I would like to use NetMeeting from my Bering protected home network.
My research indicates that requires the H323-conntrack module and maybe
some other configuration. Please feel free to correct me if that's
wrong.
However, I get the impression NetMeeting will still not be fully
functional. Is
Hi,
I'm trying to get bering or ucBering running on a motherboard with an
nvidia chipset. The drivers are partially open source :( and for that
reason aren't and will never be integrated into the kernel.
I'm having difficulty in getting a Bering kernel compile environment
setup and I'm hoping th
I'm sorry I checked this only once on Bering I have to check this
again. Maybe my permissions are wronge. Thanks for help. I'll take
closer look to that in my setup.
Andrey
Tom Eastep wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:47 PM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4000-4100 tcp
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
Boot DOS from a floppy,
type fdisk /mbr
Bingo. As a couple of you kindly suggested,
dos 6.22 fdisk /mbr works when fdisk itself
doesn't always successfully overwrite leftover
bytes in the mbr.
I think I originally fdisked and formatted that CF
in Win98, leading to the
Thanks for your assistance everyone. Scott's advice is 100% correct.
David Pitts
IT Services Manager
Reid Library
University of Western Australia
Telephone: (08) 9380 3492 Fax: (08) 9380 1012
-Original Message-
From: Scott Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:47 PM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4000-4100 tcp or udp or both?
TCP.
My ftp server runs fine for anybody who is on computer not behind the
firewall. If they are behind firewall that's the different story. Thanks
So I still don't understa
4000-4100 tcp or udp or both?
My ftp server runs fine for anybody who is on computer not behind the
firewall. If they are behind firewall that's the different story.
Thanks for help
Andrey
Tom Eastep wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:11 PM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the only line in rules that you need.
#printer server on 192.168.1.254
ACCEPTloc fw tcp 9100:9102
Remember that you have to edit all files from instructions on page
below plus add modules. The only difference in Bering is line above in
shorewall rules and this
Anyone have one site, or something (like book, pdf) about how the MTU can
affect one service of the network?
Samuel Abreu
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=39
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:11 PM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. Udp 4000 should be open in order to get ICQ working.(thats what
they say on their web site) I can't set this port in ICQ that's why I
tried to map this port on both computers. Same with 5190.
In my se
Thanks. Udp 4000 should be open in order to get ICQ working.(thats
what they say on their web site) I can't set this port in ICQ that's why
I tried to map this port on both computers. Same with 5190. As for the
ftp I'm talking about net zone to my server on 192.168.1.201 but guy
comes from oth
Somebody reported this as a yes to the instructions. About the ports, I do
not think you need those because by default they are not opened, whereas in
DCD, higher ports are open for the firewall machine.
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Caughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LEAF" <[EMAIL PR
Hi folks,
Are the instructions at: http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/cmu/dachlpd.htm
applicable to Bering as well as Dachstein...or do they differ (in what way)?
Do you have to close printer ports 9100, 9101, and 9102 on the external
interfaces as indicated in Step 5 (I don't see that I have an ipfilte
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:46 PM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
File transfer on ICQ doesn't work for me at all doesn't matter if other
computer is behind firewall or not. These are my rules:
# icq
DNAT netloc:192.168.1.201 udp 4000
DNAT netloc:192
File transfer on ICQ doesn't work for me at all doesn't matter if other
computer is behind firewall or not. These are my rules:
#icq
DNAT netloc:192.168.1.201 udp 4000
DNAT netloc:192.168.1.202 udp 4000
DNAT netloc:192.168.1.201 tcp 5190
DNAT net
Hi,
I've two LANs linked by my provider's VPN. IP is used on both sides, IPX on
LAN B
LAN A+++ provider's VPN over Internet ++
LAN B
! Router A ! = ! Router B
!-
IP++
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:02 PM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll have one computer with
direct connection and external ip on its eth0.(for passive ftp, ICQ file
transfer etc...)
Both of which you can do behind your Bering box.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptable
I think I will put switch right after modem and connect my son's
computer directly to internet and second ip will go to Bering box and
from there via hub to my computer. This will give me ability to connect
more computers if I need to my hub and also I'll have one computer with
direct connectio
Hello Gustav,
I 've experienced a problem around 3C Etherlink III 3C509 ..
The problem was due to a wrong module. ( thanks to Brad ). The 3C509
ethernet board works fine using he following module ( size 11108 ):
http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/kernel/drivers/net/
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:19 PM +0100 Jacques Nilo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you think it would be worthwhile to include this patch in the Bering
standard kernel ? Any feedback from the list ?
I have no opinion one way or the other.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made
Le Mardi 21 Janvier 2003 20:02, Tom Eastep a écrit :
> --On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:43 PM +0100 Jacques Nilo
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also I am wondering about possible compatibility problems between this
> > patch and Shorewall. Tom could you give us some light on this ?
>
> I added
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:43 PM +0100 Jacques Nilo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also I am wondering about possible compatibility problems between this
patch and Shorewall. Tom could you give us some light on this ?
