RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread ronald ferguson
: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports I was thinking you might be onto something, but I don't think so. Let me say how I have that section ticked, and maybe someone will see something: Under Options and Include Main Entries for, I have ticked the following: All individuals Show line back

RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread ronald ferguson
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Hi Barbara, Yes you've understood Child List and Main Entry correctly. I have reproduced your problem in the Child List when the person with the 4 marriages is only

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread Barbara Ford
/fergys/ _ Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:29:22 +0900 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Hi Barbara, Yes you've understood

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread Gene Young
Barbara Ford wrote: Thank you, Ron and Cathy, Sounds like you all persisted until you came up with the answer! I'm sure it would've been much easier for you if I could have been clearer with my descriptions (with my lack of understanding of child list and main entry). I am learning, thanks to

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread Barbara Ford
Let me follow up with another question. Does this mean that double brackets can be put around other things that I do not want to print in reports (for example, information in NOTES)? On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Gene Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Barbara Ford wrote: Thank you, Ron and

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread Susan Daily
Barbara, Yes, they are called Privacy brackets (probably more detail if you search in Help for them). Lots of us use them in all sorts of ways. I put much of my research data into brackets, and when I want to see that stuff, there is a checkbox on reports that says Print [[Private]] and Print

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread Gene Young
Susan Daily wrote: I think Gene suggested you could delete the brackets afterwards because he presumed at some point you would want to see the name in a report. You can leave them there forever if you wish! ;-) Susan Correct! -- Gene Y. n2kvs Researching Young, Zies, Harer Cox with

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-15 Thread Barbara Ford
Gene, This is EXACTLY what I needed--I just tried the double brackets, on the Individual View, putting double brackets around her given name and then another set around her surname. In the report, it just says Unknown which is fine (I don't want the actual data within my software to say Unknown,

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Cathy
Hi Barbara, I haven't been keeping up with the list as I've been busy with other things the last few days. It sounds as if you're having troubles when your brother is in the last generation of the report and that it doesn't have anything to do with how many generations are chosen. However I

RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread ronald ferguson
PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Thank you for being willing to help me get a handle on this. As to the questions, 1) in the instance of the descendant report, I was running the report on descendants of my great great

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
I don't know if this is helpful or not, but I think Cathy has summarized correctly, from the trials I have done. The omission of my brother's fourth marriage does seem to occur when his generation is the last one in the report...there are actually two generations after him (he has children and

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Bruce Jones
: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:04:56 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Thank you for being willing to help me get a handle on this. As to the questions, 1) in the instance of the descendant report

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Thank you for being willing to help me get a handle on this. As to the questions, 1) in the instance of the descendant report, I was running the report on descendants of my great great grandfather. So, it included him, great grandfather

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Thank you for being willing to help me get a handle on this. As to the questions, 1) in the instance of the descendant report, I was running the report on descendants of my

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Susan Daily
Barbara, Try adding a fake child to your brother and his fourth wife. Now run a report where he is the last generation. Does the fourth marriage show up? Susan On 2/14/08, Barbara Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did try unlinking the fourth wife from my brother and relinking. No change. Still

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Cathy
Hi Judy, That may be it. :-) I was about to ask a clarifying question whether Barbara meant the marriage was missing from the Child Lists rather than the main entry. I don't include marriages in the Child Lists and have Main Entries for everyone as I prefer to keep the generational entries

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Judy Wardlaw
Barbara I don't know if this is helpful or not, but I think Cathy has summarized correctly, from the trials I have done. The omission of my brother's fourth marriage does seem to occur when his generation is the last one in the report...there are actually two generations after him (he has

RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread ronald ferguson
/ _ Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:21:58 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports I think I understand what you are saying, Ron, and I appreciate all your efforts

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Thank you for being willing to help me get a handle on this. As to the questions, 1) in the instance of the descendant report, I was running

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
I was thinking you might be onto something, but I don't think so. Let me say how I have that section ticked, and maybe someone will see something: Under Options and Include Main Entries for, I have ticked the following: All individuals Show line back to starting person Show spouses for children

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
Did as suggested--put a fake child in for brother and fourth wife. Ran descendant book report with him as last generation. Fourth marriage still does not show up, even though they now have a child. Barbara On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Susan Daily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Barbara, Try

