Luis.F.Correia wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> answer to question 1
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Craig Caughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 3:04 AM
>> To: LEAF
>> Subject: [leaf-user] A couple of odd behavior issues???
>>
>> Hi folks,
>> I'm having a little s
Jeff Newmiller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 03/23/03 at 16:56:
> >
> > Can I get help on this in this fourm?
>
> This is an odd question...
I think he meant it as "Should I ask this here, or on the Shorewall list?".
At least, I hope that's what he meant
pgp0.pgp
Descriptio
Doug Sampson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 02/14/03 at 15:07:
> >
> > But ... the ONLY change we are suggesting you make is to the Exchange
> > server's default gateway. Does that *really* require a reboot
> > on Windows?
> > (I know the old joke about "You have moved your mouse - pre
Lynn Avants ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 02/10/03 at 22:05:
> On Monday 10 February 2003 06:31 pm, Mike Leone wrote:
> > Hopefully, we'll find out soon. I followed the Shorewall VPN document to
> > the letter, and now will be trying to verify my ipsecrets.conf entri
Lynn Avants ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 02/10/03 at 19:17:
> On Monday 10 February 2003 10:58 am, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> > I am unaware of any issue that would prevent you from continuing to use
> > PSKs after switching to the 509 version of FreeS/WAN. As far as I know,
> > P
OK; so I think I'm making progress ...
Anyway, when ipsec starts, I get:
# svi ipsec start
ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99...
ipsec_setup: Using /lib/modules/ipsec.o
ipsec_setup: WARNING: eth0 has route filtering turned on, KLIPS may not work
ipsec_setup: (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0
S Mohan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 02/09/03 at 21:18:
> You do not need fswcert for Freeswan 1.96 upwards. In the ipsec.secrets
> file, you can give the name of the pem file itself. Freeswan will
> "automagically" discover the format of the key and extract it at
> startup.
Good to kn
I'm trying to set up my Bering 1.0-stable installation to use IPSec
(eventually, I want to do IPSec passthru to my office's Pix firewall, but I
might also want to use IPSec to connect into my LAN from the outside).
I'm following http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/buipsec.html, creating
the c
Jay Langford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 01/24/03 at 00:44:
>
> I think this is the problem
>
> >>LRP=root,dhcpd,etc,local,modules,iptables,shorwall,dnscache,weblet
>
> Not enough packages there by the look of it.., You said you have a DSL
> modem.. you should use the PPPOE package t
Vaclav Bouse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 11 13, 02 at 15:04:
> But I the biggest problem with Bering is, that it's impossible to use ssh
> (too big and the smaller from dachstein need some libaries) and telnet
Works fine for me. But then, I use 2 floppy drives, and store ssh on the 2nd
one.
> We have a user trying to use our VPN (ipsec)
> thru a dialup AOL account and it dont work.
>
> Does anyone know for sure if AOL filters ipsec,
> protocol 50 & 51, udp port 500 ??
Empirically, I'm gonna say yes. Which means I had the same problems as you - using AOL
v6, I could not complete a
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Schalit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Help with demand dial on Dachstein
> Mike Leone wrote:
> >
> > > This FAQ and many othe
> This FAQ and many others needs to be updated. The lrp.c0wz.com site is no
> longer maintained. There are mirrors of its content at:
Really? Rick called it quits with LRP/LEAF? How sad.
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.so
Think it would depend smore on the number of simultaneous connections, and the amount
of traffic.
My Cisco Pix 515 firewall has a Pentium 200, 32M of RAM in it. I'd had a couple
simultaneous connections with it with no problems.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Holmes" <[EMAIL
> Jan 8 17:12:31 trout kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
> a.b.c.157:63882 x.y.z.86:524 L=48 S=0x00 I=15350 F=0x4000 T=112 SYN
> (#45)
>
> Jan 8 17:12:55 trout kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
> a.b.c.157:63884 x.y.z.86:445 L=48 S=0x00 I=15570 F=0x4000 T=112 SYN
> (#45)
>
>
> > The problem is that the bridge chips don't handle ISA
> > interrupts too well: Basically, the 4:1 clock speed difference
> > causes each ISA interrupt to cause 4 interrupts on the PCI
> > bus. OUCH!
>
> Could you clarify this a little? Could you explain *why* it generates
> 4 interrupts? I *
Among others here on this list ...
I have created a single-diskette distribution that installs the base
configuration of a VPN firewall based on the Linux Router Project (LRP,
www.linuxrouter.org), a compact Linux distribution that can fit on a single,
bootable floppy diskette. The distribution
> I've checked, double checked, and triple checked this a number of times -
> the culprit is ads.x10.com. Every time I see this ad, I check my lrp.
> Consistently, this is the onlysite for me that causes this DNS flood in my
> logs. Unfortunately, this ad site is attaching to more and more web s
18 matches
Mail list logo
