To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] living again
But you also have to click the Apply... button otherwise Legacy will only do
this for new entered individuals.
Evert
2009/10/9 Kramer kramer...@comcast.net
Michele, go to ToolsAdvanced Set Living. It will mark everyone who could
living.
Rita in South Carolina
--
*From:* k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] *On
Behalf Of *Evert van Dijken
*Sent:* Friday, October 09, 2009 1:30 AM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] living again
Rita,
Do you have recognisable birth dates set for all of the 'dead' folk?
Bill
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of
Rita Lynn McKale
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:54 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] living again
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] living again
Yes, you are correct. I was looking at Options Customize.
When did you do that search, before or after running Advanced Set Living?
Evert
2009/10/9 Rita Lynn McKale cagr...@comporium.net
Evert,
There is no Apply button when you go
, October 09, 2009 6:40 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] living again
Rita,
Do you have recognisable birth dates set for all of the 'dead' folk?
Bill
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of
Rita Lynn McKale
Sent: Friday
EXACTLY Rita!!! That is what I have been trying to explain!
michele
- Original Message -
From: Rita Lynn McKale cagr...@comporium.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 7:14 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] living again
No, but from what I have read
Of Bill Anderson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 6:40 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] living again
Rita,
Do you have recognisable birth dates set for all of the 'dead' folk?
Bill
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com
in consideration when calculating the dead.
Rita in South Carolina
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Bill Anderson
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 6:40 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] living
Sorry, I presumed that one. I guess I shouldn't have.
Ellen Kramer
Researching and loving Dorman, Kramer, Mirarchi, Procopio, Renninger
and Staudt-Stoudt-Stout families
On Oct 9, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Evert van Dijken wrote:
But you also have to click the Apply... button otherwise Legacy
I did everything y'all to do but the program is still killing people that
are long dead. If someone married in 1821 there is no way they could be
alive but Legacy is marking them as living unless I manually kill them off.
I have tagged everyone in my file that is marked as living that doesn't
...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Michele Lewis
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] living again
I did everything y'all to do but the program is still killing people that
are long dead. If someone
] On Behalf
Of Michele Lewis
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 4:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] living again
I did everything y'all to do but the program is still killing people that
are long dead. If someone married in 1821 there is no way they could be
alive
I have already done that.
michele
- Original Message -
From: CE Wood wood...@msn.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 8:23 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] living again
Assuming these are people without a death date, Click
OptionsCustomizeData
Michele, go to ToolsAdvanced Set Living. It will mark everyone who
could possibly be dead as dead depending on what you have set such as
the 120 years.
Legacy marks it already so you don't have to go through all the trouble.
Ellen Kramer
Researching and loving Dorman, Kramer, Mirarchi,
But you also have to click the Apply... button otherwise Legacy will only do
this for new entered individuals.
Evert
2009/10/9 Kramer kramer...@comcast.net
Michele, go to ToolsAdvanced Set Living. It will mark everyone who could
possibly be dead as dead depending on what you have set such as
Yes, according to the Help Legacy will only look at ancestors to determine
if someone is dead when you use the Advanced Set Living from the Tools menu.
So if you have a descendant who died 100 years ago all of his ancestors will
have Living set to No as well.
If someone was married 150 years ago
I thought that I remembered seeing this covered previously, but a search of the
archives found nothing.
I have many persons who already have tombstones, but yet are still living. I
would like to link them to the picture of their tombstone, but as soon as I put
any info into the burial place
Perhaps you could create an event for Tombstones and do it that way.
Frances NZ
- Original Message -
From: 1familytree
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 7:07 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living persons with Tombstones
I thought that I
@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living persons with Tombstones
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:07:50 -0700
I thought that I remembered seeing this covered
previously, but a search of the archives found nothing.
I have many persons who already have
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons with Tombstones
Perhaps you could create an event for Tombstones and do it that way.
Frances NZ
- Original Message -
From: 1familytree
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 7:07 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living
/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: 1familytree@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons
Can anyone explain why the Living Yes No is grayed out on some of my
individuals, even where there is a death date?
*** Holiday discounts on Legacy 7.0, add-ons, books, and more. Visit
http://tinyurl.com/65rpbt. ***
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Sorry - just realised that it only shows if the death date isn't there -
sorry!
*** Holiday discounts on Legacy 7.0, add-ons, books, and more. Visit
http://tinyurl.com/65rpbt. ***
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
Hope:
The indicator WILL be grayed out on an individual with a death date or a
burial location filled in. If you remove the death death or burial
information, the indicator will no longer be grayed out.
