Dennis
Location not found (###,##) means that you've used List Cleanup or
purged "unused" locations.
There's a bug where if a location is ONLY used in a Story it is purged
leading to this error.
You need to find the relevant story which is usually found on the person
with RIN equal
Error 3021
This is not the first fight with this Error Number but it's the first one
on which all the Help menu suggestions fail to solve. The final resort and
ultimate "import to Gedcom" has not and likely, will not, be attempted due
to it's source alterations.
I have run the Check & Repair
Peter,
I've been doing some testing on this and you appear to be right.
I can't see it entered as a bug so I've entered it (I'm a beta tester)
and noted you as the reporter.
They're not options I've used for a long time. I don't make Gedcoms
often and lately just for DNA purposes so
The original message to the list is in the attachment.
This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy
imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages
without conversion to attachments should use a different email address
for their subscription.
Known
Thanks Terry, That was way too easy.
Warren
From: Jim Terry/Support <jimte...@legacyusers.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:36 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: re: [LegacyUG] Living list
You can create a Search List (a
Hi all, How do I view the "Living" list for individuals? I looked in View,
Charts, Reports, etc. Warren
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived
Original Message
> From: "Warn Bushman" <warnbush...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:27 PM
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Living list
>
> Hi all, How do I view the "Living" list for individ
As I am entering a number of new individuals into my database, I have to
change the bubble from Yes to No every time, even though they are born in
the 1600s-1700s. Is there a place/setting where I can have it
automatically marked as Not Living if the birth date is over, say, 115
years?
Thanks,
...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 1:10 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living status (yes or no)
As I am entering a number of new individuals into my database, I have to
change the bubble from Yes to No every time, even though they are born
in
the 1600s
Go to Options Customize Set a cut-off age in section 2.3. Of course
you have to save the person with a date which makes them older than that
cut-off to have the living set automatically by the save. It will also
automatically change to No if you enter a death or burial date.
If you are working
I find that when a person is highlighted as the main person of interest, (or as
one of the parents of a person), then the colours work OK - e.g. Husband/Wife
is in red when they are alive and black if they are dead. But if you move them
to the children's list, by clicking on a parent then the
I've just looked again at the colours for children. Is it supposed to be that
all data for children reflects their sex (ie boys are blue and girls are red)
or should the child number reflect alive/dead?
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gray [mailto:graypa...@outlook.com]
Sent: 10
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living indicator - was Senior Moment
I've just looked again at the colours for children. Is it supposed to be that
all data for children reflects their sex (ie boys are blue and girls are red)
or should the child number reflect alive/dead?
Jack
Bobby, Paul, et al,
In my testing, I never saw a case where the Living Indicator - as
demonstrated by, in Family View, the color or the NUMBER in a child
list or the label of husband or wife - differed from the setting of
the Living radio button. I would like to see evidence of this to see
what
: RE: [LegacyUG] Living indicator - was Senior Moment
I've just looked again at the colours for children. Is it supposed to be that
all data for children reflects their sex (ie boys are blue and girls are red)
or should the child number reflect alive/dead?
Jack
-Original Message-
From
to being the child's sex.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gray [mailto:graypa...@outlook.com]
Sent: 10 December 2013 20:37
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living indicator - was Senior Moment
The living/dead colour is reflected in the child number. The color
]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 3:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living Indicator [was: Senior Moment]
Bobby, Paul, et al,
In my testing, I never saw a case where the Living Indicator - as demonstrated
by, in Family View, the color or the NUMBER in a child list
]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:54 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
Brian,
Another way would be to keep them private in your notes by enclosing them in
the privacy brackets [[ something that you want private ]] then Legacy
AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
Yes, I just test that out. Good grief, why didn't I think of that simple
solution earlier. Works like a charm. No need to create extra Address or
Repository entries with these private notes. Thanks.
