Ciprian Mustiata schreef:
Hi team,
Based on that issues, and some more, me and that designer will not look
back to Delphi legacy, excluding the LCL and we will try to manage to
make a fork of Lazarus. The role of that fork is very easy: it will must
provide bet UI for user, and will not take
On Nov 18, 2007 6:16 PM, James Chandler Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the Lazarus IDE as it is. Delphi 2005 and 2006 default IDE is less
> pleasant to use. IMO a copycat Laz IDE revamp along the lines of recent Delphi
> versions would not be an improvement.
>
>
But IMHO it wouldn't be a d
On 18/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > with a bit of Google searching. I'll attach a screenshot in my next
> > posting (just in case it's to big for this post)
>
>
> As promised. See attachment.
>
Man looki
On 18/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with a bit of Google searching. I'll attach a screenshot in my next
> posting (just in case it's to big for this post)
As promised. See attachment.
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a
On 18/11/2007, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Then starting coding instead of lengthy mails :)
> >
>
> Is there already a public svn?
>
Just to show how tough it is to create a copycat ide, even with
company funding Have a look and SpeedSoft's Sybil IDE. Has
anybody ever
I like the Lazarus IDE as it is. Delphi 2005 and 2006 default IDE is less
pleasant to use. IMO a copycat Laz IDE revamp along the lines of recent Delphi
versions would not be an improvement.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTE
Florian Klaempfl schreef:
Ciprian Mustiata schrieb:
The top of reason of forking is: Lazarus itself as IDE, has *not* that
goals, and wanting to achieve that plans in Lazarus development today
has no sense, so instead arguing and fight for every new extra change,
is easier to redesign places whe
Ciprian Mustiata schrieb:
>
> The top of reason of forking is: Lazarus itself as IDE, has *not* that
> goals, and wanting to achieve that plans in Lazarus development today
> has no sense, so instead arguing and fight for every new extra change,
> is easier to redesign places where is considered m
On 18/11/2007, Ciprian Mustiata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the long term benefits:
> - will hopefully became the newbie version of Lazarus
> - will offer a mini-framework on top of LCL, so it will remove a lot of
> "hand-made" designed code
> - it will not have to be a 100% compliant rul
On Nov 18, 2007 12:36 AM, Ciprian Mustiata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That solution is the today solution for two visions of the same problem:
> what means Lazarus to became easy and more accepted. For a short term, for
> sure Lazarus can be as Delphi 7 like as it wants.
There seams to be some c
Hi Lazarus team,
The reasoning of that fork is easy to accomplish as vision as was the Beryl
one. Compiz wants more stability, Beryl wants more eye-candy. Compiz wants
firstly to get a strong base, beryl wants to get full-featured product over the
to-date compiz version.
That solution is the
Ciprian Mustiata wrote:
The issue I want to put on top is Lazarus resemble with 10 years old
UIs, FreePascal the same, and they don't want to add value for the
product is today most needed. I've not means about Lazarus bugs, all
software has bugs.
So, the eexpectations for a new user, (I put
Hi team,
I will make the following premises about me (Ciprian Mustiata) and a designer
(John Merill):
1. I use Delphi and Lazarus for fun and always like the elegance of FreePascal
language and the power of Lazarus project
2. I came from another world, means I work with Opensource but I am from
On Nov 15, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Ciprian Mustiata wrote:
Hi team,
I will make the following premises about me (Ciprian Mustiata) and a
designer (John Merill):
1. I use Delphi and Lazarus for fun and always like the elegance of
FreePascal language and the power of Lazarus project
2. I came from
Ciprian Mustiata wrote:
- the metaphora of it is like Delphi 4 - 7 (!?) resemble,
means one top bar with project management and components, floating
windows for components, ui, errors, etc.
Personally I like that "metaphora" lot - I have used it in a few of my
own projects. It would be go
Based on that issues, and some more, me and that designer will not
look back to Delphi legacy, excluding the LCL and we will try to
manage to make a fork of Lazarus. The role of that fork is very easy:
it will must provide bet UI for user, and will not take care about
users that say: "in Delp
Christian U. wrote:
I think it is not time to make UI Forks, Lazarus is on an very good
way as it is. And a lot of Delphi code can be used "as is" so i dont
think that the Delphi compatibility is an bad thing.
Also the Delphi 7 like GUI layout is an very good decision. For my
opinion you are th
Op donderdag 15-11-2007 om 12:33 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Ciprian
Mustiata:
> Based on that issues, and some more, me and that designer will not
> look back to Delphi legacy, excluding the LCL and we will try to
> manage to make a fork of Lazarus. The role of that fork is very easy:
> it will
18 matches
Mail list logo
