On 09/10/2012 01:39, MJ SA wrote:
> Thank you Ron, I will wait for more directions.
Have you followed the instructions given for dealing with Error #3800?
The first thing anyone from Support is likely to tell you is to do so,
so you might as well try that without waiting and then see if you still
Marie,
You wrote:" I use the NARA recommended source template."
Can you send us a link to the NARA-recommended source template you mention??
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacy
No, they are my own design. Some follow Elizabeth Mills format and some,
particularly census and military follow the National Archives and Records
Administration [NARA] format. There is a very slight difference in the two.
NARA always includes Record Group number and location where the record
The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet] is:
(GIL 17) _Citing Records in the National Archives of the United States_
(http://www.archives.gov/publications/general-info-leaflets/17-citing-records.p
df) , [rev. 2010], 12 pp.
_http://www.archives.gov/publications/general-info-leaflets/in
That is correct. Since the husband is always on the left and the wife is
always on the right the genders do not need to be identified by colour
coding as well. It is the same for the names of the parents for the
husband and wife. The Father is always the top name and the Mother is
always second. On
In the note of an event I have the phrase "et als." in italics.
When it appears in a .pdf, report, however It is rendered: "et als"
Not desirable.
I can publish a WordPerfect document with something in italics to a .pdf
and it comes out fine.
So what is going on with Legacy,and can I correct
Pat,
Which report are you creating? I just tried "et als" in italics and
created a PDF report for both a family group report and a descendants
book report. In both the "et als" in italics (and without quote marks)
appeared as just et als in italics.
It shouldn't make a difference but I use Foxi
I did the cehck/repair it wouldn't let me go any further
Error rebuilding Indexes.
Error 91: Object variable or With block variable not set
Would you like to TRY IT AGAIN?
An Error was encountered while Checking/Repairing this Family File.
*** You may want to answer NO and after this Check/Repair
I am afraid that you do have serious problems. The error numbers/descriptions
are not Legacy error reports, but two are Access (database) problems and #48 a
VB one (VB is the programming language used). The CDs, which are well worth
buying, will not help you here.
I would first ensure that you
Ron, thank you, I hope I will be able to call Legacy tomorrow.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
> I am afraid that you do have serious problems. The error numbers/descriptions
> are not Legacy error reports, but two are Access (database) problems and #48
> a VB one (VB is the
I agree with Ron that the training CD's will not give you any help with the
problem you are experiencing. One thing you might consider in your decision to
buy or not buy the CD's is that they are working on a Legacy version 8. No one
knows when they expect to release this new version and certa
I thought of a question yesterday: If I died tomorrow, who would know how to
access, navigate, restore my legacy, or other genealogy files? I helped a
neighbor go through her fathers possessions, I could tell that he had done
massive amounts of genealogical research and organizing, the membe
Silly question perhaps...
Why, if you have “Direct Line as Preferred†set, don’t your own kids
show
up??
In “Data Format†the ‘Direct-line children in lists (bold) is checked
but
my own
kids are not highlighted in lists, did I miss a button somewhere??
Thanx,
Ge
Gene,
Because they are not ancestors they are descendants. The set Direct Line as
Preferred only works on the ancestors of the person that you chose as the
person to set the line on.
-Original Message-
From: Gene Hutson
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:15 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyU
To further expand on it when you navigate up the direct line ancestors then
the direct line children appear as you have selected.
-Original Message-
From: R G Strong-genes
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:40 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Direct line pre
I've been thinking about it for years. I made a READ ME file with
instructions. Also, I'm using a very simple filing system that anyone
can follow. The real question is: will anyone be interested anyway?
---
JL Beeken
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/
On 1
My point exactly...
my direct line includes my own children, "set direct line" says nothing
about ancestors.
Gene
-Original Message-
From: R G Strong-genes
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:44 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Direct line prefe
If you read the help file for the set direct line as preferred sceen you
will find that it explicitly says it sets the direct line ancestors of
the selected person as preferred.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
--
On 10/10/201
Plus when the window opens to set the preferred line, the Window Title says
"Set Direct Line Ancestors As Preferred Line" and then above the box for the
person to set it says "Set this person's direct-line ancestors as the
Preferred line"
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support
Sent: Wednes
Looking on the bright side, someone's been interested so far, that's why
there's anything for us to know/find, so assume someone will be
interested after us.
---
JL Beeken
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/
On 10/9/2012 11:06 PM, Judith wrote:
> Good idea,
20 matches
Mail list logo
