Re: [LU] Wolves

The stats say we had 2 shots on target. One was Rodders in the first half, with a soft shot straight at the keeper. I assume the other came from Raph's blocked cross just after he came on? Nigel (the Dublin one) -Original Message- From: Leedslist On Behalf Of Nicholas Armit via

Re: [LU] Wolves

Definitely one from Rodrigo (could have done better I thought) and thought there was another (but could be senility) On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 03:37:26 PM EDT, Richard Walker wrote: There were plenty of positives but we were well beaten by a better team. I’m struggling to

Re: [LU] Wolves

There were plenty of positives but we were well beaten by a better team. I’m struggling to remember those saves. I think you might be confusing save with picking the ball up. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 8:26 pm, Nicholas Armit wrote: Their goalie made two

Re: [LU] Wolves

Their goalie made two saves...directly at him but two saves. Also they had a goal rightly disallowed, one great save from Meslier and the goal. Besides that nothing else I believe. Rich I think you are being extremely critical here we were killing them the first 25-30 with really great play.

Re: [LU] Wolves

Apart from the two shots on goal, and the (I hate it) greater expected goals, and that had Phillips left the shot alone we’d have drawn 0-0, which would have been a deserved draw. Tight game. Any result would have been “deserved” or fair. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 20:07, Richard Walker via Leedslist

Re: [LU] Wolves

Not sure how anyone can say we deserved a draw or at least a draw when their keeper has not made a save all night ? I thought we were out thought and out played by a very good side. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 3:46 pm, Nicholas Armit via Leedslist wrote:

Re: [LU] Wolves

No I hot that you were just commenting on what other fans said (saw the same thing on Twitter somewhere). What they are saying is total bollocks what you are saying is lucid, well-thought out and backed by evidence. ;-) Nick On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:44:03 AM EDT, Nick wrote:

Re: [LU] Wolves

yeah - you’ve misunderstood me there…but hey… I was talking about what the fans of other teams were saying about our style of play…which, in case it hasn’t been clear, I am a huge fan of. We’ve lost 2 out 5 so far - league winners needed two penalties - last night this solid Premier league

Re: [LU] Wolves

Exactly. Really we played a really good, established premier league team who have excellent players and are in Europe and we made them look shit for 25-30 minutes. Yes the clear-cut chances did not come but it was great. Second half they were better but we never looked totally outplayed (they

Re: [LU] Wolves

Total bollocks. On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 05:59:40 AM EDT, Nick wrote: "all Leeds do is run, run, run”…is a bit like saying all Spain / Barcelona did was pass, pass, pass… get in and stop them…do something better… N > On 20 Oct 2020, at 09:47, Michael Benjamin wrote: > >

Re: [LU] Bloody hell!

I think if we can get 7/8 points from that we are doing well. That would be say 15 points from a possible 30/33. 1.5 points a game equals 57 points in the season easily survived relegation. Nick On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 07:30:38 AM EDT, Robert Heath wrote: Can we start having a

[LU] Bloody hell!

Can we start having a few easy bloody games please? 4 of our next 5 games are v teams in the current top 6 (and we've already played the other 2) (+ Man City.) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Wolves

"all Leeds do is run, run, run”…is a bit like saying all Spain / Barcelona did was pass, pass, pass… get in and stop them…do something better… N > On 20 Oct 2020, at 09:47, Michael Benjamin wrote: > > "all Leeds do is run, run, run", and to some extent they're right

[LU] Wolves

A tad pissed off after last night and not felt that for a while which is good. I thought Wolves played the perfect game, they defended en masse with 3 central defenders and despite us coming out of the tracks fast they never really looked in trouble demonstrated by the fact that their keeper

Re: [LU] Wolves

Your inability to cross line made me laugh Nigel, although it wouldn’t have done last night! I think Michael makes a fair point about being where Wolves were 3 years ago. This season is, despite us all wanting to surprise everyone and win the league, one of consolidation. If we can see the

Re: [LU] Wolves

They Wolves, are a great team who are improving. They have a good coach, lots of investment, they are experienced and gelled. We are where they were three years ago. Let's wait, so far so very good. Michael Get Outlook for Android From:

Re: [LU] Wolves

I'm not massively downhearted about the loss. They happen. I do however continue to be perplexed at our lack of ability to cross the ball with any hint of ability. This has been an ongoing, glaringly obvious issue for all our time under Bielsa, yet not only do we not seem able to sort it out,

Re: [LU] Wolves

From the Swinnow area of Queensland a loss is a loss, which ever way you dress it up邏 Norman and big Jack would never accept this. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 5:39 pm, Nick wrote: > exactly Ted - that was my biggest gripe, not being at the ground…I hate > watching our games on TV > > And you know -

Re: [LU] Wolves

exactly Ted - that was my biggest gripe, not being at the ground…I hate watching our games on TV And you know - we lost a game or two last season, it turned out OK > On 20 Oct 2020, at 08:37, Ted wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 08:28, David Boocock wrote: > >> We lost it doesn’t count,

Re: [LU] Wolves

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 08:28, David Boocock wrote: > We lost it doesn’t count, another game to make up. If enjoyable football > is watching your team lose I may as well follow Barnstoneworth United! > 8-1...8 bloody 1, to Brighouse! The centre forward wears glasses! > > It’s a loss get

Re: [LU] Wolves

We lost it doesn’t count, another game to make up. If enjoyable football is watching your team lose I may as well follow Barnstoneworth United! 8-1...8 bloody 1, to Brighouse! The centre forward wears glasses! It’s a loss get real. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 5:18 pm, Ted wrote: > Yeah - I

Re: [LU] Wolves

realising I didn’t say it…yes, I thought a draw would have been fair. Nick > On 20 Oct 2020, at 01:36, Nicholas Armit wrote: > > I don't know I thought the first 30 minutes was fantastic. Some great > football. Yes the second half not as good and they got to grips with us but a > draw was

Re: [LU] Wolves

Yeah - I agree Nick - I thought the first 30 mins was brilliant, Ayling was great. Thoroughly enjoyable. We were the better side first half, them second. I agree, a draw would have been fairer but I've no real complaints. (Bearing in mind it was 5 years ago yesterday that we got Steve fukcing