if there is any possibility to define the CPU, on which a
special thread should run on. Is there any?
Because usually, this is something your OS should handle because it
knows best about all the other parallel processes. And it's perhaps not
always the best solution for your applicati
surely recommend you to distribute
the source. :)
And you are right: Only if you distribute the source, you can ensure,
that your application will run nearly everywhere.
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 14:10 -0500 schrieb Lee Jenkins:
> Albert Zeyer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > There a
Hi
There are severeal parts you should seperate:
Firstly, all the hardware-stuff:
On the one hand, you have the CPU architecture. It is easy to
investigate (Wikipedia is your friend), which architecture is compatible
with some other. For example, you have 386 < 486 < 586/pentium1/amd_k6 <
686/al
nable to find the FPC sources.
>
> Original Message:
> -
> From: Albert Zeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:39:59 -0100
> To: lazarus@miraclec.com
> Subject: Re: [lazarus] Re: Linking Fails: cannot find -lglib
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 10:16
This is the Debian way. Under Portage, you don't need extra packages for
this. If you want to activate/deactivate something, you simply use USE
flags.
But in this case, you always got the header-files, they are installed by
default.
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:26 +0200 schrieb Dave Coventry:
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 10:16 +0200 schrieb Dave Coventry:
> Oops.
>
> This is possibly the crux of my problem.
>
> CoLinux cannot access any of the hardware on the machine, so I use a
> Virtual Desktop called Xming which acts as a VNC client similar to TightVNC.
>
> So I don't actually h
Am Dienstag, den 17.10.2006, 17:22 +0200 schrieb Lord Satan:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:51:42 +0200
"Sam Washkansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem solved and now I'm a happy camper.
Campers get fragged first.
Exactly!
Am Freitag, den 06.10.2006, 15:13 + schrieb Albert Zeyer:
Am Donnerstag, den 05.10.2006, 15:08 +0200 schrieb Christian Iversen:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 16:48, Albert Zeyer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am working on a very huge object-system, that means, I will have
> thous
Am Donnerstag, den 05.10.2006, 15:08 +0200 schrieb Christian Iversen:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 16:48, Albert Zeyer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am working on a very huge object-system, that means, I will have
> thousands objects and more in the memory.
> I am now thinking on how t
Hi
I am working on a very huge object-system, that means, I will have thousands objects and more in the memory.
I am now thinking on how to redrucing the needed memory for each object to a minimum.
The base of all objects is abstract, that means, I could use an interface for it or an abstract
Am Dienstag, den 26.09.2006, 09:18 -0400 schrieb David B Copeland:
Hi all,
I can't recall if this question has been answered before, but ...
I am running 63-bit Suse 10.1, and I'm trying to install/build 32 bit
Lazarus. FPC 2.1.1 32-bit is installed. Lazarus seems to compile fine,
but the l
Am Freitag, den 22.09.2006, 12:16 -0500 schrieb frogeye:
I have the keywords and flags set properly, I think. I foiled a bug with gentoo, aahd was politely informed that I needed to emerge a current version of findutils. After doing that, I was able to emerge fpc 2.0.4., but
Am Freitag, den 22.09.2006, 14:01 + schrieb Albert Zeyer:
If you hit Alt+Print (I think it was Alt, perhaps it could also be Shift or Ctrl) will make a screenshot of the selected window in the foreground under Gnome. This is this very usefull and make a screenshot of a special region
If you hit Alt+Print (I think it was Alt, perhaps it could also be Shift or Ctrl) will make a screenshot of the selected window in the foreground under Gnome. This is this very usefull and make a screenshot of a special region redundantly for me.
But you can use Gimp, Gimp can also make screen
Am Freitag, den 22.09.2006, 13:38 + schrieb Albert Zeyer:
Am Donnerstag, den 21.09.2006, 21:21 -0500 schrieb frogeye:
I get the same error on amd 64 gentoo trying to emerge fpc 2.0.4 : missing argument to -exec
But while I can emerge 2.0.2, it doesn’t
fpc-2.0.4 compiles fail and complains about a parameter of -exec.
However, it works if I use fpc-2.0.2
On 9/22/06, Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which error? Please write the full last ~20-30 lines of the emerge.
Most known errors are als
9/22/06, Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which error? Please write the full last ~20-30 lines of the emerge.
Most known errors are also reported on http://bugs.gentoo.org, you often also find there a solution for a problem.
But I don&#
Am Donnerstag, den 21.09.2006, 14:32 +0200 schrieb Andrea Mauri:
Hi to all,
I build a little application that I would like to deploy by the web.
