Legacy requires me to uase the City, County, State, Country
hierarchy, and I am happy to use it if it helps.
There are no counties in Australia or New Zealand, and the English
counties are treated as States, which is fair enough. So the county
field is always empty for me (except for my wife's
On 2012/11/21 12:59, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
Legacy requires me to uase the City, County, State, Country
hierarchy, and I am happy to use it if it helps.
No it doesn't! That's a fallacy! Ignore the US-centric stuff if you're not
interested in the US. And don't get too hung up on using the Geo
Doug,
I am not sure where you got your information from, so here are my comments:
Legacy requires me to uase the City, County, State, Country
hierarchy, and I am happy to use it if it helps.
It does not require you to adopt this format, but if you don't certain
functions, such as the
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:11:01 +0200
Mike Fry emjay...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/11/21 12:59, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
Legacy requires me to uase the City, County, State, Country
hierarchy, and I am happy to use it if it helps.
No it doesn't! That's a fallacy! Ignore the US-centric stuff if
I want to ask if anyone knows of any up dates or improvements that will be
coming in the near future in regards to the website creation feature on legacy?
Thanks
Rich in Cleveland
Sent from my iPhone
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:22:40 +
Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
It is, in my view, also incorrect to use , , because this will
indicate something is missing - there isn't! Every country's
locations should be written as the locals do.
This was probably more necessary in the
Rich,
In my opinion quite correctly, Legacy never gives advanced notice of
improvements, and after the problems of the launch of V7 I hope that they will
never, ever, give even a hint of a date.
---
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk
GOONS #5307
Rich Falzini rfalz...@yahoo.com wrote:
I want
Ron,
With all due respect, you are entitled to your opinion, but there are some of
us who are interested in learning if a new release is imminent, or if there are
new improvements on the horizon. If you are not interested in this
information, that is all well and good, just delete any related
Of course I send the same reply, and I am surprised that you do not recollect
the day after day of mail to this list for the 12 months after Legacy announced
that V7 would be released shortly.
I am afraid that on this occasion I will not be taking your advce and will
continue to send the same
On 2012/11/21 14:59, Ronald Bernier wrote:
with all due respect, you are entitled to your opinion, but there are some of
us who are interested in learning if a new release is imminent, or if there
are new improvements on the horizon. If you are not interested in this
information, that is all
Mike,
I'll take a look at Legacy 8 if and when it is released, but I have already
started the migration of my data to a program which I feel is/has outpaced
Legacy's innovations (which have become very stale).
I'll give Legacy points for their reports, but Legacy's GUI is definitely
outdated.
The GUI is Legacy's trademark, IMO, and it is what I like best about
Legacy. It shows 3 families at once in relationship, not just a list of
names. One has to bring up an editing screen to change anything, but
with others, one has to move to a families view to see the result.
Each program has
I disagree with belaboring a negative assessment of Milleniums' performance;
especially at the Legacy 7.5 price point!
Millennia does an excellent job in a small niche market with a steep
middle-managent learning curve and with pretty limited resources.
I expect some hickups, as long as it
I remember the version 7 release (although not at traumatized as some
Legacy users). I do think that with the advancements by other
genealogy programs (most recently Ancestral Quest and RootsMagic), it
would be nice to have some general idea regarding a newer version of
Legacy. I think we all know
Corney
I am going off memory now as I am not on my PC. If you go to the Legacy Home
tab in your program, on the top right there is an Options button, click on
that, and somewhere you will find connect to the internet on start up - check
that option.
Note that you need to have IE installed on
Hello Ron,
It was already checked, but I unchecked it and restarted and checked it
again and restarted, with and without IE running (it was already installed).
Still not luck.
The files are also generated each time I select the 'Check the Internet No'
under 'Options'.
Cheers,
Corney
Yes, we've got a lot of great things coming. No, I'm not going to give any
hint of a timeline. We've learned from that. Programmers are working 18
hours days right now for us. They've been stuck on properly implementing a
major new feature, but it's getting there. I'm excited about Legacy's
future
This is helpful as many of us buy ancillary programs that work with the current
Legacy version. If a new one is coming, we may hold off buying until the
ancillary program will work with the new Legacy. Wish there were a way to run
two versions of Legacy, because then one could still use the
You could always add a father named alternatively Father of (child) or Son
of [name of grandparent(s)] Then just be sure to correctly link the
grandfather to the father and the father to the child, which you can do in
either direction.
CEFrom: louiseboo...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012
Not to rain on your parade but there are other possibilities for his father. As
we all know, genealogy is full of surprises. With that thought in mind, it
might be possible that your “John C.” was the illegitimate son of a daughter
and was given the family surname at birth and then not raised
Brian has just rained on my parade as I was about to say the same thing.
I have several cases of grandchildren living with grandparents in
censuses and every one I have been able to confirm has been the child of
an unmarried daughter.
It was much easier for a young unmarried woman to find a
Hello everyone, Hope everyone is well. I want to take part of my
family tree and put it on a separate family tree on ancestry. How do I
do this?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
One way is to create a Focus Group - see Help on how to do this -
then create a GEDCOM to upload to Ancestry, NOT that I have ever put
anything on Ancestry.
At 01:49 PM 22/11/2012, you wrote:
Hello everyone, Hope everyone is well. I want to take part of my
family tree and put it on a separate
23 matches
Mail list logo