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
/ _ Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:21:58 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports I think I understand what you are saying, Ron, and I appreciate all your efforts

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
I guess this reminds me that there is an entire area I don't understand, and that is the meaning of main entry and child list. Would Cathy's method keep the same information from showing up twice in my reports? (As an example, when my report lists me and my siblings with my parents, is that the

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Barbara Ford
To everyone that still may be scratching your heads: I have tried all suggestions, and the problem still persists. Just for more information to input into the mix: one of my sisters has three marriages (two marriages and one relationship); one of them is Private. So, except for a fourth marriage,

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-14 Thread Cathy
Hi Barbara, Yes you've understood Child List and Main Entry correctly. I have reproduced your problem in the Child List when the person with the 4 marriages is only in the report as a Child of the Final Generation if one of the marriage partners is Private. This is using the Descendant Book

[LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Barbara Ford
Since I got no responses to my earlier question about this, I'm going to try again. I am extremely interested in an explanation for this, because this problem would be serious enough for me to change software programs. I am hoping that this error is because of something I am doing wrong, because

RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Dennis Davenport
@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Since I got no responses to my earlier question about this, I'm going to try again. I am extremely interested in an explanation for this, because this problem would be serious enough for me to change software programs. I am hoping

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Penny
list for a great software. Doesn't get any better than that. Penny - Original Message - From: Barbara Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 11:00 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Since I got

RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread ronald ferguson
/ _ Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:00:56 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Since I got no responses to my earlier question about this, I'm going to try again. I am extremely interested

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Jenny M Benson
Barbara Ford wrote Since I got no responses to my earlier question about this, I'm going to try again. The most probably reason for you getting no response the first time is because none of us was able to give you an answer. This list would be impossible if everyone replied Sorry, I don't

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Barbara Ford
I would also like to post right now that I have in fact heard directly from Support, as I was sure I would, so I wanted to clarify that at this point. I'm sure we'll get it resolved, with so many bright folks helping me. Thanks. Barbara On Feb 13, 2008 3:09 PM, Barbara Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Barbara Ford
Thank you for responding. My plea for help was not intended in any way as an insult to the group, nor to the software. Please note, however, I did contact support directly. I am certainly assuming that the fault is mine, not the software, but if I can't learn what I am doing wrong, then I can't

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Barbara Ford
-0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Since I got no responses to my earlier question about this, I'm going to try again. I am extremely interested in an explanation for this, because this problem

RE: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread ronald ferguson
@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports Thank you for being willing to help me get a handle on this. As to the questions, 1) in the instance of the descendant report, I was running the report on descendants of my great great grandfather. So, it included him, great

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Susan Daily
Barbara, Can you select just your brother and run a descendants report (3 generations) starting with him, and see what marriages are listed? Try all three: Descendants Report; Descendants Book Report; and Descendants Narrative (Book) Report. Also, in Spouse view for your brother, do you see all

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Barbara Ford
Paragraph 1: all marriages are listed, in all three reports. Paragraph 2: yes, all four spouses are listed in the correct order; no errors in date entry. Paragraph 3: double-checked, and no. On Feb 13, 2008 5:31 PM, Susan Daily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Barbara, Can you select just your

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Susan Daily
Okay, so the marriages can be listed in a descendants report, at least. So there seems to be no data entry error on YOUR part. Now try selecting your brother's father, and doing the same three reports, again, with 3 or 4 generations selected. Do all four marriages appear? (You know what is next,

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Barbara Ford
I will be glad to try these things (tomorrow). I've just been playing around with it more. It's very strange. I picked my longest line--it's about 15 generations. I did a descendant book report, starting with the farthest one back. It created an 86-page report. Guess what was included: all my

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Dawn Crowley
I loaned an extra spouse to one of my thrice married ancestors. After running all 3 types of decendants reports pointed out below for 3, 4, and 16 generations, I am still unable to duplicate your error. I even temporarily made one marriage private, but that didn't change the situation. Dawn

Re: [LegacyUG] Information Left Out of Reports

2008-02-13 Thread Dawn Crowley
P.S.: Even though I was unable to help you solve your issue, I'm glad that you asked. I had no idea that Legacy included 3 different decendant reports. Dawn Dawn Crowley wrote: I loaned an extra spouse to one of my thrice married ancestors. After running all 3 types of decendants reports