your suggestions. I can see I have a bit of work
> ahead of me.
>
> Kind Regards - June
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com]
> Sent:
> None
> To: Legacy User Group
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] U
ahead of me.
Kind Regards - June
-Original Message-
From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] Sent:
None
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
--
___
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
Check out MS Works Data Base. I find it easier than a spreadsheet.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Quill
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:19 AM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
How would you go about creating a DB?
Thank you.
Mike Quill
Sent
sorth these things out>L:aura
>>
>> -Original Message- From: June
>> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:49 PM
>> To: 'Legacy User Group'
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
>>
>> On my tree I have a direct line that I will call SMI
Such a great reminder to not rely on "found" genealogies! They might
be a good starting point (or not), but they should always be verified!
A very good researcher had posted a genealogy which merged with my
line and went back to the 1500's - it broke down my brick wall, or so
I thought. Not long
Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
On my tree I have a direct line that I will call SMITH. Unfortunately within
this Smith group there are several called John (all born around the same
time) several called Michael (all born around the same time) etc many of
these being cousins or seco
ura
-Original Message- From: June
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:49 PM
To: 'Legacy User Group'
Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
On my tree I have a direct line that I will call SMITH. Unfortunately
within
this Smith group there are several called John (all born around the
owing the details of each person? I have
>> had similar problems and a DB helps sorth these things out>L:aura
>>
>> -Original Message- From: June
>> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:49 PM
>> To: 'Legacy User Group'
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlink
h these things out>L:aura
>
> -Original Message- From: June
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:49 PM
> To: 'Legacy User Group'
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my tree
>
> On my tree I have a direct line that I will call SMITH. Unfortunately within
> this S
June,
I too had a "sick" branch on my tree with all kinds of errors - in this
case mostly due to a guy named Gustave Anjou, a "professional" genealogist
in the early half of the 1900 who "created" genealogies - several in my
line and other genealogists had used his information for their own. So I
Have you considered making a DB showing the details of each person? I have
had similar problems and a DB helps sorth these things out>L:aura
-Original Message-
From: June
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:49 PM
To: 'Legacy User Group'
Subject: [LegacyUG] Unlinking part of my t
On 22/03/2016 04:21, Cathy Pinner wrote:
It may be better to tag this branch making sure you note why you have
tagged them in Advanced tagging so that you don' t use this tag # for
something else.
The Voice of Experience speaks: this is an *excellent* tip!
I used to use tagging a lot
June,
You can unlink someone and therefore unlink their whole branch.
eg if you have a SMITH grandfather and you right click on him and unlink
from spouse, then you will have unlinked all his SMITH ancestors and
their families from your main tree - but they will still all be linked
together.
On my tree I have a direct line that I will call SMITH. Unfortunately within
this Smith group there are several called John (all born around the same
time) several called Michael (all born around the same time) etc many of
these being cousins or second cousins.
I have a feeling that I have put
14 matches
Mail list logo