Kathy
Can anyone explain why the Living Yes No is grayed out on some of my
/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:46:13 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living or not
In my
/
_
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:46:13 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living or not
In my tinkering around, trying to follow the instructions in help, I
seem to have marked everyone in my data base as dead, including me
www.pdcroteau.com
- Original Message
From: Jane Sarles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 8:53:33 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living or not
The problem arose because of all those in my data for whom I do not have
a birth or a death date. In many
event in a person's life you can always get a date
bracket for other events.
- Original Message
From: Jane Sarles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 5:53:33 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living or not
The problem arose because of all those
Mary Young wrote
If anyone on this List is actually Not Living, I'd advise putting
Unknown in their Death Date.
I wasn't really concentrating when I read your message and when I got to
that sentence I was thinking List meant LUG Mailing List!
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group
In my tinkering around, trying to follow the instructions in help, I
seem to have marked everyone in my data base as dead, including me.
I thought it said that it would only mark those people who were older
than 110, but that wasn't what it did. Operator error, no doubt.
Would it be
Jane wrote
Would it be possible for me to salvage my living people in some fashion?
Click the Hourglass/Search button on the Toolbar
Select Detailed Search
Look for Individual / Birth Date / After / 1 Jan 1905
Tick Second Condition / And
Individual / Death Date / Contains / Blank (i.e. make sure
will be set to Not
Living
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Bage
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 3:41 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living flag changes
Ron,
Thanks for this.
Of course I was referring
: [LegacyUG] Living flag changes
It means that with Advanced Set Living, if someone is marked dead due
to age, all their ancestors will be marked dead as well.
So if you have someone in your database born 1900 and you choose to
mark as dead anyone born more than 105 years ago (default is 120
years
Thanks! Now I get it!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:39 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living flag changes
It means that with Advanced Set Living, if someone
Hi Keith,
You don't need a death date for Advanced Set Living. In fact entering
a death date resets the flag automatically. You probably meant any
date for these individuals. So long as they are linked to individuals
with dates, Advanced Set Living will set people of previous
generations
PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living flag changes
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:51:55 +0100
I’m afraid I’ve historically not been very good at maintaining the “Living”
flag in Legacy and drastically need to tidy this up. Does anyone have a quick
way of doing
Well, this isn't a big help for you for fixing it automatically - but I do
have a couple of suggestions for the future
I believe that you can set up the default value for the Living Flag - you
can change it to No so that future entries are more likely to be
correct. of course, if you
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living flag changes
Keith,
It is incorrect to say that the Set Living function is only any good if
there is a date of death, in fact of there was they would not be set to
Living.
Legacy will look for dates of birth and set
I don't know of an *easy* way, but the simplest way may be to open the
Names List and select the Family tab. Then scroll through the names,
looking at those with no dates in the list. You may find a date
associated with a spouse or child in the Family info - a point in time to
use for making
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living flag changes
Ron,
Thanks for this.
Of course I was referring to the living flag being set to NO and not YES. In
addition I wasn't quite clear in my initial statement, in that I meant if no
dates were entered against a person
I'm afraid I've historically not been very good at maintaining the Living
flag in Legacy and drastically need to tidy this up. Does anyone have a
quick way of doing this? I am aware of the Advanced set living function
BUT this is only any good if I have a date of death. The main problem for me
is
While attempting to tidy up some aspects of my DB I find on the Individuals
Information Window some ancestors have the Living Yes / No greyed out. Does
it grey out when there is both a birth and a death date entered, but becomes
active if there are no birth and/or death dates entered? That
That's it Tom.
It will be greyed out if there is a death date or just a birth or
baptism date that makes them older than the age set in Options
Customise - Data Entry tab - Set as Dead if over xxx years
Cathy
At 03:21 PM 19/07/2007, you wrote:
While attempting to tidy up some aspects of my
Thanks, Cathy; it seemed that way. Just wanted to be sure!!
Regards
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2007 5:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living Yes - No Greyed
, etc to get what they want.
