Gail and Cathy,
Thanks for sharing your paper filing system. I agree about the one useful
thing from Clooz -- filing by general subject/topic does help avoid
photocopies in different files. I tried the software program for three years
on and off but could never really make it work for me.
Right
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail Nestor
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:01 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Denise, my paper system pretty much follows the same pattern. I
have eight 2-inch 3-ring
Hi Lisa, that a clever little trick! However, you're right about
effect on the sort order. I think I'm just going to leave these as is
until v7 comes out and then make a final decision once I see if the
templates are going to allow the Source List Name to be suppressed.
Maybe there will be some
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Denise, my paper system pretty much follows the same pattern. I
have eight 2-inch 3-ring binders so far: 4 for each of my grandparents
and 4 for my husband's. Each binder starts with a grandparent and
goes upward to each
Oops, sorry - I meant to say, that's a clever little trick! I hate
to see my own typos!
Gail
On 8/22/07, Gail Nestor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Hi Lisa, that a clever little trick! snip
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 features
not found in the Standard
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Denise, my paper system pretty much follows the same pattern. I
have eight 2-inch 3-ring binders so far: 4 for each of my grandparents
and 4 for my husband's. Each binder starts
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Kirsten,
You need to use the Source List Name to keep things
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Kirsten,
You need to use the Source List Name to keep things together and
findable on the Master
) and refer to them
in my FileID?
Denise Levenick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail Nestor
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 4:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi
Levenick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail
Nestor
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 4:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Kirsten, you can see my
Hi Denise,
Jumping in again ;-)
There are a number of different filing systems.
I file paper by type - the idea came from Clooz - the only useful
thing I found from it.
When I first tried to file by family or surname I never got much done
as the pile for duplication or cross referencing
One bandaid you can try is to put the Source List Name, Author, and
Title, etc. in [[double brackets]]. That seems to get the effect you
want, although it changes the sort order of your master sources (the
double brackets sort first). I tried just double bracketing the
Author/Title, but then the
: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Denise,
Jumping in again ;-)
There are a number of different filing systems.
I file paper by type - the idea came from Clooz - the only useful thing I
found from it.
When I first tried to file by family or surname I never got much done
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting (for Gail)
Hi Denise, my paper system pretty much follows the same pattern. I
have eight 2-inch 3-ring binders so far: 4 for each of my grandparents
and 4 for my husband's. Each binder starts with a grandparent and
goes
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:28 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting
Kirsten,
I do not really use the Sources for the purposes which you indicate but as a
lumper I would say that your supposition is not really accurate. For example
-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:17:43 +0100
Ron
I normally agree 100% with your comments and assistance, but in this case
you are slightly incorrect.
ALL certificates
, 2007 4:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting
Kirsten,
Again, we are different to the USA in that we have censuses for England and
Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. I just have one Master Source called
Census and in the Details I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gail
Nestor
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] More Lumping and Splitting
Hi Kirsten, yours is another good and thought-provoking question. I
decided to do a little survey of my sources. In my database
Hi Kirsten,
You need to use the Source List Name to keep things together and
findable on the Master Source list.
It sorts (currently) only by Source List Name.
How you do it depends on how you think about sources. I do it by
type. Some people put location first so that all sources for a
19 matches
Mail list logo
