Hello Erich,
I want to make a small modification in the kernel configuration. What
directory will these changes be made in, as it is neither in apps nor
contrib. Basically the sources reside in
$BUILDROOT/source/linux/
the mods are done using menuconfig, which will make a modified .config
Hello Erich,
A few questions before I dig deeper in the Bering uClibc stuff
- after a ./buildtool.pl build kernel, where does the upx compressed
kernel image go? Is it
$BUILDROOT/buildtool/source/linux/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzlinux
It goes to $BUILDROOT/buildtool/build/kernel/
I looked
Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
Hi Erich,
...
Note that unlike openswan, strongswan doesn't have a seperate patchset. So
you need to patch the kernel with the strongswan source tools itself,
build the buildenv and after that build strongswan.
Hmmm... why would I have to rebuild the buildenv?
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
Hello Erich,
A few questions before I dig deeper in the Bering uClibc stuff
- after a ./buildtool.pl build kernel, where does the upx compressed
kernel image go? Is it
$BUILDROOT/buildtool/source/linux/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzlinux
It goes to
Hi Martin
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Erich,
...
The thing you're stumbling over is probably that you're expecting the
build to be re-done, because the config changed - which is not how
buildtool works -
Correct
if you've built something and wand to rebuild it, you
need to undo the build by
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
..
The setup of linux and kernel is unlike other packages split in two
different setups because the linux source/headers are needed for buildenv
and buildenv is needed for building the kernel.
That is probably the part I am missing. What are the linux kernel
Hello Erich,
How are the dependencies handled by buildtool? Is this done by flag files?
In sources.cfg. If some source depends on an other source, it's
listed in sources.cfg as a dependency.
Eric
___
leaf-devel mailing list
Hello Erich,
The setup of linux and kernel is unlike other packages split in two
different setups because the linux source/headers are needed for buildenv
and buildenv is needed for building the kernel.
That is probably the part I am missing. What are the linux kernel
sources needed for in
Hi Erich,
Hmmm... why would I have to rebuild the buildenv? AFAIK Andreas Steffen
has just added some functionality to the *swan, just like openswan. I
will have to look a bit deeper.
You may need the strongswan kernel headers to properly build
strongswan. It's a bit subtle, you could go ahead
Hi Erich,
Hmmm... why would I have to rebuild the buildenv? AFAIK Andreas Steffen
has just added some functionality to the *swan, just like openswan. I
will have to look a bit deeper.
To be somewhat clearer, I rebuilt buildenv not for gcc/uClibc itself
but more to be sure all the headers are
Hi folks
this weekend the weather forecast is not too good, so time for another
try at the buildenv stuff
A few questions pop up .
I see that the release tag enables me to get a certain release level for
apps and contrib. I believe that even the buildenv changes with
releases. What is the
Hi Erich;
Am Samstag, 17. Juni 2006 09:56 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi folks
this weekend the weather forecast is not too good, so time for another
try at the buildenv stuff
A few questions pop up .
I see that the release tag enables me to get a certain release level for
apps and contrib.
Hi KP
Thanks for the quick reply
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
...
I see that the release tag enables me to get a certain release level for
apps and contrib. I believe that even the buildenv changes with
releases. What is the canonical way to handle this?
The buildenv doesn't change that often;
Hi Erich,
I know you want to avoid branches in CVS. What is the canonical way to,
let's say
- replace openswan with strongswan and still track current kernel
development/configuration..
don't know about that one - the whole *swan integration into the kernel
is a bit obscure (due to the fact
Hi Martin
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Erich,
I know you want to avoid branches in CVS. What is the canonical way to,
let's say
- replace openswan with strongswan and still track current kernel
development/configuration..
don't know about that one - the whole *swan integration into the kernel
Hi Folks
A few questions before I dig deeper in the Bering uClibc stuff
- after a ./buildtool.pl build kernel, where does the upx compressed
kernel image go? Is it
$BUILDROOT/buildtool/source/linux/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzlinux
I looked into the kernel patches
- what are the various netfilter
Hi Erich,
sorry - I'm not around the computer much these days, so don't expect
speedy responses from me for the next few weeks.
I found that in the corresponding apps/busybox, there is no unpacked
busybox source. Will buildtool use such a source when it exists or just
unpack the tar archive
Martin
Thank you , I really appreciate the time you are taking
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Erich,
sorry - I'm not around the computer much these days, so don't expect
speedy responses from me for the next few weeks.
Don't worry, I am pretty sure there are others in the team who must know
the
Hi Erich,
If you change the config, the safest way (I'm going from memory here, I
didn't double-check this) would be to do
$ ./buildtool.pl srcclean busybox
$ ./buildtool.pl build busybox
I am afraid this will erase my modifications.
No, it won't, unless you're making the modifications in
Hi Martin
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Erich,
If you change the config, the safest way (I'm going from memory here, I
didn't double-check this) would be to do
$ ./buildtool.pl srcclean busybox
$ ./buildtool.pl build busybox
I am afraid this will erase my modifications.
No, it won't, unless
20 matches
Mail list logo