Craig
At 01:10 10.07.2002, you wrote:
>Hi folks,
>For those who have replied, I'm running the vanilla, Dachstein CD. The
>only thing I have changed from the default configuration is to uncomment
>the correct NIC drivers, and changed the root password. That's it. I've
>left everything else alone..
This is it, thanks to all who answered!
Wonderful work guys and girls. Lynn's howto with Chad's windows setup info
makes a great combo.
IPSEC Its working!!
Thanks heaps,
Matt
> > I think the doc you are talking about is this ipsec howto, courtesy of
> > Lynn Avants, which describes four differ
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[ snip ]
> > > After savelog rotates the logfile, $DAEMON is writing to logfile.0,
> > > instead of logfile. Obviously, this is not acceptable ;<
> > >
> > > I assume that this has something to do with the original redi
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:15:23 -0700
"Brock Nanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Lucent is NOT a PRISM2 card. The orinoco_cs driver will work with
> many PRISM2 cards, but I think what this suggests is that the
> /etc/pcmcia/config file is being checked and the wrong card is found. I
> don't k
Mark,
you can add bridge_maxwait xxx to the interfaaces file
at the bridge config.
Maybe this can help.
Manfred
Mark A Nordstrand schrieb:
>
> Manfred,
>
> Have the eth entries commented out and the bridge
> entry uncommented in /etc/network/interfaces. My
> poking around in if-pre-up.d/bridg
Manfred,
Added a maxwait of 600 and a -x to the sh to see
what's going on. The for loop on `brctl showstp...`
isn't being entered, so $BREADY is still true and
this kicks it out of the while loop.
Manfred Schuler wrote:
>
> Mark,
> you can add bridge_maxwait xxx to the interfaaces file
> at th
Many thanks to those of you who gave valuable answers, especially Ray, Kim
and Phillip.
I'm currently running Dachstein, because I don't think the default Bering
dist will run on my 486CPU (2.4 kernel?) Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
So that leaves me using Seattle Firewall as my firewall soft
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Harold Miller wrote:
> I'm currently running Dachstein, because I don't think the default Bering
> dist will run on my 486CPU (2.4 kernel?) Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
I use 486's with Bering.
---
Bering rc2
This is the general procedure I use to bring up networking... I
understand there is a way to bring up an interface to listen to an
entire subnet, not just an address. Can someone help me with the ip
syntax?
Thanks,
// George
down () {
d=`ip -o link show | cut -d: -f2`
for i in $d
This bridge.lrp package should replace the one provided with any version of
Bering prior to and including rc3.
It fixes the following errors:
1) /var/lib/lrpkg/bridge.conf now points to the proper bridge scripts
2) The /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/bridge script is fixed
3) /var/lib/lrpkg/bridge.ver
Tom recently updated its shorewall package to version 1.3.3. See:
http://www.shorewall.net
The corresponding version for Bering is now available in the Bering update
directory.
It has been built following the procedure described here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bishorwall.html
It
Bering will run on 486.
Bering has netfilter and iptables. Worth
moving up to after you get your bearings.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in one.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
-
Grabbed the new lrp posted recently hoping it was
in response to problems I have been seeing with
bridge, pcmcia, and wireless.
if-up.d/bridge still falls through the for loop
at the bottom. It does work fine if I log in
afterwards and stop and restart the network.
--
Mark
Linux, it is now sa
OK, I threw away a days worth of work, and switched to Bering.
It looks like it's operational.
I still have a ways to go.
It seems that it takes a LONG time to back up all to a floppy (hour+??) Any
suggestions?
I got nothing out of the masqueraded systems untill I typed 'shorewall
start' in th
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
> Bering rc2
>
> This is the general procedure I use to bring up networking... I
> understand there is a way to bring up an interface to listen to an
> entire subnet, not just an address.
Are you thinking of proxy-arp?
http://www.shorewall.net/Docu
Hello,
I've been trying to get some Linmodem drivers to work correctly with Bering
1.0-rc3. The drivers work on my p350 with RedHat installed with both the
2.4.0 & 2.4.9-13 kernels. After compiling I end up with 2 files - pctel.o &
ptserial.o. I've put both of these in /lib/modules & made chan
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:42:43PM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, George Georgalis wrote:
>
>> Bering rc2
>>
>> This is the general procedure I use to bring up networking... I
>> understand there is a way to bring up an interface to listen to an
>> entire subnet, not just an
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 18:29, Mark A Nordstrand wrote:
> Grabbed the new lrp posted recently hoping it was
> in response to problems I have been seeing with
> bridge, pcmcia, and wireless.
>
> if-up.d/bridge still falls through the for loop
> at the bottom. It does work fine if I log in
> afte
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 18:16, Harold Miller wrote:
> It seems that it takes a LONG time to back up all to a floppy
> (hour+??) Any suggestions?
Seems like a long time to me, what are you backing up???
> I got nothing out of the masqueraded systems untill I typed
> 'shorewall start' in the LE
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 20:52, George Georgalis wrote:
> Interesting, but not what I had in mind. I'm using nat for a dmz and
> rather than bring up an each available ip as an alias, I thought
> there was a way to bring up the subnet and let iptables take over
> from there.
You can set an inter
--On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 21:13:53 -0500 guitarlynn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2002 20:52, George Georgalis wrote:
>> Interesting, but not what I had in mind. I'm using nat for a dmz and
>> rather than bring up an each available ip as an alias, I thought
>> there was
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:30:39PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>
>--On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 21:13:53 -0500 guitarlynn
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 10 July 2002 20:52, George Georgalis wrote:
>>> Interesting, but not what I had in mind. I'm using nat for a dmz and
>>> rather th
I've got a Bering RC2 setup that I need to add a static route to, but I
can't figure out where to add it... I know what I need, just not sure
where is the proper place to implement... Any help appreciated..
---
Homer Parker (The Bogus One)
http://www.homershut.net
telnet://bbs.homershut
Thanks Jim!
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] bridge update? still not working.
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:35:56 -0500
From: "Jim TerWee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have used Bering alot as a bridge with pcmcia and ethernet. What I
had to
I'm sorry George, upon re-reading my post I found a unintended
typo that is probably mis-leading you. The corrected sentence
would have been:
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> You cannot set an interface as an entire subnet w/o alias'ing. Your
^^
> >> interface must have atleas
25 matches
Mail list logo
