There is absolutely no need to filling up someone's logs.
Cipe is an encrypted tunnel and the cipe protocol has
Bridging support. In other words it is perfectly possible
To have two private lan's bridged together across the
Internet over a cipe interface.
For more info on cipe check
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 23:55, dan carter wrote:
guitarlynn wrote:
A M$ WINS server will likely be a pain to get to sync across
subnets, however Samba servers do it effortlessly. It might be
harder to setup a WINS server, but at last look the line added to
smb.conf only required wins
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 12:20 am, dan carter wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
You need to talk to more Microsoft people (motto: Microsoft doesn't
understand how tcp/ip works.) The L2TP protocol used by M$ WAN's is a
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (hence the name), which enables your systems
Scott Merrill wrote:
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 12:20 am, dan carter wrote:
I have not used it, but there is a Linux development effort for L2TP:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/l2tp
SMB Browse lists are best handled in a WAN setting by use of WINS.
I agree on a large centrally controlled
On Monday 28 October 2002 23:20, dan carter wrote:
Is there an a linux implementation of this protocol? I have been
trying to get something like that going for ages to join two private
LANs over the internet. All the VPN stuff i've looked at doesn't
seem to be able to forward the broadcast
guitarlynn wrote:
On Monday 28 October 2002 23:20, dan carter wrote:
Is there an a linux implementation of this protocol? I have been
trying to get something like that going for ages to join two private
LANs over the internet. All the VPN stuff i've looked at doesn't
seem to be able to
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 23:22, dan carter wrote:
guitarlynn wrote:
On Monday 28 October 2002 23:20, dan carter wrote:
Is there an a linux implementation of this protocol? I have been
trying to get something like that going for ages to join two
private LANs over the internet. All the VPN
guitarlynn wrote:
A M$ WINS server will likely be a pain to get to sync across subnets,
however Samba servers do it effortlessly.
Must be a new option, last time i looked at it there was no way to sync
samba WINS servers, they said they were working on it but it would be a
proprietary
Hi folks,
What do I need to do to set up 2 Bering boxes to bridge 2 subnets? Is
there any info available (I've looked, but didn't find any)? I notice in
the /etc/network/interfaces file there's a Bridge entry that's commented
out, and a reference to more files. Thank you.
Craig
help!
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:charles;steinkuehler.net]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Craig; LEAF
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] How to set up bridging with Bering?
Hi folks (and Troy, too),
I'm actually trying to connect a VPN tunnel through
At 02:40 PM 10/28/02 -0800, Craig wrote:
Hi folks,
Charles, please help me clarify this in my mind if you would please...if
I want my Private Student LAN to have the internet public addresses,
isn't this really a bridge? Here's what I mean-
Internet-Bering Box 1(School LAN)-Bering
I don't believe you can run a bridge over a VPN (it is not impossible
in
principle, but I've never seen it actually done ... since a VPN is a
Network-Layer link, you'd have to encapsulate Ethernet frames in IP
datagrams ... this isn't quite as weird as it sounds, but it is
*almost* as
weird
At 05:51 PM 10/28/02 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[...]
You need to talk to more Microsoft people (motto: Microsoft doesn't
understand how tcp/ip works.) The L2TP protocol used by M$ WAN's is a
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (hence the name), which enables your systems
to propogate Layer 2
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
You need to talk to more Microsoft people (motto: Microsoft doesn't
understand how tcp/ip works.) The L2TP protocol used by M$ WAN's is a
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (hence the name), which enables your systems
to propogate Layer 2 packets (including broadcasts and
14 matches
Mail list logo
