Hi there,
On the Bering installation guide page:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bipackages.html
In the pcmcia section, the following link is broken:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/pcmcia_full.lrp
Anyone know where this file exists? If so, does it
contain t
Le Jeudi 18 Juillet 2002 06:01, Mark A Nordstrand a écrit :
> In the interest of trying to get this working, I'm
> looking at bring this up manually. As I do this I
> realize I really don't have a good feel for the ip
> command. Can anyone point me to good reference?
http://snafu.freedom.org/lin
Le Jeudi 18 Juillet 2002 00:52, Godfried Duodu a écrit :
> where can I get iproute.lrp for bering router?
> GD
There is no iproute.lrp package:
the ip program is provided with root.lrp and
tc is provided with tc.lrp
Jcaques
---
This sf.net ema
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:01:32 CDT Mark Nordstrand wrote:
> In the interest of trying to get this working, I'm
> looking at bring this up manually. As I do this I
> realize I really don't have a good feel for the ip
> command. Can anyone point me to good reference?
A google search for
site:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 21:01, Mark A Nordstrand wrote:
> In the interest of trying to get this working, I'm
> looking at bring this up manually. As I do this I
> realize I really don't have a good feel for the ip
> command. Can anyone point me to good reference?
Mark,
Have you looked at our Web
In the interest of trying to get this working, I'm
looking at bring this up manually. As I do this I
realize I really don't have a good feel for the ip
command. Can anyone point me to good reference?
--
Mark
---
This sf.net email is sponso
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, David Pitts wrote:
> Could it be that the firewall is blocking the DHCP data from the ISP?
> They're broadcasting on 10.96.4.1. That would assume that the Dachstein
> filters were different to the Eigerstein filters and that Shorewall was
> blocking the same packets as Dachs
Hi. Me again!
By way of a reminder, I am the bloke who has a perfectly functional
Eigerstein box who wants to upgrade to Dachstein or Bering but found
that Dachstein would recognise the NICs and run the tulip driver as
required, find a good 10baseT link beat, but then DHClient couldn't pick
up I
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Webmaster - Mars Society wrote:
> OK, I have 2 servers I want to connect to the net, through my Bering RC3
> firewall. I have been told that static IP's are assigned.
> Let's call em 99.99.99.2 for the firewall and .3 and .4 for the servers. The
> remote gateway is .1. I have
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Godfried Duodu wrote:
> where can I get iproute.lrp for bering router?
I don't know what "iproute.lrp" is... never heard of it.
However, if you are wondering about iproute2, the advanced kernel routing
configuration program known as "ip", it is built into Bering (root.lrp).
where can I get iproute.lrp for bering router?
GD
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
leaf-user mailing list:
Charles
Any assistance is appreciated, but don't bust a gut - if the worst comes to
the worst I'll use a Dell Dimension for the PC or figure out how to use
Dachstein properly.
I used the 2.2.19-3-LEAF-normal-IDE.zImage.upx from your site as the image to
get IDE going on the box. This has all
OK, I have 2 servers I want to connect to the net, through my Bering RC3
firewall. I have been told that static IP's are assigned.
Let's call em 99.99.99.2 for the firewall and .3 and .4 for the servers. The
remote gateway is .1. I have added the servers to the proxy-arp file in
Shorewall. Their e
Still moving forward. Using Bering-RC3.
Setting up a firewall to serve a masq'd windows subnet and several (DMZ)
INET servers.
Changed primary interface from DHCP to static IP (yeah!!) But to make it
work I have to type:
ip route add default via xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (my gateway)
How / where should I
> I tried Dachstein this afternoon and this works with both devices on
the same
> IDE channel, unfortunately I've messed up the network settings for the
> moment. Ideally I'd like to stick with Bering as that is where most of
my
> experience is. The question is: is this likely to be a kernel issue
Le Mercredi 17 Juillet 2002 17:42, Patrick Tessier a écrit :
> At the end of this message is a sample from my kernel config file. Which
> kernel option is supposed to provide the ip_nat_protocol_register
> function?? I am obviously missing something, because the kernel that is
> bundled with the
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Patrick Tessier wrote:
> I am having a similar problem as in the following post:
>
>
> My problematic line is:
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
>
> Which gives me the same error message:
> iptables: Invalid argument
>
> I have looked in /proc/ksyms,
Le Mardi 16 Juillet 2002 20:33, vous avez écrit :
Hi Vic
My UML doc is really outdated. I'll try to uptade it over the WE.
Basically you have to create your Bering LEAF fs yourself.
The procedure is as follow:
1/ creates a 2M minix file on the same dir as your linux-uml kernel
dd if=/dev/zero of
Hi
Anyone else tried using Bering with a hard disk (master) and CompactFlash
(slave) on the same IDE channel. Let me explain:
I have a remote Warehouse using thin clients to connect to a server at the
Head Office via a 64kbit leased line. They want a digital camera, but have no
means of getti
I am having a similar problem as in the following post:
>On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Luigi Capriotti wrote:
>> I'm trying to configure Bering with masqueraded subnets (by means of
>> shorewall), but as soon as I put a line in the masq file I receive this:
>>
>> iptables: invalid arguments
>>
>> By st
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:04, Chad Carr wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2002 08:44:39 +0200
> "Ronny Aasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:24, Marco Cintolesi wrote:
> > > When i try to start ipsec (/etc/init.d/ipsec start) i have the error:
> > >
> > > Unable to determine address o
On 17 Jul 2002 08:44:39 +0200
"Ronny Aasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:24, Marco Cintolesi wrote:
> > When i try to start ipsec (/etc/init.d/ipsec start) i have the error:
> >
> > Unable to determine address of 'eth0', then ipsec0 interface dont go
> > up.
> >
> > I t
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:39, Jacques Nilo wrote:
>
> > > anyone have ipsec working on bering RC3
>
> > yes it works flawlessly here on nic's i have problem
> with xdsl
> > interfaces tho.
> >
> > veryfy that you have correct settings in shorewall
> > espesially, zones interfaces and tunne
> > anyone have ipsec working on bering RC3
> yes it works flawlessly here on nic's i have problem
with xdsl
> interfaces tho.
>
> veryfy that you have correct settings in shorewall
> espesially, zones interfaces and tunnels.
>
> mvh
> Ronny Aasen
Ronny:
Thanks for this reassuring info :-)
A
Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:48:34PM -0700 Brock Nanson wrote about Wisp-dist, VTun, Bridge
> Internet
> |
> Router
> |
> BridgeBox 200.100.10.1 (VTun endpoint)
> |
> Access Point, ROR, whatever 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 LEAFBridge (VTun
> End)---Client 200.100.10.2
> |
> 192.16
25 matches
Mail list logo
