Re: [leaf-user] Re: possible GPLed e1000 module source (was: Intel PRO/1000 (e1000)module...)

2002-11-01 Thread Stefan Engel
Greg Morgan wrote: > > Brad Fritz wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:29:47 MST Greg Morgan wrote: > > > > > >>Stefan Engel wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Is there anybody out there who has the e1000.o module for > >>>Bering 1.0 rc4 already built? Or do I have to do it on my own? > >> > >>Finally, as I

Re: [leaf-user] Re: possible GPLed e1000 module source (was: Intel PRO/1000=(e1000) module...)

2002-11-01 Thread Lars Kneschke
Hello! >From a technical point of view i will always the intel driver. The intel driver gives your very much more information about your nic(speed, duplex, linkstatus, error counters), then the gpl driver is able to do. Just try to find out the the of speed and duplex, using most of the other gpl

Re: [leaf-user] Proxy

2002-11-01 Thread Etienne Charlier
Hi, isn't it a feature added in version 2.5 of the squid proxy ?? http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/squid-2.5.STABLE1-RELEASENOTES.ht ml Regards; Etienne Charlier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "James Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thurs

RE: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb

2002-11-01 Thread Kim Oppalfens
Probably not, Added the list back to the conversation (use reply all when replying thanks). Depends on what you are trying to do. But I would gamble that since you started from htb init you will probably need : cls_fw.o or cls_u32.o Sch_htb.o off course Sch_sfq.o Sch_prio.o Sch_ingress.o And ye

Re: FW: [leaf-user] samba for bering based leaf box

2002-11-01 Thread Jacques Nilo
> > Where can I download the samba lrp package? > > > > thanks > > roberto > > See forwarded message below. > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/packages/untested/ > > Jacques, perhaps you could put a link on your main page for this--with the > appropriate disclaimers. I've seen the questio

[leaf-user] Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S Desktop Adapter recognized.

2002-11-01 Thread Jeff Greer
I am having problems with having my 2 Intel Pro/100S Desktop NICS recognized using the latest Bering release. I have tried all of the drivers I could find, even the one compiled on the 24th. I have tried each of the 3 or 4 drivers both before and after insomd'ing pci_scan.o Device does not suppor

Re: [leaf-user] Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S Desktop Adapter recognized.

2002-11-01 Thread Brad Fritz
Jeff, if you post the exact names of the drivers you tried, where you downloaded them from, the exact insmod commands you used and the exact error output, you are more likely to get speedy and accurate suggestions. I am not trying to be difficult here, but it's *so* much easier to offer good advi

RE: [leaf-user] error backing up shorewall (rc4)

2002-11-01 Thread George Luft
Will this make it onto the errata page? It's probably easier than changing the version of Shorewall included with rc4. 'mkdir /var/lib/shorewall' is an easy workaround, and it does fix the problem. George > -Original Message- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@;shorewall.net] > Sent: M

[leaf-user] RE: submitting a FAQ answer (was: change Bering default IP address)

2002-11-01 Thread George Luft
> -Original Message- > From: Brad Fritz [mailto:brad@;fritzfam.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:12 PM > To: George Luft > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: submitting a FAQ answer (was: change Bering default > IP address) > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:46:04 EST you wrote: > >

Re: [leaf-user] Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S Desktop Adapterrecognized.

2002-11-01 Thread Matthew Schalit
>> before and after insomd'ing pci_scan.o Brad Fritz wrote: Jeff, if you post the exact names of the drivers you tried, where you downloaded them from, the exact insmod commands you used and the exact error output Plus I don't think you need pci_scan.o for any Pro 100s. Maybe try putting the

[leaf-user] RE: submitting a FAQ answer (was: change Bering default IP address)

2002-11-01 Thread George Luft
> -Original Message- > From: Brad Fritz [mailto:brad@;fritzfam.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:12 PM > To: George Luft > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: submitting a FAQ answer (was: change Bering default > IP address) > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:46:04 EST you wrote: > >

[leaf-user] Need logging help.

2002-11-01 Thread Phillip . Watts
I'm trying to understand what's going on here My goal is log everything that hits the external interface, except the body of file transfers and lengthy web sites. Here's what I THINK I'm doing: Step 1 accepts everything previously established. Step 2 logs and drops NEW non connections, those sh

RE: [leaf-user] error backing up shorewall (rc4)

2002-11-01 Thread George Luft
Will this make it onto the errata page? It's probably easier than changing the version of Shorewall included with rc4. 'mkdir /var/lib/shorewall' is an easy workaround, and it does fix the problem. George > -Original Message- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@;shorewall.net] > Sent: M

[leaf-user] IPSEC SECRETS & MORE THAN ONE TUNNEL

2002-11-01 Thread Lars Emilsson
Charles Steinkuehler Thank you for your replay to my letter, as you wrote the problem was that "the two VPN gateways WILL NOT be able to ping each". I am just now looking at five different Vmware-windows on my screen and the workstations in each end have contact with each other over an Ipsec-tunne

Re: [leaf-user] IPSEC SECRETS & MORE THAN ONE TUNNEL

2002-11-01 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> And now to my question > -- > IPSEC SECRETS & MORE THAN ONE TUNNEL > Configuration of Ipsec secrets > > We have one head office, two shops, two employees with cable modems with > DHCP but known IP addresses for the local nets and two Roadwarriors. If > possible I would like to

Re: [leaf-user] Need logging help.

2002-11-01 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 12:55 PM 11/1/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to understand what's going on here My goal is log everything that hits the external interface, except the body of file transfers and lengthy web sites. Here's what I THINK I'm doing: Step 1 accepts everything previously established.

RE: [leaf-user] Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S Desktop Adapter recognized.