Brian in CA
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
The include all sources check box has no impact on what parts of a source is
included in the GEDCOM. That setting is there more for when you are only
exporting part of your file. If that is not checked only the sources linked
: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
The include all sources check box has no impact on what parts of a source is
included in the GEDCOM. That setting is there more for when you are only
exporting part of your file. If that is not checked only the sources linked to
the individuals in the export
]
Sent: 06 November 2012 01:40
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
The include all sources check box has no impact on what parts of a source is
included in the GEDCOM. That setting is there more for when you are only
exporting part of your file
On 2012/11/06 10:27, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
If it is checked all sources will be included, even though some may not be
used by the portion of the file you are exporting.
I'm a little puzzled...make that a whole bunch puzzled as to why anyone would
want to include sources that are not
desire.
I've got sufficient info to modify my records to keep everybody happy.
Brian in CA
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 1:46 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living persons
to honor any options to not include some of this
information in specific citations. Tricky.
Ward
-Original Message-
From: Brian L. Lightfoot
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 1:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
Ron,
Thanks
: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 1:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
Ron,
Thanks for the suggestion to use the Address book to store these names,
address, etc., of individuals that are a Master Source (sort of like an
interview with a living
On 05/11/2012 21:37, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
It’s interesting that this should come up right after the recent
discussion. I was just contacted by a person whose name and address
appear as a source in a report on my online tree and while he has no
objection to the name, he’d like the
I tried to test this but I was not able to duplicate the
addition/inclusion of Master Source Comments in web pages.
To confirm this as an error I need to know some details of the web pages
you created with Legacy.
What is the web page style (Ancestor, Descendant, Pedigree, Family Group
or
are not printing.
If you are using SW please let us know and I will run a test.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: R G Strong-genes
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 9:48 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
Brian,
You could add his name and address
...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
I tried to test this but I was not able to duplicate the addition/inclusion of
Master Source Comments in web pages.
To confirm this as an error I
: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living persons revisited
I tried to test this but I was not able to duplicate the addition/inclusion
of Master Source Comments in web pages
.
Howland Davis
-Original Message-
From: Karen and Jim sindbe...@att.net
To: LegacyUserGroup LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 3:52 pm
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living or Dead - take 2
Can I turn this nagger off?
JimS
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
Sent: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 3:52 pm
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living or Dead - take 2
Can I turn this nagger off?
JimS
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup
Hi again,
I'm using version 5 Deluxe.
And I still think it is the best of the best.
And I've been using genealogy software since
Roots II and CP/M in the mid 1980s.
But.
Here is what is happening with Legacy.
1. Henry Kirk is born in 1917 and I enter him into Legacy.
2. When I save, I'm asked
...@att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:27 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living or Dead - take 2
Hi again,
I'm using version 5 Deluxe.
And I still think it is the best of the best.
And I've been using genealogy software since Roots II and CP/M in the mid 1980s
), McDOUGALL(Aust), McNAIR(Aust), TRAYNOR(Aust),
SHANAHAN, OCKWELL(Aust), HADLEY (Eng), TAYLOR (Eng) LONG (Tas, Aust).
-Original Message-
From: Jenny M Benson [mailto:ge...@cedarbank.me.uk]
Sent: Friday, 7 September 2012 10:04 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
On 2012/09/07 02:04, Jenny M Benson wrote:
On 06/09/2012 21:18, Karen and Jim wrote:
Hi Listers,
I'm in the process of making my tree more bushy.
Problem:
When asked if a new entree is living or dead,
since I don't know which, what should I respond?
Entrees are for births around the
Hi Listers,
I'm in the process of making my tree more bushy.
Problem:
When asked if a new entree is living or dead,
since I don't know which, what should I respond?
Entrees are for births around the beginning of the 20th
century. Country is Denmark.
My general way of doing things is to enter
This is up to you, I use 100 years for many families, you can choose
what ever makes you feel comfortable.
Eliz
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Karen and Jim sindbe...@att.net wrote:
Hi Listers,
I'm in the process of making my tree more bushy.
Problem:
When asked if a new entree is
In Options Customize Data Entry, the default for Legacy is to presume
dead if over 120 years old (the person will be automatically flagged as not
living) and ask you if over 90 years old.
