On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:08:38 -0500
"guitarlynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 04 July 2002 14:58, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > Is there a httpd package for bering? That is other than weblet.
> > Just need something very simple.
>
> Charles has thttpd packaged on his site, it should work
On Thursday 04 July 2002 14:47, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> Don't forget that *sometimes* (large packets?) DNS uses TCP instead
> of UDP.
I guess I was assuming you were looking at typical DNS responses
rather than zone-transfers and the like. I'll quit assuming what you
are attempting
On Thursday 04 July 2002 14:58, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Is there a httpd package for bering? That is other than weblet.
> Just need something very simple.
Charles has thttpd packaged on his site, it should work fine with
Bering. Weblet/sh-httpd is the smallest of the available ones and
if it is
Le Jeudi 4 Juillet 2002 16:59, me name a écrit :
> Dear all,
> I'm trying to move to Bering rc3 from Eigerstein 2.9.4 (I think)..
>
> uname -a > 2.2.16 Sun Jun 11 11:33:38 CDT 2000 i386 unknown
>
> syslog from boot is >
>When I try to boot the bering rc3, it stops at a prompt with >
> Cannot load
Is there a httpd package for bering? That is other than weblet. Just need
something very simple.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Caffeinated soap. No kidding.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
> > Okay by me. I thought I had a development issue. My guess is I've
> > stripped something that's required for name resolution. So I ask, what
> > is used for host lookups (the udp/53 call) on lrp?
>
> The following is my understanding of how this works from using Bering RC2:
Just to confirm t
guitarlynn wrote (on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:05:21PM -0500):
| > Okay by me. I thought I had a development issue. My guess is I've
| > stripped something that's required for name resolution. So I ask,
| > what is used for host lookups (the udp/53 call) on lrp?
|
| Probably not a development issu
Le Jeudi 4 Juillet 2002 14:05, George Vieira a écrit :
> Does the Bering project have the pcmcia-cs version of the pcmcia support
> compiled into the kernel?
As stated in the changelog provided in the Bering installation guide:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/biabout.html#AEN84
Bering does
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 07:36:29AM -0700, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> >At 08:26 AM 7/4/02 -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
> >>I just remembered, my bering distro won't do hostname lookups.
> >>
> >>resolv.conf is okay
> >>hosts.allow/deny are okay
> >>the r
I try to put wisp in a 16mb CF, to use with a aaeon Gene 4310, bu t i
cant boot!
If a try the .img, returns Error loading operating system!
That's OK, the img is for CF in the primary ide master! (hda), and the
aaeon found the CF in the second ide master! So must be hdc, i tried the
instructio
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 21:37, Chad Carr wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 22:24:11 -0500
>
> "guitarlynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This can be safely ignored and should not affect operation.
>
> Unfortunately, I have found this not to be the case with my
> configuration. I see the above stateme
On Thursday 04 July 2002 11:35, George Georgalis wrote:
> >>ping galis.org just hangs. not sure how else to look up a name, am
> >> I missing a package? What could be wrong? It does ping ip
> >> addresses.
The ping works here, so it is safe to say that you are attempting global
DNS and likely to
On Thursday 04 July 2002 01:30, David Pitts wrote:
> Thanks for the info.
NP, (EOM)
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!
-
Hi Tom,
I have read this alert message few days ago, because I have forgotten to change the
default PPPoE files log/password for ADSL
provider !
So, input yours and all will be ok...
Best Regards.
Francois BERGERET / France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Message d'origine-
De :
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 02:11, Vic Berdin wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have one query about Lynn Avant's udhcp package (that came along
> with the dachstein-ipsec-1680.bin contribution).
> I'm wondering if what the "sending ACK to [dhcp client ip]" message
> that kept on scrolling on my LRP te
At 01:06 PM 7/4/02 -0400, Jeff wrote:
>I am running eigerstein 3.1.0 and wish to be able to telnet in to from
>my local (192.168.2.x) network. I installed /usr/sbin/in.telnetd and
>uncommented it in /etc/services.
Entries in /etc/services are not usually commented out, since this is just
a list
As far as I recall -- though Jacques is really the one to answer here --
Bering uses the same resolver calls as any standard Linux distro. But if
you want to try to address the problem at that level, I do suggest you wait
for Jacques to reply.
But I suspect a more conventional configuration er
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 10:06, Jeff wrote:
> I am running eigerstein 3.1.0 and wish to be able to telnet in to from
> my local (192.168.2.x) network. I installed /usr/sbin/in.telnetd and
> uncommented it in /etc/services. I added:
> in.telnetd: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0
> to hosts.allow
>
> I get c
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Brock Nanson wrote:
> > From: "me name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:59:41 +0100
> > Subject: [leaf-user] Bering rc3 - cant load ramdisk
>
>
>
> > The bering rc3 disk boots ok on a Pentium II pc OK... is
> > there an issue wi
I am running eigerstein 3.1.0 and wish to be able to telnet in to from
my local (192.168.2.x) network. I installed /usr/sbin/in.telnetd and
uncommented it in /etc/services. I added:
in.telnetd: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0
to hosts.allow
I get connection refused error. What am I missing?
