On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:47:58AM +0200, Etienne Charlier wrote:
0. It's quite amazing that such a great product has been developed
and integrated by a few people during part time ( when do they sleep
??? )
Yes it is a fantastic project. I only want the distribution presented in
a way that
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:47:58AM +0200, Etienne Charlier wrote:
[...]
3 You seem very upset by not being able to {use | install} bering on your
system and you feel better if you can put the responsability on someone
else.
I'm using Bering
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:42:07AM +0200, Jacques Nilo wrote:
Georges:
If you do not feel confortable using Bering, please do not use it.
Bering has been developped by me and Eric as a hobby, on our spare time
outside of our regular jobs.
I do feel it is an innovative quality project. Please
Georges:
If you do not feel confortable using Bering, please do not use it.
Bering has been developped by me and Eric as a hobby, on our spare time
outside of our regular jobs.
Bering is also based on the tremendous work done previously by the LRP LEAF
community: Dave Cinege, Charles
Le Samedi 13 Juillet 2002 07:55, George Georgalis a écrit :
Is Bering GNU?
I'm beginning to have my doubts. Where is /usr/src/linux/.config?
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/rc3/
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/rc3/patches/
JN
Hi,
Forgive me my poor english. I cannot express my ideas very cleareley.
( at least not with the calm and precision used by Ray ;-) )
0. It's quite amazing that such a great product has been developed
and integrated by a few people during part time ( when do they sleep
??? )
1. I'm not a
George,
I'm kind of curios. Why did you feel the need to cross-post to lists not
related to LEAF? Odd, one in San Diego and the other in New York? How
incredibly odd. Did you want encompass the United States, some LEAF
developers are not US citizens you know, you might want to cross post to
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 22:55, George Georgalis wrote:
Is Bering GNU?
George,
Yes.
I have hunted all over http://leaf-project.org and
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ for the source,
snip
I even asked a few well read LUG groups what the lrp format was, or
how I could run the lrcfg that I read
George:
I just wanted to point out the obvious:
Is Bering GNU?
[snip]
...I know asking for doc is a lot, but
maintaining a file of command lines used to make the binaries
from source would be an excellent first step.
While I'm no expert, this is a new definition of GNU
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:55:44 -0400
George Georgalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all sincerity, Bering is very cool. It could just be a lot better
if it was more in the spirit of _encouraging_ open source development
rather than barley qualifying, actually I bet if it was audited, it
wouldn't
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 06:53, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 22:55, George Georgalis wrote:
Is Bering GNU?
George,
Yes.
Clarification:
Bering is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), and would
be described by FSF people as GPL-covered software. It is not a GNU
At 01:43 PM 7/13/02 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 06:53, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 22:55, George Georgalis wrote:
Is Bering GNU?
George,
Yes.
Clarification:
Bering is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), and would
be described by FSF
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 14:57, Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 01:43 PM 7/13/02 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 06:53, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 22:55, George Georgalis wrote:
Is Bering GNU?
George,
Yes.
Clarification:
Bering is licensed under the GNU
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 15:27, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 14:57, Ray Olszewski wrote:
Am I mistaken, or doesn't Bering (and Dachstein, and perhaps the other
variants) use some components with idiosyncratic licenses that don't meet
the standards (e.g, the DFSG or OSG criteria)
14 matches
Mail list logo