I added support (untested) for NAT traversal in Shorewall 1.3.13. Set
Le Mardi 21 Janvier 2003 17:22, Tim Scott a écrit :
> Dear Jacques,
>
> Please can you tell me if the latest release of the Bering kernel contains
> support for ESPinUDP required for Mathieu Lafon's NAT Traversal patch for
> FreeSwan?
No. You will find the patches here:
http://open-source.arkoon.ne
Matt,
I have set up some systems using IDE-CF adapters, and
am amazed at what seems to trip me up in various
configurations. I had one motherboard that would not
boot the CF no matter what I did, until I found and updated
the bios (this was an older PII motherboard). I currently
have a Pentium 1
Gustav,
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:13:44 +0100 Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> I was looking under
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/net/
>
> and under
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/kernel/net/
>
> but I had failed to fi
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 07:46 am, Scott Merrill wrote:
> The smc-ultra.o module depends on the 8390.o module.
Thanks! I forgot that the smc-ultra depends on 8390.
Sorry for mis-leading you David.
General information: always mount floppies /dev/fd0u1440
or /dev/fd0u1680 respective to the act
Hi
At 15:40 21.01.2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
One more question before I start. ;-)
I have downloaded Bering 1.0 and I'm looking for a network module.
I have two 3Com Etherlink III 509 cards in this 486 box.
Will the module 3c59x.o work for 509 cards? (The name seems to indicate
otherwise.)
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 08:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One more question before I start. ;-)
>
> I have downloaded Bering 1.0 and I'm looking for a network module.
>
> I have two 3Com Etherlink III 509 cards in this 486 box.
>
> Will the module 3c59x.o work for 509 cards? (The name
On Monday 20 January 2003 11:51 pm, Darren Schell wrote:
> Lynn,
>
> I have read your "Basic IPSec VPN HowTo" at
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/ipsec.txt and have set out
> to set up a subnet to subnet scenario. If you have the time to help me
> sort out why the VPN doesn't seem to
Brad,
I found it, thanks.
I was looking under
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/net/
and under
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/kernel/net/
but I had failed to find
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/m
Gustav,
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:40:38 +0100 Gustav wrote:
> I have downloaded Bering 1.0 and I'm looking for a network module.
>
> I have two 3Com Etherlink III 509 cards in this 486 box.
Then you probably want:
http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/kernel/drivers/net/
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:07 AM -0500 "C. Dummy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running Bering and 2 computers behind Bering firewall. I'm thinking
about getting second ip from ISP. Is there a way to route those ips
directly to computers on lan via Bering firewall? Or should I just p
Hi,
One more question before I start. ;-)
I have downloaded Bering 1.0 and I'm looking for a network module.
I have two 3Com Etherlink III 509 cards in this 486 box.
Will the module 3c59x.o work for 509 cards? (The name seems to indicate
otherwise.)
Gustav
A warm Thank You to everyone that told me to look at Bering.
I'm downloading it while typing this.
Gustav
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships
On Monday 20 January 2003 10:22 pm, David Pitts wrote:
> I am using Bering_1.0-stable_img_bering_1680.exe from
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751 and
> smc-ultra.o (20-Oct-2002 09:03 6k) from
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/rc4/modules/2.4.18/kernel
>
> - Are there any plans on porting LEAF to the 2.4 series of
> kernels and most
> importantly, are there any plans on replacing ipchains with iptables?
Check out the Bering distribution (linked from the main LEAF page)
> - If yes, then are there any rough estimates on when such an effort might
>
C. Dummy wrote:
Read there:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/
Andrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list, and I have not even tried to install LEAF yet. I
have
read the subjects of the FAQ.
Since it's getting too hard to maintain my RH installation on my 486
router/fire
Thanks for help. Those 2 IPs are not static, is that matter? Doesn't
eth0 on firewall take one of them?
Andrey
S Mohan wrote:
Use the DNAT facility in Shorewall to route external IPs to specific
internal IPs.
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B
Hi,
> I've come to the conclusion that LEAF will most likely come very close.
> Still:
>
> - Are there any plans on porting LEAF to the 2.4 series of kernels and most
> importantly, are there any plans on replacing ipchains with iptables?
Done, Bering is the 2.4 kernel branch of LEAF
--
Jai
Hi,
I'm new to the list, and I have not even tried to install LEAF yet. I have
read the subjects of the FAQ.
Since it's getting too hard to maintain my RH installation on my 486
router/firewall, I'm looking for any of these 'specialized distributions'.
I've been searching the 'Net to try to find
Try this:
Boot DOS from a floppy,
type fdisk /mbr
any errors?
Also instead of setting the HD to AUTO, run the BIOS autodetect.
It helps!
The bios boot order is correct? 1st Floppy, 2nd HDD
If all the above fail, test the CF as slave in the primary IDE channel
(/dev/hdb)
My friend has a SanDi
I'm getting a whole lot of nothing when trying to boot my
new SanDisk 64MB CF using an ACS IDE-CF adapter.
I set the BIOS IDE detection to Auto/Auto, and I left the jumper
on the IDE-CF adapter in default position indicating it would be
Master. It's installed on the Primary IDE cable.
The BIOS
How did you mount the floppy?
Remember the default Bering floppy size is 1680, so you must
mount the floppy as such.
mount /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt
-Original Message-
From: David Pitts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
43 matches
Mail list logo