I compiled both on Windows and Linux. For the Windows application I used
InnoSetup, I deploy only the exe file. I need to deploy some libraries too
t; >> /etc/portage/package.use
Am Donnerstag, den 21.09.2006, 11:58 +0800 schrieb Jonathan Chiu:
I tried with emerge lazarus in gentoo but error found in compile time of fpc.
On 9/19/06, Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Montag, den 18.09.2006, 09:57
Am Montag, den 18.09.2006, 09:57 +0700 schrieb Colin Lehmann:
> Well I give up, I simply cannot get anything to work. I have changed the
> compiler path, the lazarus path, done make clean all so may times I can
> do it in my sleep.
> This afternoon I am going to re-install Ubuntu and start a
The created binary (the EXE-file on Windows) should be in the project-path, that is, where you saved your project. If you have not saved it till now, the binary is in your /tmp directory.
The output of the program itself can be seen on the console. So run your program in any terminal (on Windo
Am Dienstag, den 12.09.2006, 17:17 +0700 schrieb Colin Lehmann:
...
Searching file fpc.cfg... not found
Configfile search: /home/colin/.fpc.cfg
Searching file /home/colin/.fpc.cfg... found
Reading options from file /home/colin/.fpc.cfg
...
So it seems that fpc is using the /
I don't think so.
You have another problem with your current implementation: The reference counting of your interfaces will not work. You have to call manually the _AddRef and _Release of the interface after adding them to the list and removing them. You also can't use FList.Clear, because then
If you have updatet FPC last time, check the correctness of the unit-path in your /etc/fpc.conf.
I had the same error on saterday and this was my fault.
Albert
Am Montag, den 11.09.2006, 08:54 +0700 schrieb Colin Lehmann:
I have been struggling with the installation of Lazarus for two days
Am Freitag, den 08.09.2006, 03:56 -0300 schrieb Flávio Etrusco:
I've seen many sh***y things coming from MS through the years, but I
you really saying that their stretch (down) algorithm is worst than
"copy every Nth pixel"??? This is something I'll have to see before my
eyes ;-)
Yes, I d
Hi
Are you using Windows? I recognized that the StretchBlt in the Windows API sometimes results in crappy effects while scaling down a picture. On GTK, I don't have this effects.
To avoid such effect, I coded a very simple own Stretch-Function:
Excerpt from my little sample game Robot:
proce
Am Dienstag, den 22.08.2006, 10:15 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 8/21/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TTestObject.Create won't ever be called (only TBaseTestObject.Create
> > will be, but if I use TClass instead of TBaseTestClass, it also won't
> > be). It also makes
Am Montag, den 21.08.2006, 19:17 +0200 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:30:06 +
Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With TPersistent it would work like this
> >TMyBase = class(TPersistent)
> >public
> > function CreateCop
> I think, RTTI is very powerfull and there should be a way to do the
> same as above without a virtual constructor. But is it clean?
To use RTTI you must derive from TPersistent or use the {$M+} directive.
> In practice, I have a abstract base class with a function like this:
>
> functi
Hi,
Is there a way to cast an interface to an object?
If I have an interface:
IBlub = interface
function GetSomething(): TObject;
end;
And somewhere, I have:
var
Blub: IBlub;
...
Therefore, Blub is an interface-reference to some object which implements the interface. How can I get thi
Hello,
I want to use class-references (class of SOMECLASS) as a way for a dynamic object factory.
First I tried it with the predefined type TClass (:= class of TObject), but this doesn't work, because Create is not virtual in TObject (it costs some time to find out that this is the problem, ne
The SDL port is very interesting. All data structures I missed are there. I will take a deeper look tomorrow, but I think, this is what I want.
Albert
Am Donnerstag, den 17.08.2006, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Burkhard Carstens:
Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 13:16 schrieb Albert Zeyer:
> Wh
right, this should be merged into the FPL tree.
Albert
Am Donnerstag, den 17.08.2006, 11:25 +0200 schrieb Mattias:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:16:58 +
Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which one do you mean? I only find there a few special lists.
>
> But I need an implemen
ction because my key elements are object pointers.
Albert.
Am Donnerstag, den 17.08.2006, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Albert Zeyer wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> Is there any HashMap-implementation in the units of FPC? I didn't find
> one. Is an implemenent
No, it will not. Reference counting with interfaces only works if you use interfaces as referencing types (so it has to be 'var MyObject: IUnknown'), all class-typed variables will not counted. I think this is because all class-typed variables are simply pointers and an interface variable is ha
Hi,
Is there a way to use the reference counting (used with interfaces) with normal objects?
Albert
That's only partly true.
I think it cames with VB4 (32 Bit Version), VB5 or even only with VB6, but there you could choose to compile a real native Win32-EXE (which completly depends on the runtime DLL). That is not the same (but the speed increases aren't much higher in the native version the
72 matches
Mail list logo