--
Jeff
[
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I cannot figure out how to configure ppp on bearing or dachstein for my
> situation.
>
> the scenario:
>
> 1) one head office and 10 very small branch offices (they all have ISDN
> lines, no xDSL available)
> 2) during night, the head office should
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 07:36:29AM -0700, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>At 08:26 AM 7/4/02 -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>>I just remembered, my bering distro won't do hostname lookups.
>>
>>resolv.conf is okay
>>hosts.allow/deny are okay
>>the route is okay
>
>
>How do you know all of these are "okay"?
> From: "me name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:59:41 +0100
> Subject: [leaf-user] Bering rc3 - cant load ramdisk
> The bering rc3 disk boots ok on a Pentium II pc OK... is
> there an issue with
> "old" pentiums?
>
> Cheers,
> Simon.
Just about eve
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote:
> Is it possible to send and recieve MSN MESSengers file transfer(tcp
> ports 6891-6900)on MASQ network with one live ip. Have tried so many
> different scenarios to get it to work on Bering w/shorewall. I've
> actually had it working when usin Netgea
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tom Degreef wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a newbie on the mailinglist I would like to ask
> somebody's help.
>
> I'm trying to get my ADSL connection up and running on
> the bering firewall( RC3), but i can't get it to work
> (obviously, otherwiles i wouldn't mail here ;) )
>
> T
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 05:34 PM 7/4/02 +0200, Luigi Capriotti wrote:
> >I'm trying to configure Bering with masqueraded subnets (by means of
> >shorewall), but as soon as I put a line in the masq file I receive this:
> >
> >iptables: invalid arguments
> >
> >By stepping in
At 05:34 PM 7/4/02 +0200, Luigi Capriotti wrote:
>I'm trying to configure Bering with masqueraded subnets (by means of
>shorewall), but as soon as I put a line in the masq file I receive this:
>
>iptables: invalid arguments
>
>By stepping into the shorewall file I've realised that the offending
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Luigi Capriotti wrote:
> I'm trying to configure Bering with masqueraded subnets (by means of
> shorewall), but as soon as I put a line in the masq file I receive this:
>
> iptables: invalid arguments
>
> By stepping into the shorewall file I've realised that the offending
I cannot figure out how to configure ppp on bearing or dachstein for my
situation.
the scenario:
1) one head office and 10 very small branch offices (they all have ISDN
lines, no xDSL available)
2) during night, the head office should call one by one every branch office
to move some data (with d
I'm trying to configure Bering with masqueraded subnets (by means of
shorewall), but as soon as I put a line in the masq file I receive this:
iptables: invalid arguments
By stepping into the shorewall file I've realised that the offending
command is the following:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUT
Aanhalen hari-nuryadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thx for your kindness, yeah u r right i haven't load the
> module yet :)
> Thx for Jnilo too, i really appreciate your answer.
No problem.
>
> Btw, can u show me the example how to share 64 kbps
> bandwidth with 2 client (64 kbps 1:2) with tc comman
Dear all,
I'm trying to move to Bering rc3 from Eigerstein 2.9.4 (I think)..
uname -a > 2.2.16 Sun Jun 11 11:33:38 CDT 2000 i386 unknown
syslog from boot is >
Log File: syslog
Jul 4 14:09:40 syslogd 1.3-3#31: restart.
Jul 4 14:09:40 kernel: klogd 1.3-3#31, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Jul
At 08:26 AM 7/4/02 -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>I just remembered, my bering distro won't do hostname lookups.
>
>resolv.conf is okay
>hosts.allow/deny are okay
>the route is okay
How do you know all of these are "okay"? In particular, have you confirmed
that you can ping the IP addresses of
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> >
> > 1) Incoming connections to the servers are identified as coming from the
> > router, not the original IP address. This makes life difficult for several
> > reasons. How do I address this?
> >
>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
>
> policy: everything ACCEPT
Nachman -- I and others have tried to point out why this isn't a good
idea, even when you are just trying to make something work. Apparently you
aren't listening. See more below.
>
> Rules:
>
> ACCEPT loc
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, James wrote:
>
>>I've encountered the same problem since using Bering 1.0 rc3. This is a
>>simple permissions problem with the newly created log files if I do a
>>'chmod 644 *' in /var/logs/ then the files are marked read for the adm
>>group and weble
Hi all,
As a newbie on the mailinglist I would like to ask
somebody's help.
I'm trying to get my ADSL connection up and running on
the bering firewall( RC3), but i can't get it to work
(obviously, otherwiles i wouldn't mail here ;) )
The message i always get is : "couldn't increase mtu
to 1500"
Thx for your kindness, yeah u r right i haven't load the
module yet :)
Thx for Jnilo too, i really appreciate your answer.
Btw, can u show me the example how to share 64 kbps
bandwidth with 2 client (64 kbps 1:2) with tc command using
cbq?
What i have do succesfully is limit 64 kbps bw on one
cli
Hi,
We're getting a little off-topic here, but the answer to your question is
no. You can run two independant seti's which will have the same effect i.e.
twice the number of Work Units in the same amount of time vs. one WU in half
the amount of time :0)
TTFN
Antony Briggs
-Original Message
39 matches
Mail list logo