Gillian
- Original Message -
From: Sandra Tyler Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Yes Phil but I personally believe that LEGACY is the best
GSS wrote:
My personal view as to why I will not ALLOW information about living
people (or married people that have died young if their spouse is
still alive) to be published in any form is because of stolen
identities. I have a good friend whose identity was stolen (not from
the internet
Fort William
MLFHS | Gwynedd FHS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GSS
Sent: 09 July 2007 09:13
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives - stolen identity
My personal view as to why
- Original Message -
From: Gene Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Karl Plenge wrote:
One other consideration on this is legal issues. In the US, a dead
person has no legal
One of my aunts did not want her son-in-law to see any information on our
family - why I don't know because the entire family was hardworking, no
skeletons in the closet. She said she knew nothing about his family so he
didn't have to know about hers. When I found a cousin had put our entire
Paul,
No, I am not an expert, but I know this: being able to sue someone
tells very little about the law. Anyone can sue anyone for almost
anything if they can find a half-way plausible reason and a lawyer
willing to take the case. You can even represent yourself. Many
frivolous lawsuits are
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruth Nerud
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:19 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
One of my aunts did not want her son-in-law to see any information on our
family - why I don't know because the entire family
Jim - You are absolutely correct - I hadn't thought of it that way.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: Jim Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Ruth,
This can be a tricky
Of Jim Terry
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:24 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Ruth,
This can be a tricky situation. A couple of years ago I had uploaded some
genealogy web pages to the Internet. I was later contacted by a second
cousin who did
Slightly OT but is being discuuused regulary regarding Legacy files
I am at loss to understand what all the secrecy is about regarding
living relatives!
I have no problem with the concept of removing data that is personal
(Addresses, phone numbers etc), or data that could be embarrassing (such
(Phil Hawkins wrote: I am at loss to understand what all the secrecy is
about regarding
living relatives!)
Phil, no doubt others will reply. Have you never considered Identity Fraud
or Privacy issues? There is a very real possibility the wrong people may
access the records you innocently
Min Chambers wrote:
(Phil Hawkins wrote: I am at loss to understand what all the secrecy
is about regarding
living relatives!)
Phil, no doubt others will reply. Have you never considered Identity
Fraud or Privacy issues? There is a very real possibility the wrong
people may access the
- Original Message -
From: Phil Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 4:10 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Slightly OT but is being discuuused regulary regarding Legacy files
I am at loss to understand what all
One other consideration on this is legal issues. In the US, a dead person has
no legal right to privacy, but I suppose the websites would be opening
themselves up to lawsuits if someone published someone's name who did not wish
to be published.
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy?
- Original Message -
From: Phil Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Min Chambers wrote:
(Phil Hawkins wrote: I am at loss to understand what all the secrecy is
about
/
_
From: Gary Templeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:43:40 -0700
The name by itself
Phil,
Face facts. It just isn't done! It is a matter of common decency and
respect of those alive. You cannot publish a book without written
permission from the people named in the book if alive. It is common
courtesy and a matter legality. You could be held potentially liable for
any
(Phil Hawkins wrote: I am at loss to understand what all the
secrecy is about regarding living relatives!)
Phil, no doubt others will reply. Have you never considered
Identity Fraud or Privacy issues? There is a very real possibility
the wrong people may access the records you innocently
Karl Plenge wrote:
One other consideration on this is legal issues. In the US, a dead person has
no legal right to privacy, but I suppose the websites would be opening
themselves up to lawsuits if someone published someone's name who did not wish
to be published.
Bingo!
Give that man a
I wish folks would break the urban myth of genealogy is an invasion of
privacy in the US.
Here is a decent explanation of Federal privacy laws. Basically, the
fourth amendment is in place so the government and employers do not
wiretap you without reason, enter your home without reason, etc.
On 7/8/07, Paul Abell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil,
Face facts. It just isn't done! It is a matter of common decency and
respect of those alive. You cannot publish a book without written
permission from the people named in the book if alive. It is common
courtesy and a matter legality.
- Original Message -
From: ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
Surely I am not alone in inventing a maiden name for my mother when it is
required as the answer
Regardless of my last rant-- I do also remove living folks names on my
website to the general public. Just so I don't get hate mail :)
Joe
Sara Binkley Tarpley wrote:
On 7/8/07, Paul Abell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil,
Face facts. It just isn't done! It is a matter of common decency and
as
this is dealing with a feature of Legacy.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 10:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ? Living Relatives
I wish folks would break the urban myth
In my work as an auditor, I sometimes search names of the principals in
small companies to look for related previous entities. One small
business owner really stands out in my mind because a simple name search
yielded names, birthdates, pictures of his immediate family. Because
the search
Create a Gedcom with only the people you want to send.
It might take a while pruning out/off those to remove,
but then you KNOW exactly who you are sending.