2002-11-01 Thread Jeff Greer
It would appear to be a CPU issue. I am running an AMD 1700+ with 128MB DDR 2100 RAM. When I do insmod eepro100 I get the following message. Operation not supported by device But only after insmod pci-scan If I do the insmod eepro100 before pci-scan then I get un resolved symbol messages. If

Re: [leaf-user] Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S Desktop Adapter recognized.

2002-11-01 Thread Brad Fritz
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 14:31:21 CST Jeff Greer wrote: > It would appear to be a CPU issue. Not necessarily and in fact it would surprise me since the RC4 kernel configuration[1] doesn't have any fancy CPU optimizations set. It could be a BIOS configuration issue, something to do with the PCI bus

Re: [leaf-user] Need logging help.

2002-11-01 Thread Phillip . Watts
Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/01/2002 02:03:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx) Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Need logging help. At 12:55 PM 11/1/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "whenever"? How many different sites did you test? Is this beha

RE: [leaf-user] English version of Bering_1.0-rc4_img_bering_1680.exe???

2002-11-01 Thread George Luft
> -Original Message- > From: Jacques Nilo [mailto:jnilo@;users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:44 PM > To: Craig; LEAF > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] English version of > Bering_1.0-rc4_img_bering_1680.exe??? > > > Le Jeudi 24 Octobre 2002 20:06, Craig a ecrit : > > Hi f

[leaf-user] posted lspci for glibc-2.0.7 (was: Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S..)

2002-11-01 Thread Brad Fritz
Replying to myself... On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 16:25:20 EST I wrote: > If you could find a copy of lspci that is statically > compiled or linked to glibc-2.0.7, that would help shed some light > on the situation. (If you're really in a jam, I can probably > find/compile one for you.) I had a Slink

[leaf-user] Bearing RC3 or RC4 with MxStream ADSL in the netherlands

2002-11-01 Thread Reginald R. Richardson
Hi there, Has any got Bearing to work with KPN's MxStream in the netherlands MxStream uses a VPN type connection between the router and the modem, A pptp connection is open between router and modem, in the following manner Pptp 10.0.0.138 pc1, that's the command "pc1" needs to be added after the

Re: [leaf-user] Intel PRO/1000 (e1000) module for Bering?

2002-11-01 Thread Greg Morgan
OK, I received a response from Intel support services to which I am blind coping my response. Here's a summary of what has happened. Essentially, the http://www.scyld.com/network/ site has provided us with a red herring complete with a shrubbery. This is no longer a correct statement though i

RE: [leaf-user] Bering 1.0-rc4 Serial Modem - proxy arp ethernet address

2002-11-01 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! If your ISP is a pure ISP as it should, there are some things that need to be changed. be sure that you fill out your username password secrets into /etc/ppp/chap-secrets /etc/ppp/pap-secrets first, add this to /etc/ppp/options user your_isp_assigned_username ipcp-accept-remote ipcp-accept-l

Re: [leaf-user] posted lspci for glibc-2.0.7 (was: Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S..)

2002-11-01 Thread brad
Jeff Greer wrote: > Well it doesn't look good > > It appears that the kernel isn't seeing/ initilizing the PCI bus. > > The output of lspci lead me to look at /proc/bus in which there is > nothing. > > I have tried every BIOS setting combination that I could think might > apply with no luck. Is

RE: [leaf-user] Bering 1.0-rc4 Serial Modem - proxy arp ethernet address

2002-11-01 Thread Keith Iosso
Hello, Thank you very much for your suggestions. My main problem was some stupid/newbie assumptions I made. In doing a demand PPP setup, I read out of context that a connection would be made as PPP started up. As everybody else probably knows, this is wrong. In a demand setup,

[leaf-user] Bering RC-4 unexplainable holes in shorewall - long

2002-11-01 Thread Jeff Clark
I'm setting up a Bering rc-4 box with pppoe net access and two internal networks - not a DMZ just 2 seperate internal networks. I want traffic blocked between the internal networks and from the 2nd network to the net. I've set up 3 zones: net is pppoe through eth0 ofl is 192.168.17.0/24 on 192.1

[leaf-user] Comcast/RCA cable modem and ppoe?

2002-11-01 Thread Jeff
I Have just signed up for broadband cable access with our local Comcast cable. They have just started providing it. I have been running Eigerstein on DSL/PPPoE. As usual nobody there could tell me what the cable would be. It is Comcast internet access using an RCA DCM305 modem.Does anybody kno

[leaf-user] FW: dropped dhcp packets from eth1

2002-11-01 Thread George Luft
It looks like I need to add the dhcp option to eth1 in my Bering rc4? I was running the dhcpd package on my pppoe adsl connection. DHCP ACKs from the server to internal clients were being dropped--yet the DHCP clients were able to release and renew addresses just fine. It's just that these messa

Re: [leaf-user] Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S Desktop Adapterrecognized.

2002-11-01 Thread Greg Morgan
Jeff Greer wrote: It would appear to be a CPU issue. I am running an AMD 1700+ with 128MB DDR 2100 RAM. For what its worth many of these boards have lots of on-board extras. My Elitegroup ECS K7S5A, which sounds like yours has both a reltec ethernet and AMR devices onboard. I disabled the

Re: [leaf-user] posted lspci for glibc-2.0.7 (was: Need help getting Intel PRO/100 S..)

2002-11-01 Thread Brad Fritz
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 19:38:35 CST Jeff Greer wrote: > dmesg > > PCI: PCI BIOS revison 2.10 entry at 0xfb5f0, last bus=1 > PCI: System does not support PCI > > > The MB is a L7SOM > http://www.ecs.com.tw/products/l7som_3x.htm > > > I wonder if it has something to do with the shared memory or