(a) was also done, for RM.
Ward
From: Jay 1FamilyTree
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
I will add one comment on this subject and then move on
In one of the previous
: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Jay, I have reread this several times and cannot understand what point you are
making.
1. To clarify, I have not exported any data to any online software. My point
was simply that it makes no difference whether my newly-found
1FamilyTree mailto:1familytree@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, December 05, 2013 2:23 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re:
[LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Ward
When the standards
, December 05, 2013 11:00 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital
Events]
I will add one comment on this subject and then move on
In one of the previous messages was stated
Collaborating Online: I would think
(a) was also done, for RM.
Ward
*From:* Jay 1FamilyTree 1familytree@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:00 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital
Events]
I will add one comment on this subject
suggest that approach (a) was also done, for RM.
Ward
From: Jay 1FamilyTree
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
I will add one comment on this subject and then move
events and then give your data to anyone who doesnt use
Legacy :-(
Thanks for making us aware of this one.
Gavin...
From: Kirsty M. Haining [mailto:khain...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 11:48 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
Walker
[
mailto:wnkwal...@rogers.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 10:44 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital
Events]
I agree, Gavin. To me, this is equivalent to the problem with
SourceWriter source citations. I have long
: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Bill,
How do you plan to publish your research?
Knowing where you plan on ending up will guide you to how you use some of the
new features of Legacy.
My principal publishing vehicle is to web publish with TNG. As TNG does
: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Bill,
How do you plan to publish your research?
Knowing where you plan on ending up will guide you to how you use some of the
new features of Legacy.
My principal publishing vehicle is to web publish with TNG. As TNG does
: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
Thanks Kirsty,
Well I will be putting a change proposal in because it would be simple to
export a copy of the events to each person. Yes it won't be shared anymore
but that is far preferable to not existing at all. Essentially, with this
as it is you can't use
.)
Ward
From: Alan Pereira
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:03 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re:
[LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
John
I happened to be one person who had to resolve database nulls when linked
Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared
vital Events]
Bill,
How do you plan to publish your research?
Knowing where you plan on ending up will guide you to how you use some of
the new features of Legacy.
My principal publishing vehicle is to web publish with TNG. As TNG does
not know anything about Legacy
: Thursday, December 05, 2013 2:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Ward
When the standards for Gedcom were created way back when, this 'new feature'
wasn't even considered or even imagined.
Don't blame the software
@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, December 05, 2013 2:23 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital
Events]
Ward
When the standards for Gedcom were created way back when, this 'new
feature' wasn't even considered or even
[WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital
Events]
Ward
When the standards for Gedcom were created way back when, this 'new
feature' wasn't even considered or even imagined.
Don't blame the software for it, blame the standards that haven't been
updated.
Whatever browser you are using to read
your data to anyone who doesnt use Legacy :-(
Thanks for making us aware of this one.
Gavin...
From: Kirsty M. Haining
[
mailto:khain...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 11:48 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
Gavin
in a
simplified state, then I better not use that feature. It is not fully
implemented.
Ward
From: John B. Lisle
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:32 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Ward,
I really wish to take
RM can very quickly import a Legacy 8 file, including shared events …
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston ON
From: Ward Walker [mailto:wnkwal...@rogers.com]
Sent: December 05, 2013 05:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
2013 5:08 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re:
[LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
There have been several LUG discussions about this. When Legacy formats source
citation output from a template-based source, in many cases
, 6 December 2013 5:08 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events
[WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
There have been several LUG discussions about this. When Legacy formats
source citation output from a template-based
: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re:
[LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Gavin,
If you could include the lines from your gedcom that relate to this person and
the source, then maybe a proper explanation can be given.
But without knowing whats in the gedcom its just a guess as to how/why.
Jay
Legacy User
PM
To:
LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared
vital Events]
Ward,
I really wish to take exception to your half implemented
comment.
In the long run, the purpose of Gedcom is to communicate information to
another product. Not all products
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Ward,
Thanks for your note.
Please see below...
john.
At 05:18 PM 12/5/2013, Ward Walker wrote:
Jay and John,
I donât expect these features/structures to be re-imported intact into the
target system
2012.
Thoughts,
Gavin...
From: Jay 1FamilyTree [mailto:1familytree@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 6 December 2013 9:16 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events
[WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
Gavin,
If you
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re:
[LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
[snip]
Looks like the gedcom output is doing what is expected of it.
Jay
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
in the program.
Gavin...
*From:* Jay 1FamilyTree [mailto:1familytree@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, 6 December 2013 12:04 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events
[WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
[snip
To:
LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared
vital Events]
Ward,
Thanks for your note.
Please see below...
john.
At 05:18 PM 12/5/2013, Ward Walker wrote:
Jay and John,
I donâÂÂt expect these features/structures to be re-imported intact
Subject: Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re:
[LegacyUG] Shared vital Events]
But then it wouldn't be compliant with Gedcom standard
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http
*Subject:* Re: Exporting Shared Events [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital
Events]
Ward,
Thanks for your note.
Please see below...
john.
At 05:18 PM 12/5/2013, Ward Walker wrote:
Jay and John,
I don’t expect these features/structures to be re-imported intact
into the target system
I am experimenting with shared events and am confused.
The help file gives example usage in the event/fact field this is OK as these
are single events.
However, I want to share a vital event, in this case a birth event. I apply
this in the individual screen by using the drop down + (address,
He does not have 5 shared events. He has the five SOURCES for the one
shared birth event. These are the five sources from Asa's assigned
sources list for Asa's birth.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
On 04/12/2013 9:09 AM,
On 04/12/2013 16:44, Brian/Support wrote:
He does not have 5 shared events. He has the five SOURCES for the one
shared birth event. These are the five sources from Asa's assigned
sources list for Asa's birth.
The more I read about Shared Events, the less I think they are going to
prove useful
This is not directly in response to Steve’s question, but more a comment on how
the shared events function in general.
Earlier there was some discussion about the shared event being a proprietary
format, and what programs might or might not take advantage of Legacy’s codes.
I didn’t pay a
Message-
From: Genealogy
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:05 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
Can someone enlighten me re shared events.
Why is no role setting available for the original person in a shared event,
surely they too have a role
Does it show up on the person you begin with (who may be a son) or only on
head of household?
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Kirsty M. Haining khain...@comcast.netwrote:
This is not directly in response to Steve’s question, but more a comment
on how the shared events function in general.
, December 4, 2013 1:49 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
Does it show up on the person you begin with (who may be a son) or only on
head of household?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages
This, for me, makes shared events useless since the census data won’t appear
on the household member’s page in my Rootsweb exports. This makes sense when
you think about it, because of the limits of the gedcom format.
Sorry I haven't looked at this yet but are you saying you shared an
...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 4:42 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
This, for me, makes shared events useless since the census data won’t appear
on the household member’s page in my Rootsweb exports. This makes sense when
your data to anyone who doesnt use
Legacy :-(
Thanks for making us aware of this one.
Gavin...
From: Kirsty M. Haining [mailto:khain...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 11:48 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events
Gavin, that is exactly
40 matches
Mail list logo