Of course, that assumes you have a birth or bap/chr date.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy
On 06/09/2012 21:18, Karen and Jim wrote:
Hi Listers,
I'm in the process of making my tree more bushy.
Problem:
When asked if a new entree is living or dead,
since I don't know which, what should I respond?
Entrees are for births around the beginning of the 20th
century. Country is
I always say yes, which keeps the 'fix me' aggressive.
Rich in LA CA
From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living or dead
On 06/09/2012 21:18, Karen
There are a considerable number of people in my database, especially
from centuries back, for which only the name was known and no birth
or death date. For these people Legacy entered them as living which
excludes them from reports excluding living people, even though they
are long dead. Is there
On 2011/11/08 17:45, RaynLois wrote:
There are a considerable number of people in my database, especially from
centuries back, for which only the name was known and no birth or death date.
For these people Legacy entered them as living which excludes them from
reports
excluding living
On 08/11/2011 16:03, Mike Fry wrote:
On 2011/11/08 17:45, RaynLois wrote:
There are a considerable number of people in my database, especially from
centuries back, for which only the name was known and no birth or death
date.
For these people Legacy entered them as living which
at least some
of these as well.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 5:55 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living Only Report
Ray,
Legacy has a feature called advanced set living (a bit
McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn
Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams
From: Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, November 8, 2011 10:03:30 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living Only Report
On 2011/11/08 17:45
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:12:07 -, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
LTools has a routine which works from the oldest down...
Not exactly.
http://ltoolshelp.zippersoftware.com/#39-en
In the right hand pane (scroll about halfway down) there is a section
entitled How It
-Original Message-
From: Dennis M. Kowallek
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living Only Report
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:12:07 -, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
LTools has a routine which works from
- Original Message -
From: RaynLois
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 10:45 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living Only Report
There are a considerable number of people in my database, especially from
centuries back, for which only the name was known
Does anyone know if Legacy supports the inclusion of a Living Flag in its
Gedcom export files?
I want to export a gedcom to another piece of software without exporting
details on living individuals, but I would like the other software to be
able to determine if an individual is living. The other
Cliff,
Please use Plain Text on this List. I have already answered this on
Genealogy Wise.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Cliff Gittens
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:10 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Living Flag in Legacy Gedcom export file
Does
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living Flag in Legacy Gedcom export file
Cliff,
Please use Plain Text on this List. I have already answered this on
Genealogy Wise.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Cliff Gittens
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:10 PM
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:11:50 -0500, m...@markabout.com wrote:
By the way, the software works as expected
Your expectations may be different than others. The software has worked
this way as long as I can remember (I've been using it 7 or 8 years) and
this is the first time I recall ever hearing
[mailto:kowal...@iglou.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:21 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living?
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:11:50 -0500, m...@markabout.com wrote:
By the way, the software works as expected
Your expectations may be different than others
Hi,
I have an individual in my data that is 91 years old. In my Options
Customize Data Entry, I have Set as dead if over 90. When I go and mark
my 91 year old relative as Living and click save, my relative does not
stay Living. Is that the way it is supposed to work? What would be the
Rita,
You need to change your settings for the age to set as dead. If you change
this to 95 or 100, it will not affect any existing data (dead individuals
will not return to life), but it will allow you to have someone live to an
older age. Currently I have mine set at 110 because I have a living
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your response but my question still stands. What is the purpose
of Living? Yes or No. If we can't over ride what is set up in Options, for
an individual, maybe is just should be Dead? Don't you think?
Rita in South Carolina
Legacy User Group guidelines:
--
From: ourfamilyhistories@gmail.com [mailto:ourfamilyhistories@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:12 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Living?
Rita,
You need to change your settings for the age to set as dead. If you change this
to 95 or 100
replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: cagr...@comporium.net [mailto:cagr...@comporium.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:42 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Living?
Thank you Brian
60 matches
Mail list logo
