On 2/27/07, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Motorola modems seem to, occasionally, have an issue with a connection
> that can't autodetect on the other end. In the example I gave, if I let
> my PC autodetect, it comes up at 100BaseTX full duplex, and everything
> works great. If I force se
Andrew Haninger wrote:
> On 2/26/07, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any number of things could cause that. My concern is, sometimes
>> Motorolas don't handle forced duplex settings well, and sometimes
>> half-duplex will make things problematic to begin with.
> Okay, more of my confus
On 2/26/07, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any number of things could cause that. My concern is, sometimes
> Motorolas don't handle forced duplex settings well, and sometimes
> half-duplex will make things problematic to begin with.
Okay, more of my confusion: Why would setting the duplex
Andrew Haninger wrote:
> I half understand duplex (don't bother explaining it - I'll look it up
> for myself) but I don't understand how duplex could be negotiated
> improperly?
Any number of things could cause that. My concern is, sometimes
Motorolas don't handle forced duplex settings well, and
>I half understand duplex (don't bother explaining it - I'll look it up for
myself) but I don't understand how duplex could be negotiated improperly?
I speak from experience! I had EXACTLY the same problem, Internet was slow
through the Leaf box, directly connected PC bypassing the router, it was
Exactly Bob, and this was why Andrew, I suggested using the DOS utility
to force half-duplex, full duplex with testing performed each time.
And as far as the networking terms go, errors = bad. Pretty simple. As
you can see with your test, every one of those errors are overruns.
3: eth0: mtu 15
On 2/25/07, Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing to check is that your NICs are negotiating duplex properly.
Sorry. I'm definitely a power-user, but I'm not that familiar with
some of these networking topics.
I half understand duplex (don't bother explaining it -
One thing to check is that your NICs are negotiating duplex properly.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & busin
Hi Andrew,
It may be a duplex mismatch, you can check the link errors with 'ip -s
link'
Eric
>Hello.
>
>I'm using Bering-uClibc (not sure which version since the box is
>headless) with Linux 2.4.32. It's running on a 486 with four 3c509's
>in it. One is connected to a Motorola Surfboard 4200 cab
Andrew Haninger wrote:
>Hello.
>
>I'm using Bering-uClibc (not sure which version since the box is
>headless) with Linux 2.4.32. It's running on a 486 with four 3c509's
>in it. One is connected to a Motorola Surfboard 4200 cable modem.
>
>When I get online with my Windows laptop using my LEAF box
Hello.
I'm using Bering-uClibc (not sure which version since the box is
headless) with Linux 2.4.32. It's running on a 486 with four 3c509's
in it. One is connected to a Motorola Surfboard 4200 cable modem.
When I get online with my Windows laptop using my LEAF box as a
gateway, my downloads are
11 matches
Mail list logo