Rich in LA CA
--- Leona Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to share some family information with a
newfound cousin from the
message
Thanks for the help. Just hadn't found the right tab to locate the option
needed. Leona
Hi Leona,
Yes it is important.
In the Report Options
Top right of Format Tab you'll find: Suppress details for living
people and the option to change the names to Living.
This feature is available in all
I want to share some family information with a newfound cousin from the
message boards, but want to exclude the personal information on living
persons. I don't find that as a option when setting up the chart. Have
always been told this is very important for security reasons.Leona
Hi Leona,
Yes it is important.
In the Report Options
Top right of Format Tab you'll find: Suppress details for living
people and the option to change the names to Living.
This feature is available in all reports on the Format Tab.
Also you can exclude lots of living people by choosing to only
- Original Message -
From: Cathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Hi Cathy,
thanks for answering.
Hi Eva,
You can't in Legacy. You could in Access.
Unfortunately I'm
Hi Tom,
Any special reason for wanting to do this?
In reports you can suppress details for Living people and you can
change names to Living.
Or you can choose to only print a certain number of generations that
don't include the living generations.
You can do similar in an export.
If you
J Grimshaw
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
__
From: Martin Briscoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:53:02
.
Therefore the question again: Is there a way to check / mark all living persons
in the database as private in one operation?
Thanks for any help
Eva
- Original Message -
From: Tom Element
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 8:39 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living
]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 08:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Hello,
I really do want to know as well how to mark all living people as private in
one operation. When I upload my database for example in TNG I want to have
all my living people as private
| Gwynedd FHS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of ronald ferguson
Sent: 15 April 2007 11:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
hmmm
Seems to me that there might not be much of a family tree
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Hi Tom,
Any special reason for wanting to do this?
In reports you can suppress details for Living people and you can
change names to Living.
Or you can choose to only print a certain number of generations that
don't
/fergys/Grimshaw/
__
From: Tom Element [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:02:31 +1000
My
in a global
way.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2007 11:20 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Tom,
If your main (only) objective in your case
Have you made the choices in the Report options to Suppress details
of Living people?
You can leave names OR change names to Living
See Report Options, Format tab top right.
Cathy
At 10:48 AM 16/04/2007, you wrote:
Hello Ron
Yes, that is exactly what I want to do. I've just attempted some
Hi Eva,
You can't in Legacy. You could in Access.
Note that in Legacy private is different from suppress details of
living and the latter, which can be set in reports and exports, may
be OK for you. However, if you are really wanting to display some
living people and not others, that is a
: [LegacyUG] Living individuals
Have you made the choices in the Report options to Suppress details
of Living people?
You can leave names OR change names to Living
See Report Options, Format tab top right.
Cathy
At 10:48 AM 16/04/2007, you wrote:
Hello Ron
Yes, that is exactly what I want to do
-
From: GeoSci
To: Legacy User Group
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living??
I love the web page feature and have set up several websites using this
Legacy feature. But I just discovered that some very old ancestors are
marked as Living?? The situation is when you
I love the web page feature and have set up several websites using this
Legacy feature. But I just discovered that some very old ancestors are
marked as Living?? The situation is when you know Parents' names but no
birth or death dates. Is there a way to get around this - other than
Group
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living??
I love the web page feature and have set up several websites using this
Legacy feature. But I just discovered that some very old ancestors are
marked as Living?? The situation is when you know Parents' names but no
birth
, etc.
Good luck,
Jim Terry
Technical Support
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
(425) 788-0932
- Original Message -
From: GeoSci
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living??
Tried the Advanced Set Living process
Robert Carneal wrote
How about this?
(Made up)
John Kemmens and Ann Denise Boerman moved in together July 20, 1971 in
Shadeland, Indiana, living in an apartment.
That is certainly one way round a little bug I have found. I presume,
from the way that sentence is composed, that you are
PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living together
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:00:06 +
Robert Carneal wrote
How about this?
(Made up)
John Kemmens and Ann Denise Boerman moved in together July 20,
1971 in Shadeland, Indiana, living
Is there an option so that in a Descendant Narrative report
the wording can be set so that the children are listed as
They have; rather than they had.
It's not often I'd print out a report with living people in it but when I
do the tense is wrong.
thanksCarol
Legacy User Group
Not currently,
but if the Enhancement request that Brian reported on this list
recently is enacted, then you could use the living/not living options
as you can in other sentences you can edit.
Cathy
At 01:19 PM 25/10/2006, you wrote:
Is there an option so that in a Descendant Narrative
93 matches
Mail list logo
