On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Jacques Nilo wrote:
> Jon, Jeff, KPK and Larry:
> Thanks everyone for the useful feedback.
> I'll include most of your comments/remarks.
> Here is the updated version of butime.html:
> http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/butime1.html
You seem to have altered my suggested fix for s
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:05:49PM -0400, Eric B Kiser wrote:
> I am looking for the most recent versions of nmap.lrp and snort.lrp. I
> checked the CVS packages repository and the only thing I found was an older
> version of nmap and no snort.
I'm the one who's probably responsible for those pa
Hello Eric,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:03:47 -0400 Eric Kiser wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working with bering1.0-rc3 and using it in a UML environment. I wanting
> to be able to boot up multiple bering file systems and be able to modify
> them and save the changes. In the UML documentation it says t
Hi All,
I am working with bering1.0-rc3 and using it in a UML environment. I wanting
to be able to boot up multiple bering file systems and be able to modify
them and save the changes. In the UML documentation it says that if you use
the same copy of a file system to do this then you will corrupt
Joey
Joey Officer wrote the following at 18:51 09.10.2002:
>I like the idea of a 'service' mode versus an 'operation' mode. That could
>be extremely useful. And how hard would that be to wire in. I'd like to
>contribute on a project like this, but my biggest problem is funding. I am
>trying t
Bugs item #621031, was opened at 2002-10-09 16:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=113751&aid=621031&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brad Fritz (bradfritz)
Assigned t
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 19:24:49 +0200 Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
> Hi Boris
>
> I know that Mike Noyes was working on the write protectd flash disk.
> Actually there is such a beast, but it is hard to come by in small
> quantities. I was lucky to get a sample from SST http://www.sst
Jon, Jeff, KPK and Larry:
Thanks everyone for the useful feedback.
I'll include most of your comments/remarks.
Here is the updated version of butime.html:
http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/butime1.html
I still have to fix the rest:
Jacques
---
Th
From: Elmar Gerwalin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Larry Platzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: [leaf-user] Best way to control "ppp-on-
demand" ?
Copies to: leaflist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:13:0
Hello K-P
you are right, there is even a small error in the abbreviated version,
At the bottom I included a part of the original xml documentation.
hope this makes it more clear.
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2002 07:59 schrieb Jacques Nilo:
> > We have three new pieces for the Bering documentatio
Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2002 07:59 schrieb Jacques Nilo:
> We have three new pieces for the Bering documentation that will be released
> with rc4 coming out shortly.
>
> We would welcome proofreading, comments and suggestions before release.
>
> 1 chapter in the Bering installation guide:
> http:/
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Jacques Nilo wrote:
> We have three new pieces for the Bering documentation that will be released
> with rc4 coming out shortly.
>
> We would welcome proofreading, comments and suggestions before release.
>
> 1 chapter in the Bering installation guide:
> http://leaf.sf.net/
Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2002 19:24 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Boris
>
> I know that Mike Noyes was working on the write protectd flash disk.
> Actually there is such a beast, but it is hard to come by in small
> quantities. I was lucky to get a sample from SST http://www.sst.com and I
> am about to
Howdy Folks,
I am looking for the most recent versions of nmap.lrp and snort.lrp. I
checked the CVS packages repository and the only thing I found was an older
version of nmap and no snort.
Your guidance is appreciated...
Eric
---
This sf.n
Have you checked that ntpdate will run after serial modem is working,
I have seen ntpclnt try to run before it can reach the internet!
It might work fine for other connections but not a pppd demand dialing.
Larry Platzek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Jacques Nilo wrote:
> Date: Wed,
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:59:07AM +0200, Jacques Nilo wrote:
> We have three new pieces for the Bering documentation that will be released
> with rc4 coming out shortly.
>
> We would welcome proofreading, comments and suggestions before release.
Great stuff! I like the page about time in parti
Hi Boris
I know that Mike Noyes was working on the write protectd flash disk.
Actually there is such a beast, but it is hard to come by in small
quantities. I was lucky to get a sample from SST http://www.sst.com and I
am about to analyse the standard set up. If it is the way I believe it is
I like the idea of a 'service' mode versus an 'operation' mode. That could
be extremely useful. And how hard would that be to wire in. I'd like to
contribute on a project like this, but my biggest problem is funding. I am
trying to convince my boss to buy me some play hardware that could be us
Hi again,
> Please let me know if the physical write protector exists!
I will but dont think so.
> > Actually we dont consider that feature a must as we like the idea of
> >updating remote systems easily.
>
> From our point of view this does not really conflict. Think of a red
> button a
Hi Vladimir,
> You may want to look into using CramFS like WISP-Dist does. You will
> save RAM on this.
Yes indeed, WISP is much closer to what we want to achieve than standard
Bering. Its already a Compact Flash oriented system. The problem is we have
no experience with it, and we dont kn
Hej Jaime!
At 11:08 09.10.2002 +0200, you wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > We are doing quite the same but still have trouble finding the right
> > hardware!
>
> Have you solved the software side? Do you have already a ~10MB Bering
>distribution? It would be great to share efforts.
No, we still work
You may want to look into using CramFS like WISP-Dist does. You will
save RAM on this.
Jaime Nebrera Herrera wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are developing a Bering evolution focused in Compact Flash or DOM
> systems. Yes, Bering is great, but sticking to the floppie paradigma poses
> some limi
Hi Boris,
> We are doing quite the same but still have trouble finding the right
> hardware!
Have you solved the software side? Do you have already a ~10MB Bering
distribution? It would be great to share efforts.
> Does your CF have a physical write protection?
I have seen this thread
Hej Jaime!
We are doing quite the same but still have trouble finding the right hardware!
I hope you might answer me the following question which is a knockout
criteria for us:
Does your CF have a physical write protection?
We thought about using www.openbrick.org but didn't find the right har
24 matches
Mail list logo
